The Role of Common and Specific Factors in Child Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: A Grouped Cases Study

References

• Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (1991). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
   Google Scholar
• Achenbach, T. M., & Ruffle, T. M. (2000). The child behavior checklist and related forms for assessing behavioral/emotional problems and competencies. Pediatrics in Review, 21(8), 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.21.8.265
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allen, J. G., Fonagy, P., & Bateman, A. W. (2008). Mentalizing in clinical practice. American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bordin, I., Mari, J. J., & Caeiro, M. F. (1995). Validação da versão brasileira do “Child Behavior Checklist” (CBCL). Revista ABP-APAL, 17(2), 55–66.
   Google Scholar
• Chari, U., Hirisave, U., & Appaji, L. (2013). Exploring play therapy in pediatric oncology: A preliminary endeavour. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 80(4), 303–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-012-0807-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chazan, S. E., & Wolf, J. (2002). Using the children’s play therapy instrument to measure change in psychotherapy: The conflicted player. Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 2(3), 73–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/15289168.2002.10486407
   Google Scholar
• Chu, B. C., Skriner, L. C., & Zandberg, L. J. (2014). Trajectory and predictors of alliance in cognitive behavioral therapy for youth anxiety. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43(5), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2013.785358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Debanné, M. (2019). Attachment and mentalization in contemporary psychodynamic psychotherapy. In D. Kealy & J. S. Grodniczuk (Eds.), Contemporary psychodynamic psychotherapy (pp. 33–46). Academic Press, Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Emerich, D. R., da Rocha, M. M., Silvares, E. F. de M., & Gonçalves, J. de P. (2012). Diferenças Quanto ao Gênero entre Escolares Brasileiros Avaliados pelo Inventário de Comportamentos para Crianças e Adolescentes (CBCL/6-18). Psico, 43(3). https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistapsico/article/view/10053
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, H., Atzil-Slonim, D., Bar-Kalifa, E., Rafaeli, E., & Peri, T. (2016). Emotional experience and alliance contribute to therapeutic change in psychodynamic therapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, & Practice, 53(1), 105–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pst0000041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P., & Adshead, G. (2012). How mentalisation changes the mind. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 18(5), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.108.005876
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. L., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1998). Mentalization and the changing aims of child psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 8(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481889809539235
   Google Scholar
• Goldfried, M. R., & Davila, J. (2005). The role of relationship and technique in therapeutic change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42(4), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.42.4.421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, G. (2013). Is mentalization a common process factor in transference –Focused psychotherapy and dialectical behavior therapy sessions? Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032354
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, G., & Athey-Lloyd, L. (2011). Interaction structures between a child and two therapists in the psychodynamic treatment of a child with Asperger’s disorder. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 37(3), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/0075417X.2011.614749
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, G., Chung, H., Fischel, L., & Athey-Lloyd, L. (2017). Simulation modeling analysis of sequential relations among therapeutic alliance, symptoms, and adherence to child-centered play therapy between a child with autism spectrum disorder and two therapists. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22(3), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104517691082
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, G., Midgley, N., & Schneider, C. (2016). Expert clinicians’ prototypes of an ideal child treatment in psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral therapy: Is mentalization seen as a common process factor? Psychotherapy Research, 26(5), 590–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1049672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, G., Reed, P., & Athey-Lloyd, L. (2015). Mentalization and play therapy process between two therapists and a child with asperger’s disorder. International Journal of Play Therapy, 24(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038660
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise Multivariada de Dados. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
   Google Scholar
• Halfon, S., Bekar, O., & Guleyen, B. (2017). An empirical analysis of mental state talk and affect regulation in two single-cases of psychodynamic child therapy. Psychotherapy, 54(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfon, S., & Bulut, P. (2017). Mentalization and the growth of symbolic play and affect regulation in psychodynamic therapy for children with behavioral problems. Psychotherapy Research, 29(5), 666–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2017.1393577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfon, S., Özsoy, D., & Çavdar, A. (2019). Therapeutic alliance trajectories and associations with outcome in psychodynamic child psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87(7), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfon, S., Yılmaz, M., & Çavdar, A. (2019). Mentalization, session-to-session negative emotion expression, symbolic play, and affect regulation in psychodynamic child psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 56(4), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfon, S., Goodman, G., & Bulut, P. (2020). Interaction structures as predictors of outcome in a naturalistic study of psychodynamic child psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 30(1–2), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2018.1519267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfon, S. (2021). Psychodynamic technique and therapeutic alliance in prediction of outcome in psychodynamic child psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 89(2), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. (2017). What leads to change? I. Common factors in child therapy. In N. Midgley, J. Hayes, & M. Cooper (Eds.), Essential research findings in child and adolescent counselling and psychotherapy (pp. 119–147). Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J., & Brunst, C. (2017). What leads to change? II. Therapeutic techiniques and practices with children and young people. In N. Midgley, J. Hayes, & M. Cooper (Eds.), Essential research findings in child and adolescent counselling and psychotherapy (pp. 148–173). Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hilsenroth, M. J., Blagys, M., Ackerman, S. J., Bonge, D. R., & Blais, M. A. (2005). Measuring psychodynamic-interpersonal and cognitive-behavioral techniques: Development of the comparative psychotherapy process scale. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42(3), 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.42.3.340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/10109-042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1992). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (pp. 521–538). Copyright.
   Google Scholar
• Karver, M. S., Handelsman, J. B., Fields, J. B., & Bickman, L. (2006). Meta-analysis of relationship variables in youth and family therapy: The evidence for different relationship variables in the child and adolescent treatment outcome literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karver, M. S., De Nadai, A. S., Monahan, M., & Shirk, S. R. (2018). Meta-analysis of the prospective relation between alliance and outcome in child and adolescent psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, B. D. 2010. Scoring manual for the therapy process observational coding system for child psychotherapy – Alliance scale. Virginia Commonwealth University. Unpublished Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, B. D. (2011). The relation of the alliance with outcomes in youth therapy: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(4), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, B. D., & Weisz, J. R. (2005). The therapy process observational coding system—Alliance scale: Measure characteristics and prediction of outcome in usual clinical practice. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(2), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.2.323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. (2013). Increasing the rigor of case study evidence in therapy research. Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, 9(4), 382–402. https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v9i4.1832
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, N., Mortimer, R., Cirasola, A., Batra, P., & Kennedy, E. (2021). The evidence-base for psychodynamic psychotherapy with children and adolescents: A narrative synthesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 662671. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662671
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2011). Interaction between alliance and technique in predicting patient outcome during psychodynamic psychotherapy. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199(6), 384–389. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e31821cd28a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramires, V. R. R., Godinho, L. R., & Goodman, G. (2017). The therapeutic process of a child diagnosed with disruptive mood dysregulation disorder. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 34(4), 488–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pap0000134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. M. D., Gastaud, M. B., & Ramires, V. R. R. (2018). Estruturas de interação na psicoterapia psicodinâmica de uma menina com transtorno de adaptação. Temas em Psicologia, 26(2), 703–718. https://dx.doi.org/10.9788/TP2018.2-07Pt
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., & Jones, E. E. (2012). Appendix IB. Child psychotherapy Q-Set. coding manual. In R. A. Levy, J. S. Ablon, & H. Kächele (Eds.), Psychodynamic psychotherapy research: Evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence (pp. 611–626). Humana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shirk, S., & Karver, M. S. (2011). Alliance in child and adolescent psychotherapy. In J. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work (pp. 70–91). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shirk, S. R., Karver, M. S., & Brown, R. (2011). The alliance in child and adolescent psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Specht, P. M., Ensink, K., Normandin, L., & Midgley, N. (2016). Mentalization techniques used by psychodynamic therapists working with children and early adolescents. Bulletin of Menninger Clinic, 80(4), 281–315. https://doi.org/10.1521/bumc.2016.80.4.281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessier, V. P., Normandin, L., Ensink, K., & Fonagy, P. (2016). Fact or fiction? A longitudinal study of play and the development of reflective functioning. Bulletin of Menninger Clinic, 80(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1521/bumc.2016.80.1.60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar