Recombinogenic, genotoxic, and cytotoxic effects of azathioprine using in vivo assays

References

• Bishop, A. J. R., and R. H. Schiestl. 2003. Role of homologous recombination in carcinogenesis. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 74:94–105. doi:10.1016/S0014-4800(03)00010-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. O., V. I. Taylor, M. J. Armstrong, and S. M. Galloway. 1987. Relationships among cytotoxicity, lysosomal breakdown, chromosome aberrations, and DNA double-strand breaks. Mutat. Res. Toxicol. 189:69–79. doi:10.1016/0165-1218(87)90034-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brem, R., and P. Karran. 2012. Multiple forms of DNA damage caused by UVA photoactivation of DNA 6-thioguanine. Photochem. Photobiol. 88:5–13. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.01043.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camus, M., P. Seksik, A. Bourrier, I. Nion-Larmurier, H. Sokol, P. Baumer, L. Beaugerie, and J. Cosnes. 2013. Long-term outcome of patients with crohn’s disease who respond to azathioprine. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11:389–94. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.10.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro, C. C., S. C. Santos, R. S. Lino, M. T. F. Bara, B. A. Chaibub, P. R. de Melo Reis, D. A. Chaves, A. J. R. da Silva, L. S. Silva, D. M. e Silva, et al. 2016. Chemopreventive effect and angiogenic activity of punicalagin isolated from leaves of Lafoensia Pacari A. St.-Hil. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 310:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2016.08.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilião, H. L., D. L. Ribeiro, R. B. O. Camargo-Godoy, A. F. L. Specian, J. M. Serpeloni, and I. M. S. Cólus. 2015. Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of high concentrations of the immunosuppressive drugs cyclosporine and tacrolimus in MRC-5 cells. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 67:179–87. doi:10.1016/j.etp.2014.11.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CONCEA. 2013. Brazilian guideline for the care and use of animals for scientific and educational purposes. Conselho Nacional de Controle de Experimentação Animal. accessed January 16, 2020. https://pages.cnpem.br/ceua/wp-content/uploads/sites/56/2015/06/DBCA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Daehn, I., R. Brem, E. Barkauskaite, and P. Karran. 2011. 6-thioguanine damages mitochondrial DNA and causes mitochondrial dysfunction in human cells. FEBS. Lett. 585:3941–46. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2011.10.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Moraes Filho, A. V., C. J. S. Carvalho, C. J. Verçosa, M. W. Gonçalves, C. Rohde, D. M. E. Silva, K. S. Cunha, and L. Chen-Chen. 2017. In vivo genotoxicity evaluation of efavirenz (EFV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) alone and in their clinical combinations in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen 820:30–38. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2017.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devi, P. U. 2010. Basics of carcinogenesis. Health. Admin. 17:16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, P. A., O. A. Olivero, N. A. Wade, E. J. Abrams, C. J. Nesel, R. B. Ness, R. D. Day, Q. Meng, J. P. O’Neill, D. M. Walker, et al. 2007. Genotoxicity assessed by the comet and GPA assays following in vitro exposure of human lymphoblastoid cells (H9) or perinatal exposure of mother–child pairs to AZT or AZT-3TC. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 48:330–43. doi:10.1002/em.20285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espín, S., and A. J. García-Fernandez. 2014. Azathioprine. In Encyclopedia of Toxicology, ed. P. Wexler, 347–50. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• FDA. 2011. Imuran® (Azathioprine). Food and Drug Administration. accessed January 16, 2020. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/016324s034s035lbl.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fraile, P., P. García-Cosmes, P. Martín, V. García-Bernalt, and J. M. Tabernero. 2009. Non-skin solid tumors as a cause of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. Transplant. Proc. 41:2433–34. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.06.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frei, H., and F. E. Würgler. 1988. Statistical methods to decide whether mutagenicity test data from Drosophila assays indicate a positive, negative, or inconclusive result. Mutat. Res. Mutagen. Relat. Subj. 203:297–308. doi:10.1016/0165-1161(88)90019-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas, K. S., I. S. Squarisi, N. O. Acésio, H. D. Nicolella, S. D. Ozelin, M. R. S. de Melo, A. P. P. Guissone, G. Fernandes, L. M. Silva, A. A. da Silva Filho, et al. 2020. Licochalcone A, a licorice flavonoid: Antioxidant, cytotoxic, genotoxic, and chemopreventive potential. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A. 83:673–86. doi:10.1080/15287394.2020.1813228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glei, M., T. Schneider, and W. Schlörmann. 2016. Comet assay: An essential tool in toxicological research. Arch. Toxicol. 90:2315–36. doi:10.1007/s00204-016-1767-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, U., H. J. Frei, A. Kägi, A. J. Katz, and F. E. Würgler. 1989. Thirty compounds tested in the Drosophila wing spot test. Mutat. Res. Toxicol. 222:359–73. doi:10.1016/0165-1218(89)90112-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, U., and N. van Schaik. 1992. Improved high bioactivation cross for the wing somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat. Res. 271:59–67. doi:10.1016/0165-1161(92)90032-H.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, U., F. E. Würgler, A. J. Katz, H. Frei, H. Juon, C. B. Hall, and P. G. Kale. 1984. Somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster. Environ. Mutagen. 6:153–88. doi:10.1002/em.2860060206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hampel, G. 2020. Dose and therapy individualization in cancer chemotherapy. In Methods of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Including Pharmacogenetics, ed. G. Humpel, vol. 7, 291–319.2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, A., M. Arand, B. Epe, S. Guth, G. Jahnke, A. Lampen, H. J. Martus, B. Monien, I. M. C. M. Ritjens, S. Schimitz Spankes, et al. 2020. Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens. Arch. Toxicol. 94:1787–877. doi:10.1007/s00204-020-02733-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. W., T. Wang, and D. Dixon. 2020. Toxicologic testing methods. In Loomis’s essentials of toxicology, ed. A. W. Hayes, T. Wang, D. Dixon, and T. Loomis, 189–222. 5th ed. United States: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heddle, J. 1973. A rapid in vivo test for chromosomal damage. Mutat. Res. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 18:187–90. doi:10.1016/0027-5107(73)90035-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helleday, T. 2010. Homologous recombination in cancer development, treatment and development of drug resistance. Carcinogenesis. 31:955–60. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgq064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICH. 2014. Assessment and control of DNA reactive (mutagenic) impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk. International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, Minneapolis, MN, United States, June 4-5. accessed January 16 2020. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000208234.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Karawya, F., and A. El-Nahas. 2006. The protective effect of vitamin C on azathioprine induced seminiferous tubular structural changes and cytogenetic toxicity in albino rats. Cancer. Ther. 4:125–34. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.2929.9367.
   Google Scholar
• Karran, P. 2006. Thiopurines, DNA damage, DNA repair and therapy-related cancer. Br. Med. Bull. 79–80:153–70. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldl020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karran, P., and N. Attard. 2008. Thiopurines in current medical practice: Molecular mechanisms and contributions to therapy-related cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 8:24–36. doi:10.1038/nrc2292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastenbaum, M. A., and K. O. Bowman. 1970. Table for determining the statistical significance of mutation frequencies. Mutat. Res. Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 9:527–49. doi:10.1016/0027-5107(70)90124-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krejci, L., V. Altmannova, M. Spirek, and X. Zhao. 2012. Homologous recombination and its regulation. Nucl. Acids. Res. 40:5795–818. doi:10.1093/nar/gks270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, A., and S. A. Martinson. 2017. Respiratory system, mediastinum, and pleurae. In Pathologic basis of veterinary disease, ed. J. F. Zachary, 461–450. 6th ed. United States: Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Maistro, E. L., P. M. Terrazzas, F. F. Perazzo, I. O. M. Gaivão, A. C. H. F. Sawaya, and P. C. P. Rosa. 2019. Salix alba (white willow) medicinal plant presents genotoxic effects in human cultured leukocytes. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A. 82:1223–34. doi:10.1080/15287394.2019.1711476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello-Andrade, F., C. G. Cardoso, C. R. E Silva, L. Chen-Chen, P. R. de Melo-reis, A. P. de Lima, R. Oliveira, I. B. M. Ferraz, C. K. Grisolia, M. A. Almeida, et al. 2018. Acute toxic effects of ruthenium (II)/amino acid/diphosphine complexes on Swiss mice and zebrafish embryos. Biomed. Pharmacother. 107:1082–92. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2018.08.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraes Filho, A. V. D., C. J. S. De Carvalho, C. C. Carneiro, C. R. Do Vale, D. C. S. Lima, W. F. Carvalho, T. B. Vieira, D. M. E. Silva, K. S. Cunha, and L. Chen-Chen. 2016. Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of antiretroviral combinations in mice bone marrow. PLoS. ONE. 11 (1–12). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165706.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nuyttens, J. J., J. Harper, J. M. Jenrette, and A. T. Turrisi. 2005. Outcome of radiation therapy for renal transplant rejection refractory to chemical immunosuppression. Radiother. Oncol. 74:17–19. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2004.08.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OEDC. 2016a. Test no. 474: Mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, accessed November 22, 2020. doi:10.1787/9789264264762-en.
   Google Scholar
• OEDC. 2016b. Test no. 489: In vivo mammalian alkaline comet assay. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, accessed November 22, 2020. doi: 10.1787/9789264264885-en.
   Google Scholar
• Palermo, A. M., and M. D. Mudry. 2013. Metroinidazol induced DNA damage in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Drug Saf. 8:195–98. doi:10.2174/15748863113089990035.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quadros, A. P. O., L. M. Almeida, M. Petreanu, R. Niero, P. C. P. Rosa, A. C. H. F. Sawaya, M. S. Mantovani, I. O. M. Galvão, and E. L. Maistro. 2020. Risk assessment via genotoxicity, metabolism, apoptosis, and cell growth effects in a HepG2/C3A cell line upon treatment with Rubus rosifolius (Rosaceae) leaves extract. J. Toxico.l. Environ. Health A. 83:495–508. doi:10.1080/15287394.2020.1779888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza, M., M. Ahmad, A. Gado, and O. A. Al-Shabanah. 2003. A comparison of hepatoprotective activities of aminoguanidine and N-acetylcysteine in rat against the toxic damage induced by azathioprine. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. - C. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 134:451–56. doi:10.1016/S1532-0456(03)00022-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recio, L., C. Hobbs, W. Caspary, and K. L. Witt. 2010. Dose-response assessment of four genotoxic chemicals in a combined mouse and rat micronucleus and comet assay protocol. J. Toxicol. Sci. 35:149–62. doi:10.2131/jts.35.149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remuzzi, G., M. Lesti, E. Gotti, M. Ganeva, B. D. Dimitrov, B. Ene-Iordache, G. Gherardi, D. Donato, S. Maurizio, S. Silvio, et al. 2004. Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine for prevention of acute rejection in renal transplantation (MYSS): A randomised trial. Lancet. 364:503–12. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16808-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, F. G., L. C. Badias, M. Lopez-Nigro, A. Palermo, M. Mudry, P. G. Elio, and M. A. Carballo. 2002. DNA single strand breaks in peripheral blood lymphocytes induced by three nitroimidazole derivatives. Toxicol. Lett. 132:109–15. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(02)00039-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saner, C., B. Weibel, F. E. Würgler, and C. Sengstag. 1996. Metabolism of promutagens catalyzed by Drosophila melanogaster CYP6A2 enzyme in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 27:46–58. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1996)27:1<46::AID-EM7>3.0.CO;2-C.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarcina, C., C. Tinelli, F. Ferrario, A. Pani, A. Silvestri, P. Scani, L. Del Vecchio, E. Alberghini, L. Buzzi, I. Baragetti, et al. 2016. Changes in proteinuria and side effects of corticosteroids alone or in combination with azathioprine at different stages of IgA nephropathy. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephro.l 11. 10.2215/CJN.02300215:973–98. doi:10.2215/CJN.02300215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, J., V. Heuser, and V. Andrade. 2003. Biomonitoramento ambiental. In Genética Toxicologica, ed. J. Silva, B. Erdtmann, and J. A. P. Henriques, 193–94. 1st ed. Porto Alegre: Ed. Alcance.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, N. P., M. T. McCoy, R. R. Tice, and E. L. Schneider. 1988. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp. Cel.l Res. 175:184–91. doi:10.1016/0014-4827(88)90265-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinigaglia, M., M. Lehmann, P. Baumgardt, V. S. Do Amaral, R. R. Dihl, M. L. Reguly, and H. H. R. de Andrade. 2006. Vanillin as a modulator agent in SMART test: Inhibition in the steps that precede N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-, N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea-,ethylmethanesulphonate-and bleomycin-genotoxicity. Mutat. Res 607:225–30. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.04.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siramolpiwat, S., and D. Sakonlaya. 2017. Clinical and histologic features of azathioprine-induced hepatotoxicity. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 52:876–80. doi:10.1080/00365521.2017.1311936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skotnicki, J. S., and D. M. Huryn. 2007. Treatment of transplantation rejection and multiple sclerosis. Compr. Med. Chem. II. 7:917–34. doi:10.1016/b0-08-045044-x/00233-9.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. C., G. E. Archer, E. J. Forster, T. R. Lambert, R. W. Rees, and A. M. Lynch. 1999. Analysis of gene mutations and clastogenicity following short-term treatment with azathioprine in muta mouse. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 34:131–39. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1999)34:2/3<131::AID-EM12>3.0.CO;2-K.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer, S., I. Buraczewska, and M. Kruszewski. 2020. Micronucleus assay: The state of art, and future directions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21:15–34. doi:10.3390/ijms21041534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szikriszt, B., A. Póti, O. Pipek, M. Krzystanek, N. Kanu, J. Molnár, D. Ribli, Z. Szeltner, G. E. Tusnády, I. Csabai, et al. 2016. A comprehensive survey of the mutagenic impact of common cancer cytotoxics. Genome. Biol. 17:99. doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0963-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uno, Y., H. Kojima, T. Omori, R. Corvi, M. Honma, L. M. Schechtman, R. R. Tice, C. Beevers, M. de Boeck, B. Burlinson, et al. 2015. JaCVAM-organized international validation study of the in vivo rodent alkaline comet assay for detection of genotoxic carcinogens: II. Summary of definitive validation study results. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 786–788:45–76. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.04.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Véras, J. H., C. R. Do Vale, D. C. S. Lima, M. M. Dos Anjos, A. Bernardes, A. V. de Moraes Filho, C. R. E. Silva, G. R. de Oliveira, C. N. Pérez, and L. Chen-Chen. 2020. Modulating effect of a hydroxychalcone and a novel coumarin–chalcone hybrid against mitomycin-induced genotoxicity in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Drug. Chem. Toxicol. 1–10. doi:10.1080/01480545.2020.1776314.
   Google Scholar
• von Ledebur, M., and W. Schmid. 1973. The micronucleus test methodological aspects. Mutat. Res. Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 19:109–17. doi:10.1016/0027-5107(73)90118-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Trompowsky, A. C. M., T. R. Conde, R. C. Lemos, B. M. C. S. Quaresma, M. C. S. R. Pitombeira, A. S. de Carvalho, N. Boechat, K. Salomão, S. L. de Castro, and H. P. S. Zamith. 2019. In vitro genotoxicity of nitroimidazoles as a tool in the search of new trypanocidal agents. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo. Cruz 114:1–10. doi:10.1590/0074-02760190017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos, M., E. I. Plasmeijer, B. C. van Bemmel, W. Vander Bij, N. S. Klaver, M. E. Erasmus, G. H. Bock, E. A. M. Verschuuren, and E. Rácz. 2018. Azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil transition and risk of squamous cell carcinoma after lung transplantation. J. Heart. Lung. Transplant. 37:853–59. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2018.03.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., F. S. Wang, and M. E. Gershwin. 2015. Human autoimmune diseases: A comprehensive update. J. Intern. Med. 278:369–95. doi:10.1111/joim.12395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, C. J. E., and J. H. Dark. 2012. Organ transplantation: Historical perspective and current practice. Br. J. Anaesth. 108:29–42. doi:10.1093/bja/aer384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisgerhof, H. C., L. G. M. van der Geest, J. W. de Fijter, G. W. Haasnoot, F. H. J. Claas, S. le Cessie, R. Willemze, and J. N. B. Bavinck. 2011. Incidence of cancer in kidney-transplant recipients: A long-term cohort study in a single center. Cancer. Epidemiol. 35:105–11. doi:10.1016/j.canep.2010.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar