REFERENCES
- Appelbaum, P. S. 1993. Must we forgo informed consent to control health care costs? A response to Mark A. Hall. Milbank Quarterly 71: 669.
- Blumstein, J. F. 2002. The legal liability regime: How well is it doing in assuring quality, accounting for costs, and coping with an evolving reality in the healthcare marketplace? Annals of Health Law 11: 125.
- Carlsen, B., and O. F. Norheim. 2005. Saying no is no easy matter: A qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practice. BMC Health Services Research 1: 5.
- Dobbs, D. B., et al. 2013. The law of torts, 2nd ed. Eagan, MN: Thomson West.
- Ginsburg, M. E., et al. 2000. A survey of physician attitudes and practices concerning cost-effectiveness in patient care. Western Journal of Medicine 173: 390, 393.
- Hall, M. A. 1989. The malpractice standard under health care cost containment. Law, Medicine and Health Care 17: 347, 348.
- Haavi Morreim, E. 1991. Economic disclosure and economic advocacy: New duties in the medical standard of care. Journal of Legal Medicine 12: 275, 292.
- Peters, P. G., Jr. 2000. The quiet demise of deference to custom: Malpractice law at the millennium. Washington and Lee Law Review 57: 163, 202–203.
- Strech, D., et al. 2008. How physicians allocate scarce resources at the bedside: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33: 80, 95.
- Tilburt, J. C. 2014. Addressing dual agency: Getting specific about the expectations of professionalism. American Journal of Bioethics 14(9): 29–36.
- Walter, A., and C. Chew-Graham. 2012. Negotiating refusal in primary care consultations: A qualitative study. Family Practice 29: 488, 495.