Human versus Virtual Influencer: The Effect of Humanness and Interactivity on Persuasive CSR Messaging

References

• Abu Zayyad, H. M., Z. M. Obeidat, M. T. Alshurideh, M. Abuhashesh, M. Maqableh, and R. E. Masa’deh. 2021. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Patronage Intentions: The Mediating Effect of Brand Credibility.” Journal of Marketing Communications 27 (5): 510–533. doi:10.1080/13527266.2020.1728565.
   Google Scholar
• Afifi, W. A., and J. K. Burgoon. 2000. “The Impact of Violations on Uncertainty and the Consequences for Attractiveness.” Human Communication Research 26 (2): 203–233. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00756.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhouti, S., C. M. Johnson, and B. B. Holloway. 2016. “Corporate Social Responsibility Authenticity: Investigating Its Antecedents and Outcomes.” Journal of Business Research 69 (3): 1242–1249. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M. W., and C. A. Craig. 2016. “Rethinking Corporate Social Responsibility in the Age of Climate Change: A Communication Perspective.” International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility 1 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1186/s40991-016-0002-8.
   Google Scholar
• Anridho, N., and Y. K. Liao. 2013. “The Mediation Roles of Brand Credibility and Attitude on the Performance of Cause-Related Marketing.” International Journal of Social Sciences & Education 4 (1): 226–276.
   Google Scholar
• Arsenyan, J., and A. Mirowska. 2021. “Almost Human? A Comparative Case Study on the Social Media Presence of Virtual Influencers.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 155: 102694. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audrezet, A., G. De Kerviler, and J. G. Moulard. 2020. “Authenticity under Threat: When Social Media Influencers Need to Go beyond Self-Presentation.” Journal of Business Research 117: 557–569. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaban, D., and M. Mustățea. 2019. “Users’ Perspective on the Credibility of Social Media Influencers in Romania and Germany.” Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations 21 (1): 31–46. doi:10.21018/rjcpr.2019.1.269.
   Google Scholar
• Bellur, S., and S. S. Sundar. 2017. “Talking Health with a Machine: How Does Message Interactivity Affect Attitudes and Cognitions?” Human Communication Research 43 (1): 25–53. doi:10.1111/hcre.12094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, S. 2020. “Even Better than the Real Thing? Meet the Virtual Influencers Taking over Your Feeds.” The Drum. Accessed 8 August 2022. https://www.thedrum.com/news/2020/03/20/even-better-the-real-thing-meet-the-virtual-influencers-taking-over-your-feeds.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K. 1993. “Interpersonal Expectations, Expectancy Violations, and Emotional Communication.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 12 (1–2): 30–48. doi:10.1177/0261927X93121003.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., and J. L. Hale. 1988. “Nonverbal Expectancy Violations: Model Elaboration and Application to Immediacy Behaviors.” Communication Monographs 55 (1): 58–79. doi:10.1080/03637758809376158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., and J. B. Walther. 1990. “Nonverbal Expectancies and the Evaluative Consequences of Violations.” Human Communication Research 17 (2): 232–265. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1990.tb00232.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., J. A. Bonito, B. Bengtsson, C. Cederberg, M. Lundeberg, and L. Allspach. 2000. “Interactivity in Human–Computer Interaction: A Study of Credibility, Understanding, and Influence.” Computers in Human Behavior 16 (6): 553–574. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00029-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., J. A. Bonito, P. B. Lowry, S. L. Humpherys, G. D. Moody, J. E. Gaskin, and J. S. Giboney. 2016. “Application of Expectancy Violations Theory to Communication with and Judgments about Embodied Agents during a Decision-Making Task.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 91: 24–36. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y., Y. R. R. Chen, and C. J. F. Hung-Baesecke. 2021. “Social Media Influencers in CSR Endorsement: The Effect of Consumer Mimicry on CSR Behaviors and Consumer Relationships.” Social Science Computer Review 39 (4): 744–761. doi:10.1177/0894439320987184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S., and H. Cho. 2017. “Fostering Parasocial Relationships with Celebrities on Social Media: Implications for Celebrity Endorsement.” Psychology & Marketing 34 (4): 481–495. doi:10.1002/mar.21001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, W. T., and S. J. Holladay. 2006. “Unpacking the Halo Effect: Reputation and Crisis Management.” Journal of Communication Management 10 (2): 123–137.
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva Oliveira, A. B., and P. Chiment. 2021. “"Humanized Robots": A Proposition of Categories to Understand Virtual Influencers.” Australasian Journal of Information Systems 25: 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Veirman, M., V. Cauberghe, and L. Hudders. 2017. “Marketing through Instagram Influencers: The Impact of Number of Followers and Product Divergence on Brand Attitude.” International Journal of Advertising 36 (5): 798–828. doi:10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djafarova, E., and C. Rushworth. 2017. “Exploring the Credibility of Online Celebrities’ Instagram Profiles in Influencing the Purchase Decisions of Young Female Users.” Computers in Human Behavior 68: 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, S., and E. T. Vieira. 2012. “Striving for Legitimacy through Corporate Social Responsibility: Insights from Oil Companies.” Journal of Business Ethics 110 (4): 413–427. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1490-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, S., C. B. Bhattacharya, and S. Sen. 2010. “Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): the Role of CSR Communication.” International Journal of Management Reviews 12 (1): 8–19. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, M., and N. C. Krämer. 2022. “Humanoid Robots–Artificial. Human-like. Credible? Empirical Comparisons of Source Credibility Attributions between Humans, Humanoid Robots, and Non-Human-like Devices.” International Journal of Social Robotics 14 (6): 1397–1411. doi:10.1007/s12369-022-00879-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, C., A. Groeppel-Klein, and K. Müller. 2023. “Consumers’ Responses to Virtual Influencers as Advertising Endorsers: Novel and Effective or Uncanny and Deceiving?” Journal of Advertising 1–17. doi:10.1080/00913367.2022.2154721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Go, E., and S. S. Sundar. 2019. “Humanizing Chatbots: The Effects of Visual, Identity and Conversational Cues on Humanness Perceptions.” Computers in Human Behavior 97: 304–316. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey, P. C., and N. W. Hatch. 2007. “Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st Century.” Journal of Business Ethics 70 (1): 87–98. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9080-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goethals, G. R., and R. E. Nelson. 1973. “Similarity in the Influence Process: The Belief-Value Distinction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 117 (1): 25.
   Google Scholar
• Grover, P., A. K. Kar, and P. V. Ilavarasan. 2019. “Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Reputation—Insights from Tweets on Sustainable Development Goals by CEOs.” International Journal of Information Management 48: 39–52. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, M. C. 2021. “The Impact of Anthropomorphism on Consumers’ Purchase Decision in Chatbot Commerce.” Journal of Internet Commerce 20 (1): 46–65. doi:10.1080/15332861.2020.1863022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. 2017. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Herbig, P., J. Milewicz. 1996. “To Be or Not to Be… Credible That is: A Model of Reputation and Credibility among Competing Firms.” Corporate Communications: An International Journal 1 (2): 19–29. doi:10.1108/eb046526.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, J. W., I. Cruz, and D. Williams. 2021. “AI, You Can Drive my Car: How we Evaluate Human Drivers vs. self-Driving Cars.” Computers in Human Behavior 125: 106944. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J. W., Q. Peng, and D. Williams. 2021. “Are You Ready for Artificial Mozart and Skrillex? An Experiment Testing Expectancy Violation Theory and AI Music.” New Media & Society 23 (7): 1920–1935. doi:10.1177/1461444820925798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., I. L. Janis, and H. H. Kelley. 1953. Communication and Persuasion.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, K. T. 2012. “The Advertising Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Reputation and Brand Equity: Evidence from the Life Insurance Industry in Taiwan.” Journal of Business Ethics 109 (2): 189–201. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1118-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur, W. M., H. Kim, and J. Woo. 2014. “How CSR Leads to Corporate Brand Equity: Mediating Mechanisms of Corporate Brand Credibility and Reputation.” Journal of Business Ethics 125 (1): 75–86. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1910-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur, W. M., T. W. Moon, and W. H. Choi. 2019. “When Are Internal and External Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives Amplified? Employee Engagement in Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives on Prosocial and Proactive Behaviors.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 26 (4): 849–858. doi:10.1002/csr.1725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illia, L., S. C. Zyglidopoulos, S. Romenti, B. Rodríguez-Cánovas, and A. G. del Valle Brena. 2013. “Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility to a Cynical Public.” MIT Sloan Management Review 54 (3): 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahng, M. R., and J. Littau. 2016. “Interacting is Believing: Interactivity, Social Cue, and Perceptions of Journalistic Credibility on Twitter.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 93 (1): 38–58. doi:10.1177/1077699015606680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, T., M. M. H. Khan, M. A. A. Fahim, and Albayram Y. 2021 “Trust and Anthropomorphism in Tandem: The Interrelated Nature of Automated Agent Appearance and Reliability in Trustworthiness Perceptions.” Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021, 1470–1480. doi:10.1145/3461778.3462102.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, S. V., A. Muqaddam, and E. Ryu. 2019. “Instafamous and Social Media Influencer Marketing.” Marketing Intelligence & Planning 37 (5): 567–579. doi:10.1108/MIP-09-2018-0375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., and S. Johnson. 1972. “The Effects of Attitude Similarity, Expectation of Goal Facilitation, and Actual Goal Facilitation on Interpersonal Attraction.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 8 (3): 197–206. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(72)80001-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun, S., and J. Yi. 2020. “What Makes Followers Loyal? The Role of Influencer Interactivity in Building Influencer Brand Equity.” Journal of Product & Brand Management 29 (6): 803–814. doi:10.1108/JPBM-02-2019-2280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., and Y. Kim. 2014. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value of Restaurant Firms.” International Journal of Hospitality Management 40: 120–129. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., D. Song, and A. Jang. 2021. “Consumer Response toward Native Advertising on Social Media: The Roles of Source Type and Content Type.” Internet Research 31 (5): 1656–1676. doi:10.1108/INTR-08-2019-0328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koda, T. 1996. “Agents with Faces: A Study on the Effects of Personification of Software Agents.” Doctoral diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, Y. J., and S. S. Sundar. 2010. “Heuristic versus Systematic Processing of Specialist versus Generalist Sources in Online Media.” Human Communication Research 36 (2): 103–124. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01370.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. S., C. J. Chiu, C. F. Yang, and D. C. Pai. 2010. “The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Performance: The Mediating Effect of Industrial Brand Equity and Corporate Reputation.” Journal of Business Ethics 95 (3): 457–469. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0433-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y., W. Zhang, and A. Abitbol. 2019. “What Makes CSR Communication Lead to CSR Participation? Testing the Mediating Effects of CSR Associations, CSR Credibility, and Organization–Public Relationships.” Journal of Business Ethics 157 (2): 413–429. doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3609-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M. 2022. “Influence for Social Good: Exploring the Roles of Influencer Identity and Comment Section in Instagram-Based LGBTQ-Centric Corporate Social Responsibility Advertising.” International Journal of Advertising 41 (3): 462–499. doi:10.1080/02650487.2021.1884399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., and Y. Sung. 2021. “Anthropomorphism Brings us Closer: The Mediating Role of Psychological Distance in User–AI Assistant Interactions.” Computers in Human Behavior 118: 106680. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, M. Q., and A. K. Mak. 2019. “‘Comments Are Disabled for This Video’: A Technological Affordances Approach to Understanding Source Credibility Assessment of CSR Information on YouTube.” Public Relations Review 45 (5): 101840. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lii, Y. S., and M. Lee. 2012. “Doing Right Leads to Doing Well: When the Type of CSR and Reputation Interact to Affect Consumer Evaluations of the Firm.” Journal of Business Ethics 105 (1): 69–81. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0948-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., X. Li, and Z. Xiang. 2022. “The Effect of Chatbot-Customer Interaction on Consumer Brand Advocacy: Exploring the Role of Chatbots.” 2022 IEEE 12th International Conference on Electronics Information and Emergency Communication (ICEIEC), 185–190. IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICEIEC54567.2022.9835050.
   Google Scholar
• Lou, C., and S. Yuan. 2019. “Influencer Marketing: how Message Value and Credibility Affect Consumer Trust of Branded Content on Social Media.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 19 (1): 58–73. doi:10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501.
   Google Scholar
• Lou, C., S. T. J. Kiew, T. Chen, T. Y. M. Lee, J. E. C. Ong, and Z. Phua. 2022. “Authentically Fake? How Consumers Respond to the Influence of Virtual Influencers.” Journal of Advertising 1–18. doi:10.1080/00913367.2022.2149641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, C., S. S. Tan, and X. Chen. 2019. “Investigating Consumer Engagement with Influencer- vs. Brand-Promoted Ads: The Roles of Source and Disclosure.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 19 (3): 169–186. doi:10.1080/15252019.2019.1667928.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, A., and J. Bashir. 2020. “How Does Corporate Social Responsibility Transform Brand Reputation into Brand Equity? Economic and Noneconomic Perspectives of CSR.” International Journal of Engineering Business Management 12: 184797902092754. doi:10.1177/1847979020927547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCracken, G. 1989. “Who is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorsement Process.” Journal of Consumer Research 16 (3): 310–321. doi:10.1086/209217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGloin, R., K. L. Nowak, and J. Watt. 2014. “Avatars and Expectations: Influencing Perceptions of Trustworthiness in an Online Consumer Setting.” PsychNology Journal 12 (1–2): 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Melo, T., and A. Garrido-Morgado. 2012. “Corporate Reputation: A Combination of Social Responsibility and Industry.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 19 (1): 11–31. doi:10.1002/csr.260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, M. 1970. “The Uncanny Valley: The Original Essay by Masahiro Mori.” IEEE Spectrum.
   Google Scholar
• Moustakas, E., N. Lamba, D. Mahmoud, and C. Ranganathan. 2020. June). “Blurring Lines between Fiction and Reality: Perspectives of Experts on Marketing Effectiveness of Virtual Influencers.” 2020 International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services (Cyber Security), 1–6. IEEE. doi:10.1109/CyberSecurity49315.2020.9138861.
   Google Scholar
• Munnukka, J., O. Uusitalo, and H. Toivonen. 2016. “Credibility of a Peer Endorser and Advertising Effectiveness.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 33 (3): 182–192. doi:10.1108/JCM-11-2014-1221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, S. L., J. G. Holmes, G. Bellavia, D. W. Griffin, and D. Dolderman. 2002. “Kindred Spirits? The Benefits of Egocentrism in Close Relationships.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (4): 563–581. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nafees, L., C. M. Cook, A. N. Nikolov, and J. E. Stoddard. 2021. “Can Social Media Influencer (SMI) Power Influence Consumer Brand Attitudes? The Mediating Role of Perceived SMI Credibility.” Digital Business 1 (2): 100008. doi:10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100008.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, K. L., and C. Rauh. 2005. “The Influence of the Avatar on Online Perceptions of Anthropomorphism, Androgyny, Credibility, Homophily, and Attraction.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (1): 153–178. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00308.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, K. L., M. A. Hamilton, and C. C. Hammond. 2009. “The Effect of Image Features on Judgments of Homophily, Credibility, and Intention to Use as Avatars in Future Interactions.” Media Psychology 12 (1): 50–76. doi:10.1080/15213260802669433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohanian, R. 1990. “Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers’ Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness.” Journal of Advertising 19 (3): 39–52. doi:10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott, H. K., M. Vafeiadis, S. Kumble, and T. F. Waddell. 2016. “Effect of Message Interactivity on Product Attitudes and Purchase Intentions.” Journal of Promotion Management 22 (1): 89–106. doi:10.1080/10496491.2015.1107011.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. Y., M. Cho, and S. Kim. 2021. “The Effect of CSR Expectancy Violation: Value from Expectancy Violation Theory and Confirmation Bias.” Journal of Marketing Communications 27 (4): 365–388. doi:10.1080/13527266.2019.1671478.
   Google Scholar
• Peer, E., L. Brandimarte, S. Samat, and A. Acquisti. 2017. “Beyond the Turk: Alternative Platforms for Crowdsourcing Behavioral Research.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70: 153–163. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, A. 2019. “Building a Theoretical Framework of Message Authenticity in CSR Communication.” Corporate Communications: An International Journal 24 (2): 334–350. doi:10.1108/CCIJ-04-2018-0051.
   Google Scholar
• Potdevin, D., C. Clavel, and N. Sabouret. 2021. “A Virtual Tourist Counselor Expressing Intimacy Behaviors: A New Perspective to Create Emotion in Visitors and Offer Them a Better User Experience?” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 150: 102612. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, L., and I. Benbasat. 2009. “Evaluating Anthropomorphic Product Recommendation Agents: A Social Relationship Perspective to Designing Information Systems.” Journal of Management Information Systems 25 (4): 145–182. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222250405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafaeli, S. 1988. “From New Media to Communication.” Sage Annual Review of Communication Research: Advancing Communication Science 16: 110–134.
   Google Scholar
• Reavey, B., M. Puzakova, T. Larsen Andras, and H. Kwak. 2018. “The Multidimensionality of Anthropomorphism in Advertising: The Moderating Roles of Cognitive Busyness and Assertive Language.” International Journal of Advertising 37 (3): 440–462. doi:10.1080/02650487.2018.1438054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rim, H., J. Kim, and C. Dong. 2019. “A Cross‐National Comparison of Transparency Signaling in Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: The United States, South Korea, and China Cases.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 26 (6): 1517–1529. doi:10.1002/csr.1766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, B. 2020. “Speciesism: An Obstacle to AI and Robot Adoption.” Marketing Letters 31 (1): 3–6. doi:10.1007/s11002-019-09499-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, J. 2022. “6 Reasons Why Virtual Influencers Will Be Essential for Social Media and Metaverse Strategies.” Medium. Accessed 10 March 2022. https://medium.com/xr-marketing/6-reasons-why-virtual-influencers-will-be-essential-for-social-media-and-metaverse-strategies-404597e84bef.
   Google Scholar
• Schouten, A. P., L. Janssen, and M. Verspaget. 2020. “Celebrity vs. Influencer Endorsements in Advertising: The Role of Identification, Credibility, and Product-Endorser Fit.” International Journal of Advertising 39 (2): 258–281. doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarmeas, D., and C. N. Leonidou. 2013. “When Consumers Doubt, Watch out! the Role of CSR Skepticism.” Journal of Business Research 66 (10): 1831–1838. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. G., M. C. Kendall, D. Knighton, and T. Wright. 2018. “Rise of the Brand Ambassador: Social Stake, Corporate Social Responsibility and Influence among the Social Media Influencers.” Communication Management Review 3 (1): 6–29. doi:10.22522/cmr20180127.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, J. P., P. Linda Breves, and N. Anders. 2022. “Parasocial Interactions with Real and Virtual Influencers: The Role of Perceived Similarity and Human-Likeness.” New Media & Society 146144482211029. doi:10.1177/14614448221102900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., S. Bellur, J. Oh, H. Jia, and H. S. Kim. 2016. “Theoretical Importance of Contingency in Human-Computer Interaction: Effects of Message Interactivity on User Engagement.” Communication Research 43 (5): 595–625. doi:10.1177/0093650214534962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., H. Jia, T. F. Waddell, and Y. Huang. 2015. “Toward a Theory of Interactive Media Effects (TIME) Four Models for Explaining How Interface Features Affect User Psychology.” In The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology, edited by S. S. Sundar, 47–86. New York: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, M. 2021. “Virtual Influencers: False Reality or Real-Life Fantasy?” Sound of Life. Accessed 12 March 2022. https://www.soundoflife.com/blogs/people/virtual-influencers-false-reality-or-real-life-fantasy.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, J., H. Gao, X. Hu, and H. Liu. 2013. “Exploiting Homophily Effect for Trust Prediction.” “Proceedings of the.” Sixth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 53–62. doi:10.1145/2433396.2433405.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, V. L., and K. Fowler. 2021. “Close Encounters of the AI Kind: Use of AI Influencers as Brand Endorsers.” Journal of Advertising 50 (1): 11–25. doi:10.1080/00913367.2020.1810595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, P., M. Augusto, and M. Matos. 2019. “Antecedents and Outcomes of Digital Influencer Endorsement: An Exploratory Study.” Psychology & Marketing 36 (12): 1267–1276. doi:10.1002/mar.21274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vafeiadis, M. 2023. “Message Interactivity and Source Credibility in Online Dental Practice Reviews: responding to Reviews Triggers Positive Consumer Reactions Regardless of Review Valence.” Health Communication 38 (1): 80–90. doi:10.1080/10410236.2021.1935538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrajlai, A., and J. Di Donato. 2020. “Supporting Black Lives Matter: What Brands, Influencers and Followers Can Do Better.” HuffPost Australia Life, June 4. https://www.huffpost.com/archive/au/entry/brands-influencers-black-lives-matter_au_5ed87651c5b6c4537e7eb5db.
   Google Scholar
• Waddell, T. F. 2019. “Can an Algorithm Reduce the Perceived Bias of News? Testing the Effect of Machine Attribution on News Readers’ Evaluations of Bias, Anthropomorphism, and Credibility.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 96 (1): 82–100. doi:10.1177/1077699018815891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, M., and A. Kent. 2013. “The Roles of Credibility and Social Consciousness in the Corporate Philanthropy-Consumer Behavior Relationship.” Journal of Business Ethics 116 (2): 341–353. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1472-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiese, E., and P. P. Weis. 2020. “It Matters to Me If You Are Human-Examining Categorical Perception in Human and Nonhuman Agents.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 133: 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, M., R. Wang, and S. Chan-Olmsted. 2018. “Factors Affecting YouTube Influencer Marketing Credibility: A Heuristic-Systematic Model.” Journal of Media Business Studies 15 (3): 188–213. doi:10.1080/16522354.2018.1501146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., and J. Mundel. 2022. “Effects of Brand Feedback to Negative eWOM on Brand Love/Hate: An Expectancy Violation Approach.” Journal of Product & Brand Management 31 (2): 279–292. doi:10.1108/JPBM-05-2020-2900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., P. Chuenterawong, and K. Pugdeethosapol. 2021. “Speaking up on Black Lives Matter: A Comparative Study of Consumer Reactions toward Brand and Influencer-Generated Corporate Social Responsibility Messages.” Journal of Advertising 50 (5): 565–583. doi:10.1080/00913367.2021.1984345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., P. Chuenterawong, H. Lee, and T. M. Chock. 2022. “Anthropomorphism in CSR Endorsement: A Comparative Study on Humanlike vs. cartoonlike Virtual Influencers’ Climate Change Messaging.” Journal of Promotion Management 29 (5): 705–734. doi:10.1080/10496491.2022.2163041.
   Google Scholar
• Yim, M. C. 2019. “CEOs’ Political Tweets and Perceived Authenticity: Can Expectancy Violation Be a Pleasant Surprise?” Public Relations Review 45 (3): 101785. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, S., and C. Lou. 2020. “How Social Media Influencers Foster Relationships with Followers: The Roles of Source Credibility and Fairness in Parasocial Relationship and Product Interest.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 20 (2): 133–147. doi:10.1080/15252019.2020.1769514.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., M. Kim, and Y. K. Choi. 2022. “Social Media Advertising Endorsement: The Role of Endorser Type, Message Appeal and Brand Familiarity.” International Journal of Advertising 41 (5): 948–969. doi:10.1080/02650487.2021.1966963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar