References
- Ammons, D., & Rivenbark, W. (2008). Factors influencing the use of performance data to improve municipal services: Evidence from the North Carolina Benchmarking Project. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 304–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00864.x
- Andersen, L. B., Boesen, A., & Pedersen, L. H. (2016). Performance in public organizations: Clarifying the conceptual space. Public Administration Review, 76(6), 852–862. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12578
- Askim, J. (2015). The role of performance management in the steering of executive agencies: Layered, imbedded, or disjointed? Public Performance & Management Review, 38(3), 365–394. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1006463
- Askim, J., Johnsen, A., & Christophersen, K.-A. (2007). Factors behind organizational learning from benchmarking: Experiences from Norwegian municipal benchmarking networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 297–320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum012
- Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–605. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00322
- Berman, E., & Wang, X. (2000). Performance measurement in U.S. counties: Capacity for reform. Public Administration Review, 60(5), 409–420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00104
- Bevan, G., & Hood, C. (2006). What’s measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration, 84(3), 517–538. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00600.x
- Binderkrantz, A. S., & Christensen, J. G. (2009). Governing Danish agencies by contract: From negotiated freedom to the shadow of hierarchy. Journal of Public Policy, 29(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X09000968
- Bischoff, I., & Blaeschke, F. (2016). Performance budgeting: Incentives and social waste from window dressing. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2), 344–358. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv013
- Bjørnholt, B., Flarup, L. H., Hindsholm, M. F., Braendgaard, N. W., Andersen, C. M., Petersen, N. B., & Jensen, S. V. (2020). Anvendelsen af de nationale test – Delrapport 5: Evalueringen af de nationale test. Danish Center for Social Science Research.
- Boyne, G. A. (2002). Concepts and indicators of local authority performance: An evaluation of the statutory frameworks in England and Wales. Public Money & Management, 22(2), 17–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00303
- de Bruijn, H. (2007). Managing performance in the public sector. Routledge.
- Bouckaert, G., & van de Walle, S. (2003). Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of “good governance”: Difficulties in linking trust and satisfaction indicators. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(3), 329–343.
- Bourini, I., Jahmani, A., Mumtaz, R., & Al-Bourini, F. A. (2019). Investigating the managerial practices’ effect on employee-perceived service quality with the moderating role of supportive leadership behavior. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 25(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2018.11.001
- Bro, L. L. (2016). Små, store eller måske rettere mellemstore organisationer? En undersøgelse af sammenhaengen mellem ledelsesspaend, ledelsesidentitet og brugen af transformationsledelse i danske daginstitutioner. Politica, 48(2), 158–178.
- Caolo, C. N. (2017). Individualized consideration and employee work vigor. Does a correlation exist? Keiser University.
- Cepiku, D., Hinna, A., Scarozza, D., & Savignon, A. B. (2017). Performance information use in public administration: An exploratory study of determinants and effects. Journal of Management & Governance, 21(4), 963–991. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-016-9371-3
- De Lancer Julnes, P., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693–708. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00140
- Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Little, Brown and Company.
- Dull, M. (2008). Results-model reform leadership: Questions of credible commitment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 255–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum043
- Eagly, A., & Johnson, B. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.233
- Eagly, A., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781–797. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00241
- Favero, N., & Bullock, J. B. (2015). How (not) to solve the problem: An evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 285–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu020
- Folz, D., Abdelrazek, R., & Chung, Y. (2009). The adoption, use, and impacts of performance measures in medium-size cities. Public Performance & Management Review, 33(1), 63–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576330103
- Gao, J., Chan, H. S., & Yang, K. (2021). Gaming in performance management reforms and its countermeasures: Symposium introduction. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(2), 243–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2021.1894187
- George, B., & Pandey, S. K. (2017). We know the Yin – but where is the Yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration scholarship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17698189
- Gerrish, E. (2016). The impact of performance management on performance in public organizations: A meta-analysis. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12433
- Green, S. G., Anderson, S. E., & Shivers, S. L. (1996). Demographic and organizational influences on leader–member exchange and related work attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0049
- Grodal, S., Nelson, A. J., & Siino, R. M. (2015). Help-seeking and help-giving as an organizational routine: Continual engagement in innovative work. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 136–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0552
- Grøn, C. (2018). Perceptions unfolded: Managerial implementation in perception formation. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(6), 710–725. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2017-0237
- Gulick, L. (1937). Notes on the Theory of Organization. In L. Gulick & L. Urwick (Eds.), Papers on the Science of Administration (pp. 191–195). Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University.
- Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
- Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
- Han, Y., & Hong, S. (2019). The impact of accountability on organizational performance in the US federal government: The moderating role of autonomy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X16682816
- Hansen, H. F. (2011). NPM in Scandinavia. In T. Christensen & P. Laegreid (Eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management. Ashgate Publishing.
- Hatry, H. (1999). Performance measurement. Getting results. Urban Institute Press.
- Hong, S. (2019). A behavioral model of public organizations: Bounded rationality, performance feedback, and negativity bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy048
- Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015). A government that worked better and cost less? Evaluating three decades of reform and change in UK central government. Oxford University Press.
- Hood, C., & Piotrowska, B. (2021). Goodhart’s law and the gaming of UK public spending numbers. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(2), 250–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1749092
- Jacobsen, C. B., Andersen, L. B., Bøllingtoft, A., & Eriksen, T. L. M. (2022). Can leadership training improve organizational effectiveness? Evidence from a randomized field experiment on transformational and transactional leadership. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13356.
- Jadhav, E. D., Holsinger, J. W., Mays, G., & Fardo, D. (2015). Should they stay or should they go? Leader duration and financial performance in local health departments. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 21(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000119
- Jakobsen, M. L., Baekgaard, M., Moynihan, D. P., & van Loon, N. (2018). Making sense of performance regimes: Rebalancing external accountability and internal learning. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvx001
- Jakobsen, M., & Jensen, R. (2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.997906
- James, O. (2011). Performance measures and democracy: Information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 399–418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq057
- Jensen, U. T., Moynihan, D. P., & Salomonsen, H. H. (2018). Communicating the vision: How face-to-face dialogue facilitates transformational leadership. Public Administration Review, 78(3), 350–361. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12922
- Kelman, S., & Friedman, J. N. (2009). Performance improvement and performance dysfunction: An empirical examination of distortionary impacts of the emergency room wait-time target in the English National Health Service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 917–946. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun028
- Kristiansen, M. B. (2015). Management by objectives and results in the Nordic countries: Continuity and change, differences and similarities. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(3), 542–569. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1006468
- Kristiansen, M. B. (2017a). Performance contracting: Explaining variation across agencies in Danish central government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-11-2015-0192
- Kristiansen, M. B. (2017b). A third generation of performance contracting in Danish central government? Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 21(2), 49–68.
- Kristiansen, M. B., Dahler-Larsen, P., & Ghin, E. M. (2019). On the dynamic nature of performance management regimes. Administration & Society, 51(6), 991–1013. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399717716709
- Kroll, A. (2015). Drivers of performance information use: Systematic literature review and directions for future research. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(3), 459–486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1006469
- Kroll, A., & Moynihan, D. P. (2015). Does training matter? Evidence from performance management reforms. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 411–420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12331
- Kroll, A., & Proeller, I. (2013). Controlling the control system: Performance information in the German childcare administration. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551311293435
- Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system. The World Bank.
- Ledelseskommissionen. (2017). Offentlige ledere og ledelse anno 2017. Samlet afrapportering fra Ledelseskommissionens spørge skemaundersøgelse. Ledelseskommissionen.
- Meier, K. J., & Bohte, J. (2000). Ode to Luther Gulick: Span of control and organizational performance. Administration & Society, 32(2), 115–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00953990022019371
- Melkers, J., & Willoughby, K. (2005). Models of performance-measurement use in local governments. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00443.x
- Moynihan, D. P. (2005). Goal-based learning and the future of performance management. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00445.x
- Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The Dynamics of Performance Management. Georgetown University Press.
- Moynihan, D. P. (2009). Through a glass, darkly: Understanding the effects of performance regimes. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(4), 592–603. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576320409
- Moynihan, D. P., & Hawes, D. (2012). Responsiveness to reform values: The influence of the environment on performance information use. Public Administration Review, 72(s1), 95–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02653.x
- Moynihan, D. P., & Ingraham, P. W. (2004). Integrative leadership in the public sector: A model of performance information use. Administration & Society, 36(4), 427–453. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399704266748
- Moynihan, D. P., & Kroll, A. (2016). Performance management routines that work? An early assessment of the GPRA Modernization Act. Public Administration Review, 76(2), 314–323. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12434
- Moynihan, D. P., & Landuyt, N. (2009). How do public organizations learn? Bridging structural and cultural divides. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1097–1105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02067.x
- Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 849–866. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq004
- Moynihan, D. P., Pandey, S., & Wright, B. (2012). Setting the table: How transformational leadership fosters performance information use. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 143–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur024
- National Academy of Public Administration. (2003). First line supervisors in federal service. Selection, development and management. National Academy of Public Administration.
- Nielsen, P. (2014). Performance management, managerial authority, and public service performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 431–458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut025
- Nielsen, P. A., & Grøn, C. H. (2021). How can public managers use performance management for improvement without demotivating Employees? In P. Leisink, L. B. Andersen, G. A. Brewer, C. B. Jacobsen, E. Knies, & W. Vandenabeele (Eds.), Managing for public service performance: How people and values make a difference. Oxford University Press.
- OECD. (2009). Measuring government activity. OECD.
- Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Addison-Wesley.
- Petrovsky, N., James, O., Moseley, A., & Boyne, G. A. (2017). What explains agency heads’ length of tenure? Testing managerial background, performance, and political environment effects. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 591–602. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12735
- Pollitt, C. (2006). Performance management in practice: A comparative study of executive agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui045
- Pollitt, C. (2013). The logics of performance management. Evaluation, 19(4), 346–363. ‒https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389013505040
- Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Pollitt, C., Harrison, S., Dowswell, G., Jerak-Zuiderent, S., & Bal, R. (2010). Performance regimes in health care: Institutions, critical junctures and the logic of escalation in England and the Netherlands. Evaluation, 16(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389009350026
- Pollitt, C., Talbot, T., Caulfield, J., & Smullen, A. (2004). Agencies: How governments do things through semiautonomous organizations. Palgrave-Macmillan.
- Radaelli, G., & Sitton-Kent, L. (2016). Middle managers and the translation of new ideas in organizations: A review of micro-practices and contingencies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3), 311–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12094
- Radin, B. A. (2006). Challenging the performance measurement: Accountability, complexity, and democratic values. Georgetown University Press.
- Rafferty, A. E., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). Refining individualized consideration: Distinguishing developmental leadership and supportive leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X36731
- Rasmussen, P., & Miller, T. (2021). De nationale test – mellem performancemåling og paedagogisk evaluering. CEPRA-Striben, (27), 16–27.
- Riccucci, N. (2005). How management matters: Street-level bureaucrats and welfare reform. Georgetown University Press.
- Ritz, A., & Brewer, G. A. (2020). Performance information use under financial stress: How do public, nonprofit, and private organizations differ? Public Performance & Management Review, 43, 1–28.
- Rubecksen, K. (2010). University of Bergen. Autonomy, control and tasks in state agencies [Unpublished doctoral dissertation].
- Taylor, J. (2021). Public officials’ gaming of performance measures and targets: The nexus between motivation and opportunity. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(2), 272–293.
- United Nations. (2020). E-government survey 2020. Digital government in the decade of action for sustainable development. United Nations.
- Van Dooren, W. (2006). Performance measurement in the Flemish public sector: A supply and demand approach [doctoral dissertation]. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
- Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2015). Performance management in the public sector (2nd ed.). Routledge.
- Verhoest, K., Roness, P. G., Verschuere, B., Rubecksen, K., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2010). Autonomy and control of state agencies. Palgrave-Macmillan.
- Walker, R. M., & Brewer, G. A. (2008). An organizational echelon analysis of the determinants of red tape in public organizations. Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1112–1127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00959.x
- Walker, R. M., & Enticott, G. (2004). Using multiple informants in public administration: Revisiting the managerial values and actions debate. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 417–443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh022
- Wallin, L., Pousette, A., & Dellve, L. (2014). Span of control and the significance for public sector managers’ job demands: A multilevel study. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 35(3), 455–481. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X13488002
- Weber, M. (1968). Economy & Society. University California Press.
- Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. Free Press.
- Yang, K., & Hsieh, J. Y. (2007). Managerial effectiveness of government performance measurement: Testing a middle range model. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 861–879. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00774.x