18
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Open Peer Commentaries

Personalized Patient Preference Predictors Are Neither Technically Feasible nor Ethically Desirable

REFERENCES

  • Earp, B. D., S. Porsdam Mann, J. Allen, S. Salloch, V. Suren, K. Jongsma, M. Braun, D. Wilkinson, W. Sinnott-Armstrong, A. Rid, et al. 2024. A personalized patient preference predictor for substituted judgments in healthcare: Technically feasible and ethically desirable. The American Journal of Bioethics 24 (7):13–26. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2296402.
  • Harding, J., and N. Sharadin. 2024. What is it for a machine learning system to have a capability?
  • John, S. 2014. Patient preference predictors, apt categorization, and respect for autonomy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (2):169–77. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhu008.
  • Liang, P., R. Bommasani, T. Lee, D. Tsipras, D. Soylu, M. Yasunaga, Y. Zhang, et al. 2022. Holistic evaluation of language models. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2211.09110.
  • Perdomo, J., T. Zrnic, C. Mendler-Dünner, and M. Hardt. 2020. Performative prediction. Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, 7599–7609. PMLR. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v119/perdomo20a.html.
  • Perez, E., S. Ringer, K. Lukošiūtė, K. Nguyen, E. Chen, S. Heiner, C. Pettit, et al. 2022. Discovering language model behaviors with model-written evaluations. arXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2212.09251.
  • Ribeiro, M. H., R. Ottoni, R. West, V. A. F. Almeida, and W. Meira. 2020. Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 131–41. FAT* ‘20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. doi: 10.1145/3351095.3372879.
  • Sharadin, N. 2019. Should aggregate patient preference data be used to make decisions on behalf of unrepresented patients? AMA Journal of Ethics 21 (7):566–74.
  • Sharadin, N. 2024. Predicting and preferring. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy. https://philarchive.org/rec/SHAPAP-28.
  • Sharadin, N. P. 2018. Patient preference predictors and the problem of naked statistical evidence. Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (12):857–62. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104509.
  • Stiennon, N., L. Ouyang, J. Wu, D. Ziegler, R. Lowe, C. Voss, A. Radford, D. Amodei, and P. F. Christiano. 2020. Learning to summarize with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33:3008–21. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/hash/1f89885d556929e98d3ef9b86448f951-Abstract.html.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.