http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5233-5000
REFERENCES
- Draper, H., G. Moorlock, W. Rogers, and J. Leach-Scully. 2019. Bioethics and Activism. Bioethics 33(8): 853–856. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12680.
- Dunn, M., M. Sheehan, M. Parker, and T. Hope. 2012. Toward methodological innovation in empirical ethics research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21(4): 466–480. doi: 10.1017/S0963180112000242.
- Haimes, E. 2002. What can the Social Sciences Contribute to the study of Ethics? Theoretical, empirical and substantive considerations. Bioethics 16(2): 89–113. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00273.
- Hedgecoe, A. 2004. Critical Bioethics: Beyond the social science critique of applied ethics. Bioethics 18(2): 120–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00385.x.
- Huxtable, R., and J. Ives. 2019. Mapping, Framing, Shaping: A framework for empirical bioethics research projects. BMC Medical Ethics 20(1). doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0428-0.
- Ives, J. 2014. A method of reflexive balancing in a pragmatic, interdisciplinary and reflexive bioethics. Bioethics 28(6): 302–312. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12018.
- Ives, J., M. Dunn, and A. Cribb, eds. 2017. Empirical bioethics: Practical and theoretical perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Ives, J., M. Dunn, B. Molewijk, et al. 2018. Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: Towards a consensus. BMC Medical Ethics 19(1): 68. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0302-5.
- Ives, J., and H. Draper. 2009. Appropriate methodologies for Empirical Bioethics: It’s all relative. Bioethics 23(4): 249–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01715.x.
- Sisk, B. A. J. Mozersky, A. L. Antes, and J. M. DuBois. 2020. The “ought-is” problem: An implementation science framework for translating ethical norms into practice. American Journal of Bioethics 20(4): 62–70.