Interpersonal synchrony affects performers’ sense of agency

References

• Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 680–740). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bernieri, F. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and interactional synchrony. In R. S. Feldman & B. Rime (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior: Studies in emotion & social interaction (pp. 401–432). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, N. K., & Loehr, J. D. (2017). The predictability of a partner’s actions modulates the sense of joint agency. Cognition, 161, 60–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, N. K., Poncelet, E. M., Schultz, B. G., & Loehr, J. D. (2016). Mutual coordination strengthens the sense of joint agency in cooperative joint action. Consciousness and Cognition, 46, 173–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(I), 49–59. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condon, W. S., & Ogston, W. D. (1967). A segmentation of behavior. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 5, 221–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. A., & Carr, T. H. (2013). When dyads act in parallel, a sense of agency for the auditory consequences depends on the order of the actions. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(1), 155–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. A., & Knoblich, G. (2014). Do implicit and explicit measures of the sense of agency measure the same thing? PLoS One, 9(10), e110118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. A., Pacherie, E., & Knoblich, G. (2014). The phenomenology of controlling a moving object with another person. Cognition, 132(3), 383–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenreich, B. (2006). Dancing in the streets: A history of collective joy. New York: Metropolitan.
   Google Scholar
• Fessler, D. M. T., & Holbrook, C. (2014). Marching into battle: Synchronized walking diminishes the conceptualized formidability of an antagonist in men. Biology Letters, 10(8), 20140592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, C. D., Blakemore, S. J., & Wolpert, D. M. (2000). Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 355(1404), 1771–1788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, E. H., & Bryant, G. A. (2003). Music and dance as a coalition signaling system. Human Nature, 14(1), 21–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5(4), 382–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, J. L. (1977). African dance and the warrior tradition. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 12, 111–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hove, M. J. (2008). Shared circuits, shared time, and interpersonal synchrony. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(1), 29–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issartel, J., Marin, L., & Cadopi, M. (2007). Unintended interpersonal co-ordination: “can we march to the beat of our own drum?”. Neuroscience Letters, 411(3), 174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez, J., Gomez, A., Buhrmester, M. D., Vazquez, A., Whitehouse, H., & Swann, W. B. (2016). The dynamic identity fusion index: A new continuous measure of identity fusion for web-based questionnaires. Social Science Computer Review, 34(2), 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalckert, A., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2012). Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: A dissociation of ownership and agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalckert, A., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2014). The moving rubber hand illusion revisited: Comparing movements and visuotactile stimulation to induce illusory ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 26, 117–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, M., Bahna, V., Shaver, J. H., Reddish, P., & Xygalatas, D. (2017). Sync to link: Endorphin-mediated synchrony effects on cooperation. Biological Psychology, 127, 191–197. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, M., & Haggard, P. (2009). Sense of agency primes manual motor responses. Perception, 38, 69–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, W. H. (1995). Keeping together in time: Dance and drill in human history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mogan, R., Fischer, R., & Bulbulia, J. A. (2017). To be in synchrony or not? A meta-analysis of synchrony’s effects on behavior, perception, cognition and affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 13–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. W., Middleton, D., Haggard, P., & Fletcher, P. C. (2012). Exploring implicit and explicit aspects of sense of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(4), 1748–1753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. W., & Obhi, S. S. (2012). Intentional binding and the sense of agency: A review. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 546–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obhi, S. S., & Hall, P. (2011). Sense of agency and intentional binding in joint action. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 655–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacherie, E. (2012). The phenomenology of joint action: Self-agency vs. joint-agency. In A. Seemann (Ed.), Joint attention: New developments (pp. 343–389). MIT Press. doi:10.1007/s13164-011-0052-5
   Google Scholar
• Pacherie, E. (2013). How does it feel to act together? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(1), 25–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips-Silver, J., Aktipis, C. A., & Bryant, G. A. (2010). The ecology of entrainment: Foundations of coordinated rhythmic movement. Music Perception, 28(1), 3–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronin, E., Wegner, D. M., McCarthy, K., & Rodriguez, S. (2006). Everyday magical powers: The role of apparent mental causation in the overestimation of personal influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 218–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1948). The Andaman Islanders. Glencoe: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reddish, P., Fischer, R., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). Let’s dance together : Synchrony, shared intentionality and cooperation. PloS one, 8(8). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddish, P., Tong, E. M. W., Jong, J., Lanman, J. A., & Whitehouse, H. (2016). Collective synchrony increases prosociality towards non-performers and outgroup members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(4), 722–738. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennung, M., & Göritz, A. S. (2016). Prosocial consequences of interpersonal synchrony: A meta-analysis. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 224(3), 168–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2005). Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 62–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, A., & Yasuda, A. (2005). Illusion of sense of self-agency: Discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership. Cognition, 94(3), 241–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seemann, A. (2009). Joint agency: Intersubjectivity, sense of control, and the feeling of trust. Inquiry, 52(5), 500–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shockley, K., Santana, M. V., & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 326–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R. (2008). An embodied account of self-other “overlap” and its effects. In G. R. Semin & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 148–159). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strother, L., House, K. A., & Obhi, S. S. (2010). Subjective agency and awareness of shared actions. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(1), 12–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann, W. B., & Buhrmester, M. D. (2015). Identity fusion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(1), 52–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann, W. B., Gomez, A., Seyle, D. C., Morales, J. F., & Huici, C. (2009). Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 995–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., & Newen, A. (2008). Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 219–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarr, B., Launay, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2014). Music and social bonding: “Self-other” merging and neurohormonal mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 454–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Wel, R. P. R. D. (2015). Me and we: Metacognition and performance evaluation of joint actions. Cognition, 140, 49–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2012). The sense of agency during skill learning in individuals and dyads. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(3), 1267–1279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ulzen, N. R., Lamoth, C. J. C., Daffertshofer, A., Semin, G. R., & Beek, P. J. (2008). Characteristics of instructed and uninstructed interpersonal coordination while walking side-by-side. Neuroscience Letters, 432(2), 88–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicaria, I. M., & Dickens, L. (2016). Meta-analyses of the intra- and interpersonal outcomes of interpersonal coordination. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 40(4), 335–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M., & Sparrow, B. (2004). Authorship processing. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed., pp. 1201–1209). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M., & Sparrow, B. (2007). The puzzle of coaction. In D. Ross, D. Spurrett, H. Kincaid, & G. L. Stephens (Eds.), Distributed cognition and the will (pp. 17–37). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M., Sparrow, B., & Winerman, L. (2004). Vicarious agency: Experiencing control over the movements of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 838–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, C., Herwig, A., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2011). The self in social interactions: Sensory attenuation of auditory action effects is stronger in interactions with others. PLoS One, 6(7), e22723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, C., Tsakiris, M., Haggard, P., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2014). Agency in the sensorimotor system and its relation to explicit action awareness. Neuropsychologia, 52, 82–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, H. (1996). Apparitions, orations, and rings: Experience of spirits in Dadul. In A. Howard & J. Mageo (Eds.), Spirits in culture, history, and mind (pp. 173–193). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiltermuth, S. S. (2012a). Synchronous activity boosts compliance with requests to aggress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 453–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiltermuth, S. S. (2012b). Synchrony and destructive obedience. Social Influence, 37–41. doi:10.1080/15534510.2012.658653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar