References
- Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press.
- Argyris, C. (1996). Actionable knowledge: Design causality in the service of consequential theory. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(4), 390–406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886396324004
- Argyris, C. (2003). Actionable knowledge. In H. Tsoukas and C. Knudsen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organization theory (pp. 423–452). Oxford University Press.
- Ashworth, R., McDermott, A., & Currie, G. (2019). Theorizing from qualitative research in public administration: Plurality through a combination of rigor and richness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(2), 318–333. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy057
- Bacharach, S. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308374
- Battaglio, P., Belardinelli, P., Bellé, N., & Cantarelli, P. (2019). Behavioral public administration ad fontes: A synthesis of research on bounded rationality, cognitive biases, and nudging in public organizations. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 304–320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12994
- Baumann, P. (2016). Epistemic contextualism: A defense. Oxford University Press.
- Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. Verso.
- Bhaskar, R. (1998). The possibility of naturalism (3rd ed.). Routledge.
- Bozeman, B. (1987). All organizations are public: Bridging public and private organizational theories. Jossey-Bass.
- Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Georgetown University Press.
- Brower, R., Abolafia, M., & Carr, J. (2000). On improving qualitative methods in public administration research. Administration & Society, 32(4), 363–397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00953990022019470
- Creswell, J. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
- Cummings, T. G., & Jones, Y. (2004). Conference theme: Creating actionable knowledge. In 2014 Academy of Management Annual Conference Program Book. Retrieved from https://www.effectuation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Academy-of-Management-2004-1.pdf
- Demeulenaere, P. (Eds.). (2011). Analytical sociology and social mechanisms. Cambridge University Press.
- Edmondson, A., & McManus, S. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1246–1179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586086
- Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
- Elster, J. (1989). Nuts and bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Feldman, M., Sköldberg, K., Brown, R., & Horner, D. (2004). Making sense of stories: A rhetorical approach to narrative analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 147–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh010
- Frederickson, G., Smith, K., Larimer, C., & Licari, M. (2012). The public administration theory primer. Westview Press.
- Freedman, D. (2008). On types of scientific enquiry: The role of qualitative reasoning. In J. Box-Steffensmeier, H. Brady. & D. Collier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 300–318). Oxford University Press.
- Gerring, J. (2012). Social science methodology. Cambridge University Press.
- Goodin, R., & Tilly, C. (Eds.). (2006). The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis. Oxford University Press.
- Groeneveld, S., Tummers, L., Bronkhorst, B., Ashikali, T., & van Thiel, S. (2015). Quantitative methods in public administration: Their use and development through time. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 61–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.972484
- Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Polity.
- Hassan, S., & Wright, B. (2020). The behavioral public administration movement: A critical reflection. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 163–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13130
- Hedstrom, P. (2005). Dissecting the Social: On the principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hendren, K., Luo, Q., & Pandey, S. (2018). The state of mixed methods research in public administration and public policy. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 904–916. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12981
- Jilke, S., Van de Walle, S., & Kim, S. (2016). Generating usable knowledge through an experimental approach to public administration. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 69–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12488
- Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/259349
- Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.4001
- Lewin, K. (1952). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers by Kurt Lewin. Tavistock Publications.
- Lindblom, C., & Cohen, D. (1979). Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. Yale University Press.
- McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge University Press.
- Mele, V., & Belardinelli, P. (2019). Mixed methods in public administration research: Selecting, sequencing, and connecting. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(2), 334–347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy046
- Merton, R. (1968). Social theory and social structure. The Free Press.
- Ospina, S., Esteve, M., & Lee, S. (2018). Assessing qualitative studies in public management research. Public Administration Review, 78(4), 593–605. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12837
- Pearson, K. (1892). The grammar of science. London: Walter Scott.
- Pedersen, M., & Stritch, J. (2018). RNICE model: Evaluating the contribution of replication studies in public administration and management research. Public Administration Review, 78(4), 606–612. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12910
- Perry, J. (2012). How can we improve our science to generate more usable knowledge for public professionals? Public Administration Review, 72(4), 479–482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02607.x
- Raimondo, E., & Newcomer, K. (2017). Mixed-methods inquiry in public administration: The interaction of theory, methodology, and praxis. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 183–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17697247
- Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
- Rosenbloom, D. (2014). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and social science. Sage Publications.
- Sayer, A. (2010). Method in social science: a realist approach (2nd ed.). Routledge.
- Searle, J. (1997). The construction of social reality. Free Press.
- Swedberg, R. eds. (2014). Theorizing in social science. Stanford University Press.
- Tilly, C. (2008). Explaining social processes. Taylor & Francis.
- Van Maanen, J., Sorensen, J., & Mitchell, T. (2007). The interplay between theory and method. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1145–1154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586080
- Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2010). Perestroika ten years after: Reflections on methodological diversity. Political Science & Politics, 43(4), 741–745.
- Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2014). Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. Routledge.