Managing the Gaps: How Performance Gaps Shape Managerial Decision Making

References

• Andersen, S. C. (2017). From passive to active representation–experimental evidence on the role of normative values in shaping white and minority bureaucrats’ policy attitudes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(3), 400–414. doi:10.1093/jopart/mux006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. C., & Jakobsen, M. (2017). Policy positions of bureaucrats at the front lines: Are they susceptible to strategic communication? Public Administration Review, 77(1), 57–66. doi:10.1111/puar.12584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A. C., & Dahlin, K. B. (2007). Aspiration performance and railroads’ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organization Science, 18(3), 368–385. doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellavita, C. (Ed.). (1990). How public organizations work: Learning from experience. New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Bendor, J. (2003). Herbert A. Simon: Political scientist. Annual Review of Political Science, 6(1), 433–471. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085659
   Google Scholar
• Bendor, J. (2010). Bounded rationality and politics. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bendor, J., Diermeier, D., & Ting, M. (2016). Inequality, aspirations, social comparisons. Political Science Research and Methods, 4(03), 451–476. doi:10.1017/psrm.2015.47
   Google Scholar
• Bendor, J., Taylor, S., & Gaalen, R. V. (1987). Stacking the deck: Bureaucratic missions and policy design. American Political Science Review, 81(3), 873–896. doi:10.2307/1962681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckhaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2007). Managing performance: International comparisons. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G., James, O., John, P., & Petrovsky, N. (2009). Democracy and government performance: Holding incumbents accountable in English local governments. Journal of Politics, 71(4), 1273–1284. doi:10.1017/S0022381609990089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheon, O., & An, S.-H. (2017). Blowing in the wind: A study for granger causality between managerial strategy and organizational performance. Public Management Review, 19(5), 686–704. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1200120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, O. A., Dempster, M. A. H., & Wildavsky, A. (1966). A theory of the budgetary process. American Political Science Review, 60(03), 529–547. doi:10.2307/1952969
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmunds, A., & Morris, A. (2000). The problem of information overload in business organisations: A review of the literature. International Journal of Information Management, 1(20), 17–28. doi:10.1016/S0268-4012(99)00051-1
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. P., & McGuire, T. G. (1996). Hospital response to prospect payment: Moral hazard, selection, and practice-style effects. Journal of Health Economics, 15(3), 257–277. doi:10.1016/0167-6296(96)00002-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favero, N., & Bullock, J. B. (2015). How (not) to solve the problem: An evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 285–308. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favero, N., & Meier, K. J. (2013). Evaluating urban public schools: Parents, teachers and state assessments. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 401–412. doi:10.1111/puar.12022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., & March, J. G. (1981). Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), 171–186. doi:10.2307/2392467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaynor, M., & Haas-Wilson, D. (1999). Change, consolidation, and competition in health care markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 141–164. doi:10.1257/jep.13.1.141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, H. R. (1998). Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 58–86. doi:10.2307/2393591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, H. R. (2003). Organizational learning from performance feedback: A behavioral perspective on innovation and change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, H. R. (2008). A behavioral theory of firm growth: Sequential attention to size and performance goals. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 476–494. doi:10.5465/amj.2008.32625975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosskopf, S., & Valdmanis, V. (1987). Measuring hospital performance: A non-parametric approach. Journal of Health Economics, 6(2), 89–107. doi:10.1016/0167-6296(87)90001-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964. doi:10.1086/226424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, C. J. (2002). Outcomes–based performance management in the public sector: Implications for government accountability and effectiveness. Public Administration Review, 62(6), 712–725. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, P., & Sparkes, A. C. (1997). Careership: A sociological theory of career decision making. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(1), 29–44. doi:10.1080/0142569970180102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, B. (2008). The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery. Health Economics, 17(10), 1107–1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, J. M. (2017). Double standards? How historical and political aspiration levels guide managerial performance information use. Public Administration, 95(4), 1026–1040. doi:10.1111/padm.12379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, O., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2017). Motivated reasoning about public performance: An experimental study of how citizens judge the affordable care act. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 197–209. doi:10.1093/jopart/muw049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, M. S., Kim, T., & Zhu, L. (2018). Managing for results differently: Examining managers’ purposeful performance information use in public, nonprofit, and private organizations. American Review of Public Administration, 48(2), 133–147. doi:10.1177/0275074016676574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, M. S., & Zhu, L. (2014). Market competition, political constraint, and managerial practice in public, non-profit, and private American hospitals. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 159–184. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, M. S., & Zhu, L. (2017). Who values diversity? Comparing the effect of manager gender across the public, private, and nonprofit sectors. American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 797–809. doi:10.1177/0275074016634201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, A. (2001). Balanced scorecard: Theoretical perspectives and public management implications. Managerial Auditing Journal, 6(16), 319–330.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, A. (2015a). Drivers of performance information use: Systematic literature review and directions for future research. Public Performance & Management Review, 38 (3), 459–486. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1006469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A. (2015b). Exploring the link between performance information use and organizational performance: A contingency approach. Public Performance &Management Review, 39(1), 7–32. doi:10.1080/15309576.2016.1071159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz, P. M. (2008). Gender and leadership in healthcare administration: 21st century progress and challenges. Journal of Healthcare Management, 53(5), 291–310. doi:10.1097/00115514-200809000-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D., & March, J. G. (1981). A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2(4), 307–333. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(81)90012-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1), 319–338. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.14.1.319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liverant, S., & Scodel, A. (1960). Internal and external control as determinants of decision making under conditions of risk. Psychological Reports, 7(1), 59–67. doi:10.2466/PR0.7.5.59-67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L. (2016). Performance feedback, government goal-setting and aspiration level adaptation: Evidence from Chinese provinces. Public Administration, 94(2), 452–471. doi:10.1111/padm.12225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 587–608. doi:10.2307/3003600
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Simon, H. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & Bohte, J. (2003). Span of control and public organizations: Implementing Luther Gulick’s research design. Public Administration Review, 63(1), 61–70. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., Favero, N., & Zhu, L. (2015). Performance gaps and managerial decisions: A Bayesian decision theory of managerial action. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1221–1246. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2013). Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: Common source bias and spurious relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 429–456. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & O'Toole, L. J. Jr. (2008). Management theory and occasm’s razor: How public organizations buffer the environment. Administration and Society, 39(8), 931–958. doi:10.1177/0095399707309355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., Winter, S. C., Laurence, J., O’Toole, J., Favero, N., & Anderson, S. C. (2015). The validity of subjective performance measures: School principles in Texas and Denmark. Public Administration, 93(4), 1084–1101. doi:10.1111/padm.12180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. W., & Zucker, L. G. (1989). Permanently failing organizations. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, T. M. (1984). The new economics of organization. American Journal of Political Science, 4(28), 739–777. doi:10.2307/2110997
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2012). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2015). Uncovering the circumstances of performance information use findings from an experiment. Public Performance & Management Review, 39 (1), 33–57. doi:10.1080/15309576.2016.1071160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Ingraham, P. W. (2004). Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations. Administration and Society, 36(4), 427–453. doi:10.1177/0095399704266748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Lavertu, S. (2012). Does involvement in performance management routines encourage performance information use? Evaluating GPRA and PART. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 592–602. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02539.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 849–866. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson-Crotty, S., Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Fernandez, S. (2017). Performance and management in the public sector: Testing a model of relative risk aversion. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 603–614. doi:10.1111/puar.12619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, P. A. (2014). Learning from performance feedback: Performance information, aspiration levels, and managerial priorities. Public Administration, 92(1), 142–160. doi:10.1111/padm.12050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, P. A., & Jacobsen, C. B. (2018). Zone of acceptance under performance measurement: Does performance information affect employee acceptance of management authority? Public Administration Review, 78(5), 684–693. doi:10.1111/puar.12947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, P. A., & Moynihan, D. P. (2017). How do politicians attribute bureaucratic responsibility for performance? Negativity bias and interest group advocacy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(2), 269–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, A. L. (2017). Compared to what? How social and historical reference points affect citizens’ performance evaluations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(4), 562–580. doi:10.1093/jopart/mux023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J., Jr., Meier, K. J., & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2005). Managing upward, downward and outward: Networks, hierarchical relationships and performance. Public Management Review, 7(1), 45–68. doi:10.1080/1471903042000339419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrovsky, N., Mok, J. Y., & León-Cázares, F. (2017). Citizen expectations and satisfaction in a young democracy: A test of the expectancy-disconfirmation model. Public Administration Review, 77(3), 395–407. doi:10.1111/puar.12623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G. (1983). Public agencies and private firms: Incentive structures, goals, and individual roles. Administration and Society, 15(2), 207–243. doi:10.1177/009539978301500203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., & Bozeman, B. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 447–469. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024276
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, A., & Meier, K. J. (2015). Managerial goals in a performance-driven system: Theory and empirical tests in higher education. Public Administration, 93(1), 17–33. doi:10.1111/padm.12124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salge, T. O. (2011). A behavioral model of innovation search: Evidence from public hospital services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), 181–120. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., Ruff, M., Mendel, P. J., & Caronna, C. A. (2010). Institutional change and healthcare organizations: From professional dominance to managed care. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. Decision and Organization, 1(1), 161–176.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, F. W. (1914). The principles of scientific management. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. N. (1975). Age and experience as determinants of managerial information processing and decision making performance. Academy of Management Journal, 18(1), 74–81. doi:10.2307/255626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webeck, S., & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2017). Bureaucratic decision making: The role of historical and social comparisons in the use of performance information. Presented at the American Political Science Association meeting, San Francisco, CA, August 31.
   Google Scholar
• Winickoff, R. N., Coltin, K. L., Morgan, M. M., Buxbaum, R. C., & Barnett, G. O. (1984). Improving physician performance through peer comparison feedback. Medical Care, 22(6), 527–534. doi:10.1097/00005650-198406000-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar