Numbers over Narratives? How Government Message Strategies Affect Citizens’ Attitudes

References

• Bauhr, M. and M. Grimes. (2014). Indignation or resignation: The implications of transparency for societal accountability. Governance, 27(2), 291–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwman, R. B. & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. (2016). Experimental public administration from 1992 to 2014: A systematic literature review and ways forward. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(2), 110–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2007). Analyzing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Kao, C. F., & Rodriguez, R. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 1032–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. L. (2003). How policies make citizens: Senior political activism and the American welfare state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charbonneau, E., & Van Ryzin, G. G., (2015). Benchmarks and citizen judgments of local government performance: Findings from a survey experiment. Public Management Review, 17(2), 288–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. (2007a). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007b). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). 25 years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 32–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. (2014). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Washington, DC: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, R. (1999). The web of politics: The internet’s impact on the American political system. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Fine Licht, J. (2011). Do we really want to know? The potentially negative effect of transparency in decision-making on perceived legitimacy. Scandinavian Political Studies, 34, 183–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fine Licht, J. (2014). Policy area as a potential moderator of transparency effects: An experiment. Public Administration Review, 74(3), 361–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fine Licht, J., Naurin, D., Esaiasson, P., & Gilljam, M. (2014). When does transparency generate legitimacy? Experimenting on a context-bound relationship. Governance, 27(1), 111–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, S., & Meijer, A. (2016). Transparency and public value—analyzing the transparency practices and value creation of public utilities. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(12), 940–951. doi:10.1080/01900692.2015.1064133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (2010). Is transparency the best disinfectant? The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(4), 389–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galston, W. A. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 217–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Knies, E. (2017). Validating a scale for citizen trust in government organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(3), 583–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Meijer, A. J. (2014). Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: Evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 137–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., Boram Hong, P., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A., and Greiling, D. (2014). Transparency, e-government, and accountability: Some issues and considerations. Public Performance and Management Review, 36(3), 562–584.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Moore, E. (2001). Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. Tory Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M. B. (1978). Beyond attitude structure: Toward the informational determinants of attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 545–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2007). What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance? Public Management Review, 9(2), 191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Heald, D. (2006). Transparency: The key to better governance? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, O. (2011). Performance measures and democracy: Information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments. Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 21(3), 399–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, O., & Mosely, A. (2014). Does performance information about public services affect citizens’ perceptions, satisfaction, and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information. Public Administration, 92(2), 493–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karens, R., Eshuis, J., Klijn, E.-H., & Voets, J. (2016). The impact of public branding: An experimental study on the effects of branding policy on citizen trust. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 486–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusow, A. M., Wilson, L. C., & Martin, D. E. (1997). Determinants of citizen satisfaction with the police: The effects of residential location. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 20(4), 655–664.
   Google Scholar
• Laskey, H. A., Day, E., & Crask, M. R. (1989). Typology of main message strategies for television commercials. Journal of Advertising, 18(1), 36–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahler, J., & Regan, P. M. (2007). Crafting the message: Controlling content on agency web sites. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 505–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, D. F. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. (2009). Understanding modern transparency. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(2), 255–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, A. (2015). Citizen (dis)satisfaction: An experimental equivalence framing study. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 469–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, A. L. (2017). Compared to what? How social and historical reference points affect citizens’ performance evaluations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(4), 562–580. doi:10.1093/jopart/mux023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S. J. (2007). Governmental transparency in the path of administrative reform. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S. J. (2014). Transparency: A regime value linked with ethics. Administration & Society, 46(2), 181–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S. J., and Van Ryzin, G. G. (2007). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porumbescu, G. (2017). Linking transparency to trust in government and voice. American Review of Public Administration, 47(5), 520–537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puto, C. P., & Wells, W. D. (1984). Informational and transformational advertising: The differential effects of time. In T. C. Kinnear (Eds.), NA—Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 11, pp. 638–643). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2005). Spin control and freedom of information: Lessons for the United Kingdom from Canada. Public Administration, 83(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2012). WikiLeaks: The illusion of transparency. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 116–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J., Irani, L., Silberman, M., Zaldivar, A., & Tomlinson, B. (2010). Who are the crowdworkers? Shifting demographics in Amazon Mechanical Turk. Proceedings of the CHI EA ‘10 CHI ‘10 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, 2863–2872. Association for Computing Machinery. Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ruijer, H. J. M (Erna). (2017). Proactive transparency in the United States and the Netherlands: The role of government communication officials. American Review of Public Administration, 47(3), 354–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J. L. (1971). The management of advertising. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Slothuus, R. (2008). More than weighting cognitive importance: A dual-process model of issue framing effects. Political Psychology, 29(1), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (2nd rev. ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, V., Zinkhan, G. M., & Reddy, S. K. (1996). The evolution and antecedents of transformational advertising: A conceptual model. Advances in Consumer Research, 23(1), 49–55.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R E. (1999). A six-segment message strategy wheel. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(6), 7–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, G. (2006). Testing the expectancy disconfirmation model of citizen satisfaction with local government. Journal of Public Administration and Research Theory, 16(4), 599–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, G. G., & Lavena, C. F. (2013). The credibility of government performance reporting: An experimental test. Public Performance and Management Review, 37(1), 87–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, V. (2016). On the ethics of crowdsourced research. Political Science & Politics, 49(1), 77–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthy, B. (2010). More open but not more trusted? The effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 in the United Kingdom central government. Governance, 23(4), 561–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar