Turnover at the Top: Investigating Performance-Turnover Sensitivity among Nonprofit Organizations

References

• Ai, C. R., & Norton, E. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80(1), 123–129. doi:10.1016/s0165-1765(03)00032-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M. P., & Panian, S. K. (1982). Power, performance, and succession in the large corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4), 538–547. doi:10.2307/2392529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anheier, H. (2005). Nonprofit organizations: Theory, management, policy. London, UK: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203500927.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. L. (2004). Succession planning for the not-for-profit chief executive. Children’s Voice, 13(6), 34–36. Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/article/1P3-745707471/succession-planning-for-the-not-for-profit-chief-executive
   Google Scholar
• Balsam, S., & Miharjo, S. (2007). The effect of equity compensation on voluntary executive turnover. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(1), 95–119. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeker, W. (1992). Power and managerial dismissal: Scapegoating at the top. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 400–421. doi:10.2307/2393450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, W. G. (1994). Inside the boardroom: Governance by directors and trustees. New York, NY: J. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G., & Dahya, J. (2002). Executive succession and the performance of public organizations. Public Administration, 80(1), 179–200. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., James, O., John, P., & Petrovsky, N. (2010). Does public service performance affect top management turnover? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(Suppl. 2), i261–i279. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., James, O., John, P., & Petrovsky, N. (2011). Leadership succession and organizational success: When do new chief executives make a difference? Public Money & Management, 31(5), 339–346. doi:10.1080/09540962.2011.598345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics (2015). Consumer Price Index. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/CPI/.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese, T. D. (2011). Do donors penalize nonprofit organizations with accumulated wealth? Public Administration Review, 71(6), 859–869. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02420.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chikoto, G., & Neely, D. (2013). Building nonprofit financial capacity: The impact of revenue concentration and overhead costs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(3), 570–588. doi:10.1177/0899764012474120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chittoor, R., & Das, R. (2007). Professionalization of management and succession performance—A vital linkage. Family Business Review, 20(1), 65–79. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00084.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlan, A. T., & Schmidt, R. M. (1985). Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1–3), 43–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., & Kesner, I. F. (1985). Organizational performance as an antecedent of inside/outside chief executive succession: An empirical assessment. Academy of Management Journal, 28(4), 749–762. doi:10.2307/256235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195162073.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Firth, M., Fung, P., & Rui, O. (2006). Firm performance, governance structure, and top management turnover in a transitional economy. Journal of Management Studies, 43(6), 1289–1330. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00621.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, J., Hambrick, D., & Baumrin, S. (1988). A model of CEO dismissal. Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 255–270. doi:10.5465/amr.1988.4306882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froelich, K., McKee, G., & Rathge, R. (2011). Succession planning in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 22(1), 3–20. doi:10.1002/nml.20037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P. (2002). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/9780674037403.
   Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2004). Institutional isomorphism and public sector organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 283–307. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabarro, J. (1988). Executive leadership and succession: The process of taking charge. In D. C. Hambrick (Ed.), The executive effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers (pp. 237–268). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geer, B., Maher, J., & Cole, M. (2008). Managing nonprofit organizations: The importance of transformational leadership and commitment to operating standards for nonprofit accountability. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(1), 51–75. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576320103.
   Google Scholar
• Giambatista, R., Rowe, G., & Riaz, S. (2005). Nothing succeeds like succession: A critical review of leader succession literature since 1994. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(6), 963–991. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibelman, M., & Gelmen, S. (2002). On the departure of a chief executive officer: Scenarios and implications. Administration in Social Work, 26(2), 63–82. doi:10.1300/J147v26n02_04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. (2003). Democratic accountability: The third sector and all (Working Paper no. 19). Cambridge, MA: Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations, John F. Kennedy School of Government. doi:10.2139/ssrn.418262.
   Google Scholar
• Greenlee, J., & Trussel, J. M. (2000). Predicting the financial vulnerability of charitable organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 11(2), 199–210. doi:10.1002/nml.11205.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, C. (2007). When government becomes the principal philanthropist: The effects of public funding on patterns of nonprofit governance. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 458–473. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00729.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views on organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (vol. 9) (pp. 369–406). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammack, D., & Young, D. (1993). Nonprofit organizations in a market economy: Understanding new roles, issues, and trends (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hashemi, L. (1983). Executive succession: Factors related to executive strain. Administration in Mental Health, 11(1), 36–45. doi:10.1007/bf00843170.
   Google Scholar
• Haveman, H. A. (1993). Ghosts of managers past: Managerial succession and organizational mortality. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 864–881. doi:10.2307/256762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimovics, R. D., & Herman, R. D. (1993). Executive leadership and resource dependence in nonprofit organizations: A frame analysis. Public Administration Review, 53(5), 419–427. doi:10.2307/976342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2000). Board practices of especially effective and less effective local nonprofit organizations. The American Review of Public Administration, 30(2), 146–160. doi:10.1177/02750740022064605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, G. C. (2005). The effects of managerial succession on organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 585–597. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iecovich, E., & Bar-Mor, H. (2007). Relationships between chairpersons and CEOs in nonprofit organizations. Administration in Social Work, 31(4), 21–40. doi:10.1300/j147v31n04_04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, R. T. (1996). Ten basic responsibilities of nonprofit boards (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: National Center for Nonprofit Boards.
   Google Scholar
• James, D. R., & Soref, M. (1981). Profit constraints on managerial autonomy: Managerial theory and the unmaking of the corporation president. American Sociological Review, 46, 1–18. doi:10.2307/2095023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenter, D., & Lewellen, K. (2010). Performance-induced CEO turnover. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1570635. Retrieved from http://personal.lse.ac.uk/jenter/Performance_Induced_CEO_Turnover_11-10-14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R., & Summers, D. (1987). Doing well while doing good: Dilemmas of performance measurement in nonprofit organizations and the need for a multiple-constituency approach. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (1st ed.) (pp. 154–166). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karaca-Mandic, P., Norton, E. C., & Dowd, B. (2012). Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Health Services Research, 47, 255–274. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01314.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesner, I. F., & Sebora, T. C. (1994). Executive succession: Past, present & future. Journal of Management, 20(2), 327–372. doi:10.1016/0149-2063(94)90019-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, G. (1998). Managing executive transition. Washington, DC: NeighborWorks. Available at http://www.neighborworks.issuelab.org/resources/1765/1765.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lee, G. (2011). Uncovering the blurring of sectors: A comparison of perceived organizational values between the public and nonprofit sectors. International Review of Public Administration, 16(3), 1–23. doi:10.1080/12294659.2011.10805205.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J., & Freese, J. (2014). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (3rd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata.
   Google Scholar
• Malatesta, D., & Smith, C. (2014). Lessons from resource dependence theory for contemporary public and nonprofit management. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 14–25. doi:10.1111/puar.12181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEachern, W. A. (1975). Managerial control and performance. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Midwest Center for Nonprofit Leadership. (2010). The legal duties of the nonprofit board and its members. Accessed January 10, 2017. http://bloch.umkc.edu/mwcnl/resources/documents/legal-duties.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moxham, C. (2010). Help or hindrance? Public Performance & Management Review, 33(3), 342–354. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576330302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Charitable Statistics (NCCS). (2014). National taxonomy of exempt entities. Accessed May 15, 2014. http://nccs.urban.org/classification/national-taxonomy-exempt-entities
   Google Scholar
• Never, B. (2014). Divergent patterns of nonprofit financial distress. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 5(1), 67–84. doi:10.1515/npf-2012-0009.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, E. C., Wang, H., & Ai, C. (2004). Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata Journal, 4, 154–167. Available at http://www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?articlenum=st0063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okten, C., & Weisbrod, B. A. (2000). Determinants of donations in private nonprofit markets. Journal of Public Economics, 75(2), 255–272. doi:10.1016/s0047-2727(99)00066-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn, R., Jauch, L., Martin, T., & Glueck, W. (1981). The event of CEO succession, performance, and environmental conditions. Academy of Management Journal, 24(1), 183–191. doi:10.2307/255833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perucci, R., & Mannweiler, R. (1968). Organization size, complexity and administrative succession in higher education. The Sociological Quarterly, 9(3), 343–355. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1968.tb01126.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1977). Organizational context and the characteristics and tenure of hospital administrators. Academy of Management Journal, 20(1), 74–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
   Google Scholar
• Puffer, S. M., & Weintrop, J. B. (1991). Corporate performance and CEO turnover: The role of performance expectations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renz, D. O., & Herman, R. D. (2010). The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, R. (2000). A review of models for measuring organizational effectiveness among for-profit and nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(1), 97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, S., & Lee, Y. (2013). Examining the role of management in turnover: A contingency approach. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(1), 134–153. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576370106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawhill, J. C., & Williamson, D. (2001). Mission impossible? Measuring success in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(3), 371–386. doi:10.1002/nml.11309.
   Google Scholar
• Seaman, B. A., Wilsker, A., & Young, D. (2013, October). Measuring concentration and competition in the U.S. nonprofit sector: Implications for research and public policy. Paper presented at the Nonprofit Competition and Public Policy Conference, Washington, DC. Available at https://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/campbell/products/SyracuseGSUCompetitionPaper-SeamanWilskerYoungFINALVERSION(2).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J., & Willett, J. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, A. J., & Faulk, L. (2014). Administrative growth and grant payouts in nonprofit foundations: Fulfilling the public good amid professionalization? Public Administration Review, 74(5), 630–639. doi:10.1111/puar.12231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, J. (2006). Nonprofit fund-raising in competitive donor markets. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(2), 204–224. doi:10.1177/0899764005285951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinkelman, D., & Mankaney, K. (2007). When is administrative efficiency associated with charitable donations? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(1), 41–64. doi:10.1177/0899764006293176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussel, J. M., & Parsons, L. M. (2007). Financial reporting factors affecting donations to charitable organizations. Advances in Accounting, 23, 263–285. doi:10.1016/s0882-6110(07)23010-x.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, M., Cheung, F., & Gellis, Z. (2004). In search of an optimal model for board–executive relationships in voluntary human service organizations. International Social Work, 47(2), 169–186. doi:10.1177/0020872804041411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckman, H. P., & Chang, C. F. (1991). A methodology for measuring the financial vulnerability of charitable nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20(4), 445–460. doi:10.1177/089976409102000407.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, A. J., & Altman, D. G. (2001). Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. British Medical Journal, 323(7321), 1123–1124. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1946). Bureaucracy. In H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 196–244). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Available at https://archive.org/details/frommaxweberessa00webe
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, J., & Kirschenbaum, A. (1993). Gender and turnover: A re-examination of the impact of sex on intent and actual job changes. Human Relations, 46(8), 987–1006. doi:10.1177/001872679304600805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, W., Denison, D. V., & Butler, J. S. (2009). Revenue structure and nonprofit borrowing. Public Finance Review, 37(1), 47–67. doi:10.1177/1091142108321239.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. (2007). Why study nonprofit finance?. In D. Young (Ed.), Financing nonprofits: Putting theory into practice (pp. 3–20). Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. (2008). How leaders influence organizational effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(6), 708–722. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar