Advanced search
Publication Cover
The American Journal of Bioethics Volume 23, 2023 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
125
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Open Peer Commentaries

Considering the Collective in Ethical Decision-Making Concerning Non-Medical Uses of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing

Tess JohnsonUniversity of Oxford, Ethox CentreCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2071-4302View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 23-25 | Published online: 15 Mar 2023

REFERENCES

  • Anomaly, J., and T. Johnson. Forthcoming. The ethics of genetic enhancement: Key concepts and future prospects. In The ethics of human enhancement, ed. F. Jotterand and M. Inenca. London: Routledge.
  • Bowman-Smart, H, et al. 2023. Non-invasive prenatal testing for ‘non-medical’ traits: Ensuring consistency in ethical decision-making. The American Journal of Bioethics 23(3): 3–20. doi:10.1080/15265161.2021.1996659.
  • Cabrera, L. 2017. Reframing human enhancement: A population health perspective. Frontiers in Sociology 2: Article 4. doi:10.3389/fsoc.2017.00004.
  • Douglas, T., and K. Devolder. 2013. Procreative altruism: Beyond individualism in reproductive selection. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (4):400–19. doi:10.1093/jmp/jht022.
  • Johnson, Tess. 2021. Enhancing the collectivist critique: Accounts of the human enhancement debate. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 24: 721–730. doi:10.1007/s11019-021-10030-7.
  • McTernan, E. 2014. Should fertility treatment be state funded? Journal of Applied Philosophy 32:227–40. doi:10.1111/japp.12091.
  • Ravitsky, V. 2017. The shifting landscape of prenatal testing: Between reproductive autonomy and public health. The Hastings Center Report 47 (6):S34–S40. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00003.x.
  • Savulescu, J. 2001. Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children. Bioethics 15 (5–6):413–26. doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00251.
  • Singer, P. 1972. Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229–43.
  • Zagorsky, J. 2007. Do you have to be smart to be rich? The impact of IQ on wealth, income and financial distress. Intelligence 35 (5):489–501. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2007.02.003.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.