599
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

What's Really Happening Here? Effectively Using Surveys to Learn About Organizations

References

  • Arnulf, J. K., Larsen, K. R., Martinsen, Ø. L., & Bong, C. H. (2014). Predicting survey responses: How and why semantics shape survey statistics on organizational behaviour. PLoS ONE, 9(9), e106361. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106361
  • Bohte, J., & Meier, K. J. (2000). Goal displacement: Assessing the motivation for organizational cheating. Public Administration Review, 60(2), 173–182. doi:10.1111/0033–3352.00075
  • Boyne, G. A. (2002). Concepts and indicators of local authority performance: An evaluation of the statutory frameworks in England and Wales. Public Money & Management, 22(2), 17–24. doi:10.1111/1467-9302.00303
  • Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 685–712. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024287
  • Brown, K., & Coulter, P. B. (1983). Subjective and objective measures of police service delivery. Public Administration Review, 43(1), 50–58. doi:10.2307/975299
  • Brudney, J. L., & England, R. E. (1982). Urban policy making and subjective service evaluations: Are they compatible? Public Administration Review, 42(2), 127–135. doi:10.2307/975534
  • Charbonneau, É., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2012). Performance measures and parental satisfaction with New York City schools. American Review of Public Administration, 42(1), 54–65. doi:10.1177/0275074010397333
  • Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1997). Psychometric properties of multisource performance ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings. Human Performance, 10(4), 331–360. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1004_2
  • Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(3), 69–106. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x
  • Favero, N., & Bullock, J. (2015). How (not) to solve the problem: An evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 285–308. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu020
  • Favero, N., & Meier, K. J. (2013). Evaluating urban public schools: Parents, teachers, and state assessments. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 401–412. doi:10.1111/puar.12022
  • Ganster, D. C., Hennessey, H. W., & Luthans, F. (1983). Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 321–331. doi:10.2307/255979
  • Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Jr., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Hoffman, B., Lance, C. E., Bynum, B., & Gentry, W. A. (2010). Rater source effects are alive and well after all. Personnel Psychology, 63(1), 119–151. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01164.x
  • Hoorens, V. (1993). Self-enhancement and superiority biases in social comparison. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 113–139. doi:10.1080/14792779343000040
  • Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. D. (2003). Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 843–877. doi:10.1162/00335530360698441
  • Kelly, J. M. (2003). Citizen satisfaction and administrative performance measures: Is there really a link? Urban Affairs Review, 38(6), 855–866. doi:10.1177/1078087403038006005
  • Licari, M. J., McLean, W., & Rice, T. W. (2005). The condition of community streets and parks: A comparison of resident and nonresident evaluations. Public Administration Review, 65(3), 360–368. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00460.x
  • Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (2013a). I think (I am doing well), therefore I am: Assessing the validity of administrators’ self-assessments of performance. International Public Management Journal, 16(1), 1–27. doi:10.1080/10967494.2013.796253
  • Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (2013b). Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: Common source bias and spurious relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 429–456. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus057
  • Meier, K. J., Winter, S. C., O’Toole, L. J., Jr., Favero, N., & Andersen, S. C. (2015). The validity of subjective performance measures: School principals in Texas and Denmark. Public Administration, 93(4), 1084–1101. doi:10.1111/padm.12180.
  • Miller, T. I., Kobayashi, M. M., & Hayden, S. E. (2009). Citizen surveys for local government: A comprehensive guide to making them matter (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: ICMA.
  • New York City Department of Education. (2009). Learning environment survey 2008–09 school leader training. Available http://schools.nyc.gov/NR/rdonlyres/32A58BDC-6AD5-48CA-B338-036CAC7CA2AA/55697/LearningEnvironmentSurveySchoolLeaderPresentationF.ppt
  • O’Toole, L. J. Jr., & Meier, K. J. (2011). Public management: Organizations, governance, and performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Percy, S. L. (1986). In defense of citizen evaluations as performance measures. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 22(1), 66–83. doi:10.1177/004208168602200104
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
  • Schachter, H. L. (2010). Objective and subjective performance measures: A note on terminology. Administration & Society, 42(5), 550–567. doi:10.1177/0095399710378080
  • Schaeffer, N. C. (1991). Hardly ever or constantly? Group comparisons using vague quantifiers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(3), 395–423. doi:10.1086/269270
  • Smith, G. M., Tompkins, D. M., Bigelow, M. E., & Antoon, A. Y. (1988). Burn-induced cosmetic disfigurement: Can it be measured reliably? Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation, 9(4), 371–375. doi:10.1097/00004630-198807000-00011
  • Stipak, B. (1979a). Are there sensible ways to analyze and use subjective indicators of urban service quality? Social Indicators Research, 6(4), 421–438. doi:10.1007/bf00289436
  • Stipak, B. (1979b). Citizen satisfaction with urban services: Potential misuse as a performance indicator. Public Administration Review, 39(1), 46–52. doi:10.2307/3110378
  • Swindell, D., & Kelly, J. M. (2000). Linking citizen satisfaction data to performance measures: A preliminary evaluation. Public Performance & Management Review, 24(1), 30–52. doi:10.2307/3381075
  • Tarnai, J., & Dillman, D. A. (1992). Questionnaire context as a source of response differences in mail and telephone surveys. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Context effects in social and psychological research (pp. 115–129). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Teodoro, M. P. (2009). Bureaucratic job mobility and the diffusion of innovations. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 175–189. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00364.x
  • Van Ryzin, G. G., Immerwahr, S., & Altman, S. (2008). Measuring street cleanliness: A comparison of New York City’s scorecard and results from a citizen survey. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 295–303. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00863.x
  • Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 281–300. doi:10.1037/a0017908
  • Vazire, S., & Mehl, M. R. (2008). Knowing me, knowing you: The accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other-ratings of daily behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1202–1216. doi:10.1037/a0013314
  • Wright, D. B., Gaskell, G. D., & O’Muircheartaigh, C. A. (1994). How much is “quite a bit”? Mapping between numerical values and vague quantifiers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8(5), 479–496. doi:10.1002/acp.2350080506

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.