Growing up with a Brain-damaged Mother: Anosognosia by Proxy?

References

• Albrecht, F. (2001). Factitious disorder by proxy. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40 (1): 4–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edition). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Anson, K., & Ponsford, J. (2006). Coping and emotional adjustment following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head and Trauma Rehabilitation, 21 (3): 248–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babinski, J. (1914). Contribution a l’étude des troubles mentaux dans l’hémiplégie organique (anosognosie). Revue Neurologique, 27: 845–848.
   Google Scholar
• Babinski, J. (1918). Anosognosie. Revue Neurologique, 31: 365–367.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolotti, G., Zotti, A. M., Michielin, P., Vidotto, G., & Sanavio, E. (1990). A computerized approach to cognitive behavioural assessment: An introduction to CBA–2.0 primary scales. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 21 (1): 21–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1967). Second Thoughts. London: William Heinemann. (Reprinted London: Karnac, 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, C. H., & Turnbull, O. H. (2004). Emotion-based learning on a simplified card game: The Iowa and Bangor Gambling Tasks. Brain and Cognition 55 (2): 277–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R. W., & Light, R. (2003). Late diagnosis of neuro-degenerative disease in children: Anosognosia by proxy. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17 (3): 374–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, G. N. (1991). The delusional misidentification syndromes. British Journal of Psychiatry, 14: 65–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, P. T., Counahan, R., & Chantler, C. (1978). Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Lancet, 14 (1, 8055): 102–103.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, K. L., Panksepp, J., & Normansell, L. (2003). The Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales: Normative data and implications. Neuro-Psychoanalysis, 5 (1): 57–69.
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, T. E., & Roane, D. M. (2003a). Anosognosia. In: T. E. Feinberg & M. J. Farah (Eds.), Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychology (2nd edition). New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 345–362.
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, T. E., & Roane, D. M. (2003b). Misidentification syndromes. In: T. E. Feinberg & M. J. Farah (Eds.), Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychology (2nd edition). New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 373–379.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. D. (2004). Munchausen by proxy and malingering by proxy. Psychosomatics, 45 (4): 365–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P. (2003). Clinical implications of attachment and mentalization: Efforts to preserve the mind in contemporary treatment. Epilogue. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 67 (3): 271–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, A. (1936). Denial in fantasy. In: The Writings of Anna Freud, Vol. 2. New York: International Universities Press, 1971, pp. 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, A. (1937). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence. London: Hogarth Press (The International Psycho-Analytical Library).
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1900a). The Interpretation of Dreams, Part I. Standard Edition, 4: 1–338.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1919h). The uncanny. Standard Edition, 17: 219–256.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1923b). The Ego and the Id. Standard Edition, 19: 12–66.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1924b [1923]). Neurosis and psychosis. Standard Edition, 19: 149–153.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1925h). Negation. Standard Edition, 19: 235–239.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1926d [1925]). Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety. Standard Edition, 20: 87–172.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1927e). Fetishism. Standard Edition, 21: 152–156.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1936a). A disturbance of memory on the Acropolis. Standard Edition, 22: 239–248.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1937d). Constructions in analysis. Standard Edition, 23: 257–269.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1940a [1938]). An Outline of Psycho-Analysis. Standard Edition, 23: 139–207.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1940e [1938]). Splitting of the ego in the process of defence. Standard Edition, 23: 275–278.
   Google Scholar
• Gazzaniga, M. S. (1992). Brain modules and belief formation. In: Self and Consciousness: Multiple Perspectives, ed. F. S. Kessel, P. M. Cole, & D. L. Johnson. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 88–102.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, M. M. (1982). The Analysis of Transference. Vol. 1: Theory and Technique. New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Havet-Thomassin, V., Gardey, A. M., Aubin, G., & Legall, D. (2004). La blessure cérébrale. Contribution à une lisibilité différentielle du phénomène de méconaissance [Several factors to distinguish anosognosia from denial after a brain injury]. Encephale, 30 (2): 171–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimann, P. (1950). On countertransference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 31: 81–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josselyn, S. A., Falls, W. A., Gewirtz, J. C., Pistell P., & Davis, M. (2004). The nucleus accumbens is not critically involved in mediating the effects of a safety signal on behaviour. Neuropsychopharmacology, 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, T. (1998). Marital conflict by proxy after father kills mother: The family therapist as an expert witness in court. Family Process, 37 (4): 479–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan-Solms, K., & Solms, M. (2000). Clinical Studies in Neuro-Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg O. (1989). Further Contributions to the Treatment of Narcissistic Personalities. Mahwah, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 27: 99–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laplanche, J., & Pontalis, J.-B. (1973). The Language of Psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press. (Reprinted London: Karnac, 1988.)
   Google Scholar
• Laugharne R., Upex, T., & Palazidou, E. (1998). Dysmorpho-phobia by proxy. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 91 (5): 266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, P., Banta Lavenex, P., & Amaral, D. G. (2007). Postnatal development of the primate hippocampal formation. Developmental Neuroscience, 29 (1–2): 179–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, R., Satz, P., Asarnow, R., & Zaacha, K. (1995). Anosognosia and head injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 12, 469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingiardi, V., Lonati, C., Delucchi, F., Fossati, A., Vanzulli L., & Maffei, C. (1999). Defense mechanisms and personality disorders. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 187 (4): 224–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcel, A. J., Tegner, R., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (2004). Anosognosia for plegia: Specificity, extension, partiality and disunity of bodily unawareness. Cortex, 40 (1): 19–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadow R. (1977). Munchausen syndrome by proxy: The hinterland of child abuse. Lancet, 3 (2, 8033): 343–345.
   Google Scholar
• Meadow, R. (1982). Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Archives of Disabilities of the Child, 57 (2): 92–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, E. C., & Moreira, L. A. (1999). Hipocondria por procuração em crianças. Relato de dois casos [Hypochondriasis by proxy in children: Report of two cases]. Jornal de Pediatria (Rio de Janeiro), 75 (5): 373–376.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morin, C., & Thibierge, S. (2007). Body image in neurology and psychoanalysis: History and new developments. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 27 (3–4), 301–318.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, C., Thibierge, S., Bruguière, P., Pradat-Diehl, P., & Mazevet, D. (2005). “Daughter-somatoparaphrenia” in women with right-hemisphere syndrome: A psychoanalytic perspective on neurological body knowledge disorders. Neuro-Psychoanalysis, 7: 171–184.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, A. D., & Turnbull, O. H. (1996). Hatred of the hemiparetic limbs (misoplegia) in a 10 year old child. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 61 (2): 210–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolson P. (2001). Postnatal Depression: Facing the Paradox of Lost Happiness and Motherhood. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ownsworth, T. (2005). The impact of defensive denial upon adjustment following traumatic brain injury. Neuro-Psychoanalysis, 7 (1): 83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Ownsworth, T., & Clare, L. (2006). The association between awareness deficits and rehabilitation outcome following acquired brain injury. Clinical Psychological Revue, 26 (6): 783–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persaud, R. (1998). Dysmorphophobia-by-proxy. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 91 (8): 453–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. C. (1990). The Defense Mechanism Rating Scales Manual (5th edition). Cambridge, MA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. C. (2001). A pilot study of defenses in adults with personality disorders entering psychotherapy. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 189 (10): 651–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano, G. P., & Klonoff, P. S. (1998). A clinician’s rating scale for evaluating impaired self-awareness and denial of disability after brain injury. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12: 56–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, V. S. (1996). What neurological syndromes can tell us about human nature: Some lessons from phantom limbs, Capgras syndrome, and anosognosia. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 61: 115–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roeckerath, K. (2002). Projective identification: A neuro-psychoanalytic perspective. Neuro-Psychoanalysis, 4 (2): 177–186.
   Google Scholar
• Roeckerath, K., & Strauss V. (2004). “Psychoanalytic treatment of Neurological Patients with Hemi-neglect: Phenomenological and Psychodynamic Considerations.” Paper presented at the 5th International Neuro-Psychoanalysis Congress, Rome (September).
   Google Scholar
• Rogan, M. T., Leon, K. S., Perez, D. L., & Kandel, E. R. (2005). Distinct neural signatures for safety and danger in the amygdala and striatum of the mouse. Neuron, 46: 309–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. (1960). The background of safety. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 41: 352–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. (1976a). Dreams, unconscious fantasies and “identity of perception.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 3: 33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. (1976b). Countertransference and role-responsiveness. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 3: 43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. (Ed.) (1988). Projection, Identification, Projective Identification. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. (1990). The structure of internal objects and internal object relations. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 10: 163–181.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. (1992). Reflections on developments in the theory of technique. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 73: 189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J., & Joffe, W. G. (1970). Towards a basic psychoanalytic model. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 51: 183–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J., & Sandler, A. M. (1983). The “second censorship,” the “three-box model” and some technical implications. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 64: 413–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J., & Sandler, A. M. (1987). Past unconscious, present unconscious and the vicissitudes of guilt. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 68: 331–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J., & Sandler, A. M. (1998a). Internal Objects Revisited. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J., & Sandler, A. M. (1998b). A psychoanalytic theory of repression and the unconscious. In: Recovered Memories of Abuse: True or False? ed. J. Sandler & P. Fonagy. London: Karnac, pp. 163–182.
   Google Scholar
• Shallice, T., & Burgess, P. (1991). Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 114: 727–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solms, M. (2000). Concluding remarks. In: Neuroscientific and Psychoanalytic Perspective on Emotion. International Neuro-Psychoanalysis Congress Proceedings, Vol. 1. London: International Neuropsychoanalysis Centre, 2005, pp. 160–165.
   Google Scholar
• Solms, M., & Turnbull, O. (2002). The Brain and the Inner World: An Introduction to the Neuroscience of Subjective Experience. New York: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N., Hofer, L., Haft, W., & Dore, J. (1985). Affect attunement: The sharing of feeling states between mother and infant by means of inter-modal fluency. In: Social Perception in Infants, ed. T. M. Field & N. A. Fox. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 249–268.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, O. H., Evans, C. E. Y., & Owen, V. (2005). Negative emotions and anosognosia. Cortex, 41 (1): 67–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull, O. H., Jones, K., & Reed-Screen, J. (2002). Implicit awareness of deficit in anosognosia: An emotion-based account of denial of deficit. Neuro-Psychoanalysis, 4: 69–86.
   Google Scholar
• Vuillemier, P. (2000). Anosognosia. In: Behaviour and Mood Disorders in Focal Brain Lesions, ed. J. Bogousslavsky & J. L. Cummings. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, pp. 465–519.
   Google Scholar
• Vuillemier, P. (2004). Anosognosia: The neurology of beliefs and uncertainties. Cortex, 40 (1): 9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., & Slote, W. (1955). Withdrawal, inattention, and pain asymbolia. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 74 (3): 235–248.
   Google Scholar
• Westen, D., & Shedler, J. (1999a). Revising and assessing Axis II, Part 1: Developing a clinically and empirically valid assessment method. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 258–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westen, D., & Shedler, J. (1999b). Revising and assessing Axis II, Part 2: Toward an empirically based and clinically useful classification of personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 273–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar