1,968
Views
41
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Organizational Effectiveness Reputation in the Nonprofit Sector

REFERENCES

  • Austin, M. J. (2003). The changing relationship between nonprofit organizations and public social service agencies in the era of welfare reform. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(1), 97–114.
  • Babiak, K. M. (2009). Criteria of effectiveness in multiple cross-sectoral interorganizational relationships. Evaluation & Program Planning, 32(1), 1–12.
  • Balser, D., & McClusky, J. (2005). Managing stakeholder relationships and nonprofit organization effectiveness. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 15(3), 295–315.
  • Ben-Ner, A. (2002). The shifting boundaries of the mixed economy and the future of the nonprofit sector. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 73(1), 5–40.
  • Berry, F. S., & Brower, R. (2005). Intergovernmental and intersectoral management: Weaving networking, contracting out, and management roles into third party government. Public Performance & Management Review, 29(1), 7–17.
  • Bolton, G. E., Katok, E., & Ockenfels, A. (2005). Cooperation among strangers with limited information about reputation. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1457–1468.
  • Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2004). Building a good reputation. European Management Journal, 22(6), 704–713.
  • Bryce, H. J. (2007). The public’s trust in nonprofit organizations: The role of relationship marketing and management. California Management Review, 49(4), 112–131.
  • Bryson, J. M., Gibbons, M. J., & Shaye, G. (2001). Enterprise schemes for nonprofit survival, growth and effectiveness. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 11(3), 271–288.
  • Chen, B. (2008). Assessing interorganizational networks for public service delivery: A process-perceived effectiveness framework. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(3), 348–363.
  • Chen, B. (2010). Antecedents or processes? Determinants of perceived effectiveness of interorganizational collaborations for public service delivery. International Public Management Journal, 13(4), 381–407.
  • Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091–1112.
  • DiMaggio, P. (2001). Measuring the impact of the nonprofit sector on society is probably impossible but possibly useful: A sociological perspective. In P. Flynn & V. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Measuring the Impact of the Nonprofit Sector (pp. 249–272). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
  • Farrell, A. M. (2010). Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on Bove, Prevan, Beatty and Shiu (2009). Journal of Business Research, 63(5), 324–327.
  • Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.
  • Forbes, D. P. (1998). Measuring the unmeasurable: Empirical studies of nonprofit organizations effectiveness from 1977 to 1997. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(2), 183–202.
  • Garnett J. L., Marlowe, J., & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Penetrating the performance predicament: Communication as a mediator or moderator of organizational culture’s impact on public organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 266–281.
  • Gaskin, K. (1999). Blurred vision: Public trust in charities. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 4(2), 163–178.
  • Green, J. C., & Griesinger, D. W. (1996). Board performance and organizational effectiveness in nonprofit social services organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 6(4), 381–402.
  • Greyer, S. A. (1999). Advancing and enhancing corporate reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 4(4), 177–181.
  • Hansmann, H. B. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89(5), 835–901.
  • Herbig, P., Milewicz, J., & Golden, J. (1994). A model of reputation building and destruction. Journal of Business Research, 31(1), 23–31.
  • Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1999). Theses on nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(2), 107–126.
  • Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2000). Board practices of especially effective and less effective local nonprofit organizations. American Review of Public Administration, 30(2), 146–160.
  • Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2004). Doing things right: Effectiveness in local nonprofit organizations, a panel study. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 694–704.
  • Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2008). Advancing nonprofit organizational effectiveness research and theory: Nine theses. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 18(4), 399–415.
  • Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65.
  • Jenkinson, A., Sain, B., & Bishop, K. (2005). Optimizing communications for charity brand management. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 10(2), 79–92.
  • Johnson, J. M. (2013). Necessary but not sufficient: The impact of community input on grantee selection. Administration & Society. doi:10.1177/0095399713509241.
  • Jun, K., & Shiau, E. (2012). How are we doing? A multiple constituency approach to civic association effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(4), 632–655.
  • Keating, N. L., Green, D. C., Kao, A. C., Gazmararian, J. A., Wu, V. Y., & Cleary, P. D. (2002). How are patients’ specific ambulatory care experiences related to trust, satisfaction, and considering changing physicians? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17(1), 29–39.
  • Kendall, J., & Knapp, M. (2000). Measuring the performance of voluntary organizations. Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(1), 105–132.
  • Krashinsky, M. (1997). Stakeholder theories of the non-profit sector: One cut at the economic literature. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 8(2), 149–161.
  • Kushner, R. J., & Poole, P. P. (1996). Exploring structure-effectiveness relationships in nonprofit arts organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 7(2), 119–136.
  • Lecy, J. D., Schmitz, H. P., & Swedlund, H. (2012). Non-governmental and not-for-profit organizational effectiveness: A modern synthesis. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(2), 434–457.
  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(2), 320–341.
  • Mayer, R., & Maleham, S. (1997). The market for acute hospital services and the marketing contribution: A NHS trust experience. Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 2(3), 252–260.
  • Mechanic, D., & Rosenthal, M. (1999). Responses of HMO medical directors to trust building in managed care. Milbank Quarterly, 77(3), 283–303.
  • Mistry, S. (2007). How does one voluntary organization engage with multiple stakeholder views of effectiveness? Voluntary Sector Working Paper: Number 7, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Mohr, J. J., & Sohi, R. S. (1995). Communication flows in distribution channels: Impact on assessments of communication quality and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 71(4), 393–416.
  • Neral, J., & Ochs, J. (1992). The sequential equilibrium theory of reputation building: A further test. Econometrica, 60(5), 1151–1169.
  • Padanyi, P., & Gainer, B. (2003). Peer reputation in the nonprofit sector: Its role in nonprofit sector management. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(3), 252–265.
  • Pandey, S. K., & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Public managers’ perceptions of organizational goal ambiguity: Analyzing alternative models. International Public Management Journal, 9(2), 85–112.
  • Pandey, S. K., Coursey, D. H., & Moynihan, D. P. (2007). Organizational effectiveness and bureaucratic red tape: A multimethod study. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(3), 398–425.
  • Radbourne, J. (2003). Performing on board: The link between governance and corporate reputation in nonprofit arts boards. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(3), 212–222.
  • Rainey, H. G., & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 1–32.
  • Rigby, J., Dewick, P., Courtney R., & Gee, S. (2014). Limits to the implementation of benchmarking through KPIs in UK construction policy: Insights from game theory. Public Management Review, 16(6), 782–806.
  • Sarstedt, M., & Schloderer, M. P. (2010). Developing a measurement approach for reputation of non-profit organizations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 15(3), 276–299.
  • Sawhill, J. C., & Williamson, D. (2001). Mission impossible? Measuring success in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 11(3), 371–386.
  • Sowa, J. E., Selden, S. C., & Sandfort, J. R. (2004). No longer unmeasurable? A multidimensional integrated model of nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(4), 711–728.
  • Srivastava, J., & Chakravarti, D. (2009). Negotiations with Information asymmetries: Contingent influences of communication and trustworthiness reputations. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(4), 557–572.
  • Stazyk, E. C., & Goerdel, H. T. (2011). The benefits of bureaucracy: Public managers’ perceptions of political support, goal ambiguity, and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 645–672.
  • Stump, R. L., & Heide, J. B. (1996). Controlling supplier opportunism in industrial relations. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(4), 431–441.
  • Tax, S. S., Brown, S. W., & Chandrashekaran, M. (1998). Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: Implications for relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 60–76.
  • Thomson, D. E. (2011). The role of funders in driving nonprofit performance measurement and use in strategic management. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(1), 54–78.
  • Trogen, N., & Yavas, U. (2002). Factors enhancing effectiveness of nonprofit multihospital organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 26(1), 44–57.
  • Van Slyke, D. M. (2007). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 157–187.
  • Vendelø, M. T. (1998). Narrating corporate reputation. International Studies of Management and Organization, 28(3), 120–137.
  • Willems, J., Boenigk, S., & Jegers, M. (2014). Seven trade-offs in measuring nonprofit performance and effectiveness. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(6), 1648–1670.
  • Willems, J., Huybrechts, G., Jegers, M., Weijters, B., Vantilborgh, T., Bidee, J., & Pepermans, R. (2012). Nonprofit governance quality: Concept and measurement. Journal of Social Service Research, 38(4), 561–578.
  • Wright, B. E., & Pandey, S. K. (2011). Public organizations and mission valence: When does mission matter? Administration & Society, 43(1), 22–44.
  • Yang, K., & Holzer, M. (2006). The performance-trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 114–126.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.