‘Femme it Up or Dress it Down’: Appearance and Bisexual Women in Monogamous Relationships

References

• Anderson, E., McCormack, M., & Ripley, M. (2016). Sixth form girls and bisexual burden. Journal of Gender Studies, 25(1), 24–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andre, A. (2011). What does a bisexual look like? Retrieved from http://www.bilerico.com/2011/09/what_does_a_bisexual_look_like.php
   Google Scholar
• Balsam, K. F., & Mohr, J. J. (2007). Adaption to sexual orientation stigma: A comparison of bisexual and lesbian/gay adults. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(3), 407–420.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, M. (2007). Heteronormativity and the exclusion of bisexuality in psychology. In V. Clarke, & E. Peel (Eds.), Out in psychology: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer perspectives. London: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, M., Bowes-Catton, H., Iantaffi, A., Cassidy, A., & Brewer, L. (2008). British bisexuality: A snapshot of bisexual representations and identities in the United Kingdom. Journal of Bisexuality, 8(1–2), 141–162.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, K. L., & Hoskin, R. A. (2014). Experiences of femme identity: Coming out, invisibility and femmephobia. Psychology & Sexuality, 6(3), 229–244. doi: 10.1080/19419899.2014.921860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostwick, W. (2012). Assessing bisexual stigma and mental health status: A brief report. Journal of Bisexuality, 12(2), 214–222. doi: 10.1080/15299716.2012.674860.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowes-Catton, H. (2015). Like a playground should be? Experiencing and producing bi subjectivities in bisexual space. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, S. (2011). Fashion and sexual identity, or why recognition matters. In J. Kennett, & J. Wolfendale, (Eds.), Fashion and philosophy. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, S. (2012). Those shoes are definitely Bicurious': More thoughts on the politics of fashion. In D. Cooley, & K. Harrison, (Eds.), Passing out: Sexual identity veiled and revealed. New York: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S. (2016). Methodological breaching: Steps towards theorising the qualitative interview. Journal of Culture & Psychology, 22(4), 520–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, J., McCluskey, S., Turley, E., & King, N. (2015). The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2), 202–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2006). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callis, A. S. (2013). The black sheep of the pink flock: Labels, stigma, and bisexual identity. Journal of Bisexuality, 13(1), 82.
   Google Scholar
• Chekola, M., & McHugh, N. A. (2012). The ontological foundations of passing. In D. R. Cooley, & K. Harrison, (Eds.), Passing out: Sexual identity, veiled and revealed. New York: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Huxley, C. (2012). Lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans appearance and embodiment: A critical review of the psychological literature. Psychology of Sexualities Review, 3(1), 25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., & Spence, K. (2013). I am who I am? Navigating norms and the importance of authenticity in lesbian and bisexual women’s accounts of their appearance practices. Psychology and Sexuality, 4(1), 25.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., & Turner, K. (2007). Clothes maketh the queer? Dress, appearance and the construction of lesbian, gay and bisexual identities. Feminism & Psychology, 17(2), 267–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, S. J. (2018). A rock and a hard place: A hermeneutic phenomenological exploration into the lived experience of bisexual women in monogamous relationships. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). University of Huddersfield.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins, (Eds.), Of theories of social psychology, London: Sage, The Handbook.
   Google Scholar
• D’Erasmo, S. (2004). Lesbians on Television: ‘It’s not Easy Being Seen’. New York Times, Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/11/arts/television/11DERA.html?ex =1121832000&en =27af9563910ffo7e&ei =5070
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (2007). A dynamical systems approach to the development and expression of female same-sex sexuality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(2), 142–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, H. (1997). The use of diaries in sociological research on health experience. Sociological Research Online, Retrieved from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/7.html
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, H. H. (1906). Studies in the psychology of sex, vol 1: Sexual inversion. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Co.
   Google Scholar
• Eves, A. (2004). Queer Theory, butch/femme identities and lesbian space. Sexualities, 7(4), 480–496.
   Google Scholar
• Fahs, B. (2009). Compulsory bisexuality? The challenges of modern sexual fluidity. Journal of Bisexuality, 9(3–4), 431–449.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, H., & Gleeson, K. (2004). Clothing and embodiment. Men managing body image and appearance. Body & Society, 11(1), 37–62.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N. A., & Nolas, S. M. (2011). Exploring and expanding on pluralism in qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8(2), 115–119. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2011.572728.
   Google Scholar
• Galupo, M. P. (2018). 4 Plurisexual Identity Labels and the Marking of Bisexual Desire. In D. Swan & S. Habibi (Eds.), Bisexuality. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-71535-3_4.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1971). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Pelican.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, K. A., Ramirez, J. L., & Galupo, M. P. (2017). ‘I was and still am’: Narratives of bisexual marking in the #StillBisexual Campaign. Sexuality & Culture, 21(2), 493–515. doi: 10.1007/s12119-016-9401-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulding, C., Saren, M., Maclaran, P., & Follett, J. (2004). Into the darkness: Androgyny and gender blurring within the gothic subculture. Gender and Consumer Behaviour, 7, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, J. E. (2013). Creating a bisexual display: Making bisexuality visible. Journal of Bisexuality, 13(1), 39–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, J. E. (2011). Finding a needle in a haystack: Methods for sampling in the bisexual community. Journal of Bisexuality, 11(1), 64–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman-Linck, J. E. (2014). Keeping bisexuality alive: Maintaining bisexual visibility in monogamous relationships. Journal of Bisexuality, 14(2), 177–193.
   Google Scholar
• Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2009). How does sexual minority stigma ‘get under the skin’? A psychological mediation framework. Psychological Bulletin, 135(5), 707–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayfield, N. (2011). Bisexual women’s visual identities: A feminist mixed-method exploration. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). University of the West of England.
   Google Scholar
• Hayfield, N. (2013). Never judge a book by its cover? Students’ understandings of lesbian, gay and bisexual appearance. Psychology and Sexuality, 4(1), 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hayfield, N., Campbell, C., & Reed, E. (2018). Misrecognition and managing marginalisation: Bisexual people’s experiences of bisexuality and relationships. Psychology & Sexuality, 1, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/19419899.2018.1470106.
   Google Scholar
• Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Halliwell, E. (2014). Bisexual women’s understandings of social marginalisation: ‘The heterosexuals don’t understand us but nor do the lesbians’. Feminism & Psychology, 24(3), 352–372. doi: 10.1177/0959353514539651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayfield, N., & Huxley, C. (2015). Insider and outsider perspectives: Reflections on researcher identities in research with lesbian and bisexual women. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2), 91–106. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2014.918224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., Halliwell, E., & Malson, H. (2013). Visible lesbians and invisible bisexuals: Appearance and visual identities among bisexual women. Women's Studies International Forum, 40(8), 172–182.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, M. (2009). State of our unions: Marriage promotion and the contested power of heterosexuality. Gender & Society, 23(1), 27. doi: 10.1177/0891243208326807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, D. (2006). How does a lesbian look? Stendhal’s syndrome and the L word. In K. Akass, & J. McCabe (Eds.), Reading the L Word. London: Tauris
   Google Scholar
• Holt, A. (2010). Using the telephone for narrative interviewing: A research note. Qualitative Research, 10(1), 113. doi: 10.117711468794109348686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley, C., Clarke, V., & Halliwell, E. (2013). Resisting and conforming to the ‘Lesbian Look’: The importance of appearance norms for lesbian and bisexual women. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 6(5), 205–219. doi: 10.1002/casp.2161.
   Google Scholar
• Iida, M., Shrout, P. E., Laurenceau, J. P., & Bolger, N. (2012). Using diary methods in psychological research. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Foundations, Planning, Methods and Psychometrics. Washington D.C: The American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, S. (2005). Beauty and Misogyny: Harmful practices in the west. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. L. (2016). Sexual identity labels and their implications in later life: The case of bisexuality. In E. Peel, & R. Harding, (Eds.), Aging and sexualities: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, K. M., & Deluty, R. H. (2000). Social support, coming out, and relationship satisfaction in lesbian couples. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 4(1), 145–164.
   Google Scholar
• King, N. (2012). Doing template analysis. In Gillian Symon & Catherine Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative Organisational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• King, N. (2004). Using template analysis in the qualitative analysis of text. In C. Cassell, & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organisational Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Klesse, C. (2011). Shady characters, untrustworthy partners, and promiscuous sluts: Creating bisexual intimacies in the face of heteronormativity and biphobia. Journal of Bisexuality, 11(2–3), 227–244. 10.1080/15299716.2011.571987.
   Google Scholar
• Krafft-Ebing, R. (1927). Psychopathia Sexualis: A medico-forensic study. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lahti, A. (2015). Similar and equal relationships? Negotiating bisexuality in an enduring relationship. Feminism & Psychology, 25(4), 431–448. doi: 10.1177/0959353515574786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavis, V. (2010). Multiple researcher identities: Highlighting tensions and implications for ethical practice in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7(4), 316–333. doi: 10.1080/14780880902929506.
   Google Scholar
• Lees, S. (1993). Sugar and spice: Sexuality and adolescent girls. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. M., Gerrish, E. A., & Hiestand, K. R. (2003). The misunderstood gender: A model of modern femme identity. Sex Roles, 48(3/4), 99–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. M., & Hiestand, K. R. (2005). Gender within lesbian sexuality: Butch and femme perspectives. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18(1), 39–51. doi: 10.1080/10720530590523062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luzzatto, D., & Gvion, L. (2004). Feminine but not femme. Journal of Homosexuality, 48(1), 43. doi: 10.1300/j082v48n01_03.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maliepaard, E. (2018). Disclosing bisexuality or coming out? Two different realities for bisexual people in the Netherlands. Journal of Bisexuality, 1, 1–23. doi: 10.1080/15299716.2018.1452816.
   Google Scholar
• Maliepaard, E. (2017). Bisexuality in the Netherlands: Connecting bisexual passing, communities, and identities. Journal of Bisexuality, 17(3), 325–348. doi: 10.1080/15299716.2017.1342214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, K. (2007). Hiding in the closet? Bisexuals, coming out and the disclosure imperative. Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 151–166. doi: 10.1177/1440783307076893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress and mental health in lesbian, gay and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. doi: 10.1037/0033 = 2909.129.5.674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. D. (2006). Bi-nary objections: Voices on bisexual identity misappropriation and bisexual resistance (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Washington, DC: American University.
   Google Scholar
• Monro, S. (2015). Bisexuality: Identities, politics and theories. Hampshire: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Morandini, J. S., Pinkus, R. T., & Dar-Nimrod, I. (2018). Does partner gender influence relationship quality among non-monosexual women? Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 33(1/2), 146–165. doi: 10.1080/14681994.2017.1419568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink. (2012). Mail on-line. Retrieved from: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2212836/Pink-opens-sexuality-marriage-motherhood-The-Advocate.html#ixzz44ruthURU
   Google Scholar
• Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs, 5(4), 613–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Rust, P. C. (2003). Monogamy and polamory: Relationship issues for bisexuals. In L. D. Garnets & D. C. Kimmel (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual experiences. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, H. (2016). She's always a woman: Butch lesbian trans women in the lesbian community. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 20(1), 87–96. doi:10.1080/10894160.2015.1076236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothblum, E. (2010). The complexity of butch and femme among sexual minority women in the 21st century. Psychology of Sexualities Review, 1(1), 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, P. C. (1995). Bisexuality and the challenge to lesbian politics: Sex, loyalty, and revolution. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, C. (2009). Queerly Canadian #13: The lesbian fashion crisis. Retrieved from: https://this.org/2009/05/28/queerly-canadian-lesbian-fashion/
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. A. (1998). ’The masculine soul heaving in the female bosom’: Theories of inversion and the well of loneliness. Journal of Gender Studies, 7(3), 287–296. doi: 10.1080/09589236.1998.9960722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Y. (2008). ‘That’s not really my scene’: Working-class lesbians in (and out of) place. Sexualities, 11(5), 523–546. doi: 10.1177/136340708094266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub, J. (1999). Bisexual women and beauty norms: A qualitative examination. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 3(4), 27–36. doi: 10.1300/J155v03n04_04.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trier-Bieniek, A. (2012). Framing the telephone interview as a participant-centred tool for qualitative research: A methodological discussion. Qualitiative Research, 12(6), 630–644. doi: 10.1177/1468794112439005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, L. (2001). Looking like what you are: Sexual style, race, and lesbian identity. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, S. J., & Roripaugh, L. A. (2006). The (in)visible lesbian: Anxieties of representation in the L Word. In K. Akass & J. McCabe, Reading the L Word. London: I. B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshino, K. (2000). The epistemic contract of bisexual erasure. The Stanford Law Review, 52(2), 353–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar