Managing Goal Conflict in Public Service Delivery Networks: Does Accountability Move Up and Down, or Side to Side?

References

• Agranoff, R. (2007). Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2004). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., & Radin, B. A. (1991). The comparative case study approach in public administration. Research in Public Administration, 1, 203–221. doi:10.4135/9781473915480.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardach, E. (2015). Networks, hierarchies, and hybrids. International Public Management Journal, 20, 560–585. doi:10.1080/10967494.2015.1127863.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456. doi:10.1111/puar.12238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 44–55. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross‐sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. doi:10.1111/puar.12432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, P. J. (2003). Governing by contract: Challenges and opportunities for public managers. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E. (2007). Trust in complex decision-making networks: A theoretical and empirical exploration. Administration and Society, 39(1), 25–50. doi:10.1177/0095399706294460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 85–112. doi:10.2307/256729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, C., & Acar, M. (2005). Understanding collaboration among nonprofit organizations: Combining resource dependency, institutional, and network perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(3), 340–361. doi:10.1177/0899764005275411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, K., & Provan, K. G. (2007a). Resource tangibility and patterns of interaction in a publicly funded health and human services network. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 435–454. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, K., & Provan, K. G. (2007b). Structural embeddedness and organizational social outcomes in a centrally governed mental health services network. Public Management Review, 9(2), 169–189. doi:10.1080/14719030701340218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human, S. E., & Provan, K. G. (2000). Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm networks: A comparative study of success and demise. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 327–365. doi:10.2307/2667074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isett, K. R., Mergel, I. A., LeRoux, K., Mischen, P. A., & Rethemeyer, R. K. (2011). Networks in public administration scholarship: Understanding where we are and where we need to go. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(s1), 157–173. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq061.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. M., & Romzek, B. S. (2008). Social welfare contracts as networks: The impact of network stability on management and performance. Administration & Society, 40(2), 115–146. doi:10.1177/0095399707312826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keast, R., Brown, K., & Mandell, M. (2007). Getting the right mix: Unpacking integration meanings and strategies. International Public Management Journal, 10(1), 9–33. doi:10.1080/10967490601185716.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2015). The job of government: Interweaving public functions and private hands. Public Administration Review, 75(2), 219–229. doi:10.1111/puar.12336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt7sfxj.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2010). Trust in governance networks. Administration & Society, 42(2), 193–221. doi:10.1177/0095399710362716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koliba, C. J., Mills, R. M., & Zia, A. (2011). Accountability in governance networks: An assessment of public, private, and nonprofit emergency management practices following Hurricane Katrina. Public Administration Review, 71(2), 210–220. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02332.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. W., Robertson, P. J., Lewis, L., Sloane, D., Galloway-Gilliam, L., & Nomachi, J. (2012). Trust in a cross-sectoral interorganizational network: An empirical investigation of antecedents. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(4), 609–631. doi:10.1177/0899764011414435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandell, M. P. (1999). Community collaborations: Working through network structures. Policy Studies Review, 16(1), 42. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00840.x.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 33–43. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00664.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M., & Silvia, C. (2009). Does leadership in networks matter? Public Performance & Management Review, 33, 34–62. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576330102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, M. K., Riccucci, N. M., & Lurie, I. (2001). Achieving goal congruence in complex environments: The case of welfare reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(2), 165–202. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 359–380.
   Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2006). A manager’s guide to choosing and using collaborative networks. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government. Available at http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/CollaborativeNetworks.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R., & Bingham, L. B. (2007). Conclusion: Conflict and collaboration in networks. International Public Management Journal, 10(1), 103–109. doi:10.1080/10967490601185799.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R., & Vij, N. (2012). Collaborative public management: Where have we been and where are we going? American Review of Public Administration, 42(5), 507–522. doi:10.1177/0275074012445780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2014). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 6(4), 235–252.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2015). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. doi:10.3998/mpub.9739.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J. (1989). Alternative mechanisms for multiorganizational implementation: The case of wastewater management. Administration & Society, 21(3), 313–339. doi:10.1177/009539978902100302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, S. (2003). Entrepreneurial strategies for managing interagency collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), 311–340. doi:10.1093/jopart/mug026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414–423. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., Huang, K., & Milward, H. B. (2009). The evolution of structural embeddedness and organizational social outcomes in a centrally governed health and human services network. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 873–893. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, K. S., & Feldman, M. S. (2014). Boundaries as junctures: Collaborative boundary work for building efficient resilience. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 673–695. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romzek, B. S., & Johnston, J. M. (1999). Reforming Medicaid through contracting: The nexus of implementation and organizational culture. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 107–139. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024402.
   Google Scholar
• Romzek, B. S., LeRoux, K., & Blackmar, J. M. (2012). A preliminary theory of informal accountability among network organizational actors. Public Administration Review, 2(3), 442–453. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02547.x.
   Google Scholar
• Romzek, B., LeRoux, K., Johnston, J., Kempf, R. J., & Piatak, J. S. (2014). Informal accountability in multi-sector service delivery collaborations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(4), 813–842. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saz-Carranza, A., & Ospina, S. M. (2011). The behavioral dimension of governing interorganizational goal-directed networks—Managing the unity-diversity tension. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 327–365. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 20–32 doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• United States Government Accountability Office (USGAO). (2007). Nonprofit sector: Increasing numbers and key role in delivering federal services (GAO-07-1084T). Washington, DC: USGAO. Available at http://www.gao.gov/assets/120/117387.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2012). The tangled web: Unraveling the principle of common goals in collaborations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 731–760. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard business review, 78(1), 139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2010). Analytic generalization. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & W. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 20–22). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412957397.n8.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar