146
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Correspondence

Response to Open Peer Commentaries: On Social Harms, Big Tech, and Institutional Accountability

, ORCID Icon &

REFERENCES

  • Aggarwal, R., S. Farag, G. Martin, H. Ashrafian, and A. Darzi. 2021. Patient perceptions on data sharing and applying artificial intelligence to health care data: Cross-sectional survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 23 (8):e26162.
  • Anderson, J. A. 2009. Contextualizing clinical research: The epistemological role of clinical equipoise. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (4):269–88. doi:10.1007/s11017-009-9104-6.
  • Bracken-Roche, D., E. Bell, M. E. Macdonald, and E. Racine. 2017. The concept of “vulnerability” in research ethics: An in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines. Health Research Policy and Systems 15 (1):8. doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0164-6.
  • Futoma, J., M. Simons, T. Panch, F. Doshi-Velez, and L. A. Celi. 2020. The myth of generalisability in clinical research and machine learning in health care. The Lancet. Digital Health 2 (9):e489–92.
  • George, L., J. Tauri, and L. Te Ata O Tu MacDonald. 2020. Indigenous research ethics: Claiming research sovereignty beyond deficit and the colonial legacy. Melbourne: Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Gichoya, J. W., L. G. McCoy, L. A. Celi, and M. Ghassemi. 2021. Equity in essence: A call for operationalising fairness in machine learning for healthcare. BMJ Health & Care Informatics 28 (1):e100289. doi:10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100289.
  • Hurst, S. A. 2008. Vulnerability in research and health care; describing the elephant in the room? Bioethics 22 (4):191–202. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00631.x.
  • Levi, M., M. Bernstein, and C. Waeiss. 2022. Broadening the ethical scope. The American Journal of Bioethics 22 (5):26–8. doi:10.1080/15265161.2022.2055219.
  • Martinez-Martin, N., and M. K. Cho. 2022. Bridging the AI chasm: Can EBM address representation and fairness in clinical machine learning? The American Journal of Bioethics 22 (5):30–2. doi:10.1080/15265161.2022.2055212.
  • McCradden, M. D., J. A. Anderson, E. A. Stephenson, E. Drysdale, L. Erdman, A. Goldenberg, and R. Zlotnik Shaul. 2022. A research ethics framework for the clinical translation of healthcare machine learning. The American Journal of Bioethics 22 (5):8–22. doi:10.1080/15265161.2021.2013977.
  • McCradden, M. D., A. Baba, A. Saha, S. Ahmad, K. Boparai, P. Fadaiefard, and M. D. Cusimano. 2020. Ethical concerns around use of artificial intelligence in health care research from the perspective of patients with meningioma, caregivers and health care providers: A qualitative study. CMAJ Open 8 (1):E90–5. doi:10.9778/cmajo.20190151.
  • McCradden, M. D., T. Sarker, and P. A. Paprica. 2020. Conditionally positive: A qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research. BMJ Open 10 (10):e039798. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039798.
  • Shaw, J. 2022. Emerging paradigms for ethical review of research using artificial intelligence. The American Journal of Bioethics 22 (5):42–4. doi:10.1080/15265161.2022.2055206.
  • Solomon, S. R. 2013. Protecting and respecting the vulnerable: Existing regulations or further protections? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (1):17–28. doi:10.1007/s11017-013-9242-8.
  • Sounderajah, V., M. D. McCradden, X. Liu, et al. 2022. Ethics methods are required as part of reporting guidelines for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nature Machine Intelligence 4 (4):316–7.
  • Unsworth, H., V. Wolfram, B. Dillon, M. Salmon, F. Greaves, X. Liu, T. MacDonald, A. K. Denniston, V. Sounderajah, H. Ashrafian, et al. 2022. Building an evidence standards framework for artificial intelligence-enabled digital health technologies. The Lancet. Digital Health 4 (4):e216–7. doi:10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00030-9.
  • Vandemeulebroucke, T., Y. Denier, and C. Gastmans. 2022. The need for a global approach to the ethical evaluation of healthcare machine learning. The American Journal of Bioethics 22 (5):33–5. doi:10.1080/15265161.2022.2055207.
  • Vayena, E., A. Blasimme. 2022. A systemic approach to the oversight of machine learning clinical translation. The American Journal of Bioethics 22 (4):23–5. doi:10.1080/15265161.2022.2055216.
  • Walter, M., and M. Suina. 2019. Indigenous data, indigenous methodologies and indigenous data sovereignty. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 22 (3):233–43. doi:10.1080/13645579.2018.1531228.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.