How and When Democratic Values Matter: Challenging the Effectiveness-Centric Framework in Program Evaluation

References

• Abner, G., Perry, J. L., & Fucilla, L. (2020). Experiments on the effects of positive and negative perceptions of a public sector profession. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(5), 1025–1052. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1729823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansak, K., Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2019). Conjoint survey experiments. In James N. Druckman & Donald P. Green (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of advances in experimental political science. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beeri, I., Uster, A., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2019). Does performance management relate to good governance? A study of its relationship with citizens’ satisfaction with and trust in Israeli local government. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(2), 241–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1436074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, M. M., & Scheve, K. F. (2013). Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(34), 13763–13768. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306374110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, F. S. (2007). Government reform, public service values and the roles of public sector leadership in serving society. In Jeffrey Raffel, Peter Leisink, & Anthony Middlebrooks (Eds.), Public leadership: International challenges and perspectives. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J. Jr., & Walker, R. M. (2005). Where next? Research directions on performance in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 633–639. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanley, V. A., Rudolph, T. J., & Rahn, W. M. (2000). The origins and consequences of public trust in government: A time series analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1086/317987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, C. T., & Daoust, T. (2008). Community-based monitoring frameworks: Increasing the effectiveness of environmental stewardship. Environmental Management, 41(3), 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-007-9042-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. A., Knotts, H. G., & Brennan, K. M. (2008). The importance of trust in government for public administration: The case of zoning. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00882.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagger, R. (1997). Civic virtues. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1956). A preface to democratic theory (Vol. 115). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Boer, N., & Eshuis, J. (2018). A street‐level perspective on government transparency and regulatory performance: Does relational distance matter?. Public Administration, 96(3), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fine Licht, J., Naurin, D., Esaiasson, P., & Gilljam, M. (2014). When does transparency generate legitimacy? Experimenting on a context-bound relationship. Governance, 27(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLeon, P. (1995). Democratic values and the policy sciences. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 886–905. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service revisited. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2007). The new public service: Serving, not steering. ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, P., Persson, M., Gilljam, M., & Lindholm, T. (2019). Reconsidering the role of procedures for decision acceptance. British Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. (1982). The recovery of civism in public administration. Public Administration Review, 42(6), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.2307/976119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. (1996). Comparing the reinventing government movement with the new public administration. Public Administration Review, 56(3), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/976450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallup. (2017). Most city employees in U.S. not engaged. https://news.gallup.com/opinion/gallup/210707/city-employees-not-engaged.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Golden, M. M. (1998). Interest groups in the rule-making process: Who participates? Whose voices get heard? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024380
   Google Scholar
• Graham, M. H., & Svolik, M. W. (2020). Democracy in America? Partisanship, polarization, and the robustness of support for democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. P., Zelizer, A., & Kirby, D. (2018). Publicizing scandal: Results from five field experiments. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 13(3), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00017094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Knies, E. (2017). Validating a scale for citizen trust in government organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(3), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315585950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Feeney, M. K. (2017). Developing and testing an integrative framework for open government adoption in local governments. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 579–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Welch, E. W. (2012). Developing and testing a theoretical framework for computer-mediated transparency of local governments. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 562–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02532.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosso, A. L., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2011). How citizens view government performance reporting. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576350201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal inference in conjoint analysis: Understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (2008). The federalist papers. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvard Political Review. (2018). Stealing in the shadows: State-level political corruption. https://harvardpolitics.com/united-states/stealing-in-the-shadows-state-level-political-corruption/
   Google Scholar
• Herian, M. N., Hamm, J. A., Tomkins, A. J., & Pytlik Zillig, L. M. (2012). Public participation, procedural fairness, and evaluations of local governance: The moderating role of uncertainty. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 815–840. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M. J., & Husser, J. A. (2012). How trust matters: The changing political relevance of political trust. American Journal of Political Science, 56(2), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00548.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, T., Cho, W., Porumbescu, G., & Park, J. (2014). Internet, trust in government, and citizen compliance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingrams, A., Kaufmann, W., & Jacobs, D. (2020). Testing the open government recipe: Are vision and voice good governance ingredients? Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.31.114
   Google Scholar
• Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, D., & Kaufmann, W. (2021). The right kind of participation? The effect of a deliberative mini-public on the perceived legitimacy of public decision-making. Public Management Review, 23(1), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1668468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., & Matthews, J. S. (2017). Policy attitudes in institutional context: Rules, uncertainty, and the mass politics of public investment. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, O., & Moseley, A. (2014). DOES PERFORMANCE INFORMATION ABOUT PUBLIC SERVICES AFFECT CITIZENS' PERCEPTIONS, SATISFACTION, AND VOICE BEHAVIOUR? FIELD EXPERIMENTS WITH ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE PERFORMANCE INFORMATION. Public Administration, 92(2), 493–511. 10.1111/padm.12066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, O., Olsen, A. L., Moynihan, D., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2020). Behavioral public performance: How people make sense of government metrics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski, M., Prokop, C., & Tepe, M. (2020). Representative bureaucracy and public hiring preferences: Evidence from a conjoint experiment among German municipal civil servants and private sector employees. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(4), 596–618. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuziemko, I., Norton, M. I., Saez, E., & Stantcheva, S. (2015). How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments. American Economic Review, 105(4), 1478–1508. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeper, T. J., Hobolt, S. B., & Tilley, J. (2020). Measuring subgroup preferences in conjoint experiments. Political Analysis, 28(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. (2022). Public trust and collaborative governance: an instrumental variable approach. Public Management Review, early view, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2095003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabillard, V., & Pasquier, M. (2015). Transparency and trust in government: A two-way relationship. Yearbook of Swiss Administrative Sciences, 6(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.5334/ssas.78
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2013). Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: Common source bias and spurious relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 429–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. (2019). Theoretical frontiers in representative bureaucracy: New directions for research. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvy004
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2004). Threat as a motivator of political activism: A field experiment. Political Psychology, 25(4), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00384.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2016). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 824–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Soss, J. (2014). Policy feedback and the politics of administration. Public Administration Review, 74(3), 320–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T. (2010). Addressing the citizenship and democratic deficits: The potential of deliberative democracy for public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(4), 376–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074009356467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., & Leighninger, M. (2015). Public participation for 21st century democracy. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, A. L. (2015). Citizen (dis) satisfaction: An experimental equivalence framing study. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, A. L. (2017). Compared to what? How social and historical reference points affect citizens’ performance evaluations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(4), 562–580. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. K., Coursey, D. H., & Moynihan, D. P. (2007). Organizational effectiveness and bureaucratic red tape: A multimethod study. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(3), 398–425. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576300305
   Google Scholar
• Pew Center. (2018). Democracy and government, the U.S. political system, elected officials and governmental institutions. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/04/26/ 1-democracy-and-government-the-u-s-political-system-elected-officials-and-governmenta
   Google Scholar
• Pew Center. (2020). Public trust in government: 1958–2019. https://www.pewresearch.org/ politics/2019/04/11/public-trust-in-government-1958-2019/
   Google Scholar
• Peyton, K. (2020). Does trust in government increase support for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 596–602. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(4), 595–628. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950710
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S. J., & Rosenbloom, D. H. (2002). Non-mission-based values in results-oriented public management: The case of freedom of information. Public Administration Review, 62(6), 643–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reenock, C. M., & Gerber, B. J. (2007). Political insulation, information exchange, and interest group access to the bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(3), 415–440. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2017). Representative bureaucracy: A lever to enhance social equity, coproduction, and democracy. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinscheid, A., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2019). Germany’s decision to phase out coal by 2038 lags behind citizens’ timing preferences. Nature Energy, 4(10), 856–863. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0460-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossmann, D., & Shanahan, E. A. (2012). Defining and achieving normative democratic values in participatory budgeting processes. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02480.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruder, A. I., & Woods, N. D. (2020). Procedural fairness and the legitimacy of agency rulemaking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. M. (1997). Policy design for democracy. University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Solar Energy Industries Association. (2017). Brighter future, a study on solar in U.S. schools. The Solar Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2003). Public service performance and trust in government: The problem of causality. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(8–9), 891–913. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120019352
   Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, G. G., Grosso, A., & Charbonneau, É. (2021). Evidence of an output bias in the judgment of public performance: A replication and extension. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(3), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1835679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., Lee, M. J., James, O., & Ho, S. M. (2018). Analyzing the complexity of performance information use: Experiments with stakeholders to disaggregate dimensions of performance, data sources, and data types. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 852–863. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallmeier, F., Helmig, B., & Feeney, M. K. (2019). Knowledge construction in public administration: A discourse analysis of public value. Public Administration Review, 79(4), 488–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallner, J. (2008). Legitimacy and public policy: Seeing beyond effectiveness, efficiency, and performance. Policy Studies Journal, 36(3), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (1995). The civil society argument. In Ronald Beiner (Ed.), Theorizing citizenship (pp. 153–174). State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wichowsky, A., & Moynihan, D. P. (2008). Measuring how administration shapes citizenship: A policy feedback perspective on performance management. Public Administration Review, 68(5), 908–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00931.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar