3,445
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Ironic effects of feedback on contingency of self-worth: Why self-reports of contingency are biased

, , &
Pages 183-200 | Received 10 Jun 2017, Accepted 17 Oct 2017, Published online: 30 Nov 2017

References

  • Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss, Vol. III: Loss: Sadness and depression. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
  • Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York, NY: Scribners.
  • Crocker, J. (2002). Contingencies of Self-Worth: Implications for Self-Regulation and Psychological Vulnerability. Self and Identity, 1(2), 143–149.
  • Crocker, J. & Canevello, A. (2008). Creating and undermining social support in communal relationships: The role of compassionate and self-image goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 555–575.
  • Crocker, J., & Luhtanen, R. K. (2003). Level of Self-esteem and contingencies of self-worth: Unique effects on academic, social, and financial problems in college students. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 701–712.10.1177/0146167203029006003
  • Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R. K., Cooper, M. L., & Bouvrette, S. A. (2003). Contingencies of self-worth in college students: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 894–908.10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.894
  • Crocker, J. & Park, L. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 392–414.
  • Crocker, J., & Wolfe, C. T. (2001). Contingencies of self-worth. Psychological Review, 108, 593–623.10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.593
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human autonomy: The basis for true self-esteem. In M. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 31–49). New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Heatherton, T. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2000). Interpersonal evaluations following threats to self: Role of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 725.10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.725
  • Hedges, L. V. (1982). Estimation of effect size for a series of independent experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 490–499.10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.490
  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Jansen, J., & Vonk, R. (2005). Contingente zelfwaardering: Betrouwbaarheid en validiteit. van de Nederlandse globale en domeinspecifieke contingentieschaal [Contingent self-esteem: Reliability and validity of the Dutch global and domain-specific contingency scale]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Psychologie en haar grensgebieden, 60, 1–14.
  • Jordan, C. H., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2013). Fragile self-esteem: The perils and pitfalls of (some) high self-esteem. In V. Zeigler-Hill (Ed.), Self-esteem (pp. 80–98). London: Psychology Press.
  • Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Power anomalies in testing mediation. Psychological Science, 25, 334–339.10.1177/0956797613502676
  • Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 1–26.10.1207/S15327965PLI1401_01
  • Kernis, M. H., Paradise, A. W., Whitaker, D. J., Wheatman, S. R., & Goldman, B. N. (2000). Master of one’s psychological domain? Not likely if one’s self-esteem is unstable. Personality and Social Psycholog Bulletin, 26(10), 1297–1305.10.1177/0146167200262010
  • Kernis, M. H., Lakey, C. E., & Heppner, W. L. (2008). Secure versus Fragile high self-esteem as a predictor of verbal defensiveness: Converging findings across three different markers. Journal of Personality, 76, 477–512.10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00493.x
  • Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology 32 (pp. 1–62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Leary, M. R., Haupt, A. L., Strausser, K. S., & Chokel, J. T. (1998). Calibrating the sociometer: The relationship between interpersonal appraisals and the state self-esteem. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74(5), 1290–1299.10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1290
  • Leary, M. R., Gallagher, B., Fors, E., Buttermore, N., Baldwin, E., Kennedy, K., & Mills, A. (2003). The invalidity of disclaimers about the effects of social feedback on self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 623–636.10.1177/0146167203029005007
  • Loeys, T., Moerkerke, B., & Vansteelandt, S. (2015). A cautionary note on the power of the test for the indirect effect in mediation analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1549, 1–8.
  • Murray, S. L., Griffin, D. W., Rose, P., & Bellavia, G. (2003). Calibrating the sociometer: The relational contingencies of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 63–84.10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.63
  • Paradise, A. W., & Kernis, M. H. (1999). Development of the contingent self-esteem scale. Unpublished data, University of Georgia.
  • Park, L. E., & Crocker, J. (2008). Contingencies of self-worth and responses to negative interpersonal feedback. Self and Identity, 7, 184–203.10.1080/15298860701398808
  • Park, L. E., Young, A. F., & Eastwick, P. W. (2015). (Psychological) Distance makes the heart grow fonder effects of psychological distance and relative intelligence on men’s attraction to women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1459–1473.
  • Park, L. E., Ward, D. E., & Naragon-Gainey, K. (2017). It’s all about the money (For Some): Consequences of financially contingent self-worth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(5), 601–622.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.10.3758/BF03206553
  • Pronin, E. (2009). The Introspection Illusion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 1–67.
  • Radstaak, M. (2009). Effects of feedback and self-compassion on contingencies of self- worth: You don’t know what you got until it’s gone (Unpublished master’s thesis). Radboud University, Nijmegen.
  • Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400876136
  • Ryan, R. M., & Brown, K. W. (2003). Why we don’t need self-esteem: On fundamental needs, contingent love, and mindfulness. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 71–76.
  • Schöne, C., Tandler, S., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2015). Contingent self-esteem and vulnerability to depression: Academic contingent self-esteem predicts depressive symptoms in students. Frontiers in Developmental Psychology, 6, 1–13.
  • Sheldon, K. M. (2014). Becoming oneself: The central role of self-concordant goal selection. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(4), 349–365.10.1177/1088868314538549
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotoc confidence intervals for direct and indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
  • Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261–302). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Strahan, E. J., Lafrance, A., Wilson, A. E., Ethier, N., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2008). Victoria’s dirty secret: How sociocultural norms influence adolescent girls and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 288–301.10.1177/0146167207310457
  • van Thiel, E., & Engelen, S., (n.d.). Mini IQ test. Retrieved January 15, 2008, from http://www.123test.nl/iqtest/
  • Thoemmes, F. (2015). Reversing arrows in mediation models does not distinguish plausible models. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 226–234.10.1080/01973533.2015.1049351
  • Vonk, R. (2006). Improving self-esteem. In M. Kernis (Ed.), Self-esteem: Issues and answers (pp. 178–187). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Vonk, R., & Smit, H. (2012). Optimal self-esteem is contingent: Intrinsic versus extrinsic and upward versus downward contingencies. European Journal of Personality Psychology, 26, 182–193.10.1002/per.v26.3
  • Vonk, R., Celik, P., Jolij, J., & Stoeller, T. (2014). Effects of positive feedback and self-reflection on self-esteem. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Watson, G., & Glaser, E. M. (1980). Watson-Glaser thinking appraisal: Forms A and B. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp.
  • Wiedermann, W., & von Eye, A. (2015). Direction of effects in mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 20, 221–244.10.1037/met0000027
  • Wilson, T. D. (2002). Strangers to ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.