428
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The path to God is through the heart: Metaphoric self-location as a predictor of religiosity

, ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 650-672 | Received 03 Jan 2019, Accepted 29 Jul 2019, Published online: 07 Aug 2019

References

  • Adam, H., Obodaru, O., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Who you are is where you are: Antecedents and consequences of locating the self in the brain or the heart. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 128, 74–83.
  • Alsmith, A. J. T., & Longo, M. R. (2014). Where exactly am I? Self-location judgements distribute between head and torso. Consciousness and Cognition, 24, 70–74.
  • Argyle, M., & Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1975). The social psychology of religion. London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Aristotle. (2001 trans). The basic works of Aristotle ( R. McKeon, Trans. New York, NY: Random House.
  • Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religion’s evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 713–770.
  • Baron, J., Scott, S., Fincher, K., & Emlen Metz, S. (2015). Why does the cognitive reflection test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 265–284.
  • Baron-Cohen, S., Knickmeyer, R. C., & Belmonte, M. K. (2005). Sex differences in the brain: Implications for explaining autism. Science, 310, 819–823.
  • Bartels, D. M., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011). The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition, 121, 154–161.
  • Batson, C. B., Schoenrade, P., & Ventis, M. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Baumard, N., & Boyer, P. (2013). Religious beliefs as reflective elaborations on intuitions: A modified dual-process model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 295–300.
  • Bering, J. M. (2006). The cognitive psychology of belief in the supernatural. In P. McNamara (Ed.), Where god and science meet: How brain and evolutionary studies alter our understanding of religion (Vol. 1, pp. 138–148). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
  • Bishop, G. (1999). Trends: Americans’ belief in God. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 421–434.
  • Buchtel, E. E., & Norenzayan, A. (2008). Which should you use, intuition or logic? Cultural differences in injunctive norms about reasoning. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 264–273.
  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
  • Büssing, A. (2012). Measures. In M. Cobb, C. M. Puchalski, & B. Rumbold (Eds.), Oxford textbook of spirituality in healthcare (pp. 323–331). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 345–351.
  • Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 216–235.
  • Crawford, L. E. (2009). Conceptual metaphors of affect. Emotion Review, 1, 129–139.
  • DesCamp, M. T., & Sweetser, E. E. (2005). Metaphors for God: Why and how do our choices matter for humans? The application of contemporary cognitive linguistics research to the debate on God and metaphor. Pastoral Psychology, 53, 207–238.
  • Epstein, S. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (pp. 159–184). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.
  • Fetterman, A. K. (2016). On god-belief and feeling clean: Daily experiences are related to feeling clean, particularly for those high in god-belief. Social Psychology and Personality Science, 7, 552–559.
  • Fetterman, A. K., & Robinson, M. D. (2013). Do you use your head or follow your heart? Self-location predicts personality, emotion, decision making, and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 316–334.
  • Francis, L. J., & Wilcox, C. (1996). Religion and gender orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 119–121.
  • Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42.
  • Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science, 336, 493–496.
  • Gibbs, R. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48, 529–562.
  • Gilead, M., Gal, O., Polak, M., & Cholow, Y. (2014). The role of nature and nurture in conceptual metaphors: The case of gustatory priming. Social Psychology, 46, 167–173.
  • Gleichgerrcht, E., & Young, L. (2013). Low levels of empathetic concern predict utilitarian moral judgment. PloS One, 8, e60418.
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
  • Greene, J. D. (2011). Emotion and morality: A tasting menu. Emotion Review, 3, 227–229.
  • Haidt, J. (2013). Moral psychology for the twenty-first century. Journal of Moral Education, 42, 281–297.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Heintzelman, S. J., & King, L. A. (2016). Meaning in life and intuition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 477–492.
  • Jack, A. I., Dawson, A. J., Begany, K. L., Leckie, R. L., Barry, K. P., Ciccia, A. H., & Snyder, A. Z. (2013). fMRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domains. NeuroImage, 66, 385–401.
  • Jack, A. I., Friedman, J. P., Boyatzis, R. E., & Taylor, S. N. (2016). Why do you believe in God? Relationships between religious belief, analytic thinking, mentalizing and moral concern. PloS One, 11, e0149989.
  • John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651–670.
  • Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Landau, M. J. (2018). Using metaphor to find meaning in life. Review of General Psychology, 22, 62–72.
  • Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P., & Keefer, L. A. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1045–1067.
  • Lee, S. W. S. (2016). Multimodal priming of abstract constructs. Current Opinion in Psychology, 12, 37–44.
  • Lieberman, M. D., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2005). Conflict and habit: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to the self. In A. Tesser, J. V. Wood, & D. A. Stapel (Eds.), On building, defending and regulating the self: A psychological perspective (pp. 77–102). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Limanowski, J., & Hecht, H. (2011). Where do we stand on locating the self? Psychology, 2, 312–317.
  • Lindeman, M., & Aarnio, K. (2007). Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 731–744.
  • Lowicki, P., & Zajenkowski, M. (2017). No empathy for people nor for God: The relationship between the Dark Triad, religiosity and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 169–173.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., & Fairchild, A. J. (2009). Current directions in mediation analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 16–20.
  • Markstrom, C. A., Huey, E., Stile, B. M., & Krause, A. L. (2010). Frameworks of caring and helping in adolescence: Are empathy, religiosity, and spirituality related constructs? Youth & Society, 42, 59–80.
  • Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2004). Why good guys wear white: Automatic inferences about stimulus valence based on brightness. Psychological Science, 15, 82–87.
  • Morgan, J. (2016). Religion and dual-process cognition: A continuum of styles or distinct types? Religion, Brain & Behavior, 6, 112–129.
  • Norenzayan, A., & Hansen, I. G. (2006). Belief in supernatural agents in the face of death. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 174–187.
  • Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 36, 163–177.
  • Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2014). Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection. Memory & Cognition, 42, 1–10.
  • Pennycook, G., Ross, R. M., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2016). Atheists and agnostics are more reflective than religious believers: Four empirical studies and a meta-analysis. PloS One, 11, e0153039.
  • Petty, R. E., Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2003). Emotional factors in attitudes and persuasion. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 752–772). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Plato. (1987 trans.). The republic D. Lee, Trans. (2nd ed). New York, NY: Penguin Books.
  • Rios, K., Cheng, Z. H., Totton, R. R., & Shariff, A. F. (2015). Negative stereotypes cause Christians to underperform in and disidentify with science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 959–967.
  • Robinson, M. D. (2007). Personality, affective processing, and self-regulation: Toward process-based views of extraversion, neuroticism, and agreeableness. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 223–235.
  • Robinson, M. D., & Fetterman, A. K. (2014). Toward a metaphor-enriched personality psychology. In M. Landau, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life (pp. 133–152). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Saraglou, V. (2002). Religion and the five factors of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 15–25.
  • Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 423–428.
  • Swan, T. (2009). Metaphors of body and mind in the history of English. English Studies, 90, 460–475.
  • Szekely, R. D., Opre, A., & Miu, A. C. (2015). Religiosity enhances emotion and deontological choice in moral dilemmas. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 104–109.
  • Van Leeuwen, N. (2014). Religious credence is not factual belief. Cognition, 133, 698–715.
  • Wink, P., Ciciolla, L., Dillon, M., & Tracy, A. (2007). Religiousness, spiritual seeking, and personality: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 75, 1051–1070.
  • Yu, N. (2003). Chinese metaphors of thinking. Cognitive Linguistics, 14, 141–165.
  • Zuckerman, P. (2007). Atheism: Contemporary numbers and patterns. In M. Martin (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to atheism (pp. 47–65). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.