Ecological modernisation wanderings: ambivalent framing and unstable coalitions in the development of Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage (CCUS) in France

References

• Ademe. (2013). Captage et stockage géologique du CO2 (CSC). Les Avis de L’Ademe, March 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., Grin, J., Pel, B., & Jhagroe, S. (2016). The politics of sustainability transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1216782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., & Wittmayer, J. M. (2016). Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: A multi-actor perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 628–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aykut, S. C., & Evrard, A. (2018). Une transition pour que rien ne change? Changement institutionnel et dépendance au sentier dans les «transitions énergétiques» en Allemagne et en France. Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée, 24(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3917/ripc.241.0017
   Google Scholar
• Aykut, S., Foyer, J., & Morena, E. eds. (2018). Globalising the climate: COP21 and the climatisation of global debates. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand du Chazaud, S., Guillebon, B., Henderson, J., Pottier, A., & Silvia, M. (2018). L’acceptabilité des projets d’ingénierie du sous-sol : Questionnement et mise en perspective autour de cas concrets [Rapport du projet GEFISS 0 « Gouvernance élargie pour les filières d’ingénerie du sous-sol »].
   Google Scholar
• Bidone, F. (2022). Driving governance beyond ecological modernization: REDD+ and the Amazon fund. Environmental Policy and Governance, 32(2), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R., Pinkse, J., & Waelpoel, A. (2016). The institutional evolution process of the global solar industry: The role of public and private actors in creating institutional shifts. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 20(September), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.10.006
   Google Scholar
• Brunsting, S., Best-Waldhober, M., de Feenstra, C. F. J. (Ynke), & Mikunda, T. (2011). Stakeholder participation practices and onshore CCS: Lessons from the Dutch CCS Case Barendrecht. Energy Procedia, 4, 6376–6383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.655
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation : Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief : A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–223). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. (2010). Reputation and power. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chailleux, S., & Arnauld de Sartre, X. (2021). L’acceptabilité au prisme du stockage géologique de CO2 : Retour sur un débat non émergé. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 29, S12–S24. https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2021043
   Google Scholar
• Chailleux, S., Merlin, J., & Gunzburger, Y. (2018). Unconventional oil and gas in France: From popular distrust to politicization of the underground. The Extractive Industries and Society, 5(4), 682–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.05.007
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, J., & Metze, T. (2017). Hydraulic fracturing as an interpretive policy problem: Lessons on energy controversies in Europe and the U.S.A. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1277947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECA (European Court of Auditors). (2018). Demonstrating carbon capture and storage and innovative renewables at commercial scale in the EU: Intended progress not achieved in the past decade. (Special report carried out by ‘audit chamber/sustainable use of natural resources’). ECA.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., Torgerson, D., Durnová, A., & Orsini, M., eds. (2017). Handbook of critical policy studies (paperback edition). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2009). L’ordre du discours: Leçon inaugurale au Collège de France prononcée le 2 dećembre 1970. Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovations : A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis . Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Global CCS Institute. (2017). The Global Status of CCS: 2017. Global CCS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Gusfield, J. (1981). The culture of public problems. Drinking, driving and the symbolic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ha-Duong, M., & Chaabane, N. (2010). Captage et stockage du CO2 : Enjeux techniques et sociaux en France (Quae).
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (1993). Discourse coalition and institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in Britain. In J. Forester & F. Fischer (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 43–76). Duke Univeristy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A., & Wagenaar, H. (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, A., Jonas, A., Fridahl, M., & Haikola, S. (2022). The underworld of tomorrow? How subsurface carbon dioxide storage leaked out of the public debate. Energy Research & Social Science, 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102606.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. (2021). CCUS in Industry and Transformation, (Tracking report).
   Google Scholar
• Iea (international energy agency). (2016). 20 years of carbon capture and storage. IEA.
   Google Scholar
• INERIS (Institut national de l’environnement industriel et des risques). (2017). Captage et stockage géologique du CO2: Retour d’expérience et perspectives. (rapport d’étude, 30/11/2017 DRS-17-164859-08281A). INERIS.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment, (report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, U. (2012). Mapping and navigating transitions—The multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development. Research Policy, 41(6), 996–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenis, A., Bono, F., & Mathijs, E. (2016). Unravelling the (post-)political in transition management: Interrogating pathways towards sustainable change. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 568–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1141672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, John. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A., Mühlemeier, M. S., … Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1992). Aramis, ou, L’amour des techniques. La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Margriet, K., Ir. (2011). Public acceptance challenges for onshore CO2 storage in Barendrecht. Energy Procedia, 4, 6226–6233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.635
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Bento, N., Kittner, N., & Nuñez-Jimenez, A. (2020). Destined for decline? Examining nuclear energy from a technological innovation systems perspective. Energy Research & Social Science, 67(September), 101512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101512
   Google Scholar
• Markusson, N., Shackley, S., & Evar, B. (2012). The social dynamics of carbon capture and storage : Understanding CCS representations, governance and innovation. Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Metze, T. (2017). Fracking the debate: Frame shifts and boundary work in Dutch decision making on shale gas. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.941462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minx, J. C., Lamb, W. F., Callaghan, M. W., Fuss, S., Hilaire, J., Creutzig, F., Amann, T., Beringer, T., de Oliveira Garcia, W., Hartmann, J., Khanna, T., Lenzi, D., Luderer, G., Nemet, G. F., Rogelj, J., Smith, P., Vicente, J. L. V., Wilcox, J., & Dominguez, M. D. M. Z. (2018). Negative emissions—part 1: Research landscape and synthesis. Environmental Research Letters, 13(6), 0063001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe (French ministry of ecology). (2020). National low-carbon strategy. (French Ministry of the Ecology).
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J., Sonnenfeld, D. A., & Spaargaren, G. (2009). The ecological modernisation reader : environmental reform in theory and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, P., & Mulvaney, D. (2013). The political economy of the ‘just transition’. The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, R., & Nadaï, A. (2012). Risque et démonstration, la politique de capture et de stockage du dioxyde de carbone (CCS) dans l’Union europeenne. Vertigo, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.12172
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, M., Tobin, P., & VanDeveer, S. (2022). Climate governance antagonisms: Policy stability and repoliticization. Global Environmental Politics, 22(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pel, B. (2016). Trojan horses in transitions: A dialectical perspective on innovation ‘capture’. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 673–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1090903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigeon, J. (2016). Les technologies de Captage, Transport et Stockage du CO2 (CTSC) dans l’Axe-Seine: description des futurs possibles d’un dispositif technique de réduction des émissions de gaz à effet de serre. Thèse pour le doctorat en Aménagement de l’espace et Urbanisme. Université du Havre.
   Google Scholar
• Planko, J., Cramer, J. M., Chappin, M., & Hekkert, M. P. (2016). Strategic collective system building to commercialize sustainability innovations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(January), 2328–2341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.108
   Google Scholar
• Rudolf, F. (2013). De la modernisation écologique à la résilience: un réformisme de plus? VertigO, Volume 13 Numéro 3. https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.14558
   Google Scholar
• Scott, V., Gilfillan, S., Markusson, N., Chalmers, H., & Haszeldine, R. S. (2013). Last chance for carbon capture and storage. Nature Climate Change, 3(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. A. (1989). Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104(2), 281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2151585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnheim, B., & Sovacool, B. K. (2020). Forever stuck in old ways? Pluralising incumbencies in sustainability transitions. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 35, 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., & Shove, E. (2007). Ambivalence, sustainability and the governance of socio-technical transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3-4), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080701622840
   Google Scholar
• Zittoun, P. (2014). The political process of policymaking: A pragmatic approach to public policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zittoun, P. (2016). The domestication of wild problems: Taming policy agenda setting. In N. Zahariadis (Ed.), Handbook of public policy agenda setting (pp. 254–272). Cheltemham: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Zittoun, P. & S. Chailleux. (2022). The politics of meaning struggles: Shale gas policy under pressure in France, Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zittoun, P., Fischer, F., & Zahariadis, N., eds. (2021). The political formulation of policy solutions: Arguments, arenas and coalitions. Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar