References
- American Psychiatric Association 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: APA.
- American Psychiatric Association. 1994. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: APA.
- Campbell, J. I. et al. 2018. Dependence on digital medicine in resouce-limited settings. American Journal of Bioethics 18(9): 54–6.
- Caplan, A. 2015. Would you take a Digital Pill? Bioethcist Warns About Privacy Risk. NBCNews [cited https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/bioethicist-digital-snitch-pill-may-destroy-our-medical-privacy-n430091.
- Carter, A. et al. 2018. Surveillance medicine in the digital era: Lessons from addiction treatment. American Journal of Bioethics 18(9): 58–60.
- Chakrabarti, S. 2014. What’s in a name? compliance, adherence and concordance in chronic psychiatric disorders. World Journal of Psychiatry 4(2): 30–36.
- Chen, J. 2018. Adherence to PrEP, the HIV prevention drug, is low. A new study suggests a pill with a tiny sensor might help. STATNews [cited August 14, 2018] https://www.statnews.com/2018/07/24/digital-pill-prep-truvada/.
- Glogow, E. 1973. Noncompliance—a dilemma. The Sight-Saving Review 43(1): 29–34.
- Gordon, M., and North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. 1987. Manual of nursing diagnosis, 1986-1987. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Gorr, M. 1986. Toward a theory of coercion. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16(3): 383–406.
- Guta, A. et al. 2018. Resisting the digital medicine panopticon: Towards a bioethics of the oppressed. American Journal of Bioethics 18(9): 48–9.
- Jongsma, K. R. et al. 2018. Digital medicine: An opportunity to revisit the role of bioethicsts. American Journal of Bioethics 18(9): 69–70.
- Lamond, G. 1996. Coercion, threats, and the puzzle of blackmail. In Harm and culpability, ed. A. P. Simester and A. T. H. Smith, 215–238. Oxford UK: Clarendon Press.
- Martinez-Martin, N., and D. Char. 2018. Surveillance and digital health. American Journal of Bioethics 18(9): 67–8.
- McNiel, D. E., B. R. Gormley, and L. Binder. 2013. Leverage, the treatment relationship, and treatment participation. Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.) 64(5): 431–436.
- O'Neill, O. 1991. Which are the offers you can't refuse? In Violence, terrorism, and justice, ed. R. G. Frey and C. Morris, 170–195. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Proteus Digital Health®. 2018. Announces digital medicines pipeline development and expansion into oncology. BusinessWire [cited August 18, 2018] https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180425005798/en/.
- Shafer, D. W., and C. M. Kigin. 2002. What is digital medicine? In Future of Health Technology, ed. R. G. Buskop, 195–204. IOS Press.
- Swartz, A. K. 2018. Smart pills for psychosis: The tricky ethical challenges of digital medicine for serious mental illness. American Journal of Bioethics 18(9): 65–7.
- Swirsky, E. S., and A. D. Boyd. 2018. Adherence, surveillance, and technological hubris. American Journal of Bioethics 18(9): 61–2.
- Szmukler, G., and P. S. Appelbaum. 2008. Treatment pressures, leverage, coercion, and compulsion in mental health care. Journal of Mental Health 17(3): 233–244. doi: 10.1080/09638230802052203.
- Terrasse, M., and D. Sisti. 2018. Policing compliance: Digital medicine and criminal justice-involved persons. American Journal of Bioethics 18(9): 57–8.
- Tomlinson, T. 2018. Getting off the leash. American Journal of Bioethics 18(9): 48–9.
- Wertheimer, A. 1987. Coercion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.