Implementing Performance Reporting in Local Government: A Cross-Countries Comparison

References

• Ammons, D., & Rivenbark, W. (2008). Factors influencing the use of performance data to improve municipal services: Evidence from the North Carolina benchmarking project. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 304–318. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00864.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askim, J. (2004). Benchmarking as a catalyst for innovation in service delivery: Local government benchmarking as a national programme in Norway. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the European Group of Public Administration, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Askim, J., Johnsen, A., & Christophersen, K. (2008). Factors behind organizational learning from benchmarking: Experiences from Norwegian municipal benchmarking networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 297–320. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogumil, J., & Holtkamp, L. (2004). The civic community under pressure to consolidate? An empirical study of explanatory factors for the implementation status of civic community. German Journal of Urban Studies, 43(1). http://www.difu.de/node/6063
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G., Gould–Williams, J., Law, J., & Walker, R. (2002). Plans, performance information and accountability: The case of best value. Public Administration, 80(4), 691–710. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartered Professional Accountants Canada. (2014). Canada Public Sector Accounting Handbook.
   Google Scholar
• Coplin, W. D., Merget, A. E., & Bourdeaux, C. (2002). The professional researcher as change agent in the government-performance movement. Public Administration Review, 62(6), 699–711. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, G. M., & Harris, J. E. (2005). Toward a theory of performance reporting to achieve public sector accountability: A field study. Public Budgeting and Finance, 25(2), 15–42. doi:10.1111/j.0275-1100.2005.00359.x
   Google Scholar
• Darlow, A., Hawtin, M., & Jassi, S. (2008). Reporting performance information to citizens. London, UK: Policy Research Institute. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120919132719/ http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/communities/pdf/35.pdf
   Google Scholar
• De Lancer Julnes, P., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693–708. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Maggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folz, D. H., Abdelrazek, R., & Chung, Y. (2009). The adoption, use, and impacts of performance measures in medium-size cities. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(1), 63–87. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576330103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fudge, M. (2011). An examination of the factors that influence municipalities to report performance measures online (Doctoral dissertation). Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/33507/PDF/1
   Google Scholar
• Government Accounting Standard Board (GASB). (1987). Concepts statement no 1 objectives of financial reporting. Norwalk, CT: GASB.
   Google Scholar
• Government Accounting Standard Board (GASB). (2008). Concepts statement No. 5, service efforts and accomplishments reporting (an amendment of GASB concepts statement No. 2). Norwalk, CT: GASB.
   Google Scholar
• Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (2009). Proposed suggested guidelines for voluntary reporting SEA performance information. Norwalk, CT: GASB.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, A. (2010). Ontario municipal benchmarking initiative. Ontario, Canada: The Institute of Public Administration of Canada. http://www.ipac.ca/ecommerce/uploads/OntarioMunicipalBenchmarkingInitiative-Preview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., Mussari, R., & Tranquilli, A. (2002). Performance measurement in Italian local governments: Analysis of experiences. Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Conference on Innovative Research in Management of the European Academy of Management, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. T. (2003). Perceptions of performance measurement and the practice of performance reporting by small cities. State and Local Government Review, 35(3), 161–173. doi:10.1177/0160323x0303500302
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. T. (2008). Reporting public performance information: The promise and challenges of citizen involvement? In W. Van Dooren & S. Van de Walle (Eds.), Performance information in the public sector: How it is used (pp. 192–210). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Holdt-Olesen, P., Bjørn Madsen, L., & Nøhr, K. (2007). Measuring local council performance. Copenhagen, Denmark: KREVI.
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, M., & Kloby, K. (2005). Sustaining citizen-driven performance improvement: Models for adoption and issues of sustainability. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 10(1), 1–20. http://www.innovation.cc/peer-reviewed/holzer_kloby_sustain_citizen_perormance_v10i1a6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB). (2011). Reporting service performance information (Consultation Paper). New York, NY: IPSASB. http://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/IPSASB_CP_Reporting_Service_Performance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB). (2014). Comment letters to the exposure draft (ED) 54, reporting service performance information. New York, NY: IPSASB. http://www.ifac.org/publications-resources/exposure-draft-ed-54-reporting-service-performance-information
   Google Scholar
• International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB). (2015). Recommended Practice Guideline 3, reporting service performance information. New York, NY: IPSASB. https://www.iaasb.org/system/files/publications/files/IPSASB-RPG-3-Reporting-Service-Performance-Information.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. M. (2011). Governance by numbers: What have we learned over the past 30 years? Public Money & Management, 31(1), 13–26. doi:10.1080/09540962.2011.545542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, O. (2011). Performance measures and democracy: Information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 399–418. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, T., & Siverbo, S. (2009). Explaining the utilization of relative performance evaluation in local government: A multi-theoretical study using data from Sweden. Financial Accountability & Management, 25(2), 197–224. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2009.00474.x
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, A. (2005). What does 25 years of experience tell us about the state of performance measurement in public management and policy? Public Money and Management, 25(1), 9–17. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00445.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen, A., & Vakkuri, J. (2006). Is there a Nordic perspective on public sector performance measurement? Financial Accountability and Management, 22(3), 291–308. doi:10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00404.x
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, A., & Vakkuri, J. (2010). Exploring performance management in the public sector: Political and cultural explanations revisited. Paper presented at the 32nd EGPA Annual Conference, Toulouse, France.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. (Ed.). (2008). The study of public management in Europe and the US: A comparative analysis of national distinctiveness. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klay, W. E., & McCall, S. (2005). Confronting the perplexing issues of SEA reporting. Journal of Government Financial Management, 54, 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Knutsson, H., Ramberg, U., & Tagesson, T. (2012). Benchmarking impact through municipal benchmarking networks. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(1), 102–123. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576360105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A. (2014). Drivers of performance information use: Systematic literature review and directions for future research. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(3), 459–486. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1006469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S. (2010a). Performance measurement in European local governments: A comparative analysis of reform experiences in Great Britain, France, Sweden and Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(2), 331–345. doi:10.1177/0020852310372050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S. (2010b). New public management for the “classical continental European administration”: Modernization at the local level in Germany, France and Italy. Public Administration, 88(4), 1116–1130. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01869.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., & Fedele, P. (2010). New public management in continental Europe: Local government modernization in Germany, France and Italy from a comparative perspective. In H. Wollmann & G. Marcou (Eds.), The provision of public services in Europe (pp. 49–74). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., & Jäkel, T. (2013). Competing, collaborating or controlling? Comparing benchmarking in European local government. Public Money & Management, 33(4), 269–276. doi:10.1080/09540962.2013.799815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2014). Introduction to comparative public administration: Administrative systems and reforms in Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., Bogumil, J., & Grohs, S. (2008). Evaluating administrative modernization in German local governments: Success or failure of the “new steering model”? Public Administration Review, 68(5), 851–863. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00927.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizell, L. (2008). Promoting performance: Using indicators to enhance the effectiveness of sub central spending (OECD Working paper). Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/ctp/federalism/40832141.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Montesinos, V., Brusca, I., Manes Rossi, F., & Aversano, N. (2013). The usefulness of performance reporting in local government: Comparing Italy and Spain. Public Money & Management, 33(3), 171–176. doi:10.1080/09540962.2013.785701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. (2012). Performance management in US state governments. World Bank PREMnotes, 17, 1–10. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTPOVERTY/Images/ME17v3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. J. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 849–866. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, E. C. (2000). Future governance and the literature on policy transfer and lesson drawing. Paper prepared for the ESRC Future Governance Programme Workshop on Policy Transfer, London, UK. http://personal.lse.ac.uk/Pagee/Papers/EdPagePaper1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T., & Streib, G. (1999). Performance measurement in municipal government: Assessing the state of practice. Public Administration Review, 59(4), 325–335. doi:10.2307/3110115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T., & Streib, G. (2005). Elements of strategic planning and management in municipal government: Status after two decades. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 45–56. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00429.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollanen, R. (2012). Performance reporting as accountability mechanism in local government: Exploratory case study in two Canadian provinces. Conference Paper prepared for European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, Milan, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Pollanen, R., & Pollanen, E. (2009). Financial control and accountability in local government: Recent initiatives in Ontario. International Journal of Business and Public Administration, 6(2), 83–97.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2002). Clarifying convergence. Striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform. Public Management Review, 4(1), 471–492. doi:10.1080/14616670110071847
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Dan, C. (2013). Searching for impacts in performance-oriented management reform. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(1), 7–32. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576370101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radnor, Z., & Barnes, D. (2007). Historical analysis of performance measurement and management in operations management. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(5/6), 384–396. doi:10.1108/17410400710757105
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, F. W. (2010). Trends in the comparative study of public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(4), 750–760. doi:10.1177/0020852310386437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, R. (1991). What is lesson drawing? Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), 3–30. doi:10.1017/s0143814x00004918
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R. (1993). Lesson-drawing in public policy. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Ryzin, G., & Lavena, C. F. (2013). The credibility of government performance reporting: An experimental test. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(1), 87–103. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576370104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saliterer, I., & Korac, S. (2014). The discretionary use of performance information by different local government actors—Analysing and comparing the predictive power of three factor sets. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(3), 637–658. doi:10.1177/0020852313518170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatteman, A. (2008). Is public performance reporting living up to its expectations? A bibliographic essay. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(2), 309–327. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576320207
   Google Scholar
• Siverbo, S., & Johansson, T. (2006). Relative performance evaluation in Swedish local government. Financial Accountability and Management, 22(3), 271–290. doi:10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00403.x
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. (2014). Comprehensive performance assessment of Danish municipalities? Conference paper presented to the International Research Society for Public Management, Ottawa, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• State Government of Victoria, Australia. (2012). Local Government Performance Reporting Framework, Directions Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Steccolini, I. (2004). Is the annual report an accountability medium? An empirical investigation into Italian local governments. Financial Accountability and Management, 20(3), 327–350. doi:10.1111/j.0267-4424.2004.00389.x
   Google Scholar
• Sterck, M., & Bouckaert, G. (2008). Performance information of high quality. In P. de Lancer Julnes, F. Stokes, M. Aristigueta, & K. Yang (Eds.), International handbook of practice-based performance management (pp. 433–453). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. (2009). Strengthening the link between performance measurement and decision making. Public Administration, 87(4), 853–871. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01788.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakkuri, J. (2010). Struggling with ambiguity—Public managers as users of NPM-oriented management instruments. Public Administration, 88(4), 999–1024. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01856.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S., & Bovaird, T. (2007). Making better use of information to drive improvement in local public services: A report to the audit commission. Birmingham, UK: Institute of Local Government Studies. http://epapersnew.bham.ac.uk/33/1/INLOGOV_informationuse_final.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Van Helden, G. J., & Jansen, E. P. (2003). New public management in Dutch local government. Local Government Studies, 29(2), 68–88. doi:10.1080/03003930308559371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Helden, G. J., & Johnsen, A. (2002). A comparative analysis of the development of performance based management systems in Dutch and Norwegian local government. International Public Management Journal, 5, 75–95. http://www.ipmn.net/index.php/component/docman/doc_download/63-a-comparative-analysis-of-the-development-of-performance-based-management-systems-in-dutch-and-norwe
   Google Scholar
• Van Helden, G. J., & Reichard, C. (2013). A meta-review of public sector performance management research. Tékhne, 11, 10–20. doi:10.1016/j.tekhne.2013.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Verbeeten, F. (2008). Performance management practices in public sector organizations. Impact on performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), 427–454. doi:10.1108/09513570810863996
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K. (2008). Making performance measurement relevant: Informing and involving stakeholders in performance measurement. In P. de Lancer Julnes, F. Stokes, M. Aristigueta, & K. Yang (Eds.), International handbook of practice-based performance management (pp. 173–188). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K. (2009). Examining perceived honest performance reporting by public organizations: Bureaucratic politics and organizational practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 81–105. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Holzer, M. (2006). The performance trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 114–126. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00560.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yetano, A. (2013). What drives the institutionalization of performance measurement and management in local government? Public Performance & Management Review, 37(1), 59–86. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576370103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar