A Collaboration-Based Model of Work Motivation and Role Ambiguity in Public Organizations

References

• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 295–326. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2004). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, P., & Lewis, G. B. (2001). Public service motivation and job performance: Evidence from the federal sector. American Review of Public Administration, 31(4), 363–380. doi:10.1177/02750740122064992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aram, J. D., Morgan, C. P., & Esbeck, E. S. (1971). Relation of collaborative interpersonal relationships to individual satisfaction and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(3), 289–297. doi:10.2307/2391901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, L. B., & O’Leary, R. (2006). Conclusion: Parallel play, not collaboration: Missing questions, missing connections. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 161–167. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00686.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman, C., & Sundquist, E. (2009). Toward understanding work motivation: Worker attitudes and the perception of effective public service. American Review of Public Administration, 39(5), 519–535. doi:10.1177/0275074008324567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, L. (2007). Does person–organization fit mediate the relationship between public service motivation and the job performance of public employees? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27(4), 361–379. doi:10.1177/0734371x07307149
   Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst, B., Steijn, B., & Vermeeren, B. (2013). Transformational leadership, goal setting, and work motivation: The case of a Dutch municipality. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(2), 124–145. doi:10.1177/0734371x13515486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. W., & Im, T. (2015a). Identification and trust in public organizations: A communicative approach. Public Management Review, 17(8), 1065–1084. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.881531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. W., & Im, T. (2015b). PSM and turnover intention in public organizations: Does change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior play a role? Review of Public Personnel Administration. doi:10.1177/0734371x14567366
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. W., Lee, H., & Im, T. (2015). At the expense of others: Altruistic helping behavior, performance management, and transformational leadership. Public Management Review, 1–24. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1045018
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole‐of‐government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00797.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, Y. H., & Rainey, H. (2005). Goal ambiguity in U.S. federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 1–30. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, R., Olshfski, D., & Abdelrazek, R. (2008). Paradoxes of collaboration: Managerial decision styles. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 29(1), 58–75. doi:10.1177/0734371x08326434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeHart-Davis, L., Marlowe, J., & Pandey, S. K. (2006). Gender dimensions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 873–887. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00655.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droege, S. B., & Hoobler, J. M. (2003). Employee turnover and tacit knowledge diffusion: A network perspective. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15(1), 50–64.
   Google Scholar
• Gajda, R., & Koliba, C. (2007). Evaluating the imperative of intraorganizational collaboration: A school improvement perspective. American Journal of Evaluation, 28(1), 26–44. doi:10.1177/1098214006296198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Grant, D. (2005). Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 58–77. doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacobucci, D., Saldanha, N., & Deng, X. (2007). A meditation on mediation: Evidence that structural equation models perform better than regressions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 139–153. doi:10.1016/s1057-7408(07)70020-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingraham, P. W. (1993). Of pigs in pokes and policy diffusion: Another look at pay-for-performance. Public Administration Review, 53(4), 348–356. doi:10.2307/977147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irving, P. G., & Coleman, D. F. (2003). The moderating effect of different forms of commitment on role ambiguity–job tension relations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 20(2), 97–106. doi:10.1111/j.1936-4490.2003.tb00696.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jex, S. M., & Gudanowski, D. M. (1992). Efficacy beliefs and work stress: An exploratory study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(5), 509–517. doi:10.1002/job.4030130506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, C. S. (2014). Organizational goal ambiguity and job satisfaction in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(4), 955–981. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2006). Managing boundaries in American administration: The collaboration imperative. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 10–19. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00662.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2005). Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 245–261. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, H. A. (2004). The logic of collaboration in education and the human services. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18(3), 225–237. doi:10.1080/13561820410001731278
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. R. (1997). Matching motivational strategies with organizational contexts. In B. M. Straw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 19, pp. 57–150). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 40–53. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00695.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R., & Bingham, L.B. (Eds.). (2009). The collaborative public manager: New ideas for the twenty-first century. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York, NY: Plume/Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. K., & Wright, B. E. (2006). Connecting the dots in public management: Political environment, organizational goal ambiguity, and the public manager’s role ambiguity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(4), 511–532. doi:10.1093/jopart/muj006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. L. (1981). Bringing some clarity to role ambiguity research. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 665–674. doi:10.5465/amr.1981.4285727
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373. doi:10.2307/976618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radin, B. A. (2000). The government performance and results act and the tradition of federal management reform: Square pegs in round holes? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 111–135. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024260
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., & Jung, C. S. (2015). A conceptual framework for analysis of goal ambiguity in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 71–99. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 1–32. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024401
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150–163. doi:10.2307/2391486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. C. (2011). Beyond smokestacks and silos: Open‐source, Web‐enabled coordination in organizations and networks. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 677–693. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02406.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359–371. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x
   Google Scholar
• Sager, F., & Rosser, C. (2009). Weber, Wilson, and Hegel: Theories of modern bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1136–1147. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02071.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, J. E. (1992). Goal and process clarity: Specification of multiple constructs of role ambiguity and a structural equation model of their antecedents and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(2), 130–142. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.77.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 935–943. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483–504. doi:10.2307/256789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, S. B., & Banaji, M. R. (2011). Culture, cognition, and collaborative networks in organizations. American Sociological Review, 76(2), 207–233. doi:10.1177/0003122411399390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stata. (2013). Stata: Structural equation modeling reference manual. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stazyk, E. C., & Goerdel, H. T. (2011). The benefits of bureaucracy: Public managers’ perceptions of political support, goal ambiguity, and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 645–672. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stazyk, E. C., Pandey, S. K., & Wright, B. E. (2011). Understanding affective organizational commitment: The importance of institutional context. American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), 603–624. doi:10.1177/0275074011398119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 20–32. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjosvold, D. (1988). Cooperative and competitive dynamics within and between organizational units. Human Relations, 41(6), 425–436. doi:10.1177/001872678804100601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179–190. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (2014). Building a collaborative team environment. Accessed October 4, 2014. https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/performance-management/teams/building-a-collaborative-team-environment
   Google Scholar
• van Wijk, R., Jansen, J. J., & Lyles, M. A. (2008). Inter‐and intra‐organizational knowledge transfer: A meta‐analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 830–853. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00771.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527–540. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretative sociology (Vol. 1). Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitford, A. B., Lee, S.-Y., Yun, T., & Jung, C. S. (2010). Collaborative behavior and the performance of government agencies. International Public Management Journal, 13(4), 321–349. doi:10.1080/10967494.2010.529378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willem, A., & Buelens, M. (2006). Knowledge sharing in public sector organizations: The effect of organizational characteristics on interdepartmental knowledge sharing. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(4), 581–606. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willem, A., & Buelens, M. (2009). Knowledge sharing in inter-unit cooperative episodes: The impact of organizational structure dimensions. International Journal of Information Management, 29(2), 151–160. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E. (2001). Public-sector work motivation: A review of the current literature and a revised conceptual model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(4), 559–586. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E. (2004). The role of work context in work motivation: A public sector application of goal and social cognitive theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(1), 59–78. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E. (2007). Public service and motivation: Does mission matter? Public Administration Review, 67(1), 54–64. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00696.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E., & Kim, S. (2004). Participation’s influence on job satisfaction: The importance of job characteristics. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 24(1), 18–40. doi:10.1177/0734371x03259860
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E., Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2012). Pulling the levers: Transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 206–215. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02496.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, T.-M., & Maxwell, T. A. (2011). Information-sharing in public organizations: A literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 164–175. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar