Regulating film, regulating emotion: the emotional history of public opinion

References

• Acland, C. (2012). Swift viewing: The popular life of subliminal influence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, R. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Oxford: Harpers.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. L. (2008). Taking liberties: The Payne fund studies and the creation of the media expert. In L. Greiveson, & H. Wasson (Eds.), Inventing film studies (pp. 38–65). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bederman, G. (1995). Manliness and civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brief of Appellees. (1914). “Mutual film Co v. industrial commission of Ohio, 236 U.S. 247, transcript of record,” 26. Available from: U.S. Supreme Court Records and Briefs, 1832–1978 [database].
   Google Scholar
• Burstyn v. Wilson 343 U.S. 495 (1952).
   Google Scholar
• Butsch, R. (2008). The citizen audience: Crowds, publics, and individuals. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cantril, H., & Allport, G. (1935). The psychology of radio. New York: Harper & Bros.
   Google Scholar
• Czitrom, D. (1982). Media and the American mind: From Morse to McLuhan. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, T. (2009). Hollywood’s censor: Joseph I. Breen and the Production Code Administration. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, D. (1967). Attitude: The history of a concept. In Perspectives in American history (Vol. 1, pp. 287–365). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerkhe, P. J. (2009). The ethics and politics of speech: Communication and rhetoric in the twentieth century. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlow v New York 268 U.S. 652 (1925).
   Google Scholar
• Glander, T. (2000). Origins of mass communications research during the American Cold War: Educational effects and contemporary implications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Grieveson, L. (2004). Policing cinema: Movies and censorship in early twentieth-century America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, M. (2004). Driving into the wreck: Aesthetic spectatorship at the turn of the millennium. In Refractions of violence (pp. 103–117). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jowett, G. (1989). ‘Capacity for evil’: The 1915 Supreme Court mutual decision. Historical Journal of Film, Radio, and Television, 9(1), 59–78. doi: 10.1080/01439688900260041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koziak, B. (2000). Retrieving political emotion: Thumos, Aristotle, and gender. State College, PA: Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. (1930). Psychopathology and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. (1935). World politics and personal insecurity. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P., & Merton, R. (1948). Mass communication, popular taste, and organized social action. In L. Bryson (Eds.), The communication of ideas (pp. 95–118). New York: Institute for Religious and Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Le Bon, G. (1903). The crowd: Study of the popular mind. London: T.F. Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Lippman, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Malin, B. (2014). Feeling mediated: A history of media technology and emotion in America. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, A. (2010). The citizen machine: Governing by television in 1950s America. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munsterberg, H. (1916). The photoplay: A psychological study. Project Gutenberg.
   Google Scholar
• Mutual Film, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio 236 U.S. 230 (1915).
   Google Scholar
• Pathe Exchange, Inc. v. Cobb 202 AD 450 (1922).
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, J. (2014). Can moving pictures speak? Film, speech, and social science in early twentieth-century law. Cinema Journal, 53(3), 76–99. doi: 10.1353/cj.2014.0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, E. A. Jr. (1973). The crisis of democratic theory: Scientific naturalism and the problem of value. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, W. (2001). The navigation of feeling: A framework for the history of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roth v. United States 354 U.S. 476 (1957).
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. (1981). Discovering the news: A social history of American newspapers. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (1994). Social science in the crucible: The American debate over objectivity and purpose, 1918–1941. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stearns, P. (2014). Modern patterns in emotions history. In S.J. Matt, & P. N. Stearns (Eds.), Doing emotions history (pp. 17–40). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (1995). Democracy and the problem of free speech. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarde, G. (1901). The public and the crowd. In T. Clark (Eds.), On communication and social influence: Selected papers (1969) (pp. 277–296). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, F. (2013). The democratic surround: Multimedia and American liberalism from World War II to the psychedelic sixties. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S. (1990). Morality and entertainment: The origins of the Motion Picture Production Code. Journal of American History, 77(1), 39–65. doi: 10.2307/2078638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette 319 U.S. 624 (1943).
   Google Scholar
• Wiebe, R. H. (1967). The search for order, 1877–1920. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Wittern–Keller, L., & Haberski Jr, R. J. (2008). The Miracle case: Film censorship and the Supreme Court. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar