Engaging in Dialogues: The Impact of Comment Valence and Influencer-Viewer Interaction on the Effectiveness of YouTube Influencer Marketing

References

• Appiah, O. 2006. “Rich Media, Poor Media: The Impact of Audio/Video Vs. Text/Picture Testimonial Ads on Browsers’ Evaluations of Commercial Web Sites and Online Products.” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 28 (1): 73–86. doi:10.1080/10641734.2006.10505192.
   Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C. 2020. “The effects of the Standardized Instagram Disclosure for Micro- and Meso- Influencers.” Computers in Human Behavior 103: 199–207. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellur, Saraswathi, and S. Shyam Sundar. 2014. “How Can We Tell When a Heuristic Has Been Used? Design and Analysis Strategies for Capturing the Operation of Heuristics.” Communication Methods and Measures 8 (2): 116–137. doi:10.1080/19312458.2014.903390.
   Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., and E. Reijmersdal. 2019. “Disclosing Influencer Marketing on YouTube to Children: The Moderating Role of Para-Social Relationship.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 3042. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. 1980. “Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source versus Message Cues in Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (5): 752–66. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., and D. Maheswaran. 1994. “Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing: Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgment.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 (3): 460–473. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., and N. H. Lurie. 2013. “Temporal contiguity and Negativity Bias in the Impact of Online Word of Mouth.” Journal of Marketing Research 50 (4): 463–476. doi:10.1509/jmr.12.0063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers, C. C., L. L. Lemon, and M. G. Hoy. 2019. “#Sponsored #Ad: Agency Perspective on Influencer Marketing Campaigns.” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 40 (3): 258–274. doi:10.1080/10641734.2018.1521113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Veirman, M., V. Cauberghe, and L. Hudders. 2017. “Marketing Through Instagram Influencers: The Impact of Number of Followers and Product Divergence on Brand Attitude.” International Journal of Advertising 36 (5): 798–828. doi:10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellet, John. 2018. “New Research Shows Growing Impact of Online Research on In-Store Purchases.” Forbes, February 8. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnellett/2018/02/08/new-research-shows-growing-impact-of-online-research-on-in-store-purchases/#ce4c4f716a0b
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S. K., K. E. Pearce, J. Vitak, and J. W. Treem. 2017. “Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22 (1): 35–52. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. 1962. “Cognitive Dissonance.” Scientific American 207 (4): 93–102. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24936719. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1062-93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filieri, R., E. Raguseo, and C. Vitari. 2021. “Extremely Negative Ratings and Online Consumer Review Helpfulness: The Moderating Role of Product Quality Signals.” Journal of Travel Research 60 (4): 699–717. doi:10.1177/0047287520916785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, P., E. Jonas, D. Frey, and S. Schulz-Hardt. 2005. “Selective Exposure to Information: The Impact of Information Limits.” European Journal of Social Psychology 35 (4): 469–92. doi:10.1002/ejsp.264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., and S. E. Taylor. 1991. McGraw-Hill Series in Social Psychology. Social Cognition. 2nd ed. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, L. R., and R. E. Goldsmith. 1999. “A short, Reliable Measure of Subjective Knowledge.” Journal of Business Research 46 (1): 57–66. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00057-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogg, B. J., G. Cuellar, and D. Danielson. 2002. “Motivating, Influencing, and Persuading Users.” In The human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, edited by J. A. Jacko and A. Sears, 133–147. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, W. W., and C. C. Sim. 2011. “Aggregate Bandwagon Effect on Online Videos’ Viewership: Value Uncertainty, Popularity Cues, and Heuristics.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62 (12): 2382–2395. doi:10.1002/asi.21641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, R. H., and J. S. Seiter. 2011. “Credibility.” In Persuasion: Social Influence and Compliance Gaining, edited by K. Bowers, J. Zalesky, and M. Lentz. 4th ed., 72–90. New York, NY: Pearson
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Wolfgang Gaissmaier. 2011. “Heuristic Decision Making.” Annual Review of Psychology 62:451–482. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, R. A., and C. T. Carr. 2015. “Does Being Social Matter? Effects of Enabled Commenting on Credibility and Brand Attitude in Social Media.” Journal of Promotion Management 21 (3): 371–390. doi:10.1080/10496491.2015.1039178.
   Google Scholar
• Heinbach, D., M. Ziegele, and O. Quiring. 2018. “Sleeper Effect From Below: Long-Term Effects of Source Credibility and User Comments on the Persuasiveness of News Articles.” New media & Society 20 (12): 4765–4786. doi:10.1177/1461444818784472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S., and M. Pittman. 2020. “Ewom Anatomy of Online Product Reviews: Interaction Effects of Review Number, Valence, and Star Ratings on Perceived Credibility.” International Journal of Advertising 39 (7): 892–920. doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1703386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., I. L. Janis, and H. H. Kelley. 1953. Communication and Persuasion; Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Pres
   Google Scholar
• Ito, T. A., J. T. Larsen, N. K. Smith, and J. T. Cacioppo. 1998. “Negative Information Weighs More Heavily on the Brain: The Negativity Bias in Evaluative Categorizations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (4): 887–900. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, W., J. Kim, S. Kim, and J. W. Chun. 2021. “The role of Engagement in Travel Influencer Marketing: The Perspectives of Dual Process Theory and the Source Credibility Model.” Current Issues in Tourism 24 (17): 2416–20. doi:10.1080/13683500.2020.1845126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, S. V., and E. Ryu. 2020. “I’ll Buy What She’s #Wearing”: The Roles of Envy Toward and Parasocial Interaction With Influencers in Instagram Celebrity-Based Brand Endorsement and Social Commerce.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Service 55: 102121. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klayman, J. 1995. “Varieties of Confirmation Bias.” Psychology of Learning and Motivation 32:385–418. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60315-1.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., N. Sharma, D. L. Hansen, and S. Alter. 2005. “Impact of Popularity Indications on Readers’ Selective Exposure to Online News.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 49 (3): 296–313. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4903_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., C. Mothes, and N. Polavin. 2020. “Confirmation Bias, Ingroup Bias, and Negativity Bias in Selective Exposure to Political Information.” Communication Research 47 (1): 104–124. doi:10.1177/0093650217719596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kümpel, A. S., and J. Unkel. 2020. “Negativity Wins at Last: How Presentation Order and Valence of User Comments Affect Perceptions of Journalistic Quality.” Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications 32 (2): 89–99. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000261.
   Google Scholar
• Le, L. H., and Q. A. Ha. 2021. “Effects of Negative Reviews and Managerial Responses on Consumer Attitude and Subsequent Purchase Behavior: An Experimental Design.” Computers in Human Behavior 124. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., and E. Kim. 2020. “Influencer Marketing on Instagram: How Sponsorship Disclosure, Influencer Credibility, and Brand Credibility Impact the Effectiveness of Instagram Promotional Post.” Journal of Global Fashion Marketing 11 (3): 232–249. doi:10.1080/20932685.2020.1752766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. J., and B. Watkins. 2016. “YouTube vloggers’ Influence on Consumer Luxury Brand Perceptions and Intentions.” Journal of Business Research 69: 5753–5760. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Seungae, L. Atkinson, and Y. H. Sung. 2020. “Online Bandwagon Effects: Quantitative Versus Qualitative Cues in Online Comments Sections.” New Media & Society 24 (3): 146144482096518. doi:10.1177/1461444820965187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicka, M., J. Czapinski, and G. Peeters. 1992. “Positive-Negative Asymmetry or When the Heart Needs a Reason.” European Journal of Social Psychology 22 (5): 425–34. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420220502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, T. 2019. “The Real Difference Between Creators and Influencers.” The Atlantic, May 31. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2019/05/how-creators-became-influencers/590725/
   Google Scholar
• Lou, C., and S. Yuan. 2019. “Influencer Marketing: How Message Value and Credibility Affect Consumer Trust of Branded Content on Social Media.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 19 (1): 58–73. doi:10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501.
   Google Scholar
• McGinnies, E., and C. D. Ward. 1980. “Better Liked Than Right: Trustworthiness and Expertise as Factors in Credibility.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6 (3): 467–472. doi:10.1177/014616728063023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettenheim, W., and K. P. Wiedmann. 2021. “The Complex Triad of Congruence Issues in Influencer Marketing.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour 20 (5): 1277–1296. doi:10.1002/cb.1935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., and A. J. Flanagin. 2013. “Credibility and Trust of Information in Online Environments: The Use of Cognitive Heuristics.” Journal of Pragmatics 59: 210–220. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., A. J. Flanagin, and R. Madders. 2010. “Social and Heuristic Approach to Credibility Evaluation Online.” Journal of Communication 60 (3): 413–439. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naab, T. K., D. Heinbach, M. Ziegele, and M. T. Grasberger. 2020. “Comments and Credibility: how Critical User Comments Decrease Perceived News Article Credibility.” Journalism Studies 21 (6): 783–801. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2020.1724181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. 1998. “Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises.” Review of General Psychology 2 (2): 175–220. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175.
   Google Scholar
• Ohanian, R. 1990. “Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers’ Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness.” Journal of Advertising 19 (3): 39–52. doi:10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., and P. Brinol. 2012. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model.” In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, edited by P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, and E. T. Higgins, 224–245. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., and J. T. Cacioppo. 1984. “The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (1): 69–81. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinikainen, H., J. Munnukka, D. Maity, and V. Luoma-Aho. 2020. “You Really Are a Great Big Sister’–Parasocial Relationships, Credibility, and the Moderating Role of Audience Comments in Influencer Marketing.” Journal of Marketing Management 36 (3–4): 279–298. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2019.1708781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., and E. B. Royzman. 2001. “Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 5 (4): 296–320. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M., E. M. Perse, and R. A. Powell. 1985. “Loneliness, Parasocial Interaction, and Local Television News Viewing.” Human Communication Research 12 (2): 155–180. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saima Khan. M. A. 2020. “Effect of Social Media Influencer Marketing on Consumers’ Purchase Intention and the Mediating Role of Credibility.” Journal of Promotion Management 27 (4): 503–523. doi:10.1080/10496491.2020.1851847.
   Google Scholar
• Schouten, A. P., L. Janssen, and M. Verspaget. 2020. “Celebrity vs. Influencer Endorsements in Advertising: The Role of Identification, Credibility, and Product-Endorser Fit.” International Journal of Advertising 39 (2): 258–281. doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., and J. L. Rodgers. 2018. “Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis.” Annual review of Psychology 69 (1): 487–510. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolova, K., and H. Kefi. 2020. “Instagram and YouTube Bloggers Promote It, Why Should I Buy? How Credibility and Parasocial Interaction Influence Purchase Intentions.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 53 : 101742. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, B. A., and V. Browning. 2011. “The Impact of Online Reviews on Hotel Booking Intentions and Perception of Trust.” Tourism Management 32 (6): 1310–1323. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears, N., and S. N. Singh. 2004. “Measuring Attitude Toward the Brand and Purchase Intentions.” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 26 (2): 53–66. doi:10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. 2008. “The MAIN Model: A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility.” In The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, edited by M. J. Metzger and A. J. Flanagin, 73–100. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., A. Oeldorf-Hirsch, and Q. Xu. 2008. “The Bandwagon Effect of Collaborative Filtering Technology.” In Proceedings of the CHI'08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3453–3458. Florence: ACM. doi:10.1145/1358628.1358873.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., S. Bellur, J. Oh, H. Jia, and H. S. Kim. 2016. “Theoretical Importance of Contingency in Human-Computer Interaction: Effects of Message Interactivity on User Engagement.” Communication Research 43 (5): 595–625. doi:10.1177/0093650214534962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swant, M. 2015. “Infographic: Marketers Are Spending 500% More on Millennials Than All Others Combined.” AdWeek, November 15. https://www.adweek.com/digital/infographic-marketers-are-spending-500-more-millennials-all-others-combined-168176/
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1991. “Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (4): 1039–1061. doi:10.2307/2937956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, I. E., and D. Seegers. 2009. “Tried and Tested: The Impact of Online Hotel Reviews on Consumer Consideration.” Tourism Management 30 (1): 123–127. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell, T. F. 2018. “What Does the Crowd Think? How Online Comments and Popularity Metrics Affect News Credibility and Issue Importance.” New Media & Society 20 (8): 3068–3083. doi:10.1177/1461444817742905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell, T. F. 2020. “The Authentic (and Angry) Audience: How Comment Authenticity and Sentiment Impact News Evaluation.” Digital Journalism 8 (2): 249–266. doi:10.1080/21670811.2018.1490656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell, T. F., and S. S. Sundar. 2017. “#thisshowsucks! The Overpowering Influence of Negative Social Media Comments on Television Viewers.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 61 (2): 393–409. doi:10.1080/08838151.2017.1309414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, P. F. 2013. “In Search of Negativity Bias: An Empirical Study of Perceived Helpfulness of Online Reviews.” Psychology & Marketing 30 (11): 971–984. doi:10.1002/mar.20660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., T. Wu, and B. B. Schlegelmilch. 2020. “Seize the Day: How Online Retailers Should Respond to Positive Reviews.” Journal of Interactive Marketing 52 (1): 52–60. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2020.04.008.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, M., R. Wang, and S. Chan-Olmsted. 2018. “Factors Affecting YouTube Influencer Marketing Credibility: A Heuristic-Systematic Model.” Journal of Media Business Studies 15 (3): 188–213. doi:10.1080/16522354.2018.1501146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Qian. 2013. “Social Recommendation, Source Credibility, and Recency: Effects of News Cues in a Social Bookmarking Website.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 90 (4): 757–775. doi:10.1177/1077699013503158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, K., C. H. Kim, and M. S. Kim. 1998. “A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Effects of Source Credibility on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions.” Mass Communication and Society 1 (3–4): 153–173. doi:10.1080/15205436.1998.9677854.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, S., and C. Lou. 2020. “How Social Media Influencers Foster Relationships With Followers: The Roles of Source Credibility and Fairness in Parasocial Relationship and Product Interest.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 20 (2): 133–147. doi:10.1080/15252019.2020.1769514.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., L. Jiang, and C. Su. 2020. “To Defend or Not to Defend? How Responses to Negative Customer Review Affect Prospective Customers’ Distrust and Purchase Intention.” Journal of Interactive Marketing 50: 45–64. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2019.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar