183
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Case Commentaries

Conflicts Between Regulations and Ethical Principles: Resolving Ambiguity in Favor of the Ethically Preferable Outcome

&

REFERENCES

  • Bierer B. E., M. Barnes, and H. F. Lynch. 2017. Revised ‘Common Rule’ shapes protections for research participants. Health Affairs 36 (5): 784–788. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0307.
  • Department of Health and Human Services. 2017. Code of Federal Regulations: Protection of human subjects, subpart B—Additional protections for pregnant women, human fetuses and neonates involved in research. Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html#subpartb (access November 24, 2017).
  • Horng, S., and F. G. Miller. 2003. Ethical framework for the use of sham procedures in clinical trials. Critical Care Medicine 31 (3 Suppl.):S126–30. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000054906.49187.67.
  • Lyerly, A. D., M. O. Little, and R. Faden. 2008. The second wave: Toward responsible inclusion of pregnant women in research. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):5–22. doi:10.1353/ijf.0.0047.
  • Weijer, C. 2004. The ethical analysis of risk in intensive care unit research. Critical Care 8 (2):85–86. doi:10.1186/cc2822.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.