The identification-similarity relationship as a function of ingroup status: A social identity perspective

References

• Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakouri, M., & Staerklé, C. (2015). Coping with structural disadvantage: Overcoming negative effects of perceived barriers through bonding identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 648–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, J. C. (2012). The system-stabilizing role of identity management strategies: Social creativity can undermine collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 647–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, B. A., Charlton, K., Dorr, N., & Hume, D. L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 520–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernat, M., Vescio, T. K., & Green, M. L. (1996). Selective self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1194–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldry, J. G., Gaertner, L., & Quinn, J. (2007). Measuring the measures: A meta-analytic investigation of the measures of outgroup homogeneity. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 157–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Oxford: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B. (1993). Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group homogeneity. Social Cognition, 11, 150–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadinu, M., Latrofa, M., & Carnaghi, A. (2013). Comparing self-stereotyping with in-group-stereotyping and out-group-stereotyping in unequal-status groups: The Case of gender. Self and Identity, 12, 582–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, J. E. (2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3, 239–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats, S., Smith, E. R., Claypool, H. M., & Banner, M. J. (2000). Overlapping mental representations of self and in-group: Reaction time evidence and its relationship with explicit measures of group indentification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 304–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, B., Scheepers, D., van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2011). The threat vs. challenge of car parking for women: How self- and group affirmation affect cardiovascular responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 178–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, B., van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2009). Working for the self or working for the group: How self- versus group affirmation affects collective behavior in low-status groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 183–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N. (2001). Individual upward mobility and the perceived legitimacy of intergroup relations. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy (pp. 204–222). Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frable, D. E., Platt, L., & Hoey, S. (1998). Concealable stigmas and positive self-perceptions: Feeling better around similar others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 909–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grier, A., & Deshpandé, R. (2001). Social dimensions of consumer distinctiveness: The influence of social status on group identity and advertising persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimond, S., Chatard, A., Martinot, D., Crisp, R. J., & Redersdorff, S. (2006). Social comparison, self-stereotyping, and gender differences in self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 221–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Voice, exit, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Iacoviello, V., & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (2015). Individualistic tendencies: When group status makes the difference. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 540–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacoviello, V., & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (2018). Self-depersonalization and ingroup favoritism in minimal group hierarchies. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 77, 5–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, L. A., Sullivan, L. A., Harnish, R., & Hodge, C. N. (1996). Achieving positive social identity: Social mobility, social creativity, and permeability of group boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 241–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, C. (1993). Group identification, intergroup perceptions and collective action. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 59–83.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119, 546–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalonde, R. N. (1992). The dynamics of group differentiation in the face of defeat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 336–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latrofa, M., Vaes, J., Cadinu, M., & Carnaghi, A. (2010). The cognitive representation of self-stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 911–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., … Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaine, G. (1974). Social differentiation and social originality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 17–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., Schmidt, J., & Schmidt, L. (2006). Collective efficacy beliefs in student work teams: Relation to self-efficacy, cohesion, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 73–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1998). Group status and perceptions of homogeneity. European Review of Social Psychology, 9, 31–75.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, J., Abrams, D., & Serôdio, R. G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J., McGuire, C. V., Child, P., & Fujioka, T. (1978). Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one’s ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 511–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, D. (2009). Turning social identity threat into challenge: Status stability and cardiovascular reactivity during inter-group competition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 228–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, D., & Ellemers, N. (2009). Suffering from the possibility of status loss : Physiological responses to social identity threat in high status groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1075–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (1996). Cognition and communication. Judgement biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, B., & Brown, R. (1987). Perceived intragroup homogeneity in minority-majority contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 703–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snibbe, A. C., & Markus, H. R. (2005). You can’t always get what you want: Educational attainment, agency, and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 703–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1976). Exit, voice and intergroup relations. In L. H. Strickland, F. E. Aboud, & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Social psychology in transition (pp. 281–304). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1978). The social psychology of minorities. New York: Minority Rights Group.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup Identification as the Inclusion of Ingroup in the Self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• van Veelen, R., Otten, S., Cadinu, M., & Hansen, N. (2016). An integrative model of social identification: Self-stereotyping and self-anchoring as two cognitive pathways. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 3–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkuyten, M., & Nekuee, S. (1999). Ingroup bias: The effect of self-stereotyping, identification and group threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 411–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wombacher, J., & Felfe, J. (2012). United we are strong: An investigation into sense of community among navy crews. Armed Forces & Society, 38, 557–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar