Genotoxicity Assessment of Reactive and Disperse Textile Dyes Using Human Dermal Equivalent (3D Cell Culture System)

REFERENCES

• Adams, L. W., and Priestley, G. C. 1988. Contraction of collagen lattices by skin fibroblasts: drug-induced changes. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 280: 114–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bafana, A., Devi, S. S., and Chakrabarti, T. 2011. Azo dyes: Past,present and the future. Environ. Rev. 19:350–370.
   Google Scholar
• Behravesh, E., Emami, K., Wu, H., and Gonda, S. 2005. Comparison of genotoxic damage in monolayer cell cultures and three-dimensional tissue-like cell assemblies. Adv. Space Res. 35:260–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, E., Ivarsson, B., and Merrill, C. 1979. Production of a tissue-like structure by contraction of collagen lattices by human fibroblasts of different proliferative potential in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76: 1274–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, A. F., Bouez, C., Perrier, E., Schlotmann, K., Chapuis, F., and Damour, O. 2005. Optimization and characterization of an engineered human skin equivalent. Tissue Eng. 11: 723–733.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brinkmann, J., Stolpmann, K., Trappe, S., Otter, T., Genkinger, D., Bock, U., Liebsch, M., Henkler, F., Hutzler, C., and Luch, A. 2013. Metabolically competent human skin models: Activation and genotoxicity of benzo[a]pyrene. Toxicol. Sci. 131: 351–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brohem, C. A., Cardeal, L. B. D. S., Tiago, M., Soengas, M. S., Barros, S. B. D. M., and Maria-Engler, S. S. 2011. Artificial skin in perspective: Concepts and applications. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 24: 35–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calleja-Agius, J., Muscat-Baron, Y., and Brincat, M. P. 2007. Skin ageing. Menopause Int. 13: 60–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carmen, Z., and Daniela, S. 2012. Textile organic dyes—Characteristics, polluting effects and separation/elimination procedures from industrial effluents—A critical overview. In Organic pollutants ten years after the Stockholm Convention—Environmental and analytical update, ed. T. Puzyn and A. Mostrag-Szlichtyng, 55–86. InTech—Open Access Company. http://www.intechopen.com/books/organic-pollutants-ten-years-after-the-stockholm-convention-environmental-and-analytical-update/textile-organic-dyes-characteristics-polluting-effects-and-separation-elimination-procedures-from-in
   Google Scholar
• Chequer, F. M. D., Angeli, J. P. F., Ferraz, E. R. A., Tsuboy, M. S., Marcarini, J. C., Mantovani, M. S., and Oliveira, D. P. 2009. The azo dyes disperse red 1 and disperse orange 1 increase the micronuclei frequencies in human lymphocytes and in HepG2 cells. Mutat. Res. 676: 83–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chequer, F. M. D., Lizier, T. M., Felício, R., Zanoni, M. V. B., Debonsi, H. M., Lopes, N. P., Marcos, R., and Oliveira, D. P. 2011. Analyses of the genotoxic and mutagenic potential of the products formed after the biotransformation of the azo dye disperse red 1. Toxicol. In Vitro 25: 2054–2063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chequer, F. M. D, Oliveira, G. A. R, Ferraz, E. R. A., Cardoso, J. C., Zanoni, M. V. B., and Oliveira, D. P. 2013. Textile dyes: Dyeing process and environmental impact. In Eco-friendly textile dyeing and finishing, ed. M. Günay, 151–175. InTech — Open Access Company. http://www.intechopen.com/books/eco-friendly-textile-dyeing-and-finishing/textile-dyes-dyeing-process-and-environmental-impact
   Google Scholar
• Chung, K.-T., and Cerniglia, C. E. 1992. Mutagenicity of azo dyes: Structure–activity relationships. Mutat. Res. 277: 201–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J. E., Ellis, P. C., White, A. T., Booth, A. E. G., Moore, C. E., Burman, M., Rees, R. W., and Lynch, A. M. 2008. Evaluation of the Litron In Vitro MicroFlow Kit for the flow cytometric enumeration of micronuclei (MN) in mammalian cells. Mutat. Res. 654: 76–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curren, R. D., Mun, G. C., Gibson, D. P., and Aardema, M. J. 2006. Development of a method for assessing micronucleus induction in a 3D human skin model (EpiDerm). Mutat. Res. 607: 192–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, E. L., Curren, R., Barnett, B. C., Khambatta, Z., Reisinger, K., Ouedraogo, G., Faquet, B., Ginestet, A. C., Mun, G., Hewitt, N. J., Carr, G., Pfuhler, S., and Aardema, M. J. 2011. The reconstructed skin micronucleus assay (RSMN) in EpiDermTM: Detailed protocol and harmonized scoring atlas. Mutat. Res. 720: 42–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebisawa, K., Kato, R., Okada, M., Sugimura, T., Latif, M. A., Hori, Y., Narita, Y., Ueda, M., Honda, H., and Kagami, H. 2011. Gingival and dermal fibroblasts: their similarities and differences revealed from gene expression. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 111: 255–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eijl, S., Zhu, Z., Cupitt, J., Gierula, M., Götz, C., Fritsche, E., and Edwards, R. J. 2012. Elucidation of xenobiotic metabolism pathways in human skin and human skin models by proteomic profiling. PLoS One 7: e417–e421.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraz, E. R. A., Umbuzeiro, G. A., De-Almeida, G., Caloto-Oliveira, A., Chequer, F. M. D., Zanoni, M. V. B., Dorta, D. J., and Oliveira, D. P. 2010. Differential toxicity of disperse red 1 and disperse red 13 in the Ames test, HepG2 cytotoxicity assay, and Daphnia acute toxicity test. Environ. Toxicol. 26: 489–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraz, E. R. A., Grando, M. D., and Oliveira, D. P. 2011. The azo dye ç 1 induces DNA damage and cytotoxic effects but does not cause ecotoxic effects in Daphnia similis and Vibrio fischeri. J. Hazard. Mater. 192: 628–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraz, E. R. A., Li, Z., Boubriak, O., and Oliveira, D. P. 2012. Hepatotoxicity assessment of the azo dyes disperse orange 1 (DO1), disperse red 1 (DR1) and disperse red 13 (DR13) in HEPG2 cells. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 75: 991–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flamand, N., Marrot, L., Belaidi, J.-P., Bourouf, L., Dourille, E., Feltes, M., and Meunier, J.-R. 2006. Development of genotoxicity test procedures with Episkin, a reconstructed human skin model: Towards new tools for in vitro risk assessment of dermally applied compounds? Mutat. Res. 606: 39–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgacs, E., Cserháti, T., and Oros, G. 2004. Removal of synthetic dyes from wastewaters: A review. Environ. Int. 30: 953–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghalbzouri, A., and Ponec, M. 2004. Diffusible factors released by fibroblasts support epidermal morphogenesis and deposition of basement membrane components. Wound Repair Regen. 12: 359–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz, C., Pfeiffer, R., Tigges, J., Ruwiedel, K., Hübenthal, U., Merk, H. F., Krutmann, J., Edwards, R. J., Abel, J., Pease, C., Goebel, C., Hewitt, N., and Fritsche, E. 2012. Xenobiotic metabolism capacities of human skin in comparison with a 3D-epidermis model and keratinocyte-based cell culture as in vitro alternatives for chemical testing: Phase II enzymes. Exp. Dermatol. 21: 364–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groeber, F., Holeiter, M., Hampel, M., Hinderer, S., and Schenke-Layland, K. 2011. Skin tissue engineering-in vivo and in vitro applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 63: 352–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartung, T. 2011. From alternative methods to a new toxicology. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 77: 338–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäger, I., Hafner, C., and Schneider, K. 2004. Mutagenicity of different textile dye products in Salmonella typhimurium and mouse lymphoma cells. Mutat. Res. 561: 35–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jean, J., and Duque-Fernandez, A. 2011. Effects of serum-free culture at the air–liquid interface in a human tissue-engineered skin substitute. Tissue Eng. Part A 17: 877–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junqueira, L. C., Cossermelli, W., and Brentani, R. 1978. Differential staining of collagens type I, II and III by Sirius red and polarization microscopy. Arch. Histol. Jpn. 41: 267–274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumaravel, T. S., and Jha, A. N. 2006. Reliable Comet assay measurements for detecting DNA damage induced by ionising radiation and chemicals. Mutat. Res. 605: 7–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaravel, T. S., Vilhar, B., Faux, S. P., and Jha, A. N. 2009. Comet assay measurements: A perspective. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 25: 53–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lademann, J., Patzelt, A., Worm, M., Richter, H., Sterry, W., and Meinke, M. 2009. Analysis of in vivo penetration of textile dyes causing allergic reactions. Laser Phys. Lett. 6: 759–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lech, K., Wilicka, E., Witowska-Jarosz, J., and Jarosz, M. 2013. Early synthetic dyes-a challenge for tandem mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 48: 141–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leme, D. M., de Oliveira, G. A., Meireles, G., Dos Santos, T. C., Zanoni, M. V., and de Oliveira, D. P. 2014a. Genotoxicological assessment of two reactive dyes extracted from cotton fibres using artificial sweat. Toxicol. In Vitro 28: 31–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leme, D. M., de Oliveira, G. A., Meireles, G., Brito, L. B., Rodrigues, L. B., and de Oliveira, D. P. 2014b. Eco- and geno-toxicological assessments of two reactive textile dyes. J Toxicol. Environ Health A doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2014.971208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, R. O. A., Bazo, A. P., Salvadori, D. M. F., Rech, C. M., Oliveira, D. P., and Umbuzeiro, G. A. 2007. Mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of a textile azo dye processing plant effluent that impacts a drinking water source. Mutat. Res. 626: 53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, G., Di Lorenzo, D., and Steimberg, N. 2009. Modelling tissues in 3D: The next future of pharmaco-toxicology and food research? Genes Nutr. 4: 13–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinke, M., Abdollahnia, M., Gähr, F., Platzek, T., Sterry, W., and Lademann, J. (2009). Migration and penetration of a fluorescent textile dye into the skin—In vivo versus in vitro methods. Exp. Dermatol. 18: 789–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C., Septier, D., Bonnefoix, M., Leolle, S., Lebreton-Decoster, C., Coulomb, B., Pellat, B., and Godeau, G. 2002. Human dermal and gingival fibroblasts in a three-dimensional culture: a comparative study on matrix remodeling. Clin. Oral Invest. 6: 39–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ngo, M. A., and Maibach, H. I. 2010. Dermatotoxicology: Historical perspective and advances. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 243: 225–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. D., Cornillet-Stoupy, J., Gillery, P., and Maquart, F. X. 1991. Effects of gamma irradiation on dermal equivalents in vitro. Experientia 47: 725–728.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nohynek, G. J., Duche, D., Garrigues, A., Meunier, P. A., Toutain, H., and Leclaire, J. 2005. Under the skin: Biotransformation of para-aminophenol and para-phenylenediamine in reconstructed human epidermis and human hepatocytes. Toxicol. Lett. 158: 196–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novotný, C., Dias, N., Kapanen, A., Malachová, K., Vándrovcová, M., Itävaara, M., and Lima, N., 2006. Comparative use of bacterial, algal and protozoan tests to study toxicity of azo- and anthraquinone dyes. Chemosphere 63: 1436–1442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, D. P., Carneiro, P. A., Sakagami, M. K., Zanoni, M. V. B., and Umbuzeiro, G. A. 2007. Chemical characterization of a dye processing plant effluent—Identification of the mutagenic components. Mutat. Res. 626: 135–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, G. A., Ferraz, E. R., Chequer, F. M., Grando, M. D., Angeli, J. P., Tsuboy, M. S., Marcarini, J. C., Mantovani, M. S., Osugi, M. E., Lizier, T. M., Zanoni, M. V., and Oliveira, D. P. 2010. Chlorination treatment of aqueous samples reduces, but does not eliminate, the mutagenic effect of the azo dyes disperse red 1, disperse red 13 and disperse orange 1. Mutat. Res. 703: 200–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, G. A. R., Lapuente, J., Leme, D. M., Ferraz, E. R. A., Meireles, G., and Oliveira, D. P. 2013. New paradigms for environmental assessment: An ecotoxicological and genetic approach. In Advances in environmental research, ed. J. A. Daniels, 1–42. New York, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Pampaloni, F., and Stelzer, E. 2010. Three-dimensional cell cultures in toxicology. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 26: 117–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patlolla, A., Knighten, B., and Tchounwou, P. 2010. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes induce cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and apoptosis in normal human dermal fibroblast cells. Ethnic. Dis. 20: 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt, K. L., Aderhold, S., Kulpe, K., and Fickler, M. 2008. Unexpected DNA damage caused by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons under standard laboratory conditions. Mutat. Res. 650: 96–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfuhler, S., Kirst, A., Aardema, M., Banduhn, N., Goebel, C., Araki, D., Costabel-Farkas, M., Dufour, E., Fautz, R., Harvey, J., Hewitt, N.J., Hibatallah, J., Carmichael, P., Macfarlane, M., Reisinger, K., Rowland, J., Schellauf, F., Schepky, A., and Scheel, J. 2010. A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: genotoxicity. A COLIPA analysis. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 57: 315–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponec, M., Gibbs, S., Weerheim, A., Kempenaar, J., Mulder, A., and Mommaas, A. M. 1997. Epidermal growth factor and temperature regulate keratinocyte differentiation. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 289: 317–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poumay, Y., and Coquette, A. 2007. Modelling the human epidermis in vitro: Tools for basic and applied research. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 298: 361–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poumay, Y., Dupont, F., Marcoux, S., Leclercq-Smekens, M., Hérin, M., and Coquette, A. 2004. A simple reconstructed human epidermis: Preparation of the culture model and utilization in in vitro studies. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 296: 203–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primo, F. L., da Costa Reis, M. B., Porcionatto, M. A., and Tedesco, A. C. 2011. In vitro evaluation of chloroaluminum phthalocyanine nanoemulsion and low-level laser therapy on human skin dermal equivalents and bone marrow mesenchymal. Curr. Med. Chem. 18: 3376–3381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reus, A. A., Usta, M., and Krul, C. A. 2012. The use of ex vivo human skin tissue for genotoxicity testing. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 261: 154–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reus, A. A., Reisinger, K., Downs, T. R., Carr, G. J., Zeller, A., Corvi, R., Krul, C. A., and Pfuhler, S. 2013. Comet assay in reconstructed 3D human epidermal skin models—Investigation of intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility with coded chemicals. Mutagenesis 28:709–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, L., and Whittaker, P. 2005. Collagen and picrosirius red staining: A polarized light assessment of fibrillar hue and spatial distribution. Braz. J. Morphol. Sci 22: 97–104
   Google Scholar
• Rowling, P. J., Raxworthy, M. J., Wood, E. J., Kearney, J. N., and Cunliffe, W. J. 1990. Fabrication and reorganization of dermal equivalents suitable for skin grafting after major cutaneous injury. Biomaterials 11: 181–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadek, C. M., and Allen-Hoffmann, B. L. 1994. Cytochrome P450IA1 is rapidly induced in normal human keratinocytes in the absence of xenobiotics. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 16067–16074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoop, V. M., Mirancea, N., and Fusenig, N. E. 1999. Epidermal organization and differentiation of HaCaT keratinocytes in organotypic coculture with human dermal fibroblasts. J. Invest. Dermatol. 112: 343–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, N. P., Tice, R. R., Stephens, R. E., and Schneider, E. L. 1991. A microgel electrophoresis technique for the direct quantitation of DNA damage and repair in individual fibroblasts cultured on microscope slides. Mutat. Res. 252: 289–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strober, W. 2001. Trypan blue exclusion test of cell viability. Current Protocol Immunology, Appendix 3: Appendix 3B. doi:10.1002/0471142735.ima03bs21
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, C. K. 2009. Biotransformation of drugs in human skin. Drug Metab. Dispos. 37: 247–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tice, R. R., Agurell, E., Anderson, D., Burlinson, B., Hartmann, A., Kobayashi, H., Miyamae, Y., Rojas, E., Ryu, J. C., and Sasaki, Y. F. 2000. Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 35: 206–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tigges, J., Weighardt, H., Wolff, S., Götz, C., Förster, I., Kohne, Z., Huebenthal, U., Merk, H. F., Abel, J., Haarmann-Stemmann, T., Krutmann, J., and Fritsche, E. 2013. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor (AhRR) function revisited: Repression of CYP1 activity in human skin fibroblasts is not related to AhRR expression. J. Invest. Dermatol. 133: 87–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, D. J. 2006. Biochemistry of human skin–our brain on the outside. Chem. Soc. Rev. 35: 52–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyoizumi, T., Ohta, R., Nakagawa, Y., Tazura, Y., Kuwagata, M., Noguchi, S., and Yamakage, K. 2011. Use of the in vivo skin comet assay to evaluate the DNA-damaging potential of chemicals applied to the skin. Mutat. Res. 726: 175–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyoizumi, T., Ohta, R., Kawakami, K., Nakagawa, Y., Tazura, Y., Kuwagata, M., Noguchi, S., Sui, H., and Yamakage, K. 2012a. Usefulness of combined in vivo skin comet assay and in vivo skin micronucleus test. Mutat. Res. 743: 42–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyoizumi, T., Watanabe, M., Sui, H., Nakagawa, Y., Ohta, R., and Yamakage, K. 2012b. Evaluation of effect during cell isolation process in alkaline comet assay using epidermal skin cells. J. Toxicol. Sci. 37: 1267–1273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuboy, M. S., Angeli, J. P. F., Mantovani, M. S., Knasmüller, S., Umbuzeiro, G. A., and Ribeiro, L. R. 2007. Genotoxic, mutagenic and cytotoxic effects of the commercial dye CI Disperse Blue 291 in the human hepatic cell line HepG2. Toxicol. In Vitro 21: 1650–1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhl, M., Helma, C., and Knasmüller, S. 1999. Single-cell gel electrophoresis assays with human-derived hepatoma (Hep G2) cells. Mutat. Res. 441: 215–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umbuzeiro, G. A., Freeman, H. S., Warren, S. H., Oliveira, D. P., Terao, Y., Watanabe, T.,and Claxton, L. D. 2005. The contribution of azo dyes to the mutagenic activity of the Cristais River. Chemosphere 60: 55–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venturini, S., and Tamaro, M. 1979. Mutagenicity of anthraquinone and azo dyes in Ames’ Salmonella typbimurium test. Mutat. Res. 68: 307–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wischermann, K., Boukamp, P., and Schmezer, P. 2007. Improved alkaline comet assay protocol for adherent HaCaT keratinocytes to study UVA-induced DNA damage. Mutat. Res. 630: 122–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar