https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2071-4302
REFERENCES
- Anderson, S. 2010. The enforcement approach to coercion. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 5 (1):1–32. doi: 10.26556/jesp.v5i1.47.
- Barnhill, A., M. Bonotti, and D. Susser. 2023. Vaccine passports and political legitimacy: A public reason framework for policymakers. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 26 (5):667–87. doi: 10.1007/s10677-022-10361-1.
- Johnson, T. 2024a. Stewardship according to context: Justifications for coercive antimicrobial stewardship policies in agriculture and their limitations. Bioethics 38 (5):469–76. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13292.
- Johnson, T. 2024b. Developing an ethical evaluation framework for coercive antimicrobial stewardship policies. Public Health Ethics. doi: 10.1093/phe/phae005.
- Johnson, T., and W. Matlock. 2023. Justifying the more restrictive alternative: Ethical justifications for one health AMR policies rely on empirical evidence. Public Health Ethics 16 (1):22–34. doi: 10.1093/phe/phac025.
- Nozick, R. 1969. Coercion. In Philosophy, science, and method: Essays in honor of Ernest Nagel, edited by Sidney Morgenbesser, Patrick Suppes, and Morton White, 440–472. New York: St Martin’s Press.
- Nuffield Council on Bioethics 2020. COVID-19 antibody testing and ‘immunity certification. [Rapid policy briefing] https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/publications/covid-19-antibody-testing-and-immunity-certification
- Ortiz-Millán, G. 2023. COVID-19 health passes: Practical and ethical issues. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 20 (1):125–38. doi: 10.1007/s11673-022-10227-2.
- Park, J., and B. Davies. 2024. Rationing, responsibility, and vaccination during COVID-19: A conceptual map. The American Journal of Bioethics 24 (7):66–79. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2201188.