Sustainability transitions in Los Angeles’ water system: the ambivalent role of incumbents in urban experimentation

References

• Advantageous Systems [ADS]. (2021). http://www.advantageoussystems.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Ampe, K., Paredis, E., Asveld, L., Osseweijer, P., & Block, T. (2021). Incumbents’ enabling role in niche-innovation: Power dynamics in a wastewater project. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 39, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C. K., & Bartenberger, M. (2016). Varieties of experimentalism. Ecological Economics, 130, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, X., Roberts, B., & Chen, J. (2010). Urban sustainability experiments in Asia: Patterns and pathways. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(4), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, X., Wieczorek, A. J., Kaneko, S., Lisson, S., & Contreras, A. (2009). Enabling sustainability transitions in Asia: The importance of vertical and horizontal linkages. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(2), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betsill, M., & Stevis, D. (2016). The politics and dynamics of energy transitions: lessons from Colorado's (USA) “New Energy Economy”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(2), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15614668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., & Broto, V. C. (2013). Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent's curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.3.1.18033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., Bulkeley, H., Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K., & Curtis, S. (2018). Circulating experiments: Urban living labs and the politics of sustainability. In The Routledge handbook on spaces of urban politics (pp. 416–425). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. P. (2011). Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36(2), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrelly, M., & Brown, R. (2011). Rethinking urban water management: Experimentation as a way forward? Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuenfschilling, L., Frantzeskaki, N., & Coenen, L. (2019). Urban experimentation & sustainability transitions. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1532977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcetti, E. (2019). LA's Green New Deal: sustainable city plan. https://plan.lamayor.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of socio-technical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greywater Corps. (2021). https://www.greywatercorps.com/ (accessed 12 April 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J. (2020). ‘Doing’ system innovations from within the heart of the regime. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(5), 682–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1776099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., & Coenen, L. (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., Geels, F. W., & McMeekin, A. (2017). Reconfiguring urban sustainability transitions, analysing multiplicity. Sustainability, 9(2), 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, S., Pincetl, S., & Boone, C. (2013). Triple exposure: Regulatory, climatic, and political drivers of water management changes in the city of Los Angeles. Cities, 32, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine, S., & Bai, X. (2019). Positive inertia and proactive influencing towards sustainability: systems analysis of a frontrunner city. Urban Transformations, 1(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-019-0001-7
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, A., & Van Heur, B. (2014). Urban laboratories: Experiments in reworking cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(2), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Los Angeles Cleantech Incubator [LACI]. (2016). LACI Just impact annual report 2016. https://laincubator.org/infosheets/just-impact-report/.
   Google Scholar
• Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety [LADBS]. (2017). La amendment to CA codes, Ordinance number 164692. https://www.ladbs.org/forms-publications/publications.
   Google Scholar
• Los Angeles Department of Water and Power [LADWP]. (2015). Urban water management plan. www.ladwp.com/uwmp.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, S. H. J., & Hansen, T. (2019). Cities and climate change – Examining advantages and challenges of urban climate change experiments. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1421907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mah, D. N. Y., Wu, Y. Y., & Hills, P. R. (2017). Explaining the role of incumbent utilities in sustainable energy transitions: A case study of the smart grid development in China. Energy Policy, 109, 794–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meilinger, V., & Monstadt, J. (2022). From the sanitary city to the circular city? Technopolitics of wastewater restructuring in Los Angeles, California. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 46(2), 182–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metropolitan Water District [MWD]. (2020). Annual Report to the California State Legislature: Achievements in conservation, recycling and groundwater recharge. http://www.mwdh2o.com/AboutYourWater/Planning/Progress-Reports.
   Google Scholar
• One Water LA, LA Sanitation, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. (2018). One Water LA 2040 Plan. https://www.lacitysan.org/san/faces/home/portal/s-lsh-es/s-lsh-es-owla/s-lsh-es-owla-r?_adf.ctrl-state=tbbokb7ax_5&_afrLoop=12198289361692473#!.
   Google Scholar
• Pincetl, S., Porse, E., Mika, K. B., Litvak, E., Manago, K. F., Hogue, T. S., Gillespie, T., Pataki, D. E., & Gold, M. (2019). Adapting urban water systems to manage scarcity in the 21st century: the case of Los Angeles. Environmental Management, 63(3), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1118-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, T. (2016, April 27). New Los Angeles Building Ordinance Sets Precedent for Water Efficiency. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/tracy%20quinn/new-los-angeles-building-ordinance-sets-precedent-water-efficiency.
   Google Scholar
• Rain Systems. (2020). https://rainsystems.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, R., Sengers, F., Spaeth, P., Xie, L., Cheshmehzangi, A., & de Jong, M. (2019). Urban experimentation and institutional arrangements. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1393047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini, F., & Bertolini, L. (2019). Urban experimentation as a politics of niches. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(4), 831–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19826085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saya Life. (2019). https://saya.life/.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed). Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., Berkhout, F., Wieczorek, A. J., & Raven, R. P. J. M. (2016). Experimenting in the city: Unpacking notions of experimentation for sustainability. In J. Evans, A. Karvonen, & R. Raven (Eds.), The experimental city. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., Wieczorek, A. J., & Raven, R. (2019). Experimenting for sustainability transitions: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smink, M. M., Hekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2015). Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(2), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41(6), 1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Voß, J. P., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 39(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Späth, P., Rohracher, H., & Von Radecki, A. (2016). Incumbent actors as niche agents: the German car industry and the taming of the “Stuttgart E-Mobility Region”. Sustainability, 8(3), 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2019). How deep is incumbency? A ‘configuring fields’ approach to redistributing and reorienting power in socio-material change. Energy Research & Social Science, 58, 101239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrens, J., Johnstone, P., & Schot, J. (2018). Unpacking the formation of favourable environments for urban experimentation: The case of the Bristol energy scene. Sustainability, 10(3), 879. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrens, J., & von Wirth, T. (2021). Experimentation or projectification of urban change? A critical appraisal and three steps forward. Urban Transformations, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-021-00025-1
   Google Scholar
• Tree People. (2020). The Greater LA Water Collaborative. https://www.treepeople.org/the-greater-la-water-collaborative/.
   Google Scholar
• Truffer, B., Murphy, J. T., & Raven, R. (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: Contours of an emerging theme. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnheim, B., & Geels, F. W. (2019). Incumbent actors, guided search paths, and landmark projects in infra-system transitions: Rethinking Strategic Niche Management with a case study of French tramway diffusion (1971–2016). Research Policy, 48(6), 1412–1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnheim, B., & Sovacool, B. K. (2020). Forever stuck in old ways? Pluralising incumbencies in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 35, 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Welie, M. J., Cherunya, P. C., Truffer, B., & Murphy, J. T. (2018). Analysing transition pathways in developing cities: The case of Nairobi's splintered sanitation regime. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137, 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Wirth, T., Fuenfschilling, L., Frantzeskaki, N., & Coenen, L. (2019). Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: Mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 229–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vreugdenhil, H., Slinger, J., Thissen, W., & Rault, P. K. (2010). Pilot projects in water management. Ecology and Society, 15(3), doi:10.5751/ES-03357-150313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar