Bisexuality, Slippery Slopes, and Multipartner Marriage

References

• Angelides, S. (2000). A history of bisexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2011). Problematic proximities: Or why critiques of gay imperialism matter. Feminist Legal Studies, 19(2), 119–132. doi:10.1007/s10691-011-9180-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antalffy, N. (2011). Polyamory and the media. SCAN – Journal of Media, Arts and Culture, 8. Retrieved from http://scan.net.au/scan/journal/display.php?journal_id=157
   Google Scholar
• Ashbee, E. (2007). Polyamory, social conservatism and the same-sex marriage debate in the US. Politics, 27(2), 101–107. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9256.2007.00285
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, S. M. (2014). Sincere but naive: Methodological queries concerning the British Columbia Polygamy Reference Trial. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 51(4), 325–342.
   Google Scholar
• Auchmuty, R. (2004). Same-sex marriage revived: Feminist critique and legal strategy. Feminism & Psychology, 14(1), 101–126. doi:10.1177/0959-353504040307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aviram, H. (2010). “Geeks, goddesses, and green eggs”: Political mobilization and the cultural locus of the polyamorous community in the San Francisco Bay Area. In M. Barker & D. Langdridge (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 87–93). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aviram, H., & Leachman, G. (2015). The future of polyamorous marriage: Lessons from the marriage equality struggle. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, 38, 269–336.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, N. (2012). Not the marrying kind. A feminist critique of same-sex marriage. New York, NY: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Battalora, J. (2009). Supremacy by the law: The one man one woman marriage requirement and antimiscegenation law. In P. Galupo (Ed.) Bisexuality and same-sex marriage (pp. 7–31). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186. (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Brake, E. (2013). Recognizing care: The case for friendship and polyamory. Syracuse Law & Civic Engagement 1(1). Retrieved from http://slace.syr.edu/issue-1-2013-14-on-equality/recognizing-care-the-case-for-friendship-and-polyamory/
   Google Scholar
• Burgett, B. (2005). On the Mormon question: Race, sex, and polygamy in the 1850s and the 1990s. American Quarterly, 51(1), 75–102. doi:10.1353/aq.2005.0002
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, D. (2014). My Spivak is bigger than yours: (Mis-)representations of polyamory in the Portuguese LGBT movement and mononormative rhetorics. LES Online, 6(1), 45–64. Retrieved from http://lespt.org/lesonline/index.php?journal=lo&page=article&op=viewArticle&path%5B%5D=82
   Google Scholar
• Chatlani, H. (2006). In defense of marriage: Why same-sex marriage will not lead us … toward the legalization of polygamy. Appalachian Journal of Law, 6, 101–133.
   Google Scholar
• Civil Rights Act, 14 Stat. 27–30. (1866).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, C. J. (2001). Punks, bulldaggers, and welfare queens. In M. Blasius (Ed.), Sexual identities, queer politics (pp. 2007–227). Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, R., & Nair, Y. eds. (2009). Against equality. Queer critiques of gay marriage. Lewiston, ME: Against Equality Publishing Collective.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2004). Black sexual politics. African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cott, N. F. (2000). Public vows. A history of marriage and the nation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. (1982). Women, race and class. London, England: Women's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. D. (2010). Regulating polygamy: Intimacy, default rules and bargaining for equality. Columbia Law Review, 110(8), 1955–2046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deBoer, F. (2015, June 26). It's time to legalize polygamy. Why group marriage is the next horizon of social liberalism. Politico Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/gay-marriage-decision-polygamy-119469
   Google Scholar
• Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), Pub. L. 104–199, 110 Stat. 2419. (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Denike, M. (2010). What's queer about polygamy? In: R. Leckey & K. Brooks (Eds.) Queer theory, law, culture, empire (pp. 137–154). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Denniston, L. (2015). Opinion analysis: Marriage now open to same-sex couples. SCOTUSBlog. http://www.scotusblog.com/2015/06/opinion-analysis-marriage-now-open-to-same-sex-couples/
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, L. (2004, March 15). Holy matrimony. The Nation. Retrieved from https://www.thenation.com/article/holy-matrimony/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner, S. (2012). Bi notes for a bisexual revolution. San Francisco, CA: Seale Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emens, E. F. (2004). Monogamy's law: Compulsory monogamy and polyamorous existence. New York University Review of Law & Social Change, 29, 277–376.
   Google Scholar
• The English Oxford Living Dictionaries. (2017). Slippery slope. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/us/slippery_slope
   Google Scholar
• Ertman, M. M. (2010). Race treason: The untold story of America's ban on polygamy. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 19, 287–366.
   Google Scholar
• Farrow, K. (2009). Is gay marriage anti black? In R. Conrad & Y. Nair (Eds.), Against equality. Queer critiques of gay marriage (pp. 21–32). Lewiston, ME: Against Equality Publishing Collective.
   Google Scholar
• Fischel, J. J. (2016). A more promiscuous politics. LGBT rights without the LGBT rights. In: C. A. Ball (Ed.), After marriage equality: The future of LGBT rights (pp. 181–211). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galupo, P. (Ed.) (2009). Bisexuality and same-sex marriage. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• George, R. P. (2015, August 25). Is polyamory next? The American Interest. Retrieved from http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/08/25/is-polyamory-next/.
   Google Scholar
• Gher, J. M. (2008). Polygamy and same-sex marriage – Allies or adversaries within the same-sex marriage movement. William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 14(3), 559–603.
   Google Scholar
• Hackl, A., Boyer, C. R., & Galupo, M. P. (2013). From ‘gay marriage controversy’ (2004) to ‘endorsement of same-sex marriage’ (2012): Framing bisexuality in the same-sex marriage discourse. Sexuality & Culture, 17(3), 512–524. doi:10.1007/s12119-012-9159-9
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, A. (2014). Slippery slope arguments. Philosophical Compass, 9/10, 672–680. doi:10.1111/phc3.12161
   Google Scholar
• Klein, D. J. (2010). Plural marriage and community property law. Golden Gate University Law Review, 41(1), 33–89.
   Google Scholar
• Klesse, C. (2007). The spectre of promiscuity. Gay male and bisexual non-monogamies and polyamories. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Klesse, C. (2014). Polyamory – intimate practice, identity or sexual orientation?’ Sexualities, 17(1/2), 81–99. doi:10.1177/1363460713511096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klesse, C. (2016). Marriage, law and polyamory. Rebutting mononormativity with sexual orientation discourse? Ońati Socio-Legal Series Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 6(6), 1348–1376. Retrieved from http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/viewFile/734/960
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, S. (2003, August 4–11). Beyond gay marriage. The Weekly Standard. Retrieved from http://www.weeklystandard.com/beyond-gay-marriage/article/4186.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, S. (2005a, August 28). Here come the brides: Plural marriage is waiting in the wings. The Weekly Standard. Retrieved from http://www.weeklystandard.com/here-come-the-brides/article/7683.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, S. (2005b, March 23). Rick Santorum was right: Meet the future of marriage in America. The National Review. Retrieved from http://www.nationalreview.com/article/213974/rick-santorum-was-right-stanley-kurtz.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558. (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Loughlin, S. (2003). Santorum under fire for comments on homosexuality [online], CNN International. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/04/22/santorum.gays/
   Google Scholar
• Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1. (1967).
   Google Scholar
• Lenon, S. (2016). Intervening in the context of white settler colonialism: West Coast LEAF, gender equality and the polygamy reference. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 6(6), 1324–1347. Retrieved from http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/viewFile/738/959
   Google Scholar
• Loving More. (2012). What do polys want? Retrieved from http://www.lovemore.com/polyamory-articles/2012-lovingmore-polyamory-survey/
   Google Scholar
• Manson, P. (2005, April 21). FLDS added to list of hate groups. Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved from http://archive.sltrib.com/story.php?ref=/utah/ci_2677519.
   Google Scholar
• McClintock, A. (1995). Imperial leather: Race, gender and sexuality in the colonial contest. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, K., & Isaac, J. (1988). Race, sexual politics and black masculinity. A dosssier. In J. Rutherford & R. Chapman (Eds.), Unwrapping masculinity (pp. 97–130). London, England: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Mint, P. (2004). The power dynamics of cheating: Effects on polyamory and bisexuality. In: S. Anderlini-D'Onofrio (Ed.) Plural loves: Designs for bi and poly living (pp. 55–76). London, England: Harrington Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, G. A. (2009). Drawing the line: Slippery slopes, sex panics, and polyamorous marriages. ExpressO. Stetson University College of Law. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/gretchen_myers/1/
   Google Scholar
• Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. (2015).
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, J. (2007). Queer tensions: The cultural politics of belonging and exclusion in same gender marriage debates. In N. Rumens & A. Cervantes-Carson (Eds.). Sexual Politics of Desire and Belonging (pp. 125–149). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Pallotta-Chiarolli, M. (2010). Border sexualities, border families in schools. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Cherrie.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Navarro, P. (2016). Beyond inclusion: Non-Monogamies and the borders of citizenship. Sexuality & Culture. doi:10.1007/s12119-016-9398-2
   Google Scholar
• Polikoff, N. D. (2009). Law that values all families: Beyond (straight and gay) marriage. Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 22(2), 85–104.
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. (2007). Terrorist assemblages. Homonationalism in queer times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redding, J. A. (2010). Queer-religious potentials in US same-sex marriage debates. In R. Leckey & K. Brooks (Eds.), Queer theory, law, culture, empire (pp. 122–136). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. (8 Otto.) 145. (1878).
   Google Scholar
• Rust, P. C. (1996). Monogamy and polyamory: Relationship issues for bisexuals. In B. A. Firestein (Ed.), Bisexuality. The psychology and politics of an invisible minority (pp. 127–148). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sheff, E. (2011). Polyamorous families, same-sex marriage, and the slippery slope. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 40(5), 487–520. doi:10.1177/0891241611413578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, J., & Meadow, T. (2009). New slants on the slippery slope: The politics of polygamy and gay family rights in South Africa and the United States. Politics & Society, 37(2), 167–202. doi:10.1177/0032329209333924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenvoll, Doug (2008). ‘Slippery Slopes in Political Discourse’. In T. Carver and J. Pikalo, J.(eds.), Political Language and Metaphor (pp. 28–40). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Storr, M. (1997). The sexual reproduction of “race”: Bisexuality, history and racialisation (pp. 73–88). In Bi Academic Intervention (Ed.). The bisexual imaginary, London: Cassel.
   Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. (2016). Beyond monogamy. Polyamory and the futures of polyqueer sexualities. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strassberg, M. I. (1997). Distinctions of form and substance: Monogamy, polygamy and same-sex Marriage. North Carolina Law Review, 75, 1501–1624.
   Google Scholar
• Strassberg, M. I. (2003). The Challenge of post-modern polygamy: Considering polyamory. Capital University Law Review, 31(3), 439–563.
   Google Scholar
• Tweedy, A. E. (2011). Polyamory as a sexual orientation. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 79(4), 1461–1515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. (2013).
   Google Scholar
• USA Today. (2003). Washington/politics (Excerpts from Santorum interview). Retrieved from https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-04-23-santorum-excerpt_x.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Volokh, E. (2003). Mechanisms of the slippery slope. Harvard Law Review, 116, 1028–1137. doi:10.2307/1342743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. (1999). The trouble with normal. Sex, politics and the ethics of queer life. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. C. (2012). The nuptial deal. Same-sex marriage & neo-liberal governance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, C. (1996). Lesbian polyfidelity. San Francisco, CA: Bokklegger Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, E. (2010). What's queer about non-monogamy now?. In M. Barker & D. Langdridge (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 243–254). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Willey, A. (2006). ‘Christian nations’, ‘polygamic races’ and women's rights: Towards a genealogy of non/monogamy and whiteness. Sexualities, 9(5), 530–546. doi:10.1177/1363460706069964
   Google Scholar
• Yoshino, K. (2000). The epistemic contract of bisexual erasure. Stanford Law Review, 52(2), 353–461. doi:10.2307/1229482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar