The Intersection of Nonprofit Roles and Public Policy Implementation

References

• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 295–326. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, C. (1990). An exploratory study of conflict and coordination in interorganizational service delivery systems. Academy of Management Journal, 33(3), 478–502. doi:10.5465/256577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggetta, M. (2009). Civic opportunities in associations: Interpersonal interaction, governance experience and institutional relationships. Social Forces, 88(1), 175–199. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. Y., & Henly, J. R. (2018). “They Are Underpaid and Understaffed”: How clients interpret encounters with street-level bureaucrats. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(2), 165–181. doi:10.1093/jopart/muy008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, G. D., Arons, D. F., Guinane, K., Carter, M. F., & Rees, S. (2007). Seen but not heard: Strengthening nonprofit advocacy. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Berner, M., & O’Brien, K. (2004). The shifting pattern of food security support: Food stamp and food bank usage in North Carolina. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(4), 655–672. doi:10.1177/0899764004269145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. M., & Smith, C. R. (2010). Relational contracting and network management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(Suppl_1), 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2003). Production and service explanations for government service production decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 441–468. doi:10.1093/jpart/mug030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., Potoski, M., & Van Slyke, D. M. (2006). Managing public service contracts: Aligning values, institutions, and markets. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 323–331. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00590.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushouse, B. K. (2017). Leveraging nonprofit and voluntary action research to inform public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 50–73. doi:10.1111/psj.12195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S., & Gillespie, D. F. (2006). A conceptual model exploring the dynamics of government–nonprofit service delivery. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(3), 493–509. doi:10.1177/0899764006289327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y.-S., Cho, C.-L., Wright, D. S., & Brudney, J. L. (2005). Dimensions of contracting for service delivery by American state administrative agencies: Exploring linkages between intergovernmental relations and intersectoral administration. Public Performance and Management Review, 29(1), 46–66.
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland, G., & Krashinsky, M. (2009). The nonprofit advantage: Producing quality in thick and thin child care markets. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28(3), 440–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Corte, J., Verschuere, B., & De Bie, M. (2017). Networks for welfare provision: Getting a grip on processes of social exclusion by evaluating network effectiveness. Social Policy and Administration, 51(7), 1174–1190. doi:10.1111/spol.12241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Tocqueville, A. (1835). Democracy in America. London, UK: Saunders and Otley. Retrieved from http://polisci2.ucsd.edu/foundation/03Tocqueville1835.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dehoog, R. (1990). Competition, negotiation, or cooperation: Three models for service contracting. Administration and Society, 22(3), 317–340. doi:10.1177/009539979002200303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, S. E., & Sanders, M. L. (2010). Meaningful work? Nonprofit marketization and work/life imbalance in popular autobiographies of social entrepreneurship. Organization, 17(4), 437–459. doi:10.1177/1350508410364198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslatte, A., Schatteman, A. M., & Stokan, E. (2019). Handing over the keys: Nonprofit economic development corporations and their implications for accountability and inclusion. Public Performance and Management Review, 42(1), 90–114. doi:10.1080/15309576.2018.1441726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerfel, M. L., Atouba, Y., & Harris, J. L. (2017). (Un)Obtrusive control in emergent networks: Examining funding agencies’ control over nonprofit networks. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(3), 469–487. doi:10.1177/0899764016664588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, S. (2009). Understanding contracting performance. Administration and Society, 41(1), 67–100. doi:10.1177/0095399708330257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P. (2002). On being nonprofit : a conceptual and policy primer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fyall, R. (2016). The power of nonprofits: Mechanisms for nonprofit policy influence. Public Administration Review, 76(6), 938–948. doi:10.1111/puar.12550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyall, R. (2017). Nonprofits as advocates and providers: A conceptual framework. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 121–143. doi:10.1111/psj.12165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyall, R., & Levine Daniel, J. (2018). Pantries and policy implementation: Using nonprofit priorities to understand variation in emergency food assistance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4_Suppl), 11S–33S. doi:10.1177/0899764017753318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyall, R., Moore, M. K., & Gugerty, M. K. (2018). Beyond NTEE codes: Opportunities to understand nonprofit activity through mission statement content coding. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4), 677–701. doi:10.1177/0899764018768019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grønbjerg, K. A., & Paarlberg, L. (2001). Community variations in the nonprofit sector community variations in the size and scope of the nonprofit sector: Theory and preliminary findings. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(4), 684–706. doi:10.1177/0899764001304004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1997). Multiple constituencies and the social construction of nonprofit organization effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(2), 185–206. doi:10.1177/0899764097262006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herranz, J. (2006). The multisectoral trilemma of network. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(1), 1–31. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., Withers, M., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427. doi:10.1177/0149206309343469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundley, M., Brock, E. S., & Jensen, L. S. (2016). Fiduciary responsibilities to whom? Federal grant recipients’ perceptions of the public interest. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 28(1), 71–101.
   Google Scholar
• Internal Revenue Service. (2018). Publication 557: Tax-exempt status for your organization. Department of the Treasury. Retrieved from February 1, 2019, https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p557.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, L. (2017). How far does the post-election nonprofit giving surge extend? Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly, Retrieved from https://nonprofitquarterly.org/2017/04/17/far-post-election-nonprofit-giving-surge-extend/
   Google Scholar
• Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. (2017). Characteristics of civically engaged nonprofit arts organizations: The results of a national survey. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(1), 175–198. doi:10.1177/0899764016646473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine Daniel, J., & Moulton, S. (2017). Beyond cans and capacity: Nonprofit roles and service network objectives in an emergency food network. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 28(1), 47–64. doi:10.1002/nml.21267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32(4), 298–310. doi:10.2307/974990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIndoe, H., & Beaton, E. (2019). Friends or foes? How managerial perceptions of the political opportunity structure shape nonprofit advocacy. Public Performance and Management Review, 42(1), 59–89. doi:10.1080/15309576.2018.1498362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S., Musheno, M., & Palumbo, D. (1990). Street-wise social policy: Resolving the dilemma of street-level influence and successful implementation. The Western Political Quarterly, 43(4), 833–848. doi:10.2307/448738
   Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. (2003). Managing the hollow state Collaboration and contracting. Public Management Review, 5(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/1461667022000028834
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, G. E., & Schmitz, H. P. (2019). The nexus of public and nonprofit management. Public Performance and Management Review, 42(1), 11–33. doi:10.1080/15309576.2018.1489293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., Wood, D. J., & Agle, B. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. doi:10.2307/259247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulton, S., & Eckerd, A. (2012). Preserving the publicness of the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(4), 656–685. doi:10.1177/0899764011419517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, R. (2008). The importance of the state: Political dimensions of a nonprofit network in Oaxaca, Mexico. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(3), 492–511. doi:10.1177/0899764007310422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negoita, M. (2018). Beyond performance management: A networked production model of public service delivery. Public Performance and Management Review, 41(2), 253–276. doi:10.1080/15309576.2017.1408473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. K., & McGinnis Johnson, J. (2019). Nonprofit management, public administration, and public policy: Separate, subset, or intersectional domains of inquiry? Public Performance and Management Review, 42(1), 1–10. doi:10.1080/15309576.2018.1557382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettijohn, S. L., Boris, E. T., De Vita, C. J., & Fyffe, S. D. (2013). Nonprofit-government contracts and grants: Findings from the 2013 national survey. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Piatak, J., Romzek, B., LeRoux, K., & Johnston, J. (2018). Managing goal conflict in public service delivery networks: Does accountability move up and down, or side to side? Public Performance and Management Review, 41(1), 152–176. doi:10.1080/15309576.2017.1400993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, C. R. (2018). The “State” of nonprofit lobbying research: Data, definitions, and directions for future study. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4_suppl), 204S–217S. doi:10.1177/0899764018758957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild, J., & Milofsky, C. (2006). The centrality of values, passions, and ethics in the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(2), 137–143. doi:10.1002/nml.139
   Google Scholar
• Saidel, J. R. (1991). Relationship between state agencies and nonprofit organizations. Public Administration Review, 51(6), 543–553. doi:10.2307/976605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (1993). The marketization of welfare: Changing nonprofit and for-profit roles in the American welfare state. Social Science Review, 67(1), 16–39. doi:10.1086/603963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (2003). The resilient sector: The state of nonprofit America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, J. A. (2007). Connections and disconnections between civic engagement and social capital in community-based nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4), 572–597. doi:10.1177/0899764006297236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, M. K. (2019). Network structure and spinoff effects in a collaborative public program. Public Performance and Management Review, 1–28. doi:10.1080/15309576.2018.1549085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sowa, J. E., Selden, S. C., & Sandfort, J. R. (2004). No longer unmeasurable? A multidimensional integrated model of nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(4), 711–728. doi:10.1177/0899764004269146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Puyvelde, S., Caers, R., Du Bois, C., & Jegers, M. (2012). The governance of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(3), 431–451. doi:10.1177/0899764011409757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Raaij, D. P. A. M. (2006). Norms network members use: An alternative perspective for indicating network success or failure. International Public Management Journal, 9(3), 249–270. doi:10.1080/10967490600899549
   Google Scholar
• Van Slyke, D. M. (2006). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 157–187. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., & De Corte, J. (2014). The impact of public resource dependence on the autonomy of NPOs in their strategic decision making. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(2), 293–313. doi:10.1177/0899764012462072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining, A. R. (2011). Public agency external analysis using a modified “Five Forces” framework. International Public Management Journal, 14(1), 63–105. doi:10.1080/10967494.2011.547819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M., & Hefetz, A. (2008). Managing markets for public service: The role of mixed public-private delivery of city services. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 155–166. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00845.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicker, P., & Breuer, C. (2015). How the economic and financial situation of the community affects sport clubs’ resources: Evidence from multi-level models. International Journal of Financial Studies, 3(1), 31–48. doi:10.3390/ijfs3010031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willem, A., & Lucidarme, S. (2014). Pitfalls and challenges for trust and effectiveness in collaborative networks. Public Management Review, 16(5), 733–760. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.744426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577. doi:10.1086/227496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witesman, E. M., & Fernandez, S. (2013). Government contracts with private organizations: Are there differences between nonprofits and for-profits? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(4), 689–715. doi:10.1177/0899764012442592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. R. (1998). Third party government. In J. M. Shafritz (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration (pp. 2252–2254). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar