Perceptions of Individuals Who Are Non-monosexuals held by Graduate Students: A Q Methodological Study

References

• Barker, M., Richards, C., & Bowes-Catton, H. (2009). “All the world is queer save thee and me…”: Defining queer and bi at a critical sexology seminar. Journal of Bisexuality, 9(3/4), 363–379. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15299710903316638
   Google Scholar
• Beemyn, G., & Rankin, S. (2011). Introduction to the special issue on “LGBTQ Campus Experiences.” Journal of Homosexuality, 58, 1159–1164. doi:10.1080/00918369.2011.605728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettinger, E. P., Long, B. T., & Taylor, E. S. (2016). When inputs are outputs: The case of graduate student instructors. Economics of Education Review, 52, 63–76. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dentato, M. P. (2011). Minority stress predictors of substance use and sexual risk behavior among a cohort sample of men who have sex with men. Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text. Retrieved from http://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1249&context=luc_diss
   Google Scholar
• Dessel, A., Rogge, M. E., & Garlington, S. B. (2006). Using intergroup dialogue to promote social justice and change. Social Work, 51(4), 303–315. doi:http://dx.doi.org.argo.library.okstate.edu/10.1080/10665684.2015.1057446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebin, J. (2006). Developing successful sexual health and support services for bisexual people: Lessons learned from the BiHealth program. Journal of Bisexuality, 6(1/2), 165–189. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J159v06n01_09
   Google Scholar
• Fox, A. (1991). Development of a bisexual identity: Understanding the process. In L. Hutchins & L. Kaahumanu (Eds.), Bi any other name: Bisexual people speak out (pp. 29–39). Boston, MA: Alyson.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. R., Dodge, B., Schick, V., Herbenick, D., Hubach, R. D., Bowling, J., … Reece, M. (2014). From bias to bisexual health disparities: Attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States. LGBT Health, 1(4), 309–318. doi:10.1089/lgbt.2014.0005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. A. (2013, October 15). Barriers to non-monosexual identities. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-a-goodman/barriers-to-non-monosexual-identities_b_4061334.html
   Google Scholar
• Hoang, M., Holloway, J., & Mendoza, R. H. (2011). An empirical study into the relationship between bisexual identity congruence, internalized biphobia and infidelity among bisexual women. Journal of Bisexuality, 11(1), 23–38. doi:http://dx.doi.org.argo.library.okstate.edu/10.1080/15299716.2011.545285
   Google Scholar
• Hong, J., Woodford, M., Long, L., & Renn, K. (2016). Ecological covariates of subtle and blatant heterosexist discrimination among LGBQ college students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 117–131. doi:10.1007/s10964-015-0362-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, L. E., & Domingue, A. D. (2015). From awareness to action: College students' skill development in intergroup dialogue. Equity & Excellence In Education, 48(3), 392–402. doi: 10.1080/10665684.2015.1057446
   Google Scholar
• Israel, T., & Mohr, J. J. (2004). Attitudes toward bisexual women and men: Current research, future directions. Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park Press/The Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jorm, A. F., Korten, A. E., Rodgers, B., Jacomb, P. A., & Christensen, H. (2002). Sexual orientation and mental health: Results from a community survey of young and middle-aged adults. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180(5), 423–427. doi:10.1192/bjp.180.5.423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (2013). Q methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. (2003). Looking toward the interSEXions: Examining bisexual and transgender identity formation from a dialectical theoretical perspective. Journal of Bisexuality, 3(3/4), 151–170. doi:10.1300/J159v03n03_11
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, E. M., & Thompson, E. M. (2007). Young women's sexual experiences within same-sex friendships: Discovering and defining bisexual and bi-curious identity. Journal of Bisexuality, 6(3), 7–34. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J159v06n03_02
   Google Scholar
• Parker, K. (2015, February 20). Among LGBT Americans, bisexuals stand out when it comes to identity, acceptance. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/02/20/among-lgbt-americans-bisexuals-stand-out-when-it-comes-to-identity-acceptance/
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2013). A survey of LGBT Americans. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/06/13/a-survey-of-lgbt-americans/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2016). A wider ideological gap between more and less educated adults. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2016/04/26/a-wider-ideological-gap-between-more-and-less-educated-adults/
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, S., Weber, G., Blumenfeld, W., & Frazer, S. (2010). 2010 state of higher education for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. Charlotte, NC: Campus Pride.
   Google Scholar
• Rountree, M. A., & Pomeroy, E. C. (2010). Bridging the gaps among social justice, research, and practice. Social Work, 55(4), 293–295. doi:10.1093/sw/55.4.293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior; Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from http://argo.library.okstate.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.argo.library.okstate.edu/docview/615262244?accountid=4117
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. (1973). Applications of communication theory III-intelligence and multivalued choice. The Psychological Record, 23(1), 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. (1980). Newton's fifth rule and Q methodology: Application to educational psychology. American Psychologist, 35, 882–889. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.10.882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. (1983). Quantum theory and Q-methodology: Fictionalistic and probabilistic theories conjoined. Psychological Record, 33(2), 213–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lisdonk, J., & Keuzenkamp, S. (2016). Towards bi-inclusive policies: Suggestions based on research on Dutch same-sex attracted young people. Sexuality Research & Social Policy: A Journal of the NSRC, doi:10.1007/s13178-016-0241-1
   Google Scholar
• Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2005). Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(1), 67–91. doi:http://dx.doi.org.argo.library.okstate.edu/10.1191/1478088705qp022oa
   Google Scholar
• Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. (2004). Operant Subjectivity, 27, 145–165.
   Google Scholar
• Woodford, M. R., Kulick, A., Sinco, B. R., & Hong, J. S. (2014). Contemporary heterosexism on campus and psychological distress among LGBQ students: The mediating role of self acceptance. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84, 519–529. doi:10.1037/ort0000015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar