Assessment of skin sensitizing potential of metals with β-galactosidase-expressing E. coli culture system

References

• Anderson, S. E., and B. J. Meade. 2014. Potential health effects associated with dermal exposure to occupational chemicals. Environ. Health Insights 8 (Suppl 1):51–62. doi:10.4137/EHI.S15258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barbosa, F., Jr. 2017. Toxicology of metals and metalloids: Promising issues for future studies in environmental health and toxicology. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 80:137–44. doi:10.1080/15287394.2016.1259475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basketter, D. A., L. J. Lea, K. J. Cooper, C. A. Ryan, G. F. Gerberick, R. J. Dearman, and I. Kimber. 1999. Identification of metal allergens in the local lymph node assay. Am. J. Contact Dermat. 10:207–12. doi:10.1053/AJCD01000207.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basketter, D. A., and E. W. Scholes. 1992. Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea-pig maximization test for the detection of a range of contact allergens. Food Chem. Toxicol. 30 (1):65–69. doi:10.1016/0278-6915(92)90138-b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggs, P. B. 1985. Platinum allergy. Cutis 35:318–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borowska, S., and M. M. Brzoska. 2015. Metals in cosmetics: Implications for human health. J. Appl. Toxicol. 35:551–72. doi:10.1002/jat.3129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branco, V., S. Caito, M. Farina, J. Teixeira Da Rocha, M. Aschner, and C. Carvalho. 2017. Biomarkers of mercury toxicity: Past, present and future trends. J Toxicol. Environ. Health B 20:119–54. doi:10.1080/10937404.2017.1289834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, N. H. L., and A. L. Watson. 2017. Measuring beta-galactosidase activity in Gram-positive bacteria using a whole-cell assay with mug as a fluorescent reporter. Curr. Protoc. Toxicol. 74:4.44.1–4.44.8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colotti, G., A. Fiorillo, and A. Ilari. 2018. Metal- and metalloid-containing drugs for the treatment of trypanosomatid diseases. Front. Biosci. 23:954–66. doi:10.2741/4628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Maria, C., L. D. Pietro, A. D. Lantada, J. Madete, P. N. Makobore, M. Mridha, A. Ravizza, J. Torop, and A. Ahluwalia. 2018. Safe innovation: On medical device legislation in Europe and Africa. Health Policy Technol. 7:156–65. doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2018.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, L., N. Sun, E. N. Kitova, and J. S. Klassen. 2010. Direct quantification of protein−metal ion affinities by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 82:2170–74. doi:10.1021/ac902633d.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fage, S. W., A. Faurschou, and J. P. Thyssen. 2014. Copper hypersensitivity. Contact Derm 71:191–201. doi:10.1111/cod.12273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration. 2016. Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1. Bio Eval Med Devices Part 1: 1–68.
   Google Scholar
• Francisco, B. B. A., D. M. Brum, and R. J. Cassella. 2015. Determination of metals in soft drinks packed in different materials by ETAAS. Food Chem. 185:488–94. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.04.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, L. A. 2004. Contact dermatitis to metals. Dermatol. Ther. 17:321–27. doi:10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04034.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerberick, G. F., R. V. House, E. R. Fletcher, and C. A. Ryan. 1992. Examination of the local lymph node assay for use in contact sensitization risk assessment. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 19:438–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibbs, S., I. Kosten, R. Veldhuizen, S. Spiekstra, E. Corsini, E. Roggen, T. Rustemeyer, A. J. Feilzer, and C. J. Kleverlaan. 2018. Assessment of metal sensitizer potency with the reconstructed human epidermis IL-18 assay. Toxicology 393:62–72. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2017.10.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haneke, K. E., R. R. Tice, B. L. Carson, B. H. Margolin, and W. S. Stokes. 2001. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay: III. Data analyses completed by the national toxicology program interagency center for the evaluation of alternative toxicological methods. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 34:274–86. doi:10.1006/rtph.2001.1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikarashi, Y., K. Ohno, T. Tsuchiya, and A. Nakamura. 1992. Differences of draining lymph node cell proliferation among mice, rats and guinea pigs following exposure to metal allergens. Toxicology 76:283–92. doi:10.1016/0300-483x(92)90196-l.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, T. G. H. 1972. Gold technology in ancient Egypt. Gold Bull. 5:38–42. doi:10.1007/BF03215160.
   Google Scholar
• Katsnelson, B. A., L. I. Privalova, M. P. Sutunkova, V. B. Gurvich, N. V. Loginova, I. A. Minigalieva, E. P. Kireyeva, V. Y. Shur, E. V. Shishkina, Y. B. Beikin, et al. 2015. Some inferences from in vivo experiments with metal and metal oxide nanoparticles: The pulmonary phagocytosis response, subchronic systemic toxicity and genotoxicity, regulatory proposals, searching for bioprotectors (a self-overview). Int. J. Nanomed. 10:3013–29. doi:10.2147/IJN.S80843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriebel, D., N. L. Sprince, E. A. Eisen, and I. A. Greaves. 1988. Pulmonary function in beryllium workers: Assessment of exposure. Br. J. Ind. Med. 45:83–92. doi:10.1136/oem.45.2.83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li, H., P. Z. Toh, J. Y. Tan, M. T. Zin, C. Y. Lee, B. Li, M. Leolukman, H. Bao, and L. Kang. 2016. Selected biomarkers revealed potential skin toxicity caused by certain copper compounds. Sci. Rep. 6:37664. doi:10.1038/srep37664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, D. S., T. H. Roh, M. K. Kim, Y. C. Kwon, S. M. Choi, S. J. Kwack, K. B. Kim, S. Yoon, H. S. Kim, and B. M. Lee. 2018. Non-cancer, cancer, and dermal sensitization risk assessment of heavy metals in cosmetics. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 81:432–52. doi:10.1080/15287394.2018.1451191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linauskienė, K., L. Malinauskienė, and A. Blažienė. 2017. Metals are important contact sensitizers: An experience from Lithuania. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017:3964045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandervelt, C., F. L. Clottens, M. Demedts, and B. Nemery. 1997. Assessment of the sensitization potential of five metal salts in the murine local lymph node assay. Toxicology 120:65–73. doi:10.1016/s0300-483x(97)03629-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nepal, M. R., M. J. Kang, G. H. Kim, D. H. Cha, D. H. Nam, and T. C. Jeong. 2019. Identification of pre- and pro-haptens with a β-galactosidase-expressing E. coli culture system for skin sensitization. Toxicol. Lett. 305:81–93. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.01.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nepal, M. R., Y. Kang, M. J. Kang, D. H. Nam, and T. C. Jeong. 2018a. A β-galactosidase-expressing E. coli culture as an alternative test to identify skin sensitizers and non-sensitizers. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 81:288–301. doi:10.1080/15287394.2018.1440187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nepal, M. R., R. Shakya, M. J. Kang, and T. C. Jeong. 2018b. A simple in chemico method for testing skin sensitizing potential of chemicals using small endogenous molecules. Toxicol. Lett. 289:75–85. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2010. Test No. 429: Skin sensitisation: Local lymph node assay. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264071100-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. Test No. 442C: In chemico skin sensitisation: Direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA). Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264229709-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018a. Test No. 442D: In vitro skin sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 luciferase test method, OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264229822-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018b. Test No. 442E: In vitro skin sensitisation: In vitro skin sensitisation assays addressing the key event on activation of dendritic cells on the adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitisation. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264264359-en.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, S. E., M. C. Barnes, H. S. George, L. Joshee, B. Jeon, A. Scircle, O. Black, J. V. Cizdziel, B. E. Smith, and C. C. Bridges. 2018. Exposure to mixtures of mercury, cadmium, lead, and arsenic alters the disposition of single metals in tissues of Wistar rats. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 81:1246–56. doi:10.1080/15287394.2018.1551164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumchev, K., H. Brown, A. Wheeler, G. Pereira, and J. Spickett. 2017. Behavioral interventions to reduce nickel exposure in a nickel processing plant. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 14:823–30. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1335402.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, C. A., L. W. Cruse, R. A. Skinner, R. J. Dearman, I. Kimber, and G. F. Gerberick. 2002. Examination of a vehicle for use with water soluble materials in the murine local lymph node assay. Food Chem. Toxicol. 40:1719–25. doi:10.1016/s0278-6915(02)00116-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, E. F. S. J., D. Missio, C. S. Martinez, D. V. Vassallo, F. M. Peçanha, F. G. Leivas, D. S. Brum, and G. A. Wiggers. 2019. Mercury at environmental relevant levels affects spermatozoa function and fertility capacity in bovine sperm. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 82:268–78. doi:10.1080/15287394.2019.1589608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ständer, S., E. Sppel, P. Thomas, and B. Summner. 2017. Evaluation of lymphocyte transformation tests as compared with patch tests in nickel allergy diagnosis. Contact Derm. 76:228–34. doi:10.1111/cod.12751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, B. R., M. Solioz, D. Krewski, P. Aggett, T. C. Aw, S. Baker, K. Crump, M. Dourson, L. Haber, R. Hertzberg, et al. 2007. Copper and human health: Biochemistry, genetics, and strategies for modeling dose-response relationships. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B 10:157–222. doi:10.1080/10937400600755911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet, L. I., and J. T. Zelikoff. 2001. Toxicology and immunotoxicology of mercury: A comprehensive review in fish and humans. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B 4:161–205. doi:10.1080/109374001300339809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed, M., R. Chopra, and V. Sachdev. 2015. Allergic reactions to dental materials - A systematic review. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 9:ZE04–ZE09. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/15640.6589.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tchounwou, P. B., C. G. Yedjou, A. K. Patlolla, and D. J. Sutton. 2012. Heavy metals toxicity and the environment. Mol. Clin. Environ. Toxicol. 101:133–64.
   Google Scholar
• Vukmanovic, S., and N. Sadrieh. 2017. Skin sensitizers in cosmetics and beyond: Potential multiple mechanisms of action and importance of T-cell assays for in vitro screening. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 47:415–32. doi:10.1080/10408444.2017.1288025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdankhah, S., K. Rudi, and A. Bernhoft. 2014. Zinc and copper in animal feed - development of resistance and co-resistance to antimicrobial agents in bacteria of animal origin. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 25:25862–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar