References
- Akhtar, A. 2015. The flaws and human harms of animal experimentation. Camb. Q. Healthc. Ethics 24 (4):407–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180115000079.
- Almeida, A., B. Sarmento, and F. Rodrigues. 2017. Insights on in vitro models for safety and toxicity assessment of cosmetic ingredients. Int J Pharm 519 (1–2):178–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.01.024.
- Barroso, J., I. Y. Ahn, C. Caldeira, P. L. Carmichael, W. Casey, S. Coecke, R. Curren, B. Desprez, C. Eskes, C. Griesinger, et al. 2016. International Harmonization and Cooperation in the Validation of Alternative Methods. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 856:343–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33826-2_14.
- Benfenati, E., Q. Chaudhry, G. Ginic, and J. L. Dorne. 2019. Integrating in silico models and read-across methods for predicting toxicity of chemicals: A step-wise strategy. Environ. Int. 131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105060.
- Bergal, M., M. Puginier, C. Gerbeix, H. Groux, A. Roso, F. Cottrez, and A. Milius. 2020. In vitro testing strategy for assessing the skin sensitizing potential of “difficult to test” cosmetic ingredients. Toxicol In Vitro 65:104781. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104781.
- Blackburn, K., and S. B. Stuard. 2014. A framework to facilitate consistent characterization of read across uncertainty. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 68 (3):353–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.01.004.
- Charehsaz, M., G. Tugcu, and A. Aydin. 2020. Filling data gap for nicotinic acid, nicotinate esters and nicotinamide for the determination of permitted daily exposure by a category approach. Toxicol. Res.37 (3):337–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-020-00069-8
- Chesnut, M., T. Yamada, T. Adams, D. Knight, N. Kleinstreuer, G. Kass, T. Luechtefeld, T. Hartung, and A. Maertens. 2018. Meeting Report. Regulatory acceptance of read-across. ALTEX 35:413–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1805081.
- EC (European Commission). 2006. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union L396/1.
- EC (European Commission). 2009. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European parliament and of the council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products off. j. eur. union L, 342 (2009), pp. 59-209. Accessed. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/1223/oj.
- ECETOC (European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals). 2009. Advanced technologies in read-across for chemical risk assessment. Technical Report No. 109. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals, Brussels, Belgium, Accessed.http://www.ecetoc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ECETOC-TR-109-High-information-content-technologies-in-support-of-read-across-in-chemical-risk-assessment.pdf.
- ECETOC (European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals). 2012. ECETOC technical report No. 116: Category approaches, Read-across, (Q)SAR. Accessed.http://www.ecetoc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ECETOC-TR-116-Category-approaches-Read-across-QSAR.pdf.
- ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2015. Read-Across Assessment Framework(RAAF). Accessed. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13628/raaf_en.pdf.
- ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2016. New approach methodologies in regulatory science proceedings of a scientific workshop helsinki. AccessedApril 19–20 2016. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/22816069/scientific_ws_proceedings_en.pdf.
- ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2017a. Read-Across Assessment Framework. Considerations on Multi-Constituent Substances and UVCBs. ECHA-17-R-04-EN, March 2017. Accessed. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13630/raaf_uvcb_report_en.pdf/3f79684d-07a5-e439-16c3-d2c8da96a316.
- ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2017b. Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF). ECHA-17-R-01-EN, March 2017. Accessed. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13628/raaf_en.pdf.
- ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2017c. The use of alternatives to testing on animals for the REACH Regulation. Third report under Article 117(3)of REACH. ECHA-17-B-06-EN, Accessed. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13639/alternatives_test_animals_2017_summary_en.pdf/487e2516-0ad0-90a2-a923-96417ffd6b6b.
- ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2020. The use of alternatives to testing on animals for REACH. The fourth report under Article 117 (3)of REACH, ECHA-20-R-08-EN, Accessed. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13639/alternatives_test_nimals_2020_en.pdf/b9af7cf7-4ce0-f3a1-1bcb-8de3fd84a1fb.
- Emmerich, C. H., and C. M. Harris. 2020. Minimum information and quality standards for conducting, reporting, and organizing in vitro research. Handb Exp Pharmacol 257:177–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/164_2019_284.
- Escher, S. E., K. Hennicke, S. H. Bennekou, A. Bitsch, C. Fisher, R. Graepel, J. G. Hengstler, M. Herzler, D. Knight, M. Leist, et al. 2019. Towards grouping concepts based on new approach methodologies in chemical hazard assessment: The read‑across approach of the EU‑ToxRisk project. Arch. Toxicol 93 (12):3643–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02591-7.
- EU (European Union). 2007. Annex XI general rules for adaptation of the standard testing set out in annexes VII to X. Official Journal of the European Union L136/119, Accessed. http://chemical-net.env.go.jp/pdf_reach/REACH_official_journal_e14.pdf.
- FDA (Food and Drug Administration). 2020. FDA’S PREDICTIVE TOXICOLOGY ROADMAP. Accessed. https://www.fda.gov/files/science%20&%20research/published/FDA’s-Predictive-Toxicology-Roadmap.pdf.
- Fukuchi, J., A. Kitazawa, K. Hirabayashi, and M. Honma. 2019. A practice of expert review by read-across using QSAR Toolbox. Mutagenesis 34 (1):49–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gey046.
- Gao, R., N. Guan, M. Huang, J. Foreman, M. Kung, Z. Rong, Y. Su, L. Sweet, B. Zhu, H. Zhu, et al. 2020. Read-across: Principle, case study and its potential regulatory application in China. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 116:104728. Online ahead of print. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104728.
- Guo, Y., L. Zhao, X. Zhang, and H. Zhu. 2019. Using a hybrid read-across method to evaluate chemical toxicity based on chemical structure and biological data. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 178:178–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.04.019.
- Habas, K., M. H. Brinkworth, and D. Anderson. 2020. A male germ cell assay and supporting somatic cells: Its application for the detection of phase specificity of genotoxins in vitro . Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B 23 (3):91–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2020.1724577.
- Hanway, R. H., and P. F. Evans. 2000. Read-across of toxicological data in the notification of new chemicals. Toxicol. Lett. 116 (Suppl. 1):61.
- Hartung, T. 2017. Evolution of toxicological science: The need for change. Int. J. Risk Assess. Manage 20 (1/2/3):21–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2017.082570.
- Hartung, T., R. De Vries, S. Hoffmann, H. T. Hogberg, L. Smirnova, K. Tsaioun, P. Whaley, and M. Leist. 2019. Toward good in vitro reporting standards. ALTEX 36 (1):3–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1812191.
- Hasselgren, C., E. Ahlberg, Y. Akahori, A. Amberg, L. T. Anger, F. Atienzar, S. Auerbach, L. Beilke, P. Bellion, R. Benigni, et al. 2019. Genetic toxicology in silico protocol. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 107:104403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104403.
- Health Canada. 2005. Guidelines for the notification and testing of new substances: chemicals and polymers. Accessed. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/managing-pollution/evaluating-new-substances/chemicals-polymers/guidance-documents/guidelines-notification-testing.html.
- Hennes, E. C. 2012. An overview of values for the threshold of toxicological concern. Toxicology Letters 211 (3):296–303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.03.795.
- Kang, Y., B. Jeong, D. H. Lim, D. Lee, and K. M. Lim. 2021. In silico prediction of the full United Nations Globally Harmonized System eye irritation categories of liquid chemicals by IATA-like bottom-up approach of random forest method. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 84(23):960–72. Online ahead of print. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2021.1956661.
- Kim, G. H., D. H. Cha, M. R. Nepal, and T. C. Jeong. 2021c. A convenient fluorometric test method for skin sensitization using glutathione in chemico. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 84(19):783–99. Epub 2021 Jul 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2021.1944939.
- Kim, J. Y., K. M. Kim, and B. M. Lee. 2021a. Validation of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) and quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) approaches as alternatives to skin sensitization risk assessment. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 84(23):945–59. Online ahead of print. PMID: 34338166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2021.1956660.
- Kim, J. Y., M. K. Kim, K. B. Kim, H. S. Kim, and B. M. Lee. 2019a. Quantitative structure-activity and quantitative structure-property relationship approaches as alternative skin sensitization risk assessment methods. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 82 (7):447–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2019.1616437.
- Kim, K. B., S. J. Kwack, J. Y. Lee, S. Kacew, and B. M. Lee. 2021b. Current opinion on risk assessment of cosmetics. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B 24 (4):137–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2021.1907264.
- Kim, M. K., M. K. Kim, K. B. Kim, H. S. Kim, and B. M. Lee. 2019b. Alternative skin sensitization prediction and risk assessment using proinflammatory biomarkers, interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 82 (5):361–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2019.1609183.
- Kim, S. H., D. Lee, J. Lee, J. Y. Yang, J. Seok, K. Jung, and J. Lee. 2021d. Evaluation of the skin sensitization potential of metal oxide nanoparticles using the ARE-Nrf2 luciferase KeratinoSensTM assay. Toxicol. Res. 37 (2):277–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-020-00071-0.
- Krewski, D., D. Acosta Jr, M. Andersen, H. Anderson, J. C. Bailar 3rd, K. Boekelheide, R. Brent, G. Charnley, V. G. Cheung, S. Green Jr, et al. 2010. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: A vision and a strategy. J Toxicol Environ Health B 13 (2–4):51–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2010.483176.
- Lamon, L., D. Asturiol, A. Vilchez, J. Cabellos, J. Damásio, G. Janer, A. Richarz, and A. Worth. 2019. Physiologically based mathematical models of nanomaterials for regulatory toxicology: A review. Comput. Toxicol. 9:133–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2018.10.002.
- Lizarraga, L. E., J. L. Dean, J. P. Kaiser, S. C. Wesselkamper, J. C. Lambert, and Q. J. Zhao. 2019. A case study on the application of an expert-driven read-across approach in support of quantitative risk assessment of p,p’-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 103:301–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.02.010.
- MEE (Ministry of Ecology and Environment). 2020. Guidelines for environmental management registration of new chemical substances. AccessedNovember 17, 2020.http://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk01/202011/t20201119_808843.html.
- Messina, T. C. 2017. In silico methods for analyzing mutagenesis targets. Meth Mol Biol 1498:199–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6472-7_14.
- METI (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry). 2016. Chemical Substances Control Law (CSCL). Accessed. https://www.meti.go.jp/policy/chemical_management/english/cscl/files/about/01CSCL.pdf.
- METI (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry). 2017. Chemical Substances Control Law (CSCL)-Article-by-article explanation (in Japanese). Accessed. https://www.meti.go.jp/policy/chemical_management/kasinhou/files/about/laws/laws_exposition.pdf.
- Milani-Nejad, N., and P. M. L. Janssen. 2015. Small and large animal models in cardiac contraction research: Advantages and disadvantages. Pharmacol. Ther. 141 (3):235–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.10.007.
- MoE (Ministry of Environment). 1999. The toxic chemicals control act. Accessed. https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsSc.do?section=&menuId=1&subMenuId=17&tabMenuId=93&eventGubun=060101&query=%EC%9C%A0%ED%95%B4%ED%99%94%ED%95%99%EB%AC%BC%EC%A7%88%EA%B4%80%EB%A6%AC%EB%B2%95#undefined.
- MoE (Ministry of Environment). 2013. The act on registration, evaluation, etc. of chemicals. Accessed. https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsSc.do?section=&menuId=1&subMenuId=17&tabMenuId=93&eventGubun=060101&query=%ED%99%94%ED%95%99%EB%AC%BC%EC%A7%88%EC%9D%98+%EB%93%B1%EB%A1%9D+%EB%B0%8F+%ED%8F%89%EA%B0%80+%EB%93%B1%EC%97%90+%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C+%EB%B2%95%EB%A5%A0#undefined.
- MoE (Ministry of Environment). 2014. Republic Of Korea, The enforcement rule of the act on registration, evaluation, etc. of chemicals. Accessed. https://law.go.kr/engLsSc.do?menuId=1&subMenuId=21&tabMenuId=117&query=%ED%99%94%ED%95%99%EB%AC%BC%EC%A7%88%EC%9D%98%20%EB%93%B1%EB%A1%9D#.
- MoE (Ministry of Environment). 2015. The chemical substances control act. Accessed. https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsSc.do?section=&menuId=1&subMenuId=17&tabMenuId=93&eventGubun=060101&query=%ED%99%94%ED%95%99%EB%AC%BC%EC%A7%88%EA%B4%80%EB%A6%AC%EB%B2%95#undefined.
- MoE (Ministry of Environment). 2019. Enforcement decree of the act on registration, evaluation, etc. of chemicals. Accessed. https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsSc.do?section=&menuId=1&subMenuId=17&tabMenuId=93&eventGubun=060101&query=%ED%99%94%ED%95%99%EB%AC%BC%EC%A7%88%EA%B4%80%EB%A6%AC%EB%B2%95#undefined.
- NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research). 2015. Enforcement decree of the act on registration, evaluation, etc. of chemicals. Accessed. https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsSc.do?section=&menuId=1&subMenuId=17&tabMenuId=93&eventGubun=060101&query=%ED%99%94%ED%95%99%EB%AC%BC%EC%A7%88%EC%9D%98+%EB%93%B1%EB%A1%9D+%EB%B0%8F+%ED%8F%89%EA%B0%80+%EB%93%B1%EC%97%90+%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C+%EB%B2%95%EB%A5%A0++%EC%8B%9C%ED%96%89%EB%A0%B9#undefined.
- NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research). 2017. An application guideline for read-across. Accessed. https://ecolibrary.me.go.kr/nier/#/search/detail/5667028.
- NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research). 2019a. The NIER rule to prepare registration dossier and to assess hazards. Accessed. https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/admRulLsInfoP.do?admRulSeq=2100000176043.
- NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research). 2019b. The research to improve the chemical evaluation system. Accessed. https://ecolibrary.me.go.kr/nier/#/search/detail/5708375.
- NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research). 2021a. The guidance on genotoxicity evaluation. Accessed. https://ncis.nier.go.kr/bbs/bbsDataTabList.do.
- NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research). 2021b. The guidance to prepare dossier with QSAR information for industry. Accessed. https://ncis.nier.go.kr/bbs/bbsDataTabList.do.
- NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research). 2021c. The NIER rule: the chemical hazard assessment results (2021-19, 2021.2.22) Accessed. https://law.go.kr/admRulLsInfoP.do?chrClsCd=&admRulSeq=2100000198347.
- NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research). 2021d. NIER rule for classification and labelling of chemicals. Accessed. https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/admRulLsInfoP.do?admRulSeq=2100000202836.
- NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research). 2021e. The NIER notice of the results of chemical hazard assessment. Accessed. https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/admRulLsInfoP.do?admRulSeq=2100000202273.
- NMPA (National Medical Products Administration). 2021. Announcement of the national medical products administration on issuing the technical guidelines for safety assessment of cosmetics (2021 Edition) (No. 51 of 2021). Accessed. https://www.nmpa.gov.cn/xxgk/ggtg/qtggtg/20210409160436155.html.
- NRC (National Research Council). 2007. Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and A Strategy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- NTP (National Toxicology Program). 1983. Carcinogenesis studies of allyl isovalerate (CAS No. 2835-39-4) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (gavage studies). National Toxicology Program, Technical Report Series No. 253, NIH Publication. Accessed. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/lt_rpts/tr253.pdf?utm_source=direct&utm_medium=prod&utm_campaign=ntpgolinks&utm_term=tr253.
- NTP (National Toxicology Program). 2004. Toxicology in the 21st Century: The Role of the National Toxicology Program. Accessed. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/main_pages/ntpvision.pdf.
- NTP (National Toxicology Program). 2006. NTP technical report on the comparative toxicity studies of allyl acetate, allyl alcohol, and acrolein. Administered by gavage to F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice. National toxicology program, toxicity report series No. 48, NIH Publication. Accessed. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/st_rpts/tox048.pdf
- OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2004. OECD principles for the validation, for regulatory purposes, of (quantitative) structure activity relationship models. Accessed. https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/risk-assessment/37849783.pdf
- OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2007. Series on Testing and Assessment, Number 80. Guidance on Grouping of Chemicals. ENV/JM/MONO (2007) 28, Accessed September26 2007. https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2007)28&doclanguage=en.
- OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2016a. Case study on the use of an integrated approach to testing and assessment for hepatotoxicity of allyl esters. Series on Testing & Assessment No. 253, Accessed. https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2016)51&doclanguage=en.
- OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2016b, Report on considerations from case studies on Integrated Approaches for Testing and Assessment (IATA), First review cycle (2015); Case studies on grouping methods as a part of IATA. Series on Testing and Assessment No. 250, Accessed. https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2016)48&doclanguage=en.
- Patel, N. H., P. K. Mishra, R. Nagane, A. Deshpande, I. Y. Tamboli, and R. Date. 2019. Comparison of in chemico skin sensitization methods and development of an in chemico skin photosensitization assay. ALTEX 36:373–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1811011.
- Patlewicz, G., G. Helman, P. Pradeep, and I. Shah. 2017. Navigating through the minefield of read-across tools: A review of in silico tools for grouping. Comput. Toxicol. 3:1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2017.05.003.
- Patlewicz, G., L. E. Lizarraga, D. Rua, D. G. Allen, A. B. Daniel, S. C. Fitzpatrick, N. Garcia-Reyero, J. Gordon, P. Hakkinen, A. S. Howard, et al. 2019. Exploring current read-across applications and needs among selected U.S. Federal Agencies. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 106:197–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.05.011.
- Patlewicz, G., M. T. D. Cronin, G. Herman, J. C. Lambert, L. E. Lizarraga, and I. Shah. 2018. Navigating through the minefield of read-across frameworks: A commentary perspective. Comput. Toxicol. 6:39–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2018.04.002.
- PBS. 2016. It could take centuries for EPA to test all the unregulated chemicals under a new landmark bill. Accessed. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/it-could-take-centuries-for-epa-to-test-all-the-unregulated-chemicals-under-a-new-landmark-bill.
- Pham, L. L., S. J. Borghoff, and C. M. Thompson. 2020. Comparison of threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) values to oral reference dose (RfD) values. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 113:104651. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104651.
- Quin, Y., and M. Tong. 2013. Safety and regulations for cosmetics. Beijing China: Chemical Industry Press. ISBN 978-7-122-16770-5.
- Rossi, L. H., and J. Ezendam. 2018. Predicting chemically induced skin sensitization by using in chemico/in vitro methods. Meth Mol Biol 1800:485–504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7899-1_22.
- Rovida, C., T. Barton-Maclaren, E. Benfenati, F. Caloni, P. C. Chandrasekera, C. Chesne, M. T. D. Cronin, J. De Knecht, D. R. Dietrich, S. E. Escher, et al. 2020. Internationalization of read-across as a validated new approach method (NAM) for regulatory toxicology. ALTEX 37:579–606. doi:https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1912181.
- Sakuratani, Y., M. Horie, and E. Leinala. 2018. Integrated approaches to testing and assessment: OECD activities on the development and use of adverse outcome pathways and case studies. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 123:20–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.12955.
- SCC (Solid Waste and Chemicals Management Center). 2021. Notice on collecting models or software for computational toxicology and exposure prediction in 2021. Accessed. https://www.meescc.cn/zhxx/tzgg/202103/t20210304_823338.shtml.
- Schechtman, L. M. 2002. Implementation of the 3Rs (refinement, reduction, and replacement): Validation and regulatory acceptance considerations for alternative toxicological test methods. Inst Lab Animal Res J 43 (Suppl_1):S85–S94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.43.suppl_1.s85.
- Schmidt, K. 2011. Concepts of animal welfare in relation to positions in animal ethics. Acta Biotheor. 59 (2):153–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-011-9128-y.
- Schultz, W., P. Amcoff, E. Berggren, F. Gautier, M. Klaric, D. J. Knight, C. Mahony, M. Schwarz, A. White, and M. T. D. Cronini. 2015. A strategy for structuring and reporting a read-across prediction of toxicity. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol 72 (3):586–601. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.016.
- Shanks, N., R. Greek, and J. Greek. 2009. Are animal models predictive for humans?. Phil. Ethics Humanit. Med 4 (1):2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-4-2.
- TC251 (National Technical Committee for standardization of hazardous chemicals management) in China. 2009. Grouping and read-across methods of chemicals (GB/T 24776-2009). AccessedDecember 15, 2009. http://std.samr.gov.cn/gb/search/gbDetailed?id=71F772D7D141D3A7E05397BE0A0AB82A.
- U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1998. Development of chemical categories in the HPV challenge program. Accessed. https://web.archive.org/web/20080829212006/http:/www.epa.gov/chemrtk/pubs/general/categuid.htm.
- U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2018. New GenRA Module in EPA’s comptox dashboard will help predict potential chemical toxicity. Accessed. https://www.epa.gov/sciencematters/new-genra-module-epas-comptox-dashboard-will-help-predict-potential-chemical-toxicity
- U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2019. EPA releases first major update to chemicals List in 40 Years. Accessed. https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-releases-first-major-update-chemicals-list-40-years.
- U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2020. Chemical Assessment Clustering Engine (ChemACE). Accessed. https://www.epa.gov/tsca-screening-tools/chemical-assessment-clustering-engine-chemace.
- Wu, S., K. Blackburn, J. Amburgey, J. Jaworska, and T. Federle. 2010. A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 56 (1):67–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.09.006.
- Yamada, T., Y. Tanaka, R. Hasegawa, Y. Sakuratani, J. Yamada, E. Kamata, A. Ono, A. Hirose, Y. Yamazoe, O. Mekenyan, et al. 2013. A category approach to predicting the repeated-dose hepatotoxicity of allyl esters. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 65 (2):189–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.12.001.
- Yang, C., M. Cheeseman, J. Rathman, A. Mostrag, N. Skoulis, V. Vitcheva, and S. A. Goldberg. 2020. A new paradigm in threshold of toxicological concern based on chemoinformatics analysis of a highly curated database enriched with antimicrobials. Food Chem. Toxicol. 143:111561. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2020.111561.