481
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The two-dimensions-five-components structure of in-group identification is invariant across various identification patterns in different social groups

, &
Pages 668-684 | Received 21 Feb 2018, Accepted 07 Aug 2018, Published online: 05 Sep 2018

References

  • Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80–114.
  • Becker, J. C., Barreto, M., Kahn, K. B., & de Oliveira Laux, S. H. (2015). The collective value of “me” (and its limitations): Towards a more nuanced understanding of individual and collective coping with prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 497–516.
  • Becker, J. C., & Tausch, N. (2014). When group memberships are negative: The concept, measurement, and behavioral implications of psychological disidentification. Self and Identity, 13(3), 294–321.
  • Cameron, J. E. (2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3(3), 239–262.
  • Cassidy, C., & Trew, K. (1998). Identities in Northern Ireland: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Social Issues, 54(4), 725–740.
  • Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2–3), 371–389.
  • FernUniversität in Hagen. (2017). Kurzer Semesterüberblick. [Short overview of term]. Retrieved from https://www.fernuni-hagen.de/arbeiten/statistik/daten/index.shtml
  • Hinkle, S., Taylor, L. A., Fox-Cardamone, D. L., & Crook, K. F. (1989). Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: A multicomponent approach. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28(4), 305–317.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P., M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Jackson, J. W. (2002). Intergroup attitudes as a function of different dimensions of group identification and perceived intergroup conflict. Self and Identity, 1(1), 11–33.
  • Kachanoff, F. J., Ysseldyk, R., Taylor, D. M., Sablonnière, R., & Crush, J. (2016). The good, the bad and the central of group identification: Evidence of a u-shaped quadratic relation between in-group affect and identity centrality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 563–580.
  • La Barbera, F., & Capone, V. (2016). Five dimensions of European identity: A contribution to the Italian adaptation and validation of the in-group identification scale. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(2), 288–303.
  • Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., … Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165.
  • Lovakov, A. V., Agadullina, E. R., & Osin, E. N. (2015). A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification: Examining in Russian samples. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18, 12.
  • Martiny, S. E., Roth, J., Jelenec, P., Steffens, M. C., & Croizet, J. C. (2012). When a new group identity does harm on the spot: Stereotype threat in newly created groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 65–71.
  • Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Jans, L. (2013). A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 597–617.
  • Reysen, S., Katzarska-Miller, I., Nesbit, S. M., & Pierce, L. (2013). Further validation of a single-item measure of social identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(6), 463–470.
  • Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S., Halevy, N., & Eidelson, R. (2008). Toward a unifying model of identification with groups: Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 280–306.
  • Roth, J., & Mazziotta, A. (2015). Adaptation and validation of a German multidimensional and multicomponent measure of social identification. Social Psychology, 46(5), 277–290.
  • Sassenberg, K., & Wieber, F. (2005). Don’t ignore the other half: The impact of ingroup identification on implicit measures of prejudice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(5), 621–632.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
  • Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1994). Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent, overlapping, or complementary concepts? Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 16–35.
  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1–39.
  • Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178.
  • van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., & Christ, O. (2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(2), 171–191.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.