Introduction to the Special Issue: EuroBiReCon: (Inter)National Research Frontiers

References

• Anderlini-D'Onofrio, S., & Alexander, J. (2009). Introduction to the special issue: Bisexuality and queer theory: Intersections diversions, and connections. Journal of Bisexuality, 9(3/4), 197–212. doi:10.1080/15299710903316489
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E., Scoats, R., & McCormack, M. (2015). Metropolitan bisexual men's relationships: Evidence of a cohort effect. Journal of Bisexuality, 15(1), 21–39. doi:10.1080/15299716.2014.994055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, H. L., & Reissing, A. D. (2014). Attitudes toward casual sex, dating, and committed relationships with bisexual partners. Journal of Bisexuality, 14(2), 236–264. doi:10.1080/15299716.2014.902784
   Google Scholar
• Barker, M. J., Richards, C., Jones, R. L., & Monro, S. (2011). BiReCon: An international academic conference on bisexuality including the program for BiReCon. Journal of Bisexuality, 11(2/3), 157–170. doi:10.1080/15299716.2011.571630
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, R. (2017). ‘I think I'm not a relationship person’: Bisexual women's accounts of (internalised) binegativity in non-monogamous relationship narratives. Psychology and Sexualities Review, 8(2), 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D., & Binnie, J. (2006). Geographies of sexual citizenship. Political Geography, 25 (8), 869–873. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowes-Catton, H., Barker, M. J., & Richards, C. (2011). “I didn't know that I could feel this relaxed in my body”: Using visual methods to research bisexual people's embodied experiences of identity and space. In P. Reavey (Ed.), Visual methods in psychology ( pp. 255–270). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, P. (2009). Bisexual people in the workplace: Practical advice for employers. London, England: Stonewall.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. (2006). Active citizenship and the governmentality of local lesbian and gay politics. Political Geography, 25(8), 921–943. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson-Schroth, L., & Mitchell, J. (2009). Queering queer theory, or why bisexuality matters. Journal of Bisexuality, 9(3/-4), 297–315. doi:10.1080/15299710903316596
   Google Scholar
• European Pride Organisers Association (n.d.). Europe – join our freedom @EuroPride 2016 in Amsterdam. Retrieved from: http://epoa.eu/europride/europride-2016-amsterdam/
   Google Scholar
• Green, H. B., Payne, N. R., & Green, J. (2011). Working bi: Preliminary findings from a survey on workplace experiences of bisexual people. Journal of Bisexuality, 11(2/3), 300–316. doi:10.1080/15299716.2011.572007
   Google Scholar
• Gustavson, M. (2009). Bisexuals in relationships: Uncoupling intimacy from gender ontology. Journal of Bisexuality, 9(3/4), 407–429. doi:10.1080/15299710903316653
   Google Scholar
• Jelstrup, V., &. Bowring, D. (2016). Young bisexual Danish women show significantly poorer health and wellbeing than the general female population and even lesbians. Paper presented at the First European Bisexual Research Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Kangasvuo, J. (2011). “There has been no phase in my life when I wasn't somehow bisexual”: Comparing the experiences of Finnish bisexuals in 1999 and 2010. Journal of Bisexuality, 11(2/3), 271–289. doi:10.1080/15299716.2011.571989
   Google Scholar
• Klesse, C. (2005). Bisexual women, non-monogamy and differentialist anti-promiscuity discourses. Sexualities, 8(4), 445–464. doi:10.1177/1363460705056620
   Google Scholar
• Klesse, C. (2006). Polyamory and its ‘others’: Contesting the terms of non-monogamy. Sexualities, 9(5), 565–583. doi:10.1177/1363460706069986
   Google Scholar
• Klesse, C. (2011). Shady characters, untrustworthy partners, and promiscuous sluts: Creating bisexual intimacies in the face of heteronormativity and biphobia. Journal of Bisexuality, 11(2/3), 227–244. doi:10.1080/15299716.2011.571987
   Google Scholar
• Köllen, T. (2013). Bisexuality and diversity management—Addressing the B in LGBT as a relevant ‘sexual orientation’ in the workplace. Journal of Bisexuality, 13(1), 122–137. doi:10.1080/15299716.2013.755728
   Google Scholar
• Kristof, L. K. D. (1959). The nature of frontiers and boundaries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 49(3), 269–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyper, L. (2013). Seksuele orientatie en werk [Sexual orientation and work]. The Hague, Netherlands: Netherlands Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Lathi, A. (2015). Similar and equal relationships? Negotiating bisexuality in an enduring relationship. Feminism & Psychology, 25(4), 431–448. doi:10.1177/0959353515574786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDowall, L. (2009). Historicizing contemporary bisexuality. Journal of Bisexuality, 9(1), 3–15. doi:10.1080/15299710802659989
   Google Scholar
• Maliepaard, E. (2015). Bisexual citizenship in the Netherlands: On homo-emancipation and bisexual representations in national emancipation policies. Sexualities, 18(4), 377–393. doi:10.1177/1363460714550906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maliepaard, E. (2017). Bisexuality in the Netherlands: Connecting bisexual passing, communities, and identities. Journal of Bisexuality, 17(3), 325–348. doi:10.1080/15299716.2017.1342214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, N. (2015). Bridging bisexual erasure in LGBT-rights discourse and litigation. Michigan Journal of Gender and Law, 22(2), 291–344.
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Pérez, A., González, E., Marrero, N., & Rebollo, J. (2016). Bisexual men and women mental health outcomes and perceived health status disparities in Spain. Paper presented at the First European Bisexual Research Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, K. (2004). Negotiating (non)monogamy: Bisexuality and intimate relationships. Journal of Bisexuality, 4(1/2), 83–97. doi:10.1300/J159v04n01_07
   Google Scholar
• McLean, K. (2007). Hiding in the closet? Bisexuals, coming out and the disclosure imperative. Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 151–166. doi:10.1177/1440783307076893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monro, S. (2005). Gender politics: Activism, citizenship and sexual diversity. London, England: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monro, S., & Richardson, D. (2012). Sexuality, equality and diversity. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Monro, S. (2015). Bisexuality: Identities, politics, and theories. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Monro, S. (2016). Bisexual studies: Where have we been and where are we going? Paper presented at the First European Bisexual Research Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Monro, S., Hines, S., & Osbourne, A. (2017). Is bisexuality invisible? A review of sexualities scholarship 1970–2015. Sociological Review, 65 (4), 663–681. doi:10.1177/0038026117695488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterhuis, H., & Lipperts, A. (2013). Falling between two stools: The difficult emancipation of bisexuality in the Netherlands. Journal of Bisexuality, 13(2), 245–272. doi:10.1080/15299716.2013.782259
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, S. (2009). Bisexuals “doing gender” in romantic relationships. Journal of Bisexuality, 9(1), 33–69. doi:10.1080/15299710802660029
   Google Scholar
• Portero, I., Montero, E., & Merinero, R. (2016). National survey about homophobia and biphobia. A project for human rights visibilization and defense in Spain. Paper presented at the First European Bisexual Research Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Van Lisdonk, J. (2016). Bisexuality in the Netherlands: A picture based on survey studies and methodological reflections. Paper presented at the First European Bisexual Research Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, G., Browne, K., & Gupta, D. (2014). Embracing the ‘and’ between queer and bisexual theory in Brighton BiFest. Journal of Homosexuality, 61 (11), 1605–1625. doi:10.1080/00918369.2014.944055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshino, S. (2000). The epistemic contract of bisexual erasure. Stanford Law Review 52, 353−461. doi:10.2307/1229482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar