Implications for the self determine benevolence and self-protection in intergroup relations

References

• Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 155–194.10.1023/A:1024471506938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, B., Charlton, K., Dorr, N., & Hume, D. L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 520–542. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Oxford: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B., & Campbell, D. T. (1976). Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes: East African evidence. New York, NY: Halstead.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1965). Ethnocentrism and other altruistic motives. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 13, pp. 283–311). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., Glass, D. C., & Katz, I. (1978). Favorable evaluations of blacks and the handicapped: Positive prejudice, unconscious denial, or social desirability? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 97–106. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1978.tb00768.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, P. G., Monteith, M. J., Zuwerink, J., & Elliot, A. J. (1991). Prejudice with and without compunction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 817–830. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiDonato, T. E., Ullrich, J., & Krueger, J. I. (2011). Social perception as induction and inference: An integrative model of intergroup differentiation, ingroup favoritism, and differential accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 66–83. doi:10.1037/a00210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durante, F., Fiske, S. T., Kervyn, N., Cuddy, A. C., Akande, A., Adetoun, B. E., … Storari, C. C. (2013). Nations’ income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 726–746. doi:10.1111/bjso.1200551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton, D. G., & Lake, R. A. (1973). Threat of own prejudice and reverse discrimination in interracial situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 94–100. doi:10.1037/h003558237/0022-3514.46.6.1335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766–778. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esses, V. M., Deaux, K., Lalonde, R. N., & Brown, R. (2010). Psychological perspectives on immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 635–647. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (2004). Social beings. New Jersey, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (2010). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, G. Lindzey, S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 5th ed., pp. 941–982). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470561119
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61–89). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaertner, L., & Insko, C. A. (2000). Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation, or fear? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 77–94. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harber, K. D. (1998). Feedback to minorities: Evidence of a positive bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 622–628. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harber, K. D. (2004). The Positive feedback bias as a response to out-group unfriendliness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2272–2297. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01977.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harber, K. D., Gorman, J. L., Gengaro, F. P., Butisingh, S., Tsang, W., & Ouellette, R. (2012). Students’ race and teachers’ social support affect the positive feedback bias in public schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1149–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harber, K. D., Stafford, R., & Kennedy, K. A. (2010). The positive feedback bias as a response to self-image threat. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 207–218.10.1348/014466609X473956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2008). Diminishing vertical distance: Power and social status as barriers to intergroup reconciliation. In A. Nadler, T. E. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 301–317). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300314.003.0014
   Google Scholar
• Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (2004). Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 862–879. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, O. P. (1990). The “Big Five” factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66–100). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, C. W., Spears, R., Branscombe, N. R., & Doosje, B. (2003). Malicious pleasure: Schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 932–943. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeVine, R. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, T. E. (2008). Intergroup relations and reconciliation: A theoretical and methodological analysis. In A. Nadler, T. E. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation. (pp. 345–365). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, T. E. (2013). Différentiation et favorabilité des jugements sur les traits de l’endogroupe et de l’exogroupe lors des rencontres sans connaissance antérieure [Trait ratings of the in-group and out-group with minimal acquaintance: Differentiation and out-group favorability]. Psychologie Française, 58, 337–350.10.1016/j.psfr.2013.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy, T. E. (2014). Responses to out-groups sharing a common feature with an adversary: Intergroup generalization and differentiation. In T. Draper (Ed.), Psychology of prejudice: New research. (pp. 101–120). New York, NY: Nova Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, T. E., & Albright, L. (1990). Interpersonal perception in a social context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 419–428. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy, T. E., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The social relations model: An integrative method for personality research. Journal of Personality, 54, 199–225. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00393.x:10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy, T. E., Ristikari, T., Berrios-Candelaria, R., Lewis, B., & Agatstein, F. (2011). Status-based asymmetry in intergroup responses: Implications for intergroup reconciliation. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17, 31–42. doi:10.1037/a0021666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, D. M., & Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45–81. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S., & Malloy, T. E. (2003). Interpersonal behavior, perception, and affect in status-discrepant dyads: Social interaction of gay and heterosexual men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 121–135. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.4.2.121
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103–122. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420220202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadler, A., Malloy, T. E., & Fisher, J. D. (2008). The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300314.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, L., & Levy, S. R. (2012). The relation between polyculturalism and intergroup attitudes among racially and ethnically diverse adults. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18, 1–16. doi:10.1037/a0026490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, D., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). The emergence and effects of deviants in low and high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 611–617. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00506-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, D., & Ellemers, N. (2005). When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 192–200. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, D., Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Manstead, A. R. (2002). Integrating identity and instrumental approaches to intergroup differentiation: Different contexts, different motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1455–1467. doi:10.1177/014616702237574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, D., Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Manstead, A. R. (2003). Two functions of verbal intergroup discrimination: Identity and instrumental motives as a result of group identification and threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 568–577. doi:10.1177/0146167203029005002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, D., Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Manstead, A. R. (2006). The social functions of ingroup bias: Creating, confirming, or changing social reality. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 359–396. doi:10.1080/10463280601088773
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, L., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2013a). The self-regulatory role of anticipated group-based shame and guilt in inhibiting in-group favoritism. European Journal Of Social Psychology, 43, 493–504. doi:10.1037/t05289-000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, L., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2013b). When does anticipating group-based shame lead to lower ingroup favoritism? The role of status and status stability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 334–343. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, M. (1966). The psychology of social norms. Oxford: Harper Torchbooks.
   Google Scholar
• Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R. E. (1965). Attitude and attitude change. The social judgment-involvement approach. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways. New York, NY: Ginn.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar