Science, epistemology, and future prospects for psychoanalysis

References

• Appelbaum, J. (2011). Should psychoanalysis become a science? The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71(1), 1–15. doi:10.1057/ajp.2010.31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balconi, M., & Lucchiari, C. (2008). Consciousness and arousal effects on emotional face processing as revealed by brain oscillations: A gamma band analysis. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 67(1), 41–46. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin, H. A. (2011). The neural basis of the dynamic unconscious. Neuropsychoanalysis, 13(1), 5–31. doi:10.1080/15294145.2011.10773654
   Google Scholar
• Beutel, M. E., Stern, E., & Silbersweig, D. A. (2003). The emerging dialogue between psychoanalysis and neuroscience: Neuroimaging perspectives. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 51, 773–801. doi:10.1177/00030651030510030101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blalock, J. E. (1989). A molecular basis for bidirectional communication between the immune and neuroendocrine systems. Physiological Reviews, 69, 1–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blass, R. B., & Carmeli, Z. (2007). The case against neuropsychoanalysis: On fallacies underlying psychoanalysis' latest scientific trend and its negative impact on psychoanalytic discourse. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88(1), 19–40. doi:10.1516/6NCA-A4MA-MFQ7-0JTJ
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesky, D. (1995). Commentaries. Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, 43, 356–360. doi:10.1177/000306519504300204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F. (1988). Psychoanalysis in the undergraduate curriculum: The treatment of psychoanalytic theory in abnormal psychology texts. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 5(1), 83–93. doi:10.1037/h0085122
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F. (2001). The impending death of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 18(1), 3–20. doi:10.1037/0736-9735.18.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, S. C., Bernat, E., Wong, P. S., & Shevrin, H. (1999). Further evidence for unconscious learning: Preliminary support for the conditioning of facial EMG to subliminal stimuli. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 33, 341–347. doi:10.1016/S0022-3956(99)00003-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavell, M. (1993). The psychoanalytic mind: From Freud to philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D. (1995). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cioffi, F. (1970). Freud and the idea of a pseudoscience. In R. R. Borger & F. Cioffi (Eds.), Explanation: Minding the gap in the Behavioral Sciences (pp. 508–515). London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1995). Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex? Nature, 375(6527), 121–123. doi:10.1038/375121a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1998). Consciousness and neuroscience. Cerebral Cortex, 8(2), 97–107. doi:10.1093/cercor/8.2.97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daston, L., & Galison, P. (1992).The image of objectivity. Representations, 40(1), 81–128. doi:10.1525/rep.1992.40.1.99p0137h
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. (1982). Paradoxes of irrationality. In R. Wollheim & J. Hopkins (Eds.), Philosophical essays on Freud (pp. 289–305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derksen, A. A. (1993). The seven sins of pseudo-science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 24, 17–42.
   Google Scholar
• Derksen, A. A. (2001). The seven strategies of the sophisticated pseudo-scientist: A look into Freud's rhetorical tool box. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 32, 329–350. doi:10.1023/A:1013100717113
   Google Scholar
• Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1), 176–180. doi:10.1007/BF00230027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, G. (2011). Towards a two-body neuroscience. Community Integrated Biology, 4, 349–352. doi:10.4161/cib.4.3.15110
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dumas, G., Nadel, J., Soussignan, R., Martinerie, J., & Garnero, L. (2010). Inter-brain synchronization during social interaction. PLoS ONE, 5, e12166. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012166.t002
   Google Scholar
• Edelson, M. (1984). Hypothesis and evidence in psychoanalysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelson, M. (1986). The convergence of psychoanalysis and neuroscience illusion and reality. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 22, 479–519. doi:10.1080/00107530.1986.10746143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esterson, A. (1996). Grunbaum's tally argument. History of the Human Sciences, 9(1), 43–57. doi:10.1177/095269519600900103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1953). Uses and abuses of psychology. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against method. London: NLB.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, S., & Greenberg, R. P. (1996). Freud scientifically reappraised: Testing the theories and therapy. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Flax, J. (1981). Psychoanalysis and the philosophy of science: Critique or resistance? The Journal of Philosophy, 78, 561–569. doi:10.2307/2026190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flax. J. (2004a). The scandal of desire: Psychoanalysis and disruptions of gender: A meditation on Freud's three essays on the theory of sexuality. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 40(1), 47–68. doi:10.1080/00107530.2004.10747235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flax. J. (2004b). What is the subject? Review essay on psychoanalysis and feminism in postcolonial time. Signs, 29, 905–923. doi:10.1086/380628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P. (1996). Discussion of Peter Wolff's “Infant observation and psychoanalysis”. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 44, 404–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotopoulou, A., Solms, M., & Turnbull, O. H. (2004).Wishful reality distortions in confabulation. Neuropsychologia, 42, 727–744. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1917). Introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud (Vols. 17 and 16). London: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 18). London: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1922). Some neurotic mechanisms in jealousy, paranoia and homosexuality. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 18, pp. 223–232). London: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1925). An Autobiographical Study. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 20). London: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1926). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 20, pp. 87–174). London: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1940). An outline of psychoanalysis. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 23, pp. 144–207). London: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, A. (1946). The ego and the mechanisms of defense. New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. (1970). The crisis of psychoanalysis. New York: Fawcett Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gallese, V. (2006). Mirror neurons and intentional attunement: A commentary on David Olds. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 54(1), 46–57. doi:10.1177/00030651060540011101
   Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593–609. doi:10.1093/brain/119.2.593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. (1993a). Irrationality and the philosophy of psychoanalysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. (1993b). Psychoanalysis, contemporary views. Retrieved April 26, 2014, from http://ai.ato.ms/MITECS/Entry/gardner.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gellner, E. (1992). Psychoanalysis, social role and testability. In W. Dryden, & C. Feltham (Eds.), Psychotherapy and its discontents. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Shalizi, C. R. (2012). Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics in the social sciences.. In H. Kincaid (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of social science (pp. 259–273). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, M. M. (1976). Metapsychology is not psychology. Psychological Issues, 9, 71–105.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. (1996). What kind of research for psychoanalysis? International Psychoanalysis: Newsletter of the International Psychoanalytical Association, 5, 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. (2000). Science and science fiction in infant research. In J. Sandler, A. M. Sandler, & R. Davies (Eds.), Clinical and observational research: Roots of a controversy (pp. 41–72). London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Grier, M. (2001). Kant's doctrine of transcendental illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grünbaum, A. (1977). How scientific is psychoanalysis? In Raphael Stern, Louise S. Horowitz, & Jack Lynes (Eds.), Science and psychotherapy (pp. 219–254). New York: Haven.
   Google Scholar
• Grünbaum, A. (1978). Is psychoanalysis a pseudo-science? [Is psychoanalysis a pseudo-science?] Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung [Journal of Philosophical Research], 32, 49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Grünbaum, A. (1979). Is Freudian psychoanalytic theory pseudo-scientific by Karl Popper's criterion of demarcation? American Philosophical Quarterly, 16, 131–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grünbaum, A. (1984). The foundations of psychoanalysis: A philosophical critique (pp. 127–172). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grünbaum, A. (2008). Popper's fundamental misdiagnosis of the scientific defects of Freudian psychoanalysis, and of their bearing on the theory of demarcation, Psychoanalytic Psychology, 25, 574–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grush, R., & Churchland, P. S. (1995). Gaps in Penrose's toilings. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, 10–29.
   Google Scholar
• Guntrip, H. (1978). Psychoanalysis and some scientific and philosophical critics. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 51, 207–224. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1978.tb02466.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameroff, S. R., & Penrose, R. (1995). Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: A model for consciousness. Neural Network World, 5, 793–804.
   Google Scholar
• Harre, R. (1970). The principles of scientific thinking. Chicago, MA: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harre, R. (1972). The philosophies of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, S. T. (2002). The future of psychoanalytic research: Turning points and opportunities. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 50, 395–405. doi:10.1177/00030651020500021401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, N. N. (2004). Psychoanalysis as science. PSYART: A hyperlink journal for the Psychological study of the arts. Online publication. Retrieved from http://www.psyartjournal.com/article/show/n_holland
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, J. (1988). Epistemology and depth psychology: Critical notes on "the foundations of psychoanalysis." In P. Clark & C. Wright (Eds.), Mind, psychoanalysis and science (pp. 33–60). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, J. (1992). Psychoanalysis, interpretation, and science. In J. Hopkins & A. Savile (Eds.), Psychoanalysis, mind and art: Perspectives on Richard Wollheim (pp. 3–34). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Howson, C., & Urbach, P. (1989). Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, M. R. (2008). Human psychoneuroimmunology: 20 years of discovery. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 22(2), 129–139. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2007.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, F. (1998). Offlies, mice and men. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel, E. R. (1999). Biology and the future of psychoanalysis: A new intellectual framework for psychiatry revisited. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 505–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan-Solms, K., & Solms, M. (2000). Clinical studies in neuro-psychoanalysis: Introduction to a depth neuropsychology. London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kelk, N. (1977). Is psychoanalysis a science? A reply to Slater. British Journal of Psychiatry, 130(2), 105–111. doi:10.1192/bjp.130.2.105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M. (1955). New directions in psycho-analysis; the significance of infant conflict in the pattern of adult behavior. Tavistock: London.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H., & Strozier, C. B. (1985). Self-psychology and the humanities: Reflections on a new psychoanalytic approach. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1970). Logic of discovery or psychology of research? In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 1–23). London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–195). London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lattey, R. M. (1969). Dr. Sigmund Freud, pseudoscientist. Canadian Family Physician, 15, 59–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lear, J. (1990). Love and its place in nature: A philosophical reconstruction of psychoanalysis. London: Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Lear, J. (1998). Open minded, working out the logic of the soul. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LeDoux, J. (1998). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, D. C. (2007). The beginnings of western science: The European scientific tradition in philosophical, religious, and institutional context, prehistory to A.D. 1450, Second Edition, Part 1450. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linkins, R. W., & Comstock, G. W. (1990). Depressed mood and development of cancer. American Journal of Epidemiology, 132, 962–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masling, J. M., & Bornstein, R. F. (Eds). (1996). Empirical studies of psychoanalytic theories. Psychoanalytic perspectives on developmental psychology Vol. 6. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, J. (2007). A response to Grünbaum's refutation of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 24, 539–544. doi:10.1037/0736-9735.24.3.539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, J. (2011). Deconstructing Hermes: A critique of the hermeneutic turn in psychoanalysis. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71, 238–245. doi:10.1057/ajp.2011.20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. (1968). The will to power (new ed.) (W. Kaufman, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Oberman, L. M., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2007). The simulating social mind: The role of simulation in the social and communicative deficits of autism spectrum disorders. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 310–327. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberman, L. M., Ramachandran, V. S., & Pineda, J. A. (2008). Modulation of mu suppression in children with autism spectrum disorders in response to familiar or unfamiliar stimuli: The mirror neuron hypothesis. Neuropsychologia, 46, 1558–1565. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perls, F., Hefferline, R. F., & Goodman, P. (1973). Gestalt therapy: Excitement and growth in the human personality. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pert, C. B., Dreher, H. E., & Ruff, M. R. (1998). The psychosomatic network: Foundations of mind–body medicine. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 4, 30–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, E. A., O'Connor, K. J., Cunningham, W. A., Funayama, E. S., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., & Banaji, M. R. (2000). Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(5), 729–738. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10836912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: London: Routledge and Keagan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1974). Replies to my critics. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper (Vol. 2, pp. 961–1197). LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery (2nd English ed.). New York: Routledge Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, V. S. (1995). Anosognosia in parietal lobe syndrome. Consciousness Cognition, 4(1), 22–51. doi:10.1006/ccog.1995.1002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, V. S. (1996a). The evolutionary biology of self-deception, laughter, dreaming and depression: Some clues from anosognosia. Medical Hypotheses, 47, 347–362. doi:10.1016/S0306-9877(96)90215-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, V. S. (1996b). What neurological syndromes can tell us about human nature: Some lessons from phantom limbs, capgras' syndrome, and anosognosia. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia, LXI, 115–134.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, V. S. (2000). Mirror neurons and imitation learning as the driving force behind “the great leap forward” in human evolution. Retrieved January 4, 2012, from http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge69.html
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, V. S. (2004). The astonishing Francis Crick. Retrieved January 4, 2013, from http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/crick04/crick04_index.html
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1998). Three laws of qualia: What neurology tells us about the biological functions of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4, 429–457.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, V. S., & Rogers-Ramachandran, D. (1996). Denial of disabilities in anosognosia. Nature, 382, 501–501. doi:10.1038/382501a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapaport, D. (1960). The structure of psychoanalytic theory. Psychological Issues, 2, 1–158.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and philosophy: An essay in interpretation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(2), 131–141. doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Safran, J. D. (2001). When worlds collide: Psychoanalysis and the empirically supported treatment movement. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11, 659–681. doi:10.1080/10481881109348635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, R. (1976). A new language far psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, R. (1990). The search for common ground. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71, 49–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlipp, P. A. (1969). Albert Einstein; Philosopher-Scientist. New York: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Schilbach, L. (2010). A second-person approach to other minds. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(6), 449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, J. (1996). Physics, philosophy psychoanalysis, and ideology: On engaging with Adolf Grünbaum. Psychoanalytic Dialogues: The International Journal of Relational Perspectives, 6, 503–513. doi:10.1080/10481889609539135
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, T., & Emde, R. N. (1995). Research in psychoanalysis: Process, development, outcome. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shedler, J. (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65(2), 98–109. doi:10.1037/a0018378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevrin, H. (2001). Event-related markers of unconscious processes. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 42(2), 209–218. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(01)00165-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevrin H., Bond, J., Brakel, L., Hertel, R., & Williams, W. (1996). Conscious and unconscious processes: Psychodynamic, cognitive, and neuro-physiologic convergences. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shevrin, H., Smith, W., & Fritzler, D. (1969). Repressiveness as a factor in the subliminal activation of brain and verbal responses. Journal of Nervous Mental Disorders, 149, 261–269. doi:10.1097/00005053-196909000-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevrin H., Smith W., & Fritzler, D. (1971). Average evoked response and verbal correlates of unconscious mental processes. Psychophysiology, 6, 149–162. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1971.tb00447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, E. (1975). The psychiatrist in search of a science: The depth psychologies. British Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 205–224. doi:10.1192/bjp.126.3.205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sletvold, H. (2003). Neuroscientific research with possible relevance for psychoanalysis. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 26, 51–57.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. F. (1997). Creative misreading: Why we talk past each other. Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, 45, 335–337. doi:10.1177/00030651970450021901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. E., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Fredrickson, L. B., & Loftus, E. (2003). Atkinson Hilgard's introduction to psychology. Wadsworth: Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, M., & Shevrin, H. (2006). Unconscious inhibition and facilitation at the objective detection threshold: Replicable and qualitatively different unconscious effects. Cognition, 101(1), 43–79. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, R. S. (1979). Psychoanalysis and hermeneutics. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 6, 389–411.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, D. P. (1982). Narrative truth and historical truth. Meaning and interpretation in psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, D. J., Solms, M., & van Honk, J. (2006). The cognitive affective neuroscience of the unconscious. CNS Spectrums, 11, 580–583.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, R. (2000). Introduction. In J. Sandler, A. M. Sandler, & R. Davies (Eds.), Clinical and observational research roots of a controversy (pp. 1–17). London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (2000). The relevance of empirical infant research to psychoanalytic theory and practice. In J. Sandler, A.M. Sandler, & R. Davies (Eds.), Clinical and observational research: Roots of a controversy (pp. 73–90). London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tognoli, E., Lagarde, J., Deguzman, G. C., & Kelso, J. A. (2007). The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 104, 8190–8195. doi:10.1073/pnas.0611453104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrey, E. F. (1992). Freudian fraud: The malignant effect of Freud's theory on American thought and culture. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, O. H., Jones, K., & Reed-Screen, J. (2002). Implicit awareness of deficit in anosognosia: An emotion-based account of denial of deficit. Neuropsychoanalysis, 4(1), 69–86. doi:10.1080/15294145.2002.10773381
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, O. H., Owen, V., & Evans, C. E. Y. (2005). Negative emotions in anosognosia. Cortex, 41(1), 67–75. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70179-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. (2005). Psychoanalytic controversies: Will psychoanalytic pluralism be an enduring state of our discipline?. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86(3), 623–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westen, D. (1998). The scientific legacy of Sigmund Freud: Toward a psycho dynamically informed psychological science. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 333–371. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westen, D. (1999). The scientific status of unconscious processes: Is Freud really dead? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47, 1061–1106. doi:10.1177/000306519904700404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westen, D. (2002). The language of psychoanalytic discourse. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12, 857–898. doi:10.1080/10481881209348710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiens, S. (2006). Subliminal emotion perception in brain imaging: Findings, issues, and recommendations. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 105–121. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56006-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, P. H. (1996). The irrelevance of infant observations for psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 44, 369–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollheim, R. (1984). The thread of life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wollheim, R. (1991). Freud (2nd ed.) London: Fontana Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Wollheim, R. (1993). Desire, belief and professor Grünbaum's Freud. In R. Wollheim (Ed.), The mind and its depths (pp. 91–111). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, P. S., Shevrin, H., & Williams, W. J. (1994). Conscious and nonconscious processes: An ERP index of an anticipatory response in a conditioning paradigm using visually masked stimuli. Psychophysiology, 31(1), 87–101. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb01028.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurmser, L. (1989). Special issue: Methodology in psychoanalytic research. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 9(2), 220–224. doi:10.1080/07351698909533765
   Google Scholar