Metagovernance as Strategic Supervision

References

• Allen, G. (2000). Intertextuality. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, N. A. (2000). Public market. Political firms. Acta Sociologica, 43, 43–61. doi:10.1177/000169930004300105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, N. A. (2008). Partnerships: Machines of possibility. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, N. A. (2012). To promise a promise: When contractors desire a life-long partnership. In N. A. Andersen & I.-J. Sand (Eds.), Hybrid forms of governance (pp. 205–231). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, N. A., & Pors, J. G. (2016). Public management in transition: The orchestration of potentiality. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S., & Hindmoor, A. (2009). Rethinking Governance: The centrality of the state in modern society. Port Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2010). Governance without a state: Can it work? Regulation and Governance, 4(2), 113–134. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01076.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2003). Contract-management capacity in municipal and county governments. Public Administration Review, 63, 153–164. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, A. (2002). Associative democracy. In A. Carter & G. Stokes (Eds.), Democratic theory today (pp. 228–248). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coaffee, J., & Deas, I. (2008). The search for policy innovation in urban governance—lessons from community-led regeneration partnerships. Public Policy and Administration, 23(4), 167–187. doi:10.1177/0952076707086254
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P. J. (2003). Governing by contract. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damgaard, B., & Torfing, J. (2010). Network governance of active employment policy: The Danish experience. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(3), 248–262. doi:10.1177/0958928710364435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Evaluating productivity of collaborative governance regimes: A performance matrix. Public Performance & Management Review, 38, 717–747. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, P., & Daugbjerg, C. (2012). Explaining governance outcomes: Epistemology, network governance and policy network analysis. Political Studies Review, 10, 195–207. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00257.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2006). Participatory governance as deliberative empowerment: Cultural politics and the facilitation of discursive space. American Review of Public Administration, 36, 58–78. doi:10.1177/0275074005282582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedland, M. (1994). Government by contract and public law. Public Law, 86, 86–104.
   Google Scholar
• Freedland, M., & Silvana, S. (1994). Public services and citizenship in European Law: Public and labour law perspectives. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., & Maybin, J. (2011). Documents, practices and policy. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 7(2), 155–170. doi:10.1332/174426411x579207
   Google Scholar
• Greenaway, J., Salter, B., & Hart, S. (2007). How policy networks can damage democratic health: A case study in the government of governance. Public Administration, 85(3), 717–738. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00661.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, C. (1997). Målstyring, kontraktstyring og udlicitering i den offentlige sektor [Goal steering, contracts and outsourcing in the public sector]. Økonomistyring og Informatik, 13, 109–131.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, C. (2000). Exploring contracts as reinvented institutions in the Danish public sector. Public Administration, 78, 153–164. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. D. (2007). Governance networks and participation. In E. Sørensen & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 247–261). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Haus, M., & Klausen, J. E. (2011). Urban leadership and community involvement: Ingredients for good governance. Urban Affairs Review, 47(2), 256–279. doi:10.1177/1078087410388867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, B. (2002). Civil society and democracy. In A. Carter & G. Stokes (Eds.), Democratic theory today (pp. 203–227). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2003). Collaborative policymaking: Governance through dialogue. In M. A. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis—Understanding governance in network society (pp. 33–59). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, L. (2013). Housing welfare policies in Scandinavia: A comparative perspective on a transition era. Journal of Land, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 13(2), 133–144. doi:10.5804/lhij.2013.4.2.133
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2000). Governance failure. In G. Stoker (Ed.), The new politics of local British governance (pp. 11–32). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2002). Governance and meta-governance: On reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony. In H. P. Bang (Ed.), Governance as social and political communication (pp. 101–116). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2004). Multi-level governance and multi-level metagovernance. Multi-Level Governance, 1(9), 49–75. doi:10.1093/0199259259.003.0004
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, S. J. (2002). Contracting. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government (pp. 282–318). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., & Skelcher, C. (2007). Democracy and governance networks: Compatible or not? Public Administration, 85(3), 587–608. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00662.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Københavns Almene Boligorganisation. (2011). Håndbog om almene boliger—Spilleregler for bestyrelser, beboere og ansatte i den almene boligsektor [Handbook of social house associations, rules for burdened sizes, residents and employees in housing associations]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Litotryk København. http://www.kab-bolig.dk/Admin/Public/Download.aspx?file=Files%2fFiler%2fKAB_bolig%2fOm+KAB%2fKAB+Bogshop%2fUdpluk_til_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ladeur, K.-H. (2007). The role of contracts and networks in public governance: The importance of the “social epistemology” of decision making. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 14(2), 329–351. doi:10.2979/gls.2007.14.2.329
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The rise of regulatory capitalism: The global diffusion of a new order. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), 200–217. doi:10.1177/0002716204273623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, D. H. (2009). Metagovernance of the national park process in Denmark. Local Environment, 14(3), 245–257. doi:10.1080/13549830802693086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaulay, S. (1991). Longterm continuing relations: The American experience regulating dealerships and franchises. In C. Joerges (Ed.), Franchising and the law (pp. 119–207). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Macaulay, S. (2003). The real and the paper deal: Empirical pictures of relationships, complexity and the urge for transparent simple rules. In D. Campbell, H. Collins, & J. Wrightman (Eds.), Implicit dimensions of contract (pp. 44–79). Oxford, UK: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Macneil, I. R. (1988). Contractland invaded again: A comment on doctrinal writing and Shell’s ethical standards. Northwestern University Law Review, 82(4), 1195–1197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macneil, I. R. (2003). Reflection on relational contract theory after a neoclassical seminar. In D. Campbell, H. Collins, & J. Wrightman (Eds.), Implicit dimensions of contract (pp. 207–217). Oxford, UK: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17(3), 77–101. doi:10.1080/01402389408425031
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1997). From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17(2), 139–167. doi:10.1017/S0143814x00003524
   Google Scholar
• McGrew, A. (2002). Transnational democracy. In A. Carter & G. Stokes (Eds.), Democratic theory today (pp. 269–294). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. (1993). The Hollow state: Private provision of public services. In H. Ingham & S. R. Smith (Eds.), Public policy for democracy (pp. 222–237). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. (2003). Managing the hollow state collaboration and contracting. Public Management Review, 5, 1–18. doi:10.1080/1461667022000028834
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Interior & Social Affairs. (2009). Den almene boligsektors documentation—Rapport fra arbejdsgruppen vedrørende almene boligorganisationers dokumentation [Documentation for Social Housing Associations - Report from the Working Group for the Documentation of the Social House Associations]. Silkeborg, Denmark: Silkeborg Bogtryk. https://bl.dk/media/169627/trykdokrapport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Social Affairs. (2010). Vejledning om styringsdialog [Supervision of the steering dialogue]. Silkeborg, Denmark: Silkeborg Bogtryk. https://almenstyringsdialog.dk/pages/guide/guide_styringsdialog.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Welfare. (2008). Den almene boligsektors styring [Steering of the Social House Associations]. Silkeborg, Denmark: Silkeborg Tryk. https://bl.dk/media/100258/Dokumentationspakken.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Housing Associations & National Association of Municipalities. (2009). Styringsreformen—Det fremtidige samarbejde mellem boligorganisationer og kommuner [Steeringreform - The future cooperation between the Social House Associations and the Municipalities]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Kommunernes Landsforening & Boligselskabernes Landsforening. http://www.e-pages.dk/bl/87/
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Housing Associations, & National Association of Municipalities. (2010). Styringsdialog—Et værktøj til samarbejde mellem kommuner og boligorganisationer [Steering dialogue - A tool for the cooperation between the municipalities and the Social House Associations]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Kommunernes Landsforening & Boligselskabernes Landsforening. http://www.e-pages.dk/bl/144
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (Ed.). (2010). The new public governance? London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2010). Meta-governance and public management. In S. P. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance (pp. 36–51). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Talbot, C. (Eds). (2004). Unbundled government. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Poulsen, B. (2009). Competing traditions of governance and dilemmas of administrative accountability: The case of Denmark. Public Administration, 87(1), 117–131. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00727.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1994). The hollowing out of the state: The changing nature of the public service in Britain. The Political Quarterly, 65(2), 138–151. doi:10.1111/j.1467-923X.1994.tb00441.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (2000). Governance and public administration. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance (pp. 54–90). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robichau, R. W. (2011). The mosaic of governance: Creating a picture with definitions, theories and debates. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 113–131. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00389_8.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D. H., & Gong, T. (2013). Coproducing “clean” collaborative governance. Public Performance & Management Review, 36, 544–561. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576360403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1994). Games real actors could play: Positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(1), 27–53. doi:10.1177/0951692894006001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (1984). Textually mediated social organization. International Social Science Journal, 36(1), 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (1990). Texts, facts and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. (2006). Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. American Review of Public Administration, 36, 98–114. doi:10.1177/0275074005282584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance network effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01753.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, A. (2015). More micro than meta? Competing concepts of metagovernance in the European Union. Public Policy and Administration, 30(1), 73–91. doi:10.1177/0952076714543862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? American Review of Public Administration, 36, 41–57. doi:10.1177/0275074005282583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teubner, G. (2000). Contracting worlds: The many autonomies of private law. Current Legal Problems, 9(3), 399–417. doi:10.1177/096466390000900305
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoerst, K., Van Thiel, S., Bouckaert, G., & Lægreid, P. (2012). Government agencies: Practices and lessons from 30 countries. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent-Jones, P. (1998). Responsive law in public services provision: A future for the local contracting state. Modern Law Review, 61, 362–381. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00148
   Google Scholar
• Vincent-Jones, P., & Harries, A. (1996). Conflict and co-operation in local authority quasi-markets: The hybrid organization of internal contracting under CCT. Local Government Studies, 22, 187–209. doi:10.1080/03003939608433840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallington, T., Lawrence, G., & Loechel, B. (2008). Reflections on the legitimacy of regional environmental governance: Lessons from Australia’s experiment in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 10(1), 1–30. doi:10.1080/15239080701652763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (2002). Deliberative democracy. In A. Carter & G. Stokes (Eds.), Democratic theory today (pp. 173–202). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M. (2003). “In the shadow of hierarchy”: Meta-governance, policy reform and urban regeneration in the West Midlands. Area, 35(1), 6–14. doi:10.1111/1475-4762.00105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar