Development of a two stage liability allocation process in case of multiple party pollution

References

• Abraham, S. K. 1988. Environmental liability and limits of insurance. Columbia Law Review 88(5):942–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamson, D. T., Mahendra, S., Jr., K. L, W., Rauch, S. R., Sengupta, S., and Newell, C. J. 2014. A multisite survey to identify the scale of the 1,4-dioxane problem at contaminated groundwater sites. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 1(5):254–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashwini, S. K., and Varghese, G. K. 2019. Environmental forensic analysis of the microplastic pollution at “Nattika” Beach, Kerala Coast, India. Environmental Forensics 21(1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashwini, S. K., and Varghese, G. K. 2021. Source apportionment of marine microplastics: First step towards managing microplastic pollution. Chemical Engineering & Technology 44(5):906–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 2021. Available at: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ (accessed February 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Besser, H., and Hamed, Y. 2019. Causes and risk evaluation of oil and brine contamination in the Lower Cretaceous Continental Intercalaire aquifer in the Kebili region of southern Tunisia using chemical fingerprinting techniques. Environmental Pollution (Barking, Essex: 1987) 253:412–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, M. E. 2015. Critical subset allocation: A framework for complex remedial sites. Environmental Forensics 16(2):186–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, United Kingdom. 2006. Defra Circular 01/2006 Environmental Protection Act 1990 : Part 2 A Contaminated land. 1-200. www.defra.gov.uk.
   Google Scholar
• ECETOC (European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology for chemicals). 2021. Available at: https://www.ecetoc.org/ (accessed February 2021).
   Google Scholar
• ECETOC (European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology for chemicals). 2003. Persistence of chemicals in the environment. Technical report No.90. ISSN-0773-8072-90
   Google Scholar
• ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2021. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/ (accessed February 2021).
   Google Scholar
• ECOTOX (ECOTOXicology knowledgebase). 2021. Available at: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ecotox/ (accessed February 2021).
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2021. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/ (accessed February 2021).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 1990. Environmental Protection Act. Published by The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2006. Regulation (EC) no 1907/2006 of the European parliament and of the Council.
   Google Scholar
• Francová, A., Chrastný, V., Šillerová, H., Kocourková, J., and Komárek, M. 2017. Suitability of selected bioindicators of atmospheric pollution in the industrialised region of Ostrava, Upper Silesia, Czech Republic. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 189(478):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Friberg, M. D., Zhai, X. D., Holmes, H., Chang, H. H., Strickland, M., Sarnat, S. E., et al. 2016. Method for fusing observational data and chemical transport model simulations to estimate spatiotemporally resolved ambient air pollution. Environmental Science and Technology 50(7):1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FRTR (Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable). 2021. Available at: https://frtr.gov/matrix/default.cfm (accessed February 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Gorgij, D. A., Ozgur, K., Moghaddam, A. A., and Taghipour, A. 2017. Groundwater quality ranking for drinking purposes, using the entropy method and the spatial autocorrelation index. Environmental Earth Sciences 76(7):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, B. J., Jordan, D., Carton, D., Stephens, D. B., and Francis, M. A. 2000. Allocating responsibility for groundwater remediation costs. Trial Lawyer 23(2):159–171.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, D., O’Connor, D., Nathanail, P., Tian, L., and Ma, Y. 2017. Integrated GIS and multivariate statistical analysis for regional scale assessment of heavy metal soil contamination: A critical review. Environmental Pollution 231(1):1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• INTERPOL. 2014. Police Crime Forensic Investigation Manual (Vols. 1 and 2).  Lyon: INTERPOL General Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• IRIS (Integrated Risk Information System). 2021. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/iris (accessed February 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, R., Hinsby, K., Aamand, J., van der Keur, P., Kidmose, J., Purtschert, R., et al. 2020. History and sources of co-occurring pesticides in an abstraction well unraveled by age distributions of depth-specific groundwater samples. Environmental Science & Technology 54:158–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, S., Kwon, M., Yang, J., and Lee, S. 2017. Identifying the source of Zn in soils around a Zn smelter using Pb isotope ratios and mineralogical analysis. Science of the Total Environment 601–602:66–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamath, R., Connor, J. A., McHugh, T. E., Nemir, A., Le, M. P., and Ryan, A. J. 2012. Use of long-term monitoring data to evaluate benzene, MTBE, and TBA plume behavior in groundwater at retail gasoline sites. Journal of Environmental Engineering 138(4):458–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanbar, H. J., Montargès-Pelletier, E., Losson, B., Bihannic, I., Gley, R., Bauer, A., et al. 2017. Iron mineralogy as a fingerprint of former steelmaking activities in river sediments. The Science of the Total Environment 599–600:540–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, M. M., Rogers, D. T., and Murray, K. S. 2005. An empirical model for estimating remediation costs at contaminated sites. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 167:365–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazemi-Beydokhti, M., Abbaspour, R., Ali, Kheradmandi, M., and Bozorgi-Amiri, A. 2019. Determination of the physical domain for air quality monitoring stations using the ANP-OWA method in GIS. Environmental Monitoring Assessment 191(2):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Khashei-Siuki, A., Keshavarz, A., and Sharifan, H. 2019. Comparison of AHP and FAHP methods in determining suitable areas for drinking water harvesting in Birjand aquifer. Iran. Groundwater for Sustainable Development 10:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C., Zhou, K., Qin, W., Tian, C., Qi, M., Yan, X., et al. 2019. A review on heavy metals contamination in soil: effects, sources, and remediation techniques. Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal 28(4):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., Hsu, S., Chou, C. C., Zhang, R., Wu, Y., Kao, S., et al. 2015. Wintertime haze deterioration in Beijing by industrial pollution deduced from trace metal fingerprints and enhanced health risk by heavy metals. Environmental Pollution 208:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., Li, W., Song, W., and Guo, M. 2018. Remediation techniques for heavy metal-contaminated soils: Principles and applicability. The Science of the Total Environment 633:206–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Vicente, M., Onda, Y., Takahashi, J., Kato, H., Chayama, S., and Hisadome, K. 2018. Radiocesium concentrations in soil and leaf after decontamination practices in a forest plantation highly polluted by the Fukushima accident. Environmental Pollution 239:448–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., Zhan, W., and Hu, C. 2016. Detecting and quantifying oil slick thickness by thermal remote sensing: A ground-based experiment. Remote Sensing of Environment 181:207–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marryott, R. A., Sabadell, G. P., Ahlfeld, D. P., Harris, R. H., and Pinder, G. F. 2000. Allocating remedial costs at superfund sites with commingled groundwater contaminant plumes. Environmental Forensics 1:47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, T. M., Newell, C. J., Osario, X., Walker, K. L., and Keat, A. J. 2020. Allocating remedial costs at a superfund site using risk magnitude, geographic information systems, and Monte Carlo analysis. Environmental Forensics 21(2):223–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment and Forest. 1974. The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act. Act Number 6. Act Id 197606.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment and Forest. 1981. The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act. Act Number 14. Act Id 198114.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment. 2006. Air Pollution Control Act Japan. Act Number 97..
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. 1999. Canadian Environmental Protection Act. S.C. 1999, c.33.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, R. D., and Murphy, B. L. 2015. Introduction to Environmental Forensics. Academic Press. Oxford, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Mudge, S. M. 2008. Environmental forensics and the importance of source identification. In Environmental Forensics, eds. Hester, R. E., and Harrison, R. M. Royal Society of Chemistry, 1–17. Cambridge, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, B. L. 2000. Allocation by contribution to cost and risk at superfund sites. Environmental Forensics 1:117–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIOSH (The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). 2021. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/index.htm (accessed February 2021).
   Google Scholar
• NPIC (National Pesticide Information Center). 2021. Available at: http://npic.orst.edu/ (accessed February 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Ossai, I. C., Ahmed, A., Hassan, A., and Hamid, F. S. 2019. Remediation of soil and water contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbon: A review. Environmental Technology & Innovation 17 :1–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owete, O. S. 2007. Cost allocation strategies at Florida petroleum cleanup facilities: A tiered decision approach. Environmental Forensics 8 (4):329–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrisor, I. G. 2014. Environmental Forensics Fundamentals: A Practical Guide. CRC Press. Boca Raton, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Pivato, A., Gwinett, C., and Varghese, G. 2020a. Environmental crime scene analysis. Detritus 10(12):1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Pivato, A., Gwinett, C., and Varghese, G. 2020b. Environmental forensics: The what? when? where? why? and how? Detritus 10 (12):3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Priya, L., Varghese, G. K., and Shah, I. K. 2020. Liability allocation in pollution involving multiple responsible parties. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati, O., and Melesse, A. M. 2016. Application of Dempster–Shafer theory, spatial analysis and remote sensing for groundwater potentiality and nitrate pollution analysis in the semi-arid region of Khuzestan, Iran. Science of the Total Environment 568(15):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, K. R. 2010. Technical challenges to in-situ remediation of polluted sites. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 28:211–221.
   Google Scholar
• Samad, M. S. A., Mohan, P., Varghese, G. K., Shah, I. K., and Alappat, B. J. 2019. Environmental forensic investigation of the air pollution from a cement manufacturing unit. Environmental Forensics 21(2):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samad, M. S. A., Padippingal, A., Varghese, G. K., and Alappat, B. J. 2019. An environmental forensic investigation at a bio-medical waste treatment and disposal facility in Kerala, India. Environmental Forensics 20(2):162–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samad, M. S. A., Varghese, G. K., and Alappat, B. J. 2015. Environmental forensics in India – Four years after the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010. Procedia Environmental Sciences 30:91–96.
   Google Scholar
• Seifi, A., Dehghani, M., and Singh, V. P. 2020. Uncertainty analysis of water quality index (WQI) for groundwater quality evaluation: Application of Monte-Carlo method for weight allocation. Ecological Indicators 117:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddik, A. M., Chand, A., Varghese, G. K., and Alappat, B. J. 2018. Assessment of trace metal contamination and its anthropogenic influence in the sediments of an urban water body in Kozhikode, Kerala, India. Environmental Forensics 19(4):288–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solé, M., Bonsignore, M., Rivera-Ingraham, G., and Freitas, R. 2018. Exploring alternative biomarkers of pesticide pollution in clams. Marine Pollution Bulletin 136:61–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souissi, D., Zouhri, L., Hammami, S., Msaddek, M. H., Zghibi, A., and Dlala, M. 2019. GIS-based MCDM - AHP modeling for flood susceptibility mapping of arid areas, southeastern Tunisia. Geocarto International 35(9):1–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, E. 2012. Social vulnerability indices: a comparitive assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Natural Hazards 63:325–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, D., Mao, K., Ali, W., Xu, G., Huang, G., Niazi, N. K., et al. 2020. Describing the toxicity and sources and the remediation technologies for mercury-contaminated soil. RSC Advances 10:23221–23232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1987. Non binding preliminary allocations of responsibility. Vol.52, No. 102.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1996a. EPA/540/R95/128, Soil Screening Guidance : Technical Background Document. Second Edition. 1–447.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1996b. EPA/630/R-96/010. Summary report for the workshop in Monte Carlo Analysis. 1–406.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 2003. Measure and Calculations for Volume of Contaminated Medium Addressed With Respect to the Superfund And RCRA Corrective Action Programs. 1–32
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 2012. EPA 817-B-12-002. Containment and Disposal of Large Amounts of Contaminated Water: A Support Guide for Water Utilities. 1–96.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 2013. Physicochemical Properties for TRI Chemicals and Chemical Categories. 1-20.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 2014. Office of pollution prevention and toxics. TSCA Workplan for Chemical Assessments. 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Varghese, G. K., and Alappat, B. J. 2012. National Green Tribunal Act : A Harbinger for the development of environmental forensics in India ? Environmental Forensics 13(3):209–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varghese, G. K., Alappat, B. J., and Samad, M. S. A. 2015. MT3DMS and genetic algorithm in environmental forensic investigations. Procedia Environmental Sciences 30:85–90.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeeck, H., Samson, R., Verdonck, F., and Lemeur, R. 2006. Parameter sensitivity and uncertainty of the forest carbon flux model FORUG: a Monte Carlo analysis. Tree Physiology 26:807–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar