The Impact Of Business Intelligence Systems on an Organization’s Effectiveness: The Role of Metadata Quality From a Developing Country’S View

References

• Alsetoohy, O., & Ayoun, B. (2018). Intelligent agent technology: The relationships with hotel food procurement practices and performance. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology. doi:10.1108/JHTT-04-2017-0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anjariny, A. H., & Zeki, A. M. (2011). Development of model for assessing organizations’ readiness toward successful business intelligence systems. In Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS), 2011 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (pp. 1-6), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Arefin, M., Hoque, M., & Bao, Y. (2015). The impact of business intelligence on organization’s effectiveness: An empirical study. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 17(3), 263–285. doi:10.1108/JSIT-09-2014-0067
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural evaluation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. doi:10.1007/BF02723327
   Google Scholar
• Breur, T. (2009). Data quality is everyone’s business-designing quality into your data warehouse-Part 1. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 11(1), 20–29. doi:10.1057/dddmp.2009.14
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. (2001). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Chau, M., & Xu, J. (2012). Business intelligence in blogs: Understanding consumer interactions and communities. MIS Quarterly, 1189–1216. doi:10.2307/41703504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Chiang, R. H., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 1165–1188. doi:10.2307/41703503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioural impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487. doi:10.1006/imms.1993.1022
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, L., & Heery, R. (1998). Metadata: A current view of practice and issues. Journal of Documentation, 54(2), 145–172. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbashir, M., & Williams, S. (2007). BI Impact: The assimilation of business intelligence into core business process. Business Intelligence Journal, 12(4), 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Even, A., Shankaranarayanan, G., & Watts, S. (2006). Enhancing decision making with process metadata: Theoretical framework, research tool, and exploratory examination. In System Sciences, 2006. HICSS’06. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on (Vol. 8, pp. 209a–209a), IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foshay, N., Mukherjee, A., & Taylor, A. (2007). Does data warehouse end-user metadata add value? Communications of the ACM, 50(11), 70–77. doi:10.1145/1297797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foshay, N., Taylor, A., & Mukherjee, A. (2014). Winning the hearts and minds of business intelligence users: The role of metadata. Information Systems Management, 31, 167–180. doi:10.1080/10580530.2014.890444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, R., Hoppe, T., & Pastwa, A. (2010). Classification of metadata categories in data warehousing-a generic approach. In AMCIS (pp. 133).
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hassani, A. L., & Mansouri, K. (2017). Towards a model of a scalable middleware architecture based on cloud computing, application reliable integration and e-learning platforms in academic information systems. Transactions on Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, 5(4). doi:10.14738/tmlai
   Google Scholar
• Herschel, R. T., & Jones, N. E. (2005). Knowledge management and business intelligence: The importance of integration. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4), 45–55. doi:10.1108/13673270510610323
   Google Scholar
• Igbaria, M., Livari, J., & Maragahh, H. (1995). Why do individuals use computer technology? A finnish case study. Information and Management, 29, 227–238. doi:10.1016/0378-7206(95)00031-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, J., & Ellen, C. (2009). Business need, data and business intelligence. Journal of Digital Asset Management, 5(1), 10–20. doi:10.1057/dam.2008.53
   Google Scholar
• Jourdan, Z., Rainer, R. K., & Marshall, T. E. (2008). Business intelligence: An analysis of the literature. Information Systems Management, 25(2), 121–131. doi:10.1080/10580530801941512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohavi, R. (1995). A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2 (IJCAI’95), Vol. 2. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1137–1143.
   Google Scholar
• Krejcie, R., & Morgan, D. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610. doi:10.1177/001316447003000308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajevardi, J., & Rahimi, P. A. (2012). Business intelligence and its effect on improving port operation. Didgah Journal, 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities (2017). Retrieved from: http://www.mota.gov.jo
   Google Scholar
• Olaru, C. (2014). Business intelligence in telecommunications industry. International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories, 4(1), 89–100.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows version 12. Chicago, Illinois: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan, T., Jones, M. C., & Sidorova, A. (2012). Factors influencing business intelligence (bi) data collection strategies: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 52(2), 486–496. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjan, J. (2009). Business intelligence: Concepts, components, techniques and benefits. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 9(1), 60–70.
   Google Scholar
• Sahay, B. S., & Ranjan, J. (2008). Real time business intelligence in supply chain analytics. Information Management & Computer Security, 16(1), 28–48. doi:10.1108/09685220810862733
   Google Scholar
• Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (6th ed.). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shankaranarayanan, G., & Cai, Y. (2006). Supporting data quality management in decision-making. Decision Support Systems, 42(1), 302–317. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2004.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankaranarayanan, G., & Even, A. (2004). Managing metadata in data warehouses: Pitfalls and possibilities. The Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 14(1), 47.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, B. (2003). An exploratory investigation of system success factors in data warehousing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 6. doi:10.17705/1jais.00033
   Google Scholar
• Turban, E., Sharda, R., & Delen, D. (2011). Decision support and business intelligence systems. Pearson Education India.
   Google Scholar
• Vassiliadis, P., Simitsis, A., & Georgantas, P. (2005). A Generic and Customizable Framework for the Design of ETL Scenarios. Information Systems, 30(7), 492–525. doi:10.1016/j.is.2004.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, H. J., & Wixom, B. H. (2007). The current state of business intelligence. Computer, 40(9). doi:10.1109/MC.2007.331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witten, I., Frank, E., & Hall, M. (2011). Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, D., Song, H., & Shen, S. (2017). New developments in tourism and hotel demand modelling and forecasting. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(1), 507–529. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-05-2015-0249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeoh, W., Koronios, A., & Gao, J. (2008). Managing the implementation of business intelligence systems: A critical success factors framework. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 4(3). doi:10.4018/jeis.2008070106
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, L., Xu, L., Shi, Z., Wang, M., & Wu, W. (2006). Techniques, process, and enterprise solutions of business intelligence. In Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2006. SMC’06. IEEE International Conference on (Vol. 6, pp. 4722–4726). Taipei, Taiwan, IEEE.
   Google Scholar