Cultural Barriers and Familial Resources for Negotiation of Engineering Careers Among Young Women: Relational Dialectics Theory in an Asian Perspective

References

• Anderson, M., & Shrum, W. (2007). Circumvention and social change: ICTs and the discourse of empowerment. Women’s Studies in Communication, 30, 229–253. doi:10.1080/07491409.2007.10162514
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans., pp. 259–422). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics ( C. Emerson, Ed. and Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres & other late essays (W. McGee, Trans., pp. 60–102). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A. (2004). A tale of two voices: Relational dialectics theory. Journal of Family Communication, 4, 181–192. doi:10.1080/15267431.2004.9670130
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A. (2011). Voicing relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2008). Relational dialectics theory. In L. A. Baxter, & D. O. Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (pp. 349–361). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues & dialectics. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, E., & Nkomo, S. M. (2001). Our separate ways. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkelaar, B. L., Buzzanell, P. M., Kisselburgh, L. G., Tan, W., & Shen, Y. (2012). “First, it’s dirty. Second, it’s dangerous. Third, it’s insulting”: Urban Chinese children talk about dirty work. Communication Monographs, 79, 93–114. doi:10.1080/03637751.2011.646490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, S. L. (2014). Parental involvement and children’s educational performance: A comparison of Filipino and U.S. parents. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 45, 351–366. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24339542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Supporting a grounded theory with an audit trail: An illustration. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12, 305–316. doi:10.1080/13645570802156196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. O., & Baxter, L. A. (2006). “You’re my parent but you’re not”: Dialectical tensions in stepchildren’s perceptions about communicating with the non-residential parent. Journal of Applied Communication Research., 34, 30–48. doi:10.1080/00909880500420200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. O., Toller, P. W., Daas, K. L., Durham, W. T., & Jones, A. C. (2008). Centered but not caught in the middle: Stepchildren’s perceptions of dialectical contradictions in the communication of co-parents. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 33–55. doi:10.1080/00909880701799337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Buzzanell, P. M., Berkelaar, B. L., & Kisselburgh, L. (2011). From the mouths of babes: Exploring families’ career socialization of young children in China, Lebanon, Belgium, and the United States. Journal of Family Communication, 11, 148–164. doi:10.1080/15267431.2011.554494
   Google Scholar
• Buzzanell, P. M., & Lucas, K. (2006). Gendered stories of career: Unfolding discourses of time, space, and identity. In B. J. Dow & J. T. Wood (Eds.), The Sage handbook on gender and communication (pp. 161–178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cannady, M. A., Greenwald, E., & Harris, K. N. (2014). Problematizing the STEM pipeline metaphor: Is the STEM pipeline metaphor serving our students and the STEM workforce? Science Education, 98, 443–460. doi:10.1002/sce.21108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. L. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences, USA, 108, 3157–3162. doi:10.1073/pnas.1014871108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collingwood, H. (2001). Leadership’s first commandment: Know thyself. Harvard Business Review, 79(11), 8.
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, D. L. (1988). Engineering humor: Masculinity, joking and conflict in shop floor relations. Organization Studies, 9, 181–199. doi:10.1177/017084068800900203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, D. (2015). Sustaining the pipeline: Experiences and negotiations of international women engineers in United States graduate programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 104, 326–344. doi:10.1002/jee.20077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, D. (2016). Negotiations of cultural identities by Indian women engineering students in US engineering programmes. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 45, 177–195. doi:10.1080/17475759.2016.1165727
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. (2007). Where are all these women? Gender differences in participation in physical sciences and engineering. In S. J. Ceci & W. L. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? (pp. 119–209). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. (2009). Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures: Gender in/authenticity and the invisibility paradox. Engineering Studies, 1, 169–189. doi:10.1080/19378620903225059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frome, P. M., & Eccles, J. S. (1998). Parents’ influence on children’s achievement-related perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 435–452. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, D. J., & Baxter, L. A. (1996). Constituting relationships in talk a taxonomy of speech events in social and personal relationships. Human Communication Research, 23, 87–114. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00388.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, N. (2007). Indian women in doctoral education in science and engineering a study of informal milieu at the reputed Indian Institutes of Technology. Science, Technology & Human Values, 32, 507–533. doi:10.1177/0895904805303200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurer, D., & Camp, T. (2002). An ACM-W literature review on women in computing. SIGCSE Bulletin, 34, 121–127. doi:10.1145/543812.543846
   Google Scholar
• Halliwell, D. (2016). Extending relational dialectics theory: Exploring new avenues of research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 39, 67–95. doi:10.1080/23808985.2015.11679172
   Google Scholar
• Harvard Family Research Project. (2007). Family involvement in middle and high school students’ education. Retrieved from resources/publications-series/family-involvement-makes-a-difference/family-involvement-in-middle-and-high-school-students-education
   Google Scholar
• Helwig, A. (2004). A ten-year longitudinal study of the career development of students: Summary findings. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82, 49–57. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Report of the American Association of University Women. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED509653&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED509653
   Google Scholar
• Holmegaard, H. T. (2015). Performing a choice-narrative: A qualitative study of the patterns in STEM students’ higher education choices. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 1454–1477. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1042940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, N. (2015). When family narratives conflict: An autoethnography of my mother’s secrets. Journal of Family Communication, 15, 113–129. doi:10.1080/15267431.2015.1013108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ing, M. (2014). Can parents influence children’s mathematics achievement and persistence in STEM careers? Journal of Career Development, 41, 87–103. doi:10.1177/0894845313481672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jablin, F. (2001). Organizational entry, assimilation, and disengagement/exit. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 732–818). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kidder, L. H. (1981). Qualitative research and quasi-experimental frameworks. In M. B. Brewer & B. E. Collins (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences (pp. 226–256). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kisselburgh, L. G., Berkelaar, B. L., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2009). Discourse, gender, and the meaning of work: Rearticulating science, technology, and engineering careers through communicative lenses. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 33 (pp. 384–408). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, N. (2001). Gender and stratification in science an empirical study in the Indian setting. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 8, 51–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, G. (2006). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high tech corporation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M., Jackson, M. H., & Diwan, A. (2009). The enactment-externalization dialectic: Rationalization and the persistence of counterproductive technology design practices in student engineering. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 400–420. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.37315471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litzler, E., Samuelson, C. C., & Lorah, J. A. (2014). Breaking it down: Engineering student STEM confidence at the intersection of race/ethnicity and gender. Research in Higher Education, 55, 810–832. doi:10.1007/s11162-014-9333-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F. (2006). Boys as only-children and girls as only-children: Parental gendered expectations of the only-child in the nuclear Chinese family in present-day China. Gender and Education, 18, 491–505. doi:10.1080/09540250600881626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, K. (2011). Socializing messages in blue-collar families: Communicative pathways to social mobility and reproduction. Western Journal of Communication, 75, 95–121. doi:10.1080/10570314.2010.536964
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, K., Liu, M., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2006). No limits careers: A critical examination of career discourse in the US and China. In M. Orbe, B. Allen, & L. Flores (Eds.), International and intercultural communication annual 28 (pp. 217–242). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2003). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf, H. (2010). Stuck in the pipeline: A critical review of STEM workforce literature. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 6(2), 1–20. Article 4. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6zf09176
   Google Scholar
• Myers, K. K., Jahn, J. L., Gailliard, B. M., & Stoltzfus, K. (2011). Vocational anticipatory socialization (VAS): A communicative model of adolescents’ interests in STEM. Management Communication Quarterly, 25, 87–120. doi:10.1177/0893318910377068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering [NAE]. (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., Kisselburgh, L. G., Berkelaar, B. L., Buzzanell, P. M., Mastronardi, M., Jackson, M., … Wang, J. (2008). 21st century STEM careers: Communication perspectives and research opportunities. In L. M. Harter, M. J. Dutta, & C. C. Cole (Eds.), Communicating for social impact: Engaging theory, research and Pedagogy (pp. 47–62). Cressskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shenoy, S. (2009). Women and work in India: (Re)engaging class, careers, and occupations in a globalizing economy ( Unpublished dissertation). Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, T. D., Tan, A. G., & Hoffman, C. M. (2005). Digest of education statistics 2005. Publication from National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2006030
   Google Scholar
• Spelke, E., & Grace, A. (2007). Sex, math, and science. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? (pp. 27–37). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2015). Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality. Intelligence, 48, 137–151. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stohl, C. (1986). The role of memorable messages in the process of organizational socialization. Communication Quarterly, 34, 231–249. doi:10.1080/01463378609369638
   Google Scholar
• Stonyer, H. (2002). Making engineering students-making women: The discursive content of engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18, 392–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter, E. A., Baxter, L. A., Seurer, L. M., & Thomas, L. J. (2014). Discursive constructions of the meaning of “family” in online narratives of foster adoptive parents. Communication Monographs, 81, 59–78. doi:10.1080/03637751.2014.880791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, W. (2010, January 25). Overview of educational reforms in the People’s Republic of China. Presentation to the Department of Communication, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods. London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Valian, V. (1999). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valian, V. (2007). Women at the top in science—And elsewhere. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 27–37). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Valla, J. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2014). Breadth-based models of women’s underrepresentation in STEM fields: An integrative commentary on Schmidt (2011) and Nye et al. (2012). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 219–224. doi:10.1177/1745691614522067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., Eccles, J., & Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 24, 770–775. doi:10.1177/0956797612458937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T. R. (2014). I’m the only person where I’m from to go to college: Understanding the memorable messages first generation college students receive from parents. Journal of Family Communication, 14, 270–290. doi:10.1080/15267431.2014.908195
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T. R., & Nuru, A. K. (2017). “He wanted me to achieve that for our family and I did, too”: Exploring first-eneration students’ experiences of turning points during the transition to college. Journal of Family Communication, 17, 153–168. doi:10.1080/15267431.2016.1264401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wozniak, A., Lollis, S., & Marshall, S. K. (2014). Competing discourses within parent–adolescent conversations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 847–867. doi:10.1177/0265407513508726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar