Ignoring sexism increases women’s tolerance of sexual harassment

References

• Ashburn-Nardo, L., Morris, K. A., & Goodwin, S. A. (2008). The Confronting Prejudiced Responses (CPR) model: Applying CPR in the workplace. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7, 332–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attardo, S. (1993). Violation of conversational maxims and cooperation: The case of jokes. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 537–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, M. M., Friedman, C. K., & Leaper, C. (2009). Individual and situational factors relating to young women’s likelihood of confronting sexism in their everyday lives. Sex Roles, 61, 449–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, L. D., Lancaster, A. R., & Reyst, H. E. (1996). Department of defense 1995 sexual harassment survey. Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bill, B., & Naus, P. (1992). The role of humor in the interpretation of sexist incidents. Sex Roles, 27, 645–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, R. (2018, February 21). A new survey finds 81 percent of women have experienced sexual harassment. National Public Radio. Retrieved from: https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/02/21/587671849/a-new-survey-finds-eighty-percent-of-women-have-experienced-sexual-harassment
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, B. Z., Datta, P., Stohlman, S., Cornell, D., & Konold, T. (2019). Authoritative school climate and sexual harassment: A cross-sectional multilevel analysis of student self-reports. School Psychology, 34(5), 469–478.
   Google Scholar
• Czopp, A. M. (2013). The passive activist: Negative consequences of failing to confront anti-environmental statements. Ecopsychology, 5, 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Czopp, A. M. (2019). The consequences of confronting prejudice. In R. K. Mallett & M. J. Monteith (Eds.), Confronting prejudice and discrimination: The science of changing minds and behaviors (pp. 201–222). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Czopp, A. M., Monteith, M. J., & Mark, A. Y. (2006). Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 784–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickter, C. L., Kittel, J. A., & Gyurovski, I. I. (2012). Perceptions of non-target confronters in response to racist and heterosexist remarks. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42,112–119.
   Google Scholar
• Feagin, J. R. (1991). The continuing significance of race: AntiBlack discrimination in public places. American Sociological Review, 56(1), 101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L. F., Swan, S., & Fischer, K. (1995). Why didn’t she just report him? The psychological and legal implications of women’s responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 117–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, T. E. (2000). Effects of sexist humor on tolerance of sexist events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1094–1107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, M. D. (2013). Everyday confrontation of discrimination: The well-being costs and benefits to women over time. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 5, 135–154.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, M. D. (2015). Tweeting about sexism: The well-being benefits of a social media collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Gervais, S. J., Hillard, A., & Vescio, T. K. (2010). Confronting sexism: The role of relationship orientation and gender. Sex Roles, 63, 463–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, J. J., Woodzicka, J. A., Bourne, K. A., & Moss-Racusin, C. A. (2019). The decision to act: Factors that predict women’s and men’s decisions to confront sexism. In R. K. Mallett & M. J. Monteith (Eds.), Confronting prejudice and discrimination: The science of changing minds and behaviors (pp. 49–72). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C., & Kearl, H. (2011). Crossing the line: Sexual harassment at school. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
   Google Scholar
• Hitlan, R. T., Pryor, J. B., Hesson-McInnis, M. S., & Olson, M. (2009). Antecedents of gender harassment: An analysis of person and situation factors. Sex Roles, 61, 794–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyers, L. (2007). Resisting prejudice every day: Exploring women’s assertive responses to anti-Black racism, anti-Semitism, heterosexism, and sexism. Sex Roles, 56, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantor, J., & Twohey, M. (2017, October 5). Harvey Weinstein paid off sexual harassment accusers for decades. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/05/us/harvey-weinstein-harassment-allegations.html
   Google Scholar
• Kulik, C. T., Perry, E. L., & Schmidtke, J. M. (1997). Responses to sexual harassment: The effect of perspective. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9, 37–53.
   Google Scholar
• Mallett, R. K., & Melchiori, K. J. (2019). Goals drive responses to perceived discrimination. In R. K. Mallett & M. J. Monteith (Eds.), Confronting prejudice and discrimination: The science of changing minds and behaviors (pp. 95–120). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mallett, R. K., Ford, T., & Woodzicka, J. (2016). What did he mean by that? Humor decreases attributions of sexism and confrontation of sexist jokes. Sex Roles, 75(5), 272–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallett, R. K., & Wagner, D. E. (2011). The unexpectedly positive consequences of confronting sexism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 215–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazer, D. B., & Percival, E. (1989). Ideology or experience? Sex Roles, 20, 135–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. T., Rothblum, E. D., Felicio, D., & Brand, P. (1995). Compensating for stigma: Obese and non-obese women’s reactions to being visible. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1093–1106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, L. R., Monteith, M. J., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Van Camp, A. R. (2018). Promoting concern about gender bias with evidence-based confrontation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 8–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 36, 717–731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pryor, J. B. (1995). The psychosocial impact of sexual harassment on women in the U.S. Military. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 581–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasinski, H. M., Geers, A. L., & Czopp, A. M. (2013). “I guess what he said wasn’t that bad:” Dissonance in non-confronting targets of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 859–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, B. L., & Trigg, K. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50(7–8), 565–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, J. N. (2003). Interpersonal concerns in social encounters between majority and minority group members. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 171–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. A., Salvatore, J., & Hill, D. M. (2006). Silence is not golden: Intrapersonal consequences of not confronting prejudice. In S. Levin & C. Van Laar (Eds.), Social stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 65–81). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. A., & Salvatore, J. (2004). Expecting to be the target of prejudice: Implications for interethnic interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(9), 1189–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, L., Greenberg, J., & Brehm, J. (1995). Trivialization: The forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 247–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Excuse me–What did you just say?!: Women’s public and private reactions to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swim, J. K., Mallett, R., Russo-Devosa, Y., & Stangor, C. (2005). Judgments of sexism: A comparison of the subtlety of sexism measures and sources of variability in judgments of sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 406–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodzicka, J. A., & LaFrance, M. (2001). Real versus imagined gender harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 15–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodzicka, J. A., Mallett, R. K., Hendricks, S., & Pruitt, A. (2015). It’s just a (sexist) joke: Comparing reactions to racist and sexist sentiments. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 28(2), 289–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D. (1983). Disparagement humor. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research (Vol. 1, pp. 85–107). NewYork, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar