491
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Increasing Inclusivity in Developmental Research

&

References

  • Arnett, J. J. (2009). The neglected 95%, a challenge to psychology’s philosophy of science. American Psychologist, 64(6), 571–574. doi:10.1037/a0016723
  • Bard, K. A., Keller, H., & Leavens, D. A. (October, 2023). Beyond WEIRD, beyond BIZARRE: The urgent necessity to increase inclusivity in theories of developmental psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. ( target article is under review).
  • Bard, K. A., Keller, H., Ross, K. M., Hewlett, B., Butler, L., Boysen, S. T., & Matsuzawa, T. (2022). Joint attention in human and chimpanzee infants in varied socio-ecological contexts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 86(4), 7–217. Serial No.343. doi:10.1111/mono.12435
  • Burger, O., Chen, L., Erut, A., Fong, F. T. K., Rawlings, B., & Legare, C. H. (2023). Developing cross-cultural data infrastructures (CCDIs) for research in cognitive and behavioral sciences. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 14(2), 565–585. doi:10.1007/s13164-022-00635-z
  • Cheon, B. K., Melani, I., & Hong, Y. (2020). How USA‐centric is psychology? An archival study of implicit assumptions of generalizability of findings to human nature based on origins of study samples. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(7), 928–937. doi:10.1177/1948550620927269
  • Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Pub.
  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, N. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
  • Kärtner, J., Keller, H., Chaudhary, N., & Yovsi, R. D. (2012). The development of mirror self-recognition in different sociocultural contexts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 77(4), 1–87. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.2012.00688.x
  • Keller, H., Bard, K. A., Morelli, G., Chaudhary, N., Vicedo, M., Rosabal–Coto, M. … Gottlieb, A. (2017). The myth of universal sensitive responsiveness: Comment on Mesman et al. (2017). Child Development, 89(5), 1921–1928. doi:10.1111/cdev.13031
  • Keller, H., Lamm, B., Abels, M., Yovsi, R., Borker, J., Jensen, H. … Chaudhary, N. (2006). Cultural models, socialization goals, and parenting ethnotheories: A multicultural analysis. Journal of Cross‐Cultural Psychology, 37(2), 155–172. doi:10.1177/0022022105284494
  • Kline, M. A. (2015). How to learn about teaching: An evolutionary framework for the study of teaching behavior in humans and other animals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38(e00), 1–71. doi:10.1017/S0140525X14000090
  • Kline, M. A., Shamsudheen, R., & Broesch, T. (2018). Variation is the universal: Making cultural evolution work in developmental psychology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 373(1743), 20170059. doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0059
  • Lancy, D. (2024). Learning without lessons: Pedagogy in indigenous communities (Child development in cultural context series). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Morelli, G., Bard, K. A., Chaudhary, N., Gottlieb, A., Keller, H., Murray, M. … Vicedo, M. (2018). Bringing the real world into developmental science: A commentary on Weber, Fernald, & Diop (2017). Child Development, 89(6), e594–e603. doi:10.1111/cdev.13115
  • Nielsen, M., Haun, D., Kärtner, J., & Legare, C. H. (2017). The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: A call to action. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 162, 31–38. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.017
  • Oppong, S. (2020). When something dehumanizes, it is violent but when it elevates, it is not violent. Theory & Psychology, 30(3), 468–472. doi:10.1177/0959354320920942
  • Oppong, S. (2023). Promoting global ECD top-down and bottom-up. Ethos, 51(3), 321–325. doi:10.1111/etho.12393
  • Scheidecker, G., Tekola, B., Rasheed, M., Oppong, S., Mezzenzana, F., Keller, H., & Chaudhary, N. (2024). Ending epistemic exclusion: Toward a truly global science and practice of early childhood development. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 8(1), 3–5. doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00292-4
  • Schmidt, W. J., Keller, H., & Rosabal Coto, M. (2021). Development in context: What we need to know to assess children’s attachment relationships. Developmental Psychology, 57(12), 2206–2219. doi:10.1037/dev0001262
  • Schmidt, W. J., Keller, H., & Rosabal Coto, M. (2023). The cultural specificity of parent-infant interaction: Perspectives of urban middle-class and rural indigenous families in Costa Rica. Infant Behavior and Development, 70, 101796. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2022.101796
  • Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. doi:10.1177/1745691617708630
  • van de Vijver, F., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 54(2), 119–135. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2003.12.004
  • Vogt, P., Mastin, J. D., & Schots, D. M. (2015). Communicative intentions of child‐directed speech in three different learning environments: Observations from the Netherlands, and rural and urban Mozambique. First Language, 35(4–5), 341–358. doi:10.1177/0142723715596647
  • Whittemore, R., Chase, S. K., & Mandle, C. L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522–537. doi:10.1177/104973201129119299
  • Yovsi, R., Kärtner, J., Keller, H., & Lohaus, A. (2009). Maternal interactional quality in two cultural environments. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(4), 701–707. doi:10.1177/0022022109335065