396
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Postapplication Fipronil Exposure Following Use on Pets

, , &
Pages 1217-1226 | Received 05 May 2015, Accepted 22 Jul 2015, Published online: 05 Oct 2015

REFERENCES

  • Australian Pesticides & Veterinary Medicines Authority. 2009. Review of the mammalian toxicology and metabolism/toxicokinetics of fipronil. Prepared by Office of Chemical Safety & Environmental Health, Office of Health Protection. Amended September 2009. http://apvma.gov.au/node/15176
  • Beamer, P., Key, M. E., Ferguson, A. C., Canales, R. A., Au Yeung, W., and Leckie, J. O. 2008. Quantified activity pattern data from 6 to 27-month-old farmworker children for use in exposure assessment. Environmental Research 108:239–46.
  • California Department of Pesticide Regulation. 2011. Toxicological summary for fipronil. http://cdpr.ca.gov/docs/risk/toxsums/toxsumlist.htm
  • Camann, D. E., Majumadar, T. K., and Geno, P. 1989. Determination of pesticide removal efficiency from human hands wiped with gauze moistened with three salivary fluids. Final Report to EPA by ManTech under Contract 68-D5-0049. http://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?dirEntryId=63397
  • Cole, L. M., Nicholson, R. A., and Casida, J. E. 1993. Action of phenylpyrazole insecticides at the GABA-gated chloride channel. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 46: 47–54.
  • Driver, J. H., Ross, J. H., Holden, L. R., Selim, S., Sharp, J. K, Carlson, D., and Nouvel, L. 2015 Cyphenothrin flea and tick squeeze-on for dogs: Evaluation of potential health risks based on the results of observational biological monitoring. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health A 78: 1–17.
  • Dyk, M. M. B. 2009. Determinants of human exposure to fipronil following use as a topical flea and tick treatment of companion animals. PhD dissertation, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA.
  • Jennings, K. A., Canerdy, T. D., Keller, R. J., Atieh, B. H., Doss, R. B., and Gupta, R. C. 2002. Human exposure to fipronil from dogs treated with Frontline. Veterinary and Human Toxicology 44:301–3.
  • Krieger, R. I., Dinoff, T. M., Fell, L., Osimitz, T. G., Ross, J. H., and Thongsinthusak, T. 2000. Biomonitoring and whole body cotton dosimetry to estimate the potential human dermal exposure to semi volatile chemicals used indoors. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology 10:50–57.
  • Ross, J. H., Thongsinthusak, T., Fong, H. R., Margetich, S., and Krieger, R. I. 1990. Measuring potential dermal transfer of surface pesticide residue generated from indoor fogger use: An interim report. Chemosphere 20:349–60.
  • Ross, J., Chester, G., Driver, J., Lunchick, C., Holden, L., Rosenheck, I., and Barnekow, D. 2008. Comparative evaluation of absorbed dose estimates derived from passive dosimetry measurements with those derived from biological monitoring. Validation of exposure monitoring methodologies. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology 18:211–30.
  • Selim, S., and Krieger, R. I. 2006. Indoor human pyrethrins exposure: Contact absorption, metabolism, urine biomonitoring. In Assessing exposures and reducing risks to people from the use of pesticides, ed. R. Krieger, J. Seiber, and N. Ragsdale, 125–40. ACS Series Publication 951. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Thongsinthusak, T. 1999. Dermal absorption of 14C-fipronil Regent 80WDG in male rats CHW 6224-230). HSM-99005. Sacramento, CA: Worker Health and Safety Branch, Department of Pesticide Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency.
  • Tulve, N. S., Egeghy, P. P., Fortmann, R. C., Xue, J., Evans, J., Whitaker, D. A., and Croghan, C. W. 2011. Methodologies for estimating cumulative human exposures to current-use pyrethroid pesticides. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology 21: 317–27.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998a. Summary of the U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship Between Exposure Duration and Toxicity. EPA/600/R-99/081. http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=30003SK2.PDF
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998b. Framework for assessing non-occupational, non-dietary (residential) exposure to pesticides. http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/trac/science/framework-4-addressing-non-occupational.pdf
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998c. Health Effects Test Guidelines. 870.76 Dermal penetration studies. EPA 712–C–98–350. http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0156-0048
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998d. Fipronil for use on rice (Regent®, Icon®) and pets (Frontline®). HED risk Assessment. Chemical 129121. Barcodes 242090, D245656, D245657, and D2412676. Cases 288765, 031271, 060305, 060305, and 061662. Submissions S535772, S541670, S541551, S534929. http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/40001EGT.PDF?Dockey=40001EGT.PDF
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998e. Assessment of thyroid follicular cell tumors. Office of Pesticide Programs and Office of Research and Development. EPA/630/R-97/002. http://www.epa.gov/raf/publications/pdfs/THYROID.PDF
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2007. Amended human health risk assessment for fipronil incorporating the IR-4 Section 3 petition for registration on onion and shallot seed (dry bulb) and a proposed permanent tolerance on tuberous and corm vegetables and (Crop Group 1C). http://biospotvictims.homestead.com/EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0206-0008.pdf
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. Standard operating procedures for residential exposure assessments. October. http://www.epa.gov/opp00001/science/residential-exposure-sop.html
  • Wong, E. Y., Shirai, J. H., Garlock, T. J., and Kissel, J. C. 2000. Adult proxy responses to a survey of children’s dermal soil contact activities. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology 10:509–17.
  • Zartarian V. G., Xue, J., Ozkaynak, H. A., Dang, W., Glen, G., Smith, L., and Stallings, C. 2005. A probabilistic exposure assessment for children who contact CCA-treated playsets and decks using the Stochastic Human Exposure and Dose Simulation Model for the Wood Preservative Scenario (SHEDS-WOOD). Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/X-05/009.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.