Public Participation in Policy Making: Evidence from a Citizen Advisory Panel

References

• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkeson, L. R. (2003). Not all cues are created equal: The conditional impact of female candidates on political engagement. The Journal of Politics, 65(4), 1040–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentrup, G. (2001). Evaluation of a collaborative model: A case study analysis of watershed planning in the Intermountain West. Environmental Management, 27(5), 739–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardo, R., Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2014). Interorganizational engagement in collaborative environmental management: Evidence from the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 697–719. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brader, T. (2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryer, T. A. (2013). Public participation in regulatory decision-making: Cases from regulations. gov. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(2), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576370204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Quick, K. S., Slotterback, C. S., & Crosby, B. C. (2013). Designing public participation processes. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02678.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, P. (2009). Conceptual, theoretical and practical issues in measuring the benefits of public participation. Evaluation, 15(3), 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389009105881
   Google Scholar
• Callanan, M. (2005). Institutionalizing participation and governance? New participative structures in local government in Ireland. Public Administration, 83(4), 909–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00483.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W., Thatcher, J. B., & Wright, R. T. (2012). Assessing common method bias: Problems with the ULMC technique. MIS Quarterly, 1003–1019.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. K. (2018). Designing public participation: Managing problem settings and social equity. Public Administration Review, 78(3), 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, B. K., Kim, H. J., & Tao, J. (2019). Managing for citizen satisfaction: Is good not enough? Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 5(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.5.1.21-38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, D. T., & Goldman, P. (1994). Facilitative Leadership: How Principals Lead without Dominating. OSSC Bulletin, 37(9), n9.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2005). A leadership framework for cross-sector collaboration. Public Management Review, 7(2), 177–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030500090519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassonneville, R., & McAllister, I. (2018). Gender, political knowledge, and descriptive representation: The Impact of long-term socialization. American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, G. W., & Easton, J. (2011). Appointed public volunteer boards: Exploring the basics of citizen participation through boards and commissions. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(5), 519–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074010385838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubé, L., & Paré, G. (2003). Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 27, 597–636. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazi, E., Smith, J. (2006). Civil dialogue: Making it work better. Civil Society Contact Group. http://euproact.org/files/democratic_governance/Civil_dialogue_making_it_work_better.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics & Society, 29(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329201029001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 959–974. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunton, T. I., & Day, J. C. (2003). The theory and practice of collaborative planning in resource and environmental management. Environments, 31(2), 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Handley, D. M., & Howell-Moroney, M. (2010). Ordering stakeholder relationships and citizen participation: Evidence from the community development block grant program. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02181.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, J., & Henn, M. (2017). Neoliberalism and the unfolding patterns of young people’s political engagement and political participation in contemporary Britain. Societies, 7(4), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc7040033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, A. J., & Ma, L. (2021). Citizen participation, perceived public service performance, and trust in government: Evidence from health policy reforms in Hong Kong. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(3), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1780138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M., Bolitho, A., & Foulkes, C. (2013). Localism and the paradox of devolution: Delegated citizen committees in Victoria, Australia. Policy Studies, 34(5–6), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2013.862450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S. (2015). Citizen participation in budgeting: A trade-off between knowledge aninclusiveness? Public Administration Review, 75(4), 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S., & Cho, B. S. (2018). Citizen participation and the redistribution of public goods. Public Administration, 96(3), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ianniello, M., Iacuzzi, S., Fedele, P., & Brusati, L. (2019). Obstacles and solutions on the ladder of citizen participation: A systematic review. Public Management Review, 21(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1438499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imperial, M. T. (2005). Using collaboration as a governance strategy: Lessons from six watershed management programs. Administration & Society, 37(3), 281–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399705276111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkin, T. A., Chan, Y. E., & Sabherwal, R. (2019). Mutual understanding in information systems development: Changes within and across projects. MIS Quarterly, 43(2), 649–671. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, W. J., Leach, M. P., & Liu, A. H. (1999). Theory testing using case studies in business-to-business research. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(3), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(98)00040-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp, J. A., & Banducci, S. A. (2008). When politics is not just a man’s game: Women’s representation and political engagement. Electoral Studies, 27(1), 105–115. 10.1016/j.electstud.2007.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kathlene, L., & Martin, J. A. (1991). Enhancing citizen participation: Panel designs, perspectives, and policy formation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/3325512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidron, A., & Peretz, H. V. (2018). Organizational political climate and employee engagement in political behavior in public sector organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 26(4), 773–795. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-09-2017-1243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M. (2005). We finished the plan, so now what? Impacts of collaborative stakeholder participation on land use policy. Policy Studies Journal, 33(3), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00125.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurian, L., & Shaw, M. M. (2009). Evaluation of public participation: The practices of certified planners. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08326532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T.-C., Hsu, J. S.-C., Cheng, K.-T., & Wu, S. (2012). Understanding the role of behavioural integration in ISD teams: An extension of transactive memory systems concept. Information Systems Journal, 22(3), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00383.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, F. M., & Kartez, J. D. (1995). The redemption of citizen advisory committees: A perspective from critical theory. In O. Renn, T. Webler, & P. Wiedemann (Eds.), Fairness and competence in citizen participation (pp. 87–101). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E., & MacKuen, M. B. (1993). Anxiety, enthusiasm, and the vote: The emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 672–685. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo, D. F., & Stockemer, D. (2014). Age and political participation in Germany, France and the UK: A comparative analysis. Comparative European Politics, 12(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2012.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, K. A. (2003). Citizen satisfaction with public meetings used for risk communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31(2), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/0090988032000064605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, A., & De Graaf, L. (2010). Examining citizen participation: Local participatory policy making and democracy. Local Government Studies, 36(4), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2010.494101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local Health System Integration Act, § S.O. 2006, c. 4 (2006). https://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/common/legislation/lhins/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, S., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Cohen, N. (2009). Trust, participation, and performance in public administration: An empirical examination of health services in Israel. Public Performance & Management Review, 33(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576330101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2003). Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation: Citizen summits in Washington, DC. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(2), 164–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074003251379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., & Amsler, L. B. (2014). Direct public engagement in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 44(4_suppl), 63S–88S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013519702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1979). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, Y., & Lim, S. (2017). Connecting a missing link between participation in administration and political participation: The mediating role of political efficacy. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(4), 694–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315591644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Deat, F. (2019). Numbers over narratives? How Government message strategies affect Citizens’ attitudes. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(5), 1005–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2017.1400992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
   Google Scholar
• Rebori, M. K. (2011). Citizen advisory boards and their influence on local decision-makers. Community Development, 42(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2010.505294
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, H. A., Simmering, M. J., & Sturman, M. C. (2009). A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 762–800.
   Google Scholar
• Rossmann, D., & Shanahan, E. A. (2012). Defining and achieving normative democratic values in participatory budgeting processes. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02480.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rühli, E., Sachs, S., Schmitt, R., & Schneider, T. (2017). Innovation in multistakeholder settings: The case of a wicked issue in health care. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(2), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2589-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, S. L., & Chess, C. (2003). Evaluating citizen advisory boards: The importance of theory and participant-based criteria and practical implications. Risk Analysis, 23(2), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. C., & Bos, A. L. (2019). The application of social role theory to the study of gender in politics. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 173–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrat, R., Scharf, T., Villar, F., & Gómez, C. (2020). Fifty-five years of research into older people’s civic participation: Recent trends, future directions. The Gerontologist, 60(1), e38–e51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., & Kearins, K. (2011). Interorganizational collaboration for regional sustainability: What happens when organizational representatives come together? The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(2), 168–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886310381782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, J., & Park, J.-H. (2016). Public participation and trust in government: The case of the Korean Financial Regulatory Agency. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2016.1177554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1467–1478. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockemer, D., & Rocher, F. (2017). Age, political knowledge and electoral turnout: A case study of Canada. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 55(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2017.1252896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svara, J. H. (2003). Effective mayoral leadership in council-manager cities: Reassessing the facilitative model. National Civic Review, 92(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.14
   Google Scholar
• Toff, B., & Palmer, R. A. (2019). Explaining the gender gap in news avoidance: “News-Is-for-Men” Perceptions and the Burdens of Caretaking. Journalism Studies, 20(11), 1563–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1528882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F., & Jackson, D. N. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., Burns, N., & Schlozman, K. L. (1997). Knowing and caring about politics: Gender and political engagement. The Journal of Politics, 59(4), 1051–1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. (2001). Assessing public participation in US cities. Public Performance & Management Review. 24(4), 322–336.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1989). Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 462–468.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, A., & Fung, A. (2004). Public deliberation: Where are we and where can we go? National Civic Review, 93(4), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.66
   Google Scholar
• Yates, D. (1977). The ungovernable city: The politics of urban problems and policy making. Mit Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar